The measurement by Yamanouchi, Chiba, Matsukura, Dietl and Ohno (Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 096601 (2006)) of current-driven domain-wall velocities in (Ga,Mn)As over five decades, up to 22 m/s, corroborated spin-transfer theory only after assuming that the spin-current polarization entering the torque formulas equals the thermodynamic spin polarization , and left a fourfold microscopic problem: (i) the relation between and for the complex valence band; (ii) the microscopic origin and magnitude of the nonadiabatic spin torque, bounded only by an upper limit on the ratio ; (iii) a microscopic theory of the empirical spin-current-assisted creep law with and , ; and (iv) the experimental disentangling of thermal activation, pinning, and torque contributions at low currents. Later work has measured and microscopically calculated the carrier spin-relaxation time and the nonadiabatic torque in (Ga,Mn)As, extracted the current spin polarization from domain-wall dynamics, and recast current-driven creep in a universal elastic-interface framework. The surviving open core is a material-specific microscopic theory that predicts, rather than fits, the spin-transfer parameters and their temperature dependence, and derives the current-assisted creep barrier and its near-Curie-temperature scaling in realistic pinning landscapes.
Background
(Ga,Mn)As is a dilute ferromagnetic semiconductor in which substitutional Mn spins are coupled antiferromagnetically to holes residing in the strongly spin-orbit-coupled heavy-hole valence band of GaAs; the p-d exchange between Mn moments and holes, with coupling constant , mediates ferromagnetism with Curie temperatures of order 100 K in the layers used here. Grown under suitable strain, (Ga,Mn)As acquires perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, so up- and down-magnetized domains are separated by a domain wall (DW), a planar magnetic texture of nanometer width (about 17 nm in the source layers) that can be pushed through a lithographic track either by a magnetic field or by an electrical current of density .
A current of spin-polarized holes exerts torques on the wall. In the adiabatic spin-transfer picture (carrier spins track the local magnetization and transfer angular momentum to the wall, as in Slonczewski's torque), the wall velocity grows as with a critical current density (Tatara and Kohno, 2004), or is linear in above a pinning threshold (Barnes and Maekawa, 2005); the efficiency and are set by the spin-current polarization (with the hole g-factor, the Bohr magneton, the elementary charge, the magnetization, the anisotropy energy density, and the wall width). Because holes have a finite spin relaxation time (limited by spin-orbit scattering and by spin mixing from the noncollinear magnetization inside the wall), while their precession time in the Mn exchange (molecular) field is with the p-d exchange coupling above, Zhang and Li (2004) predicted an additional nonadiabatic torque, giving a subthreshold, linear-in- wall mobility with Gilbert damping . In the later spin-transfer literature this nonadiabatic torque is conventionally parametrized by a dimensionless coefficient also denoted ; to avoid confusion with the p-d coupling, the nonadiabatic coefficient is written below.
In the pinned, thermally activated regime, an elastic interface such as a DW line creeps — that is, it advances by rare thermally activated hops over the frozen (quenched) disorder landscape — with a stretched-exponential Arrhenius velocity law, generically for a driving force , whose exponent reflects the universality class of the disorder (for a one-dimensional wall in short-range two-dimensional disorder, the quenched Edwards-Wilkinson class, the standard universality class of elastic-interface depinning in random-bond disorder, gives ).
Yamanouchi et al. (2006) measured DW velocities by magneto-optical Kerr microscopy in (Ga,Mn)As tracks with perpendicular anisotropy, calibrating Joule heating with the device resistance, and found (a) above-threshold velocities consistent with spin-transfer theory, provided was identified with the thermodynamic spin polarization of the p-d Zener mean-field model ( the Mn spin, the hole concentration, the saturation magnetization), an identification uncertain because and the p-d coupling were poorly known and the multiband valence band makes the relation between and nontrivial; (b) an upper limit on the nonadiabaticity from the subthreshold slope, without a microscopic determination; (c) an empirical creep scaling with , and with , where is the measured effective wall velocity, which they conjectured — but did not derive — to arise from critical magnetization fluctuations that locally depress near the Curie temperature ; and (d) an unresolved experimental decomposition of low-current motion into thermal activation, extrinsic pinning, and torque contributions. What is asked for is the microscopic physics behind this phenomenology.
Problem Statement
Provide a microscopic, quantitative account of electrically driven domain-wall motion in the ferromagnetic semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As that connects the measured velocity-current-temperature data of Yamanouchi et al. (2006) to the underlying spin-transfer physics. In the generality of that source experiment, this requires: (1) establishing the relation between the spin-current polarization entering spin-transfer formulas and the thermodynamic spin polarization of the complex heavy-hole valence band, including the propagation of the uncertainties in hole concentration , p-d exchange coupling , and band-structure effects; (2) determining the microscopic origin and magnitude of the nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque — equivalently, the carrier spin relaxation time , or the nonadiabatic coefficient and its ratio to the Gilbert damping in the notation of Zhang-Li-type theories — together with its temperature dependence, improving on the source's upper bound ; (3) deriving, from microscopic pinning physics and critical magnetization fluctuations, the observed subthreshold creep law — its exponent , and the prefactors and with near the Curie temperature — for realistic disorder landscapes; and (4) decomposing the low-current motion into its thermal-activation, extrinsic-pinning, and torque components across wide temperature and disorder regimes. These four items are jointly posed and together constitute one objective: a predictive theory, validated against experiment, of how spin-polarized hole currents move and pin domain walls in (Ga,Mn)As.
References
- M. Yamanouchi, D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, T. Dietl, H. Ohno, 'Velocity of Domain-Wall Motion Induced by Electrical Current in the Ferromagnetic Semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As', Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 096601 (2006). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.096601, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.096601
- G. Tatara, H. Kohno, 'Theory of Current-Driven Domain Wall Motion: Spin Transfer versus Momentum Transfer', Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 086601 (2004). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.086601, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.086601
- S. Zhang, Z. Li, 'Roles of Nonequilibrium Conduction Electrons on the Magnetization Dynamics of Ferromagnets', Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 127204 (2004). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.127204, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.127204
- S. E. Barnes, S. Maekawa, 'Current-Spin Coupling for Ferromagnetic Domain Walls in Fine Wires', Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 107204 (2005). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.107204, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.107204
- M. Yamanouchi, J. Ieda, F. Matsukura, S. E. Barnes, S. Maekawa, H. Ohno, 'Universality Classes for Domain Wall Motion in the Ferromagnetic Semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As', Science 317, 1726 (2007). DOI: 10.1126/science.1145516, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145516
- R. A. Duine, C. Morais Smith, 'Creep of current-driven domain-wall lines: Effects of intrinsic versus extrinsic pinning', Phys. Rev. B 77, 094434 (2008). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.094434, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.094434 (arXiv:0711.4058, https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.4058)
- J.-P. Adam, N. Vernier, J. Ferré, A. Thiaville, V. Jeudy, A. Lemaître, L. Thevenard, G. Faini, 'Nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque in (Ga,Mn)As with perpendicular anisotropy', Phys. Rev. B 80, 193204 (2009). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.193204, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.193204
- A. Kanda, A. Suzuki, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, 'Domain wall creep in (Ga,Mn)As', Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 032504 (2010). DOI: 10.1063/1.3467048, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3467048
- V. Jeudy, J. Curiale, J.-P. Adam, A. Thiaville, A. Lemaître, G. Faini, 'Current induced domain wall motion in GaMnAs close to the Curie temperature', J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 446004 (2011). DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/23/44/446004, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/23/44/446004
- K. Shen, M. W. Wu, 'Hole spin relaxation and coefficients in Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation in ferromagnetic (Ga,Mn)As', Phys. Rev. B 85, 075206 (2012). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.075206, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.075206 (arXiv:1109.4964, https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4964)
- J. Curiale, A. Lemaître, C. Ulysse, G. Faini, V. Jeudy, 'Spin Drift Velocity, Polarization, and Current-Driven Domain-Wall Motion in (Ga,Mn)(As,P)', Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 076604 (2012). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.076604, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.076604
- N. Vernier, J.-P. Adam, A. Thiaville, V. Jeudy, A. Lemaître, J. Ferré, G. Faini, 'Modified current-induced domain-wall motion in GaMnAs nanowires', Phys. Rev. B 88, 224415 (2013). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.224415, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.224415 (arXiv:1303.6174, https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6174)
- E. De Ranieri, P. E. Roy, D. Fang, E. K. Vehsthedt, A. C. Irvine, D. Heiss, A. Casiraghi, R. P. Campion, B. L. Gallagher, T. Jungwirth, J. Wunderlich, 'Piezoelectric control of the mobility of a domain wall driven by adiabatic and non-adiabatic torques', Nature Materials 12, 808-814 (2013). DOI: 10.1038/nmat3657, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3657
- A. Patz, T. Li, X. Liu, J. K. Furdyna, I. E. Perakis, J. Wang, 'Ultrafast probes of nonequilibrium hole spin relaxation in the ferromagnetic semiconductor GaMnAs', Phys. Rev. B 91, 155108 (2015). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155108, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155108 (arXiv:1411.6979, https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.6979)
- S. DuttaGupta, S. Fukami, C. Zhang, H. Sato, M. Yamanouchi, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, 'Adiabatic spin-transfer-torque-induced domain wall creep in a magnetic metal', Nature Physics 12, 333-336 (2016). DOI: 10.1038/nphys3593, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3593
- L. Thevenard, B. Boutigny, N. Güsken, L. Becerra, C. Ulysse, S. Shihab, A. Lemaître, J.-V. Kim, V. Jeudy, C. Gourdon, 'Spin transfer and spin-orbit torques in in-plane magnetized (Ga,Mn)As tracks', Phys. Rev. B 95, 054422 (2017). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.054422, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.054422
- R. Díaz Pardo, N. Moisan, L. J. Albornoz, A. Lemaître, J. Curiale, V. Jeudy, 'Common universal behavior of magnetic domain walls driven by spin-polarized electrical current and magnetic field', Phys. Rev. B 100, 184420 (2019). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.184420, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.184420 (arXiv:1904.03047, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.03047)
- L. J. Albornoz, R. Díaz Pardo, A. Lemaître, S. Bustingorry, J. Curiale, V. Jeudy, 'Internal structure dependent creep motion of domain walls driven by spin-transfer torques', Phys. Rev. B 110, 024403 (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.024403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.024403 (arXiv:2312.15512, https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.15512)
- M. H. Jin, L. Xiong, N. J. Zhou, B. Zheng, T.-J. Zhou, 'Universality classes of the domain-wall creep motion driven by spin-transfer torques', Phys. Rev. E 103, 062119 (2021). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.062119, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.062119