This task concerns the open directions in Taichiro Takagi's study of the odd/even minimal excludant (mex) in integer partitions (Annals of Combinatorics, 2026). Takagi introduced two partition statistics, sqrank and rerank, defined through Durfee-square/rectangle decomposition, iterated rim-hook stripping, and a maximum over Frobenius coordinates, and proved analytically - via a polynomial bosonic form of one-dimensional configuration sums originating in the box-ball system - that the partitions of nn with odd (resp. even) minimal excludant 2r+12r+1 (resp. 2r+22r+2) are equinumerous with the partitions of nn on which sqrank (resp. rerank) takes the value rr, thereby answering a question of Andrews and Newman on the mex-counting function p2,2(n)p_{2,2}(n). The paper itself expresses two hopes that remain unfulfilled: a direct, explicit bijective proof of this equidistribution, and a partition statistic of rank/crank-like brevity that reproduces p2,2(n)p_{2,2}(n). A 2026 follow-up by Miyazawa and Takagi constructs energy-preserving bijections between the statistic classes and highest-weight paths of level-one Uq(sl^2)U_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2) crystals, but its connection to the mex classes still passes through the analytic branching-function identity, so both asks remain open.

Background

An integer partition of nn is a weakly decreasing sequence of positive integers summing to nn, drawn as a Ferrers diagram of unit squares whose row lengths are the parts. Two standard diagrammatic notions are used below. The Durfee square of a partition is the largest square sitting in the upper-left corner of its Ferrers diagram; the Durfee rectangle (as used here) is the largest rectangle containing that corner whose width exceeds its height by exactly one. A rim hook (border strip) is a connected skew diagram containing no 2×22\times 2 block of cells. The Frobenius representation of a partition λ\lambda with Durfee square of side dd is F(λ)=(x1,…,xd∣y1,…,yd)F(\lambda)=(x_1,\dots,x_d\mid y_1,\dots,y_d), where xix_i (resp. yiy_i) counts cells of row ii to the right of (resp. column ii below) the diagonal cell (i,i)(i,i).

Andrews and Newman (2020) extended the minimal excludant (mex, the least positive integer missing from a set) to partitions: mexA,a(λ)\mathrm{mex}_{A,a}(\lambda) is the smallest positive integer congruent to aa modulo AA that is not a part of λ\lambda. They studied pA,a(n)p_{A,a}(n), the number of partitions of nn whose mexA,a\mathrm{mex}_{A,a} lies in the residue class aa modulo 2A2A, and, for A=2A=2, the refinements p2,1(r)(n)p^{(r)}_{2,1}(n) and p2,2(r)(n)p^{(r)}_{2,2}(n) counting partitions with mex2,1(λ)=2r+1\mathrm{mex}_{2,1}(\lambda)=2r+1 and mex2,2(λ)=2r+2\mathrm{mex}_{2,2}(\lambda)=2r+2, which were introduced in Takagi's study. In particular mex2,1\mathrm{mex}_{2,1} is the smallest missing odd positive integer and mex2,2\mathrm{mex}_{2,2} the smallest missing even positive integer (the smallest positive integer congruent to 22 modulo 22), so p2,2(n)p_{2,2}(n) counts partitions of nn whose even minimal excludant is congruent to 22 modulo 44 (that is, is not a multiple of four). They proved that p1,1(n)p_{1,1}(n) equals the number of partitions of nn with nonnegative crank, that p3,3(n)p_{3,3}(n) equals the number with rank at least −1-1 (rank and crank being the classical statistics of partition theory, defined in a few lines from the parts: rank is the largest part minus the number of parts, and crank is built from the multiplicity of the part 1 and the number of parts), and that p2,1(n)p_{2,1}(n) equals pe(n)p_e(n), the number of partitions of nn into an even number of parts. They then asked whether a comparable theorem exists for p2,2(n)p_{2,2}(n) (their Question II), and, studying the generating function

∑n≥0p2,2(n)qn=∑n≥0qn2+nBn(q)(q;q)2n+1,Bn(q)=∑r=0n(−1)r[2n+1n−r],\sum_{n\geq 0}p_{2,2}(n)q^{n}=\sum_{n\geq 0}\frac{q^{n^{2}+n}B_{n}(q)}{(q;q)_{2n+1}},\qquad B_{n}(q)=\sum_{r=0}^{n}(-1)^{r}{2n+1\brack n-r},

where (q;q)m=∏k=1m(1−qk)(q;q)_m=\prod_{k=1}^{m}(1-q^k) and [Ls]{L\brack s} is the Gaussian polynomial (the qq-binomial coefficient generating partitions in an s×(L−s)s\times(L-s) box), they conjectured that Bn(q)B_n(q) has nonnegative coefficients (proved by Chern, 2023), is unimodal, and enumerates some subset of the partitions into at most nn parts each at most n+1n+1.

Takagi (arXiv:2412.19503, published in Annals of Combinatorics, 2026) answered Question II. He introduced two statistics defined by the following procedure on the Ferrers diagram of λ\lambda (for a=0,1a=0,1): let Da(λ)D_a(\lambda) be the Durfee square (a=0a=0) or Durfee rectangle (a=1a=1), of height nan_a, and let Aa(λ)A_a(\lambda) be the diagram of the first nan_a rows with DaD_a removed; repeatedly strip from the rim of AaA_a the longest rightmost rim hook of arm length na+an_a+a until fewer than na+a+1n_a+a+1 columns remain, leaving a residual diagram RaR_a; then, with F(Ra)=(x1,…,xd∣y1,…,yd)F(R_a)=(x_1,\dots,x_d\mid y_1,\dots,y_d), y0=nay_0=n_a and xd+1=−1x_{d+1}=-1, set f(a)(λ)=max⁡0≤i≤d(yi−xi+1)−1f^{(a)}(\lambda)=\max_{0\leq i\leq d}(y_i-x_{i+1})-1. The statistics are sqrank(λ)=f(0)(λ)\mathrm{sqrank}(\lambda)=f^{(0)}(\lambda) and rerank(λ)=f(1)(λ)\mathrm{rerank}(\lambda)=f^{(1)}(\lambda) (with the conventions that DaD_a, AaA_a are empty and na=0n_a=0 when λ=∅\lambda=\emptyset, or, for a=1a=1, when λ\lambda has only ones as parts, and that f(a)(λ)=naf^{(a)}(\lambda)=n_a when the residual diagram RaR_a is empty). His Theorem 1 states that p2,1(r)(n)p^{(r)}_{2,1}(n) equals the number of partitions of nn with sqrank rr, and p2,2(r)(n)p^{(r)}_{2,2}(n) the number with rerank rr; as a corollary, p2,2(n)p_{2,2}(n) equals the number of partitions of nn with even rerank. The proof is analytic: the key polynomial XL,s+(q)=[Ls]−[Ls−1]X^{+}_{L,s}(q)={L\brack s}-{L\brack s-1}, a difference of Gaussian polynomials (a so-called bosonic form, i.e. a manifestly subtractive expression that nevertheless has nonnegative coefficients), is rewritten as a one-dimensional configuration sum ∑ηqE(η)\sum_{\eta}q^{E(\eta)} over bit sequences with an energy EE, a type of formula originating in exactly solved lattice models and conformal-field-theory characters; Takagi's derivation draws on his earlier work on the box-ball system, an integrable cellular automaton whose soliton content is encoded by such bit sequences. Along the way he identifies the subset enumerated by Bn(q)B_n(q): writing E1(λ;n)=max⁡0≤i≤d(yi−xi+1)−1\mathcal{E}_1(\lambda;n)=\max_{0\leq i\leq d}(y_i-x_{i+1})-1 on Frobenius coordinates with y0=ny_0=n, xd+1=−1x_{d+1}=-1, the polynomial Bn(q)B_n(q) enumerates the partitions in the n×(n+1)n\times(n+1) box with even E1\mathcal{E}_1, answering conjecture (3) of Andrews and Newman. In the published version he further connects the counting to Kostka polynomials and to level-one sl^2\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2 character (branching-function) formulae.

The concluding remarks of the paper state two explicit hopes: that a more explicit bijective proof of the main equidistribution will be found (the existing proof matches generating functions analytically), and that a partition statistic with a more succinct definition - comparable to the three-line, notation-free definitions of rank and crank, using only the parts rather than diagrammatic procedures - will be found that reproduces the same integer sequence p2,2(n)p_{2,2}(n). A 2026 follow-up by Miyazawa and Takagi constructs explicit energy-preserving bijections between the sqrank/rerank classes and certain highest-weight paths in the crystal graphs of the level-one Uq(sl^2)U_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2) crystals B(Λ0)B(\Lambda_0) and B(Λ1)B(\Lambda_1) (a crystal is the colored directed graph encoding the combinatorial skeleton of a quantum-group representation; Kashiwara operators move along its arrows), but the equality between the number of such paths and the number of partitions in the corresponding mex class is still deduced from the analytic branching-function identity, not by a bijection.

Problem Statement

The common objective is to give the Takagi-Andrews-Newman equidistribution between minimal-excludant classes and the sqrank/rerank statistics a direct, succinct, purely combinatorial foundation, replacing the analytic generating-function proof. Concretely, the problem asks for the following linked deliverables.

(1) Direct bijective proof of the equidistribution. For all n,r∈Z≥0n,r\in\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}, construct an explicit weight-preserving bijection between the set of partitions λ⊢n\lambda\vdash n with mex2,1(λ)=2r+1\mathrm{mex}_{2,1}(\lambda)=2r+1 and the set of partitions λ⊢n\lambda\vdash n with sqrank(λ)=r\mathrm{sqrank}(\lambda)=r, and likewise between the set of partitions λ⊢n\lambda\vdash n with mex2,2(λ)=2r+2\mathrm{mex}_{2,2}(\lambda)=2r+2 and the set of partitions λ⊢n\lambda\vdash n with rerank(λ)=r\mathrm{rerank}(\lambda)=r (a single uniform construction covering both cases is welcome). The proof of bijectivity must be direct: the construction itself must establish the equinumerosity, rather than composing bijections whose connection to the mex classes rests on an analytic identity such as the branching-function/character equality through which the known crystal-path bijections (Miyazawa-Takagi 2026) are currently linked to the mex classes. Recall that the mex classes have an elementary structure - a partition has mex2,1(λ)=2r+1\mathrm{mex}_{2,1}(\lambda)=2r+1 exactly when 1,3,…,2r−11,3,\dots,2r-1 are parts of λ\lambda and 2r+12r+1 is not, and mex2,2(λ)=2r+2\mathrm{mex}_{2,2}(\lambda)=2r+2 exactly when 2,4,…,2r2,4,\dots,2r are parts and 2r+22r+2 is not - so the target is a concrete bijection between multiplicity-defined families and the statistics defined by Durfee decomposition, rim-hook stripping, and Frobenius coordinates.

(2) Succinct statistic for p2,2(n)p_{2,2}(n). Find a partition statistic ss whose definition has brevity comparable to the classical rank and crank - statable in a few lines in terms of the parts and their multiplicities, without iterative Ferrers-diagram surgery - such that, for every n≥0n\geq 0, either finely #{λ⊢n:s(λ)=r}=p2,2(r)(n)\#\{\lambda\vdash n: s(\lambda)=r\}=p^{(r)}_{2,2}(n) for all rr, or at least coarsely #{λ⊢n:s(λ) even}=p2,2(n)\#\{\lambda\vdash n: s(\lambda)\ \mathrm{even}\}=p_{2,2}(n); a comparably simple closed identity for p2,2(n)p_{2,2}(n), paralleling p2,1(n)=pe(n)p_{2,1}(n)=p_e(n), would equally answer this part. A proof of the counting identity is required. The statistic ss (and any such identity) must be defined independently of the mex class being counted: its definition may not refer to mex2,2\mathrm{mex}_{2,2}, or to any statistic determined by mex2,2\mathrm{mex}_{2,2}, so that the answer is a genuinely new parts-and-multiplicities invariant rather than a re-encoding of the class that p2,2(n)p_{2,2}(n) counts.

A complete resolution establishes the common objective by delivering both (1) and (2), each with proof; delivering either one alone constitutes substantial, independently reviewable partial progress.

References

  1. Taichiro Takagi, A polynomial bosonic form of statistical configuration sums and the odd/even minimal excludant in integer partitions, Annals of Combinatorics (2026), DOI 10.1007/s00026-025-00792-9, arXiv:2412.19503, https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19503
  2. George E. Andrews and David Newman, The minimal excludant in integer partitions, Journal of Integer Sequences 23 (2020), Article 20.2.3, https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL23/Andrews/andrews5.html
  3. Shane Chern, q-Log-concavity and q-unimodality of Gaussian polynomials and a problem of Andrews and Newman, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series A, Mathematical Sciences 99 (2023), pp. 33-36, DOI 10.3792/pjaa.99.007, https://doi.org/10.3792/pjaa.99.007
  4. Sota Miyazawa and Taichiro Takagi, Novel energy preserving bijections between affine crystals for Uq(sl^2)U_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2) and integer partitions, arXiv:2605.30806 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30806
  5. Bernard L. S. Lin and Han Liu, Identities and Inequalities Involving the Crank and Minimal Excludant of Integer Partitions, Annals of Combinatorics (2025), DOI 10.1007/s00026-025-00773-y, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-025-00773-y
  6. George E. Andrews and Brian Hopkins, Extending Andrews and Newman's refinement of the crank-mex theorem, arXiv:2511.19698 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19698
  7. Nargish Punia, On kk-color mex-related partition functions, arXiv:2606.25698 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.25698
  8. Subhash Chand Bhoria, Pramod Eyyunni and Subhrangsu Santra, On the number of missing integers in partitions, arXiv:2604.12557 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12557
  9. Chen Dandan, Zhao Mengjie and Zou Ziyin, Combinatorial Proofs for Two-Color Partition Identities Involving Overpartitions and Minimal Excludants, arXiv:2607.02556 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02556
  10. Xiangyu Ding and Lisa Hui Sun, A combinatorial proof for the positivity of the normalized Jacobi triple product tails, arXiv:2606.27507 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27507