The two-dimensional qq-state Potts model with quenched bond disorder whose correlations decay as a power law r−ar^{-a} flows, below the marginal value a≈2a \approx 2 and above an instability value a∗(q)a^{*}(q) at which Monte-Carlo studies locate the takeover by the infinite-disorder fixed point (a∗≈1a^{*} \approx 1 at q=2q = 2), to a long-range (LR) disorder fixed point distinct from both the pure and the short-range random-bond universality classes. The magnetic exponent (β/ν)LR(\beta/\nu)^{LR} — the scaling dimension of the Potts spin field at this fixed point — is currently known only to leading order O(ϵ3)O(\epsilon^3) in a double expansion in ϵSR≃4(q−2)/(3π)\epsilon_{SR} \simeq 4(q-2)/(3\pi) and ϵLR=1−a/2+ϵSR/2\epsilon_{LR} = 1 - a/2 + \epsilon_{SR}/2 [Lecce, Picco, Santachiara, Phys. Rev. E 110, 064154 (2024)]. The open problem is a controlled determination of (β/ν)LR(a,q)(\beta/\nu)^{LR}(a,q) beyond this perturbative window: its value in the strongly long-range regime approaching a∗(q)a^{*}(q), where the leading-order prediction already deviates from Monte-Carlo data; the two-loop and higher magnetic-sector corrections and their dependence on higher cumulants of the disorder distribution; and the fixed-point disorder amplitude μLR2\mu_{LR}^2 together with the correction-to-scaling exponents at the LR fixed point (ω\omega and the approach-to-fixed-point eigenvalue), whose present indeterminacy blocks unambiguous numerical extrapolation.

Background

The qq-state Potts model assigns to each site ii of a square lattice a spin taking qq values and couples nearest neighbours through bonds JijJ_{ij}; in two dimensions the pure model is critical for q≤4q \le 4 and its continuum limit is a conformal field theory (CFT). Quenched (frozen-in) bond disorder replaces the uniform couplings by random variables; averaging over the disorder via the replica trick yields, in the continuum limit, nn replicas of the Potts CFT perturbed by products of energy-density (thermal) operators ε\varepsilon, followed by the limit n→0n \to 0.

For uncorrelated — short-range (SR) — disorder this replica perturbed-CFT renormalization group (RG) was developed by Dotsenko, Picco and Pujol: the SR disorder coupling has RG eigenvalue ϵSR=4−6π/(2π−arccos⁡((q−2)/2))≃4(q−2)/(3π)\epsilon_{SR} = 4 - 6\pi/(2\pi - \arccos((q-2)/2)) \simeq 4(q-2)/(3\pi), which is positive (relevant disorder) for q>2q > 2 and vanishes at q=2q = 2, and the magnetic exponent at the SR fixed point is known as a series in ϵSR\epsilon_{SR} starting at order ϵSR3\epsilon_{SR}^3.

Long-range (LR) correlated disorder, in which the random couplings have algebraically decaying correlations (Jij−Jˉ)(Jkl−Jˉ)‾∝r−a\overline{(J_{ij}-\bar J)(J_{kl}-\bar J)} \propto r^{-a}, is far less understood. The extended Harris criterion of Weinrib and Halperin states that such disorder is relevant when a ν<2a\,\nu < 2, with ν\nu the correlation-length exponent of the pure model (at the Ising point q=2q=2, ν=1\nu = 1, so relevance requires a<2a < 2); their perturbative RG also led to the conjecture νLR=2/a\nu^{LR} = 2/a at the disorder-induced fixed point. On the lattice, such disorder is realized by taking the random variable on each site to be the product of the spins of mm independent critical two-dimensional Ising models, which produces correlations decaying as r−m/4r^{-m/4} (i.e. a=m/4a = m/4); with bimodal bonds J1,J2J_1, J_2 the critical manifold is exactly known from self-duality, (eJ1−1)(eJ2−1)=q(e^{J_1}-1)(e^{J_2}-1) = q, and μ2=(J1−J2)2/4\mu^2 = (J_1-J_2)^2/4 measures the disorder strength. Monte-Carlo studies established the fixed-point structure: the pure point (μ2=0\mu^2 = 0), an SR fixed point, a finite-disorder LR fixed point, and an infinite-disorder point whose universality class is Bernoulli percolation (independent bond occupation) for a>3/2a > 3/2 and long-range percolation for a<3/2a < 3/2. The same simulations established that, for each q∈[1,4]q \in [1,4], there is a value a∗(q)a^{*}(q) — with a∗≈1a^{*} \approx 1 at q=2q = 2 — at which the LR fixed point becomes unstable: for a<a∗(q)a < a^{*}(q) the model is described by the infinite-disorder point.

Analytically, the thermal sector of the two-dimensional LR-disordered Potts model was computed at two loops by Chippari, Picco and Santachiara: the central charges agree well with numerics, while νLR\nu^{LR} obeys the Weinrib–Halperin value only for Gaussian disorder, the two-loop results being sensitive to the fourth cumulant of the disorder distribution. The magnetic sector is known only at leading order. Working in a double expansion in ϵSR\epsilon_{SR} and ϵLR=1−a/2+ϵSR/2\epsilon_{LR} = 1 - a/2 + \epsilon_{SR}/2 (both small when q→2+q \to 2^+ and a→2−a \to 2^-), Lecce, Picco and Santachiara obtained for the exponent of the spin pair-correlation function at the LR fixed point — equal to the scaling dimension of the spin field, since β/ν=xσ\beta/\nu = x_\sigma —

(βν)LR=(βν)P−132 ϵLR(ϵLR−ϵSR)(4ϵLR+ϵSR ξ2)+O(ϵ4),\left(\frac{\beta}{\nu}\right)^{LR} = \left(\frac{\beta}{\nu}\right)^{P} - \frac{1}{32}\,\epsilon_{LR}\left(\epsilon_{LR}-\epsilon_{SR}\right)\left(4\epsilon_{LR}+\epsilon_{SR}\,\xi^{2}\right) + O(\epsilon^{4}),

where ξ=2 Γ(1/6)Γ(−2/3)/(Γ(−1/6)Γ(−1/3))\xi = 2\,\Gamma(1/6)\Gamma(-2/3)/(\Gamma(-1/6)\Gamma(-1/3)); at the Ising point this reduces to (β/ν)LR=18−(2−a)364+O((2−a)4)(\beta/\nu)^{LR} = \frac{1}{8} - \frac{(2-a)^3}{64} + O((2-a)^4), reproducing the Monte-Carlo value 0.1230.123 at q=2q=2, a=1.5a=1.5. The prediction agrees with simulations for a≲2a \lesssim 2 but deviates for a≤1a \le 1, where the expansion parameters are no longer small. The numerical determination is itself obstructed: the value μLR2\mu_{LR}^2 of the disorder strength at the LR fixed point on the lattice critical manifold is unknown, and two competing corrections — corrections to scaling with irrelevant exponent ω\omega and the approach-to-fixed-point contribution governed by the disorder RG eigenvalue at the LR fixed point (negative, since that fixed point is attractive, and distinct from the disorder-coupling eigenvalue yd=2ϵLRy_d = 2\epsilon_{LR} verified near the pure point) — of unknown relative size prevent an unambiguous finite-size extrapolation (at q=2q=2, a=1.5a=1.5 the effective exponent drifts within 0.120.12–0.1250.125). Simulations indicate that below a∗(q)a^{*}(q) the LR fixed point gives way to the infinite-disorder fixed point, but an analytic description of that changeover is not established; and the LR→\toSR crossover near the marginal value a≈2a \approx 2 has been evidenced numerically through the magnetization scaling function m(μ2,L)/m(0,L)=f(μ2Lyd)m(\mu^2,L)/m(0,L) = f(\mu^2 L^{y_d}) with yd=2ϵLRy_d = 2\epsilon_{LR}, but lacks an analytic characterization.

Problem Statement

Determine the magnetic critical exponent (β/ν)LR(\beta/\nu)^{LR} — the scaling dimension of the Potts spin field at the long-range disorder fixed point — of the two-dimensional qq-state Potts model with quenched bond disorder whose correlations decay as r−ar^{-a}, beyond the leading perturbative order, throughout the region of the (a,q)(a,q) plane in which that fixed point governs the critical behavior (for q=2q = 2 this is the interval a∗(q)<a<2a^{*}(q) < a < 2, between the instability towards the infinite-disorder fixed point at a∗(q)≈1a^{*}(q) \approx 1 and the crossover to the short-range class near a≈2a \approx 2; for q>2q > 2 the region is bounded analogously by the crossovers to the short-range and to the infinite-disorder fixed points). The problem comprises two jointly linked components:

(a) A controlled determination of (β/ν)LR(a,q)(\beta/\nu)^{LR}(a,q) away from the double-perturbative point q→2q \to 2, a→2a \to 2 — whether by a higher-order or resummed renormalization-group computation, an exact or nonperturbative result, or a numerical determination with controlled errors — in particular in the strongly long-range regime approaching the instability value a∗(q)a^{*}(q) (for q=2q = 2, a∗≈1a^{*} \approx 1), where the leading-order prediction already deviates from Monte-Carlo data, together with an analytic account of the destabilization of the LR fixed point at a∗(q)a^{*}(q) and of the changeover to the infinite-disorder class, which is established numerically but not characterized analytically;

(b) the two-loop and higher-order contributions to the magnetic sector and their dependence on higher cumulants of the disorder distribution (the leading magnetic correction depends only on the first two cumulants, while two-loop thermal-sector results already involve the fourth cumulant).

These components jointly serve one objective: a quantitatively reliable theory of the spin-sector critical behavior at the long-range disorder fixed point, with its domain of validity specified. A numerical determination of (β/ν)LR(\beta/\nu)^{LR} additionally requires the fixed-point disorder amplitude μLR2\mu_{LR}^2 on the lattice critical manifold and the leading correction-to-scaling exponents at the LR fixed point, which are presently unknown and obstruct unambiguous finite-size extrapolation.

A solution counts as a resolution only when both components (a) and (b) are supplied jointly, each in full as specified above — component (a) including its analytic account of the destabilization of the LR fixed point at a∗(q)a^{*}(q) and of the changeover to the infinite-disorder class, and component (b) requiring the higher-order magnetic-sector contributions and their dependence on the higher cumulants of the disorder distribution to be supplied — with the domain of validity of the resulting expression or numerical estimate stated. A partial result — for example, magnetic-sector corrections established only within the double-perturbative window q→2q \to 2, a→2a \to 2, or a single numerical value of (β/ν)LR(\beta/\nu)^{LR} at one point of the (a,q)(a,q) plane — does not by itself resolve the task. The fixed-point disorder amplitude μLR2\mu_{LR}^2 and the correction-to-scaling exponents at the LR fixed point are required only insofar as the determination of (β/ν)LR(\beta/\nu)^{LR} is numerical, where they are needed to make the finite-size extrapolation unambiguous; for an analytic or nonperturbative determination they are supporting results rather than mandatory deliverables.

References

  1. Ivan Lecce, Marco Picco, Raoul Santachiara, 'Magnetic exponent for the long-range bond disordered Potts model', Phys. Rev. E 110, 064154 (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.110.064154; arXiv:2407.13456. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.064154
  2. Francesco Chippari, Marco Picco, Raoul Santachiara, 'Long-range quenched bond disorder in the bidimensional Potts model', J. Stat. Mech. (2023) 043301. DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/acc72a; arXiv:2301.13727. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/acc72a
  3. Francesco Chippari, Marco Picco, Raoul Santachiara, 'Two-dimensional Ising and Potts model with long-range bond disorder: A renormalization group approach', SciPost Phys. 15, 135 (2023). DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.4.135; arXiv:2306.01887. https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.4.135
  4. Connor Behan, Dario Benedetti, Fanny Eustachon, Edoardo Lauria, 'Long-range minimal models', J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 001. DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2026)001; arXiv:2509.26372. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep02(2026)001
  5. Abel Weinrib, B. I. Halperin, 'Critical phenomena in systems with long-range-correlated quenched disorder', Phys. Rev. B 27, 413 (1983). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.27.413. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.27.413
  6. Vladimir Dotsenko, Marco Picco, Pierre Pujol, 'Renormalisation-group calculation of correlation functions for the 2D random bond Ising and Potts models', Nucl. Phys. B 455, 701 (1995). DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00534-Y. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00534-Y
  7. M. Dudka, A. A. Fedorenko, V. Blavatska, Yu. Holovatch, 'Critical behavior of the two-dimensional Ising model with long-range correlated disorder', Phys. Rev. B 93, 224422 (2016). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.224422. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.224422
  8. Christophe Chatelain, 'Griffiths phase and critical behavior of the two-dimensional Potts models with long-range correlated disorder', Phys. Rev. E 89, 032105 (2014). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.032105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.032105
  9. Zhijin Li, 'Conformality loss and short-range crossover in long-range conformal field theories', arXiv:2409.19392 (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19392