The measurement by Yamanouchi, Chiba, Matsukura, Dietl and Ohno (Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 096601 (2006)) of current-driven domain-wall velocities in (Ga,Mn)As over five decades, up to 22 m/s, corroborated spin-transfer theory only after assuming that the spin-current polarization PP entering the torque formulas equals the thermodynamic spin polarization PsP_s, and left a fourfold microscopic problem: (i) the relation between PP and PsP_s for the complex valence band; (ii) the microscopic origin and magnitude of the nonadiabatic spin torque, bounded only by an upper limit on the ratio τex/τsf\tau_{\rm ex}/\tau_{\rm sf}; (iii) a microscopic theory of the empirical spin-current-assisted creep law ln⁡veff=a(T)−b(T)j−ν\ln v_{\rm eff} = a(T) - b(T) j^{-\nu} with ν≈0.5\nu \approx 0.5 and b(T)∝(TC−T)γb(T) \propto (T_C - T)^\gamma, γ≈2\gamma \approx 2; and (iv) the experimental disentangling of thermal activation, pinning, and torque contributions at low currents. Later work has measured and microscopically calculated the carrier spin-relaxation time and the nonadiabatic torque in (Ga,Mn)As, extracted the current spin polarization from domain-wall dynamics, and recast current-driven creep in a universal elastic-interface framework. The surviving open core is a material-specific microscopic theory that predicts, rather than fits, the spin-transfer parameters and their temperature dependence, and derives the current-assisted creep barrier and its near-Curie-temperature scaling in realistic pinning landscapes.

Background

(Ga,Mn)As is a dilute ferromagnetic semiconductor in which substitutional Mn spins are coupled antiferromagnetically to holes residing in the strongly spin-orbit-coupled heavy-hole valence band of GaAs; the p-d exchange between Mn moments and holes, with coupling constant β\beta, mediates ferromagnetism with Curie temperatures of order 100 K in the layers used here. Grown under suitable strain, (Ga,Mn)As acquires perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, so up- and down-magnetized domains are separated by a domain wall (DW), a planar magnetic texture of nanometer width (about 17 nm in the source layers) that can be pushed through a lithographic track either by a magnetic field or by an electrical current of density jj.

A current of spin-polarized holes exerts torques on the wall. In the adiabatic spin-transfer picture (carrier spins track the local magnetization and transfer angular momentum to the wall, as in Slonczewski's torque), the wall velocity grows as A(j2−jC2)1/2A(j^2 - j_C^2)^{1/2} with a critical current density jCj_C (Tatara and Kohno, 2004), or is linear in jj above a pinning threshold (Barnes and Maekawa, 2005); the efficiency A=gμBP/(2eM)A = g\mu_B P/(2eM) and jC=2eKδW/(πℏP)j_C = 2eK\delta_W/(\pi\hbar P) are set by the spin-current polarization PP (with gg the hole g-factor, μB\mu_B the Bohr magneton, ee the elementary charge, MM the magnetization, KK the anisotropy energy density, and δW\delta_W the wall width). Because holes have a finite spin relaxation time τsf\tau_{\rm sf} (limited by spin-orbit scattering and by spin mixing from the noncollinear magnetization inside the wall), while their precession time in the Mn exchange (molecular) field is τex=ℏgμB/(∣β∣M)\tau_{\rm ex} = \hbar g\mu_B/(|\beta|M) with β\beta the p-d exchange coupling above, Zhang and Li (2004) predicted an additional nonadiabatic torque, giving a subthreshold, linear-in-jj wall mobility C=A τex/(τsfαG)C = A\,\tau_{\rm ex}/(\tau_{\rm sf}\alpha_G) with Gilbert damping αG\alpha_G. In the later spin-transfer literature this nonadiabatic torque is conventionally parametrized by a dimensionless coefficient also denoted β\beta; to avoid confusion with the p-d coupling, the nonadiabatic coefficient is written βSTT\beta_{\rm STT} below.

In the pinned, thermally activated regime, an elastic interface such as a DW line creeps — that is, it advances by rare thermally activated hops over the frozen (quenched) disorder landscape — with a stretched-exponential Arrhenius velocity law, generically ln⁡v=a−bF−μ\ln v = a - bF^{-\mu} for a driving force FF, whose exponent μ\mu reflects the universality class of the disorder (for a one-dimensional wall in short-range two-dimensional disorder, the quenched Edwards-Wilkinson class, the standard universality class of elastic-interface depinning in random-bond disorder, gives μ=1/4\mu = 1/4).

Yamanouchi et al. (2006) measured DW velocities by magneto-optical Kerr microscopy in (Ga,Mn)As tracks with perpendicular anisotropy, calibrating Joule heating with the device resistance, and found (a) above-threshold velocities consistent with spin-transfer theory, provided PP was identified with the thermodynamic spin polarization Ps=6kBTCM/[(S+1)pβMS]P_s = 6k_BT_CM/[(S+1)p\beta M_S] of the p-d Zener mean-field model (SS the Mn spin, pp the hole concentration, MSM_S the saturation magnetization), an identification uncertain because pp and the p-d coupling β\beta were poorly known and the multiband valence band makes the relation between PP and PsP_s nontrivial; (b) an upper limit τex/τsf≈10−2\tau_{\rm ex}/\tau_{\rm sf} \approx 10^{-2} on the nonadiabaticity from the subthreshold slope, without a microscopic determination; (c) an empirical creep scaling ln⁡veff=a(T)−b(T)j−ν\ln v_{\rm eff} = a(T) - b(T) j^{-\nu} with ν=0.5±0.1\nu = 0.5 \pm 0.1, a(T)∼(TC−T)a(T) \sim (T_C - T) and b(T)∝(TC−T)γb(T) \propto (T_C - T)^\gamma with γ=2±0.5\gamma = 2 \pm 0.5, where veffv_{\rm eff} is the measured effective wall velocity, which they conjectured — but did not derive — to arise from critical magnetization fluctuations that locally depress jCj_C near the Curie temperature TCT_C; and (d) an unresolved experimental decomposition of low-current motion into thermal activation, extrinsic pinning, and torque contributions. What is asked for is the microscopic physics behind this phenomenology.

Problem Statement

Provide a microscopic, quantitative account of electrically driven domain-wall motion in the ferromagnetic semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As that connects the measured velocity-current-temperature data of Yamanouchi et al. (2006) to the underlying spin-transfer physics. In the generality of that source experiment, this requires: (1) establishing the relation between the spin-current polarization PP entering spin-transfer formulas and the thermodynamic spin polarization PsP_s of the complex heavy-hole valence band, including the propagation of the uncertainties in hole concentration pp, p-d exchange coupling β\beta, and band-structure effects; (2) determining the microscopic origin and magnitude of the nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque — equivalently, the carrier spin relaxation time τsf\tau_{\rm sf}, or the nonadiabatic coefficient βSTT\beta_{\rm STT} and its ratio to the Gilbert damping αG\alpha_G in the notation of Zhang-Li-type theories — together with its temperature dependence, improving on the source's upper bound τex/τsf≲10−2\tau_{\rm ex}/\tau_{\rm sf} \lesssim 10^{-2}; (3) deriving, from microscopic pinning physics and critical magnetization fluctuations, the observed subthreshold creep law ln⁡veff=a(T)−b(T)j−ν\ln v_{\rm eff} = a(T) - b(T) j^{-\nu} — its exponent ν\nu, and the prefactors a(T)a(T) and b(T)b(T) with b(T)∝(TC−T)γb(T) \propto (T_C - T)^\gamma near the Curie temperature — for realistic disorder landscapes; and (4) decomposing the low-current motion into its thermal-activation, extrinsic-pinning, and torque components across wide temperature and disorder regimes. These four items are jointly posed and together constitute one objective: a predictive theory, validated against experiment, of how spin-polarized hole currents move and pin domain walls in (Ga,Mn)As.

References

  1. M. Yamanouchi, D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, T. Dietl, H. Ohno, 'Velocity of Domain-Wall Motion Induced by Electrical Current in the Ferromagnetic Semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As', Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 096601 (2006). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.096601, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.096601
  2. G. Tatara, H. Kohno, 'Theory of Current-Driven Domain Wall Motion: Spin Transfer versus Momentum Transfer', Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 086601 (2004). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.086601, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.086601
  3. S. Zhang, Z. Li, 'Roles of Nonequilibrium Conduction Electrons on the Magnetization Dynamics of Ferromagnets', Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 127204 (2004). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.127204, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.127204
  4. S. E. Barnes, S. Maekawa, 'Current-Spin Coupling for Ferromagnetic Domain Walls in Fine Wires', Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 107204 (2005). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.107204, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.107204
  5. M. Yamanouchi, J. Ieda, F. Matsukura, S. E. Barnes, S. Maekawa, H. Ohno, 'Universality Classes for Domain Wall Motion in the Ferromagnetic Semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As', Science 317, 1726 (2007). DOI: 10.1126/science.1145516, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145516
  6. R. A. Duine, C. Morais Smith, 'Creep of current-driven domain-wall lines: Effects of intrinsic versus extrinsic pinning', Phys. Rev. B 77, 094434 (2008). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.094434, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.094434 (arXiv:0711.4058, https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.4058)
  7. J.-P. Adam, N. Vernier, J. Ferré, A. Thiaville, V. Jeudy, A. Lemaître, L. Thevenard, G. Faini, 'Nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque in (Ga,Mn)As with perpendicular anisotropy', Phys. Rev. B 80, 193204 (2009). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.193204, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.193204
  8. A. Kanda, A. Suzuki, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, 'Domain wall creep in (Ga,Mn)As', Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 032504 (2010). DOI: 10.1063/1.3467048, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3467048
  9. V. Jeudy, J. Curiale, J.-P. Adam, A. Thiaville, A. Lemaître, G. Faini, 'Current induced domain wall motion in GaMnAs close to the Curie temperature', J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 446004 (2011). DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/23/44/446004, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/23/44/446004
  10. K. Shen, M. W. Wu, 'Hole spin relaxation and coefficients in Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation in ferromagnetic (Ga,Mn)As', Phys. Rev. B 85, 075206 (2012). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.075206, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.075206 (arXiv:1109.4964, https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4964)
  11. J. Curiale, A. Lemaître, C. Ulysse, G. Faini, V. Jeudy, 'Spin Drift Velocity, Polarization, and Current-Driven Domain-Wall Motion in (Ga,Mn)(As,P)', Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 076604 (2012). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.076604, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.076604
  12. N. Vernier, J.-P. Adam, A. Thiaville, V. Jeudy, A. Lemaître, J. Ferré, G. Faini, 'Modified current-induced domain-wall motion in GaMnAs nanowires', Phys. Rev. B 88, 224415 (2013). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.224415, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.224415 (arXiv:1303.6174, https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6174)
  13. E. De Ranieri, P. E. Roy, D. Fang, E. K. Vehsthedt, A. C. Irvine, D. Heiss, A. Casiraghi, R. P. Campion, B. L. Gallagher, T. Jungwirth, J. Wunderlich, 'Piezoelectric control of the mobility of a domain wall driven by adiabatic and non-adiabatic torques', Nature Materials 12, 808-814 (2013). DOI: 10.1038/nmat3657, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3657
  14. A. Patz, T. Li, X. Liu, J. K. Furdyna, I. E. Perakis, J. Wang, 'Ultrafast probes of nonequilibrium hole spin relaxation in the ferromagnetic semiconductor GaMnAs', Phys. Rev. B 91, 155108 (2015). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155108, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155108 (arXiv:1411.6979, https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.6979)
  15. S. DuttaGupta, S. Fukami, C. Zhang, H. Sato, M. Yamanouchi, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, 'Adiabatic spin-transfer-torque-induced domain wall creep in a magnetic metal', Nature Physics 12, 333-336 (2016). DOI: 10.1038/nphys3593, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3593
  16. L. Thevenard, B. Boutigny, N. Güsken, L. Becerra, C. Ulysse, S. Shihab, A. Lemaître, J.-V. Kim, V. Jeudy, C. Gourdon, 'Spin transfer and spin-orbit torques in in-plane magnetized (Ga,Mn)As tracks', Phys. Rev. B 95, 054422 (2017). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.054422, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.054422
  17. R. Díaz Pardo, N. Moisan, L. J. Albornoz, A. Lemaître, J. Curiale, V. Jeudy, 'Common universal behavior of magnetic domain walls driven by spin-polarized electrical current and magnetic field', Phys. Rev. B 100, 184420 (2019). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.184420, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.184420 (arXiv:1904.03047, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.03047)
  18. L. J. Albornoz, R. Díaz Pardo, A. Lemaître, S. Bustingorry, J. Curiale, V. Jeudy, 'Internal structure dependent creep motion of domain walls driven by spin-transfer torques', Phys. Rev. B 110, 024403 (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.024403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.024403 (arXiv:2312.15512, https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.15512)
  19. M. H. Jin, L. Xiong, N. J. Zhou, B. Zheng, T.-J. Zhou, 'Universality classes of the domain-wall creep motion driven by spin-transfer torques', Phys. Rev. E 103, 062119 (2021). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.062119, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.062119