For a nonisotrivial elliptic curve E/Q(T)E/\mathbb{Q}(T) — an algebraic one-parameter family of elliptic curves with non-constant jj-invariant — of generic Mordell–Weil rank rr, Silverman's specialization theorem gives rank⁡Et(Q)≥r\operatorname{rank}E_t(\mathbb{Q})\ge r for all but finitely many t∈Qt\in\mathbb{Q}. Zywina (2025) produced the first unconditional example in which equality holds for infinitely many tt, and left as the paper's open problem the general conjecture: for every nonisotrivial E/Q(T)E/\mathbb{Q}(T), the non-jumping set N(E)={t∈Q:rank⁡Et(Q)=r}\mathcal{N}(E)=\{t\in\mathbb{Q}:\operatorname{rank}E_t(\mathbb{Q})=r\} is infinite, with the stronger expectation that N(E)\mathcal{N}(E) has positive density with respect to the natural height. All known unconditional results (rank-0 and rank-2 families over Q\mathbb{Q}, ranks 0 through 4 over any number field, and higher-genus analogues) are proved only for specially engineered families whose specializations have few, explicitly analyzable bad primes, using deep theorems on prime patterns. The problem asks for a proof, or a refutation by explicit counterexample, of the general conjecture for arbitrary nonisotrivial families.

Background

An elliptic curve over the rational function field Q(T)\mathbb{Q}(T) is a one-parameter algebraic family of elliptic curves: a Weierstrass equation y2=x3+a(T)x2+b(T)x+c(T)y^{2}=x^{3}+a(T)x^{2}+b(T)x+c(T) with coefficients in Q[T]\mathbb{Q}[T] and discriminant Δ(T)\Delta(T) defines, for each rational tt with Δ(t)≠0\Delta(t)\neq 0, an elliptic curve Et/QE_t/\mathbb{Q} by substituting T=tT=t (an elliptic curve being a smooth genus-one curve with a chosen base point, whose rational points form a finitely generated abelian group by the Mordell–Weil theorem). The family is nonisotrivial when its jj-invariant — the standard modulus of an elliptic curve — is not constant, i.e. does not lie in Q\mathbb{Q}; geometrically, such a family corresponds to an elliptic surface over PQ1\mathbb{P}^1_{\mathbb{Q}} with varying moduli. The group E(Q(T))E(\mathbb{Q}(T)) is finitely generated (Lang–Néron theorem), and its rank rr is called the generic rank of the family. A theorem of Silverman says that the specialization homomorphism E(Q(T))→Et(Q)E(\mathbb{Q}(T))\to E_t(\mathbb{Q}) is injective for all but finitely many tt, so rank⁡Et(Q)≥r\operatorname{rank}E_t(\mathbb{Q})\ge r for all but finitely many t∈Qt\in\mathbb{Q}; specializations where the rank is strictly larger are said to have a rank jump. Writing N(E)={t∈Q:Δ(t)≠0, rank⁡Et(Q)=r}\mathcal{N}(E)=\{t\in\mathbb{Q}:\Delta(t)\neq 0,\ \operatorname{rank}E_t(\mathbb{Q})=r\} for the non-jumping set, the basic question is whether N(E)\mathcal{N}(E) is infinite — and conjecturally whether it even has positive density in Q\mathbb{Q} with respect to the natural height H(a/b)=max⁡(∣a∣,b)H(a/b)=\max(|a|,b) on Q\mathbb{Q} (with a/ba/b in lowest terms, b>0b>0). The nonisotriviality hypothesis is essential: Cassels and Schinzel exhibited a nonconstant isotrivial family (constant jj-invariant) of generic rank 0 whose every specialization has global root number −1-1 — the root number being the sign in the functional equation of the Hasse–Weil LL-function of the curve, linked to the rank by the parity conjecture, which predicts (−1)rank⁡(-1)^{\operatorname{rank}} equals the root number — so the parity conjecture forces a jump for every tt and N(E)\mathcal{N}(E) is expected to be empty; in the isotrivial (essentially quadratic-twist) case both behaviors are comparatively well understood. For nonisotrivial families the heuristic picture, developed by Helfgott and by Conrad–Conrad–Helfgott in the function-field setting and revisited by Caro–Pasten, combines Silverman's density conjecture (that rank⁡Et(Q)∈{r,r+1}\operatorname{rank}E_t(\mathbb{Q})\in\{r,r+1\} for a density-one set of tt) with the prediction that the average root number over the family lies strictly between −1-1 and 11: both N(E)\mathcal{N}(E) and its complement should then have positive density. Before 2025 no nonisotrivial example with infinite N(E)\mathcal{N}(E) was known unconditionally. The family of Neumann and Setzer gives rank-0 fibers at every integer tt for which t2+64t^2+64 is prime, such tt being infinite in number only under the Bunyakovsky conjecture (the conjecture that an irreducible polynomial with positive leading coefficient and no fixed prime divisor takes infinitely many prime values); Caro and Pasten proved that the Legendre surface y2=x(x+1)(x+T)y^2=x(x+1)(x+T) has rank-0 fibers at t=2qt=2^q for every Mersenne prime 2q−12^q-1 with q≥5q\ge 5 (a Mersenne prime being a prime of this form), making their example conditional on the conjectured infinitude of Mersenne primes. Zywina (2025) then gave the first unconditional example, y2=x(x2−x+T)y^2=x(x^2-x+T): for positive integers m,nm,n with mm, m+nm+n, m+2nm+2n all primes congruent to 3(mod8)3\pmod 8 (infinitely many such 3-term arithmetic progressions of primes exist by a theorem of Green, later extended by Green–Tao), the specialization at t=(m+n)/(2m)t=(m+n)/(2m) has rank 0, proved by a 2-descent — the standard technique of computing a Selmer group, a finite effectively computable group that bounds Et(Q)/2Et(Q)E_t(\mathbb{Q})/2E_t(\mathbb{Q}) and hence the rank — which is possible because these fibers have bad reduction at only the four primes 22, mm, m+nm+n, m+2nm+2n, all explicitly analyzable. The same strategy of few controllable bad primes plus descent, with prime-pattern theorems (Green, Green–Tao, Tao–Ziegler's theorem on prime values of polynomial patterns, and Kai's number-field analogue) supplying the specializations, underlies all subsequent unconditional results: a rank-2 family over Q\mathbb{Q}, ranks 0 through 4 over arbitrary number fields, and hyperelliptic analogues. What none of these provides is an argument for an arbitrary family E/Q(T)E/\mathbb{Q}(T), where the prime divisors of Δ(t)\Delta(t) follow no exploitable pattern. Zywina's Conjecture 1.1 — that N(E)\mathcal{N}(E) is infinite for every nonisotrivial E/Q(T)E/\mathbb{Q}(T) — and its positive-density strengthening remain open, and no unconditional positive-density statement for N(E)\mathcal{N}(E) is known for even a single nonisotrivial family.

Problem Statement

Let E/Q(T)E/\mathbb{Q}(T) be an arbitrary nonisotrivial elliptic curve (non-constant jj-invariant) with generic rank r=rank⁡E(Q(T))r=\operatorname{rank}E(\mathbb{Q}(T)), given by a Weierstrass model over Q[T]\mathbb{Q}[T] with discriminant Δ\Delta, and define the non-jumping set N(E)={t∈Q:Δ(t)≠0, rank⁡Et(Q)=r}.\mathcal{N}(E)=\{t\in\mathbb{Q}:\Delta(t)\neq 0,\ \operatorname{rank}E_t(\mathbb{Q})=r\}. Prove or refute the conjecture (Conjecture 1.1 of Zywina 2025, equivalently the non-jumping half of Conjecture 1.1 of Caro–Pasten 2023): N(E)\mathcal{N}(E) is infinite for every nonisotrivial E/Q(T)E/\mathbb{Q}(T). The stronger expected form, likewise open, is that N(E)\mathcal{N}(E) has positive density with respect to the natural height H(a/b)=max⁡(∣a∣,b)H(a/b)=\max(|a|,b) on Q\mathbb{Q} in lowest terms, i.e. lim inf⁡X→∞#{t∈N(E):H(t)≤X}#{t∈Q:H(t)≤X}>0;\liminf_{X\to\infty}\frac{\#\{t\in\mathcal{N}(E):H(t)\le X\}}{\#\{t\in\mathbb{Q}:H(t)\le X\}}>0; a proof of this stronger statement for all nonisotrivial EE resolves the conjecture a fortiori and is the fully expected answer. A refutation consists of an explicit nonisotrivial E/Q(T)E/\mathbb{Q}(T) together with an unconditional proof that N(E)\mathcal{N}(E) is finite. The statement concerns arbitrary nonisotrivial families: answers restricted to specially constructed families, to a fixed generic rank, to particular geometric types of elliptic surfaces, or conditional on unproved conjectures (parity, Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer, Bunyakovsky-type or Mersenne-type prime infinitude, average-root-number conjectures) do not settle the problem.

References

  1. J. H. Silverman, Heights and the specialization map for families of abelian varieties, J. Reine Angew. Math. 342 (1983), 197–211, doi:10.1515/crll.1983.342.197, https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1983.342.197
  2. J. H. Silverman, Divisibility of the specialization map for families of elliptic curves, Amer. J. Math. 107 (1985), 555–565, doi:10.2307/2374369, https://doi.org/10.2307/2374369
  3. J. W. S. Cassels and A. Schinzel, Selmer's conjecture and families of elliptic curves, Bull. London Math. Soc. 14 (1982), 345–348, doi:10.1112/blms/14.4.345, https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/14.4.345
  4. H. A. Helfgott, On the behaviour of root numbers in families of elliptic curves, preprint (2004), arXiv:math/0408141, https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0408141
  5. B. Conrad, K. Conrad and H. Helfgott, Root numbers and ranks in positive characteristic, Adv. Math. 198 (2005), 684–731, doi:10.1016/j.aim.2005.06.013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2005.06.013
  6. C. Salgado, On the rank of the fibers of rational elliptic surfaces, Algebra Number Theory 6 (2012), 1289–1314, doi:10.2140/ant.2012.6.1289, https://doi.org/10.2140/ant.2012.6.1289
  7. J. Caro and H. Pasten, On the fibres of an elliptic surface where the rank does not jump, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 108 (2023), 276–282, doi:10.1017/S0004972722001368, arXiv:2210.14181, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.14181
  8. D. Zywina, An elliptic surface with infinitely many fibers for which the rank does not jump, preprint (2025), arXiv:2502.01026, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.01026, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01026
  9. D. Zywina, There are infinitely many elliptic curves over the rationals of rank 2, preprint (2025), arXiv:2502.01957, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.01957, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01957
  10. M. Melistas, Low rank specialisations of elliptic surfaces, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 112 (2025), 118–127, doi:10.1017/S0004972724001175, arXiv:2408.02419, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972724001175
  11. D. Zywina, Rank one elliptic curves and rank stability, preprint (2025), arXiv:2505.16960, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.16960, https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16960
  12. P. Koymans and C. Pagano, Elliptic curves of rank one over number fields, preprint (2025), arXiv:2505.16910, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.16910, https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16910
  13. W. Kai, Linear patterns of prime elements in number fields, preprint (2023), arXiv:2306.16983, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2306.16983, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16983
  14. B. Green, Roth's theorem in the primes, Ann. of Math. (2) 161 (2005), 1609–1636, doi:10.4007/annals.2005.161.1609, https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2005.161.1609
  15. B. Green and T. Tao, The primes contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions, Ann. of Math. (2) 167 (2008), 481–547, doi:10.4007/annals.2008.167.481, https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2008.167.481
  16. B. Savoie, Infinitely many elliptic curves over Q(i)\mathbb{Q}(i) with rank 2 and jj-invariant 1728, preprint (2025), arXiv:2506.17605, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.17605, https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17605
  17. S. Gajović and S. W. Park, Infinitely many hyperelliptic curves of small genus and small fixed rank, and of any genus and rank two, preprint (2025), arXiv:2505.22470, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.22470, https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22470
  18. P. Koymans and A. Morgan, Constructing Jacobians of rank 1, J. Reine Angew. Math. (2026), doi:10.1515/crelle-2026-0061, arXiv:2509.24937, https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.24937
  19. D. Zywina, On the infinitude of elliptic curves over a number field with prescribed small rank, preprint (2026), arXiv:2602.10865, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.10865, https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10865
  20. B. Savoie, Infinitely many elliptic curves over Q(i)\mathbb{Q}(i) of exact ranks 4 and 6 with jj-invariant 1728, preprint (2026), arXiv:2608.13202, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2608.13202, https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13202
  21. C. Salgado, An Overview on Mordell–Weil Rank Jumps for Fibres of Elliptic Surfaces, in: ZAG Handbook of Algebraic Geometry, CRC Press (2025), 679–686, doi:10.1201/9781003286363-174, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003286363-174