The periodic Fredkin chain — a frustration-free spin-1/2 model with three-site interactions whose degenerate ground states are labeled by Dyck-path equivalence classes — was shown by Pronko (2025) to possess two nonlocal ladder operators Σ±\Sigma^\pm that commute with the Hamiltonian and connect its ground states. Exact computations for chains of up to N=10N=10 sites indicate that these operators generate a Lie algebra of type BnB_n (odd NN) or CnC_n (even NN) of rank n=⌈N/2⌉n=\lceil N/2\rceil, extended by a central element contained in the total-spin component Sz\mathrm{S}^z; all of these structural claims are conjectural. The problem is to establish the conjectured symmetry algebra rigorously for arbitrary NN: prove or refute that Σ±\Sigma^\pm annihilate every non-cyclic-invariant eigenstate, that Σ±\Sigma^\pm are representable through nested anticommutators of the total-spin operators with coefficients γk(N)\gamma_k(N), that the generated algebra is exactly BnB_n or CnC_n in the Chevalley–Serre sense, that Sz\mathrm{S}^z decomposes into Cartan elements plus a central element with coefficients αi(N)\alpha_i(N), and that the diagonal Sz=0S^z=0-sector operator Ξ\Xi commutes with the Hamiltonian for even NN. A 2025 proof that the chain has no local conserved charges settled the adjacent integrability question negatively, leaving the symmetry-algebra conjectures untouched and open.

Background

The Fredkin chain is a frustration-free spin-1/2 model (a model whose ground states simultaneously minimize every interaction term of the Hamiltonian) introduced by Salberger and Korepin (2017) as a spin-1/2 analogue of the spin-1 Motzkin chain (a sibling frustration-free model of nearest-neighbor-interacting spin-1 spins whose ground state is a uniform sum of Motzkin paths, lattice walks with steps of height 00 or ±1\pm 1 that never cross below the axis). Its Hamiltonian on NN sites with periodic boundary conditions is a cyclic sum of three-site densities,

H=∑j=1N(nj↑ Πj+1,j+2+Πj,j+1 nj+2↓),H=\sum_{j=1}^{N}\left(n^{\uparrow}_{j}\,\Pi_{j+1,j+2}+\Pi_{j,j+1}\,n^{\downarrow}_{j+2}\right),

where nj↑n^{\uparrow}_j and nj↓n^{\downarrow}_j project site jj onto spin up/down and Πj,j+1=12(1−Pj,j+1)\Pi_{j,j+1}=\tfrac{1}{2}(1-P_{j,j+1}) projects the two spins at sites j,j+1j,j+1 onto their spin-0 state (PP is the permutation operator swapping the two sites); the interaction descends from the Fredkin (controlled-SWAP) gate of reversible computation. With open boundaries the ground state is the uniform superposition of all Dyck paths — lattice walks of NN steps of height ±1\pm 1 that never cross below the axis — and its entanglement entropy grows logarithmically with subsystem size, violating the area law (the expectation that the entanglement entropy of a local-Hamiltonian ground state scale with the boundary of a subsystem rather than with its volume). With periodic boundary conditions, the case of interest here, the ground-state space is degenerate: a theorem of Salberger and Korepin states that for each eigenvalue Sz∈{−N/2,…,N/2}S^z\in\{-N/2,\dots,N/2\} of the third component of total spin there is exactly one zero-energy ground state with cyclic-shift (translation) eigenvalue C=1C=1, and for even NN there is one additional C=−1C=-1 ground state at Sz=0S^z=0. Each ground state is a sum over an equivalence class of Dyck-path configurations, two paths being equivalent when they differ by moving “peaks” (Fredkin moves) along the path. In the notation of the source, Ca,b(N)C_{a,b}(N) (with N=a+2k+bN=a+2k+b, k≥0k\ge 0) denotes the class of length-NN paths with steps of height ±1\pm 1 obtained by Fredkin moves from the reference path consisting of aa down steps, kk peaks and bb up steps; its basis vectors are SzS^z-eigenvectors with eigenvalue 12(b−a)\tfrac{1}{2}(b-a), and for even NN the class C0,0(N)C_{0,0}(N) is the standard Dyck class of walks that never cross below the axis.

Two exact symmetries are obvious: the cyclic shift operator C\mathrm{C} and Sz\mathrm{S}^z commute with HH. Pronko (2025) discovered a much larger hidden symmetry. He defined the two nonlocal operators

Σ±=∑r1,…,rN∈{−1,0,1}r1+⋯+rN=±1σ1r1⋯σNrN,\Sigma^{\pm}=\sum_{\substack{r_1,\dots,r_N\in\{-1,0,1\}\\ r_1+\dots+r_N=\pm 1}}\sigma_1^{r_1}\cdots\sigma_N^{r_N},

with σi0=1\sigma_i^0=1 and σi±1=σi±\sigma_i^{\pm 1}=\sigma_i^{\pm} the Pauli raising/lowering matrices (equivalently, the residue at λ=0\lambda=0 of ∏i=1N(λ−1σi±+1+λσi∓)\prod_{i=1}^{N}(\lambda^{-1}\sigma_i^{\pm}+1+\lambda\sigma_i^{\mp})), and proved rigorously (his Theorem 2) that [Σ±,H]=0[\Sigma^{\pm},H]=0 while Σ±\Sigma^{\pm} act as ladder operators on the ground states, mapping the ground state at a given SzS^z to that at Sz±1S^z\pm 1. All of his further structural findings are conjectural, based on exact computations for N≤10N\le 10:

  • Conjecture 1: Σ±\Sigma^{\pm} annihilate every eigenstate of HH that is not cyclic-invariant (i.e., with C≠1C\ne 1), so the hidden symmetry acts nontrivially only on the C=1C=1 subspace.
  • Conjecture 2: Σ±\Sigma^{\pm} admit a representation entirely in terms of the total-spin operators S±=∑jσj±\mathrm{S}^{\pm}=\sum_j\sigma_j^{\pm} via nested anticommutators,
Σ±=∑k=1⌈N/2⌉γk(aad S± aad S∓)k−1S±,\Sigma^{\pm}=\sum_{k=1}^{\lceil N/2\rceil}\gamma_k\left(\mathrm{aad}\,\mathrm{S}^{\pm}\,\mathrm{aad}\,\mathrm{S}^{\mp}\right)^{k-1}\mathrm{S}^{\pm},

where aad\mathrm{aad} is the anti-adjoint action, (aad a)b≡{a,b}=ab+ba(\mathrm{aad}\,a)b\equiv\{a,b\}=ab+ba, and the rational coefficients γk\gamma_k depend on NN (for example, for N=3N=3: Σ±=−14S±+18{S±,{S∓,S±}}\Sigma^{\pm}=-\tfrac{1}{4}\mathrm{S}^{\pm}+\tfrac{1}{8}\{\mathrm{S}^{\pm},\{\mathrm{S}^{\mp},\mathrm{S}^{\pm}\}\}).

  • Conjecture 3: the Lie algebra g\mathfrak{g} generated by Σ±\Sigma^{\pm} has rank n=⌈N/2⌉n=\lceil N/2\rceil and is of type Bn=so2n+1B_n=\mathfrak{so}_{2n+1} for odd N=2n−1N=2n-1 or Cn=sp2nC_n=\mathfrak{sp}_{2n} for even N=2nN=2n — the odd-dimensional orthogonal and the symplectic Lie algebras — meaning that Chevalley generators ei,fi,hie_i,f_i,h_i (the standard generators of a semisimple Lie algebra, defined by the commutation and Serre relations with a given Cartan matrix, the encoding of the algebra's Dynkin diagram) can be built from Σ±\Sigma^{\pm} and its iterated commutators and satisfy the Serre relations with the BnB_n/CnC_n Cartan matrix.
  • Conjecture 4: the symmetry algebra is extended by a central element pp contained in the total-spin component: Sz=p+∑i=1⌈N/2⌉αihi\mathrm{S}^{z}=p+\sum_{i=1}^{\lceil N/2\rceil}\alpha_i h_i, with hih_i the Cartan subalgebra elements (a basis of the maximal commuting subalgebra of g\mathfrak{g}) and coefficients αi\alpha_i depending on NN; the empirically observed patterns include α1=N/2\alpha_1=N/2 for N≥4N\ge 4 and α2=N−1\alpha_2=N-1 for N≥5N\ge 5.
  • For even NN, a further operator Ξ\Xi (equations (4.1)–(4.3) of that paper) — diagonal, acting only in the Sz=0S^z=0 sector with 0,+1,−10,+1,-1 entries organized by the Dyck-path classes Ck,k(N)C_{k,k}(N) — exchanges the two Sz=0S^z=0 ground states, anti-commutes with the cyclic shift (obvious from its form), and appears to commute with HH in all checks; the proof of [Ξ,H]=0[\Xi,H]=0 is lacking, and Ξ\Xi would explain a clearly visible double degeneracy of the whole spectrum.

These conjectures are the spin-1/2 analogues of those made earlier by the same author for the periodic spin-1 Motzkin chain, where the algebra is conjectured to be of CC-type with rank equal to the number of sites; remarkably, the central-element formula for even NN coincides exactly with the Motzkin-chain formula, suggesting a structure independent of the spin representation. The picture is known not to be an integrability statement in the usual sense: Fan et al. (2025) proved that the Fredkin chain, periodic or open, admits no local conserved charges (operators supported on a fixed finite number of adjacent sites that commute with HH) beyond the trivial ones, so the conjectured Bn/CnB_n/C_n symmetry is a genuinely nonlocal symmetry of a nonintegrable chain (one lacking the infinite family of conserved quantities characteristic of Yang–Baxter-integrable models). What is missing is any rigorous general-NN treatment of the conjectures themselves: everything rests on exact computations up to N=10N=10, and the intermediate equations needed to identify the Cartan matrix (solving quadratic systems for the Chevalley generators) already involve integers of roughly two hundred digits at N=10N=10, blocking direct numerical extension.

Problem Statement

Determine, with rigorous proof valid for arbitrary chain length NN, whether the conjectured hidden symmetry structure of the periodic Fredkin chain holds; specifically, prove or refute each of the following claims:

  1. (Conjecture 1 of Pronko 2025) The operators Σ±\Sigma^{\pm} annihilate all eigenstates of the periodic Fredkin Hamiltonian HH with cyclic-shift eigenvalue C≠1C\ne 1.
  2. (Conjecture 2) The operators Σ±\Sigma^{\pm} admit the representation Σ±=∑k=1⌈N/2⌉γk(aad S± aad S∓)k−1S±\Sigma^{\pm}=\sum_{k=1}^{\lceil N/2\rceil}\gamma_k(\mathrm{aad}\,\mathrm{S}^{\pm}\,\mathrm{aad}\,\mathrm{S}^{\mp})^{k-1}\mathrm{S}^{\pm} with coefficients γk\gamma_k depending on NN.
  3. (Conjecture 3) The Lie algebra g\mathfrak{g} generated by Σ±\Sigma^{\pm} has rank n=⌈N/2⌉n=\lceil N/2\rceil and is exactly of type BnB_n for odd N=2n−1N=2n-1 and CnC_n for even N=2nN=2n: Chevalley generators ei,fi,hie_i,f_i,h_i can be built from Σ±\Sigma^{\pm} and its iterated commutators and satisfy the Serre relations with the BnB_n/CnC_n Cartan matrix.
  4. (Conjecture 4) There exists a nontrivial central element p=Sz−∑i=1⌈N/2⌉αihip=\mathrm{S}^{z}-\sum_{i=1}^{\lceil N/2\rceil}\alpha_i h_i with respect to the symmetry algebra g\mathfrak{g} (i.e. [p,g]=0[p,\mathfrak{g}]=0), with coefficients αi\alpha_i depending on NN.
  5. (Ξ\Xi-commutativity) For even NN, the diagonal operator
Ξ=∑k=0N/2(−1)k∑ℓ1ℓ2…ℓN∈Ck,k(N)n1ℓ1n2ℓ2⋯nNℓN,\Xi=\sum_{k=0}^{N/2}(-1)^{k}\sum_{\ell_1\ell_2\dots\ell_N\in C_{k,k}(N)}n_1^{\ell_1}n_2^{\ell_2}\cdots n_N^{\ell_N},

with njℓjn_j^{\ell_j}, ℓj=↑,↓\ell_j=\uparrow,\downarrow, the projectors of site jj onto spin up/down — so that the entries of Ξ\Xi are (−1)k(-1)^k on the Dyck-path class Ck,k(N)C_{k,k}(N) and 00 elsewhere, Ξ\Xi acting only in the Sz=0S^z=0 sector (equation (4.3) of Pronko 2025) — satisfies [Ξ,H]=0[\Xi,H]=0.

The common objective uniting these claims is to replace the exact numerical evidence for N≤10N\le 10 with general theorems establishing the exact symmetry algebra of the periodic Fredkin chain and its action on the spectrum. Any method is admissible — direct operator algebra, representation-theoretic construction, or identification of the Σ±\Sigma^{\pm}-generated algebra inside a known algebraic structure acting on Dyck-path space — and, since each claim is a universal statement over NN, a single verified counterexample at any specific NN refutes the corresponding claim. A full structural answer is expected to illuminate the group-theoretical origin of the BB/CC dichotomy and the combinatorial (Dyck-path) meaning of the coefficient sequences; the completion boundary of the problem is the determination — proof or refutation — of claims (1)–(5).

References

  1. Andrei G. Pronko, Symmetries of the periodic Fredkin chain, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 58 (2025) 445204, doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ae1644, arXiv:2507.18291, https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18291
  2. Andrei G. Pronko, Periodic Motzkin chain: Ground states and symmetries, Nuclear Physics B 1017 (2025) 116963, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116963, arXiv:2504.00835, https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00835
  3. Wen-Ming Fan, Kun Hao, Yang-Yang Chen, Kun Zhang, Xiao-Hui Wang, Vladimir Korepin, Absence of local conserved charges of the Fredkin spin chain and its truncated versions, Physical Review B 112 (2025) 205124, doi:10.1103/2qhs-fz3g, arXiv:2509.04838, https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04838
  4. Shunsuke Sengoku, Haruki Watanabe, Absence of nontrivial local conserved quantities in a class of U(1)U(1)-symmetric spin-1 chains, arXiv:2608.17548 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17548
  5. Olof Salberger, Vladimir Korepin, Entangled spin chain (arXiv title: Fredkin Spin Chain), Reviews in Mathematical Physics 29 (2017) 1750031, doi:10.1142/S0129055X17500313, arXiv:1605.03842, https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.03842