Chayes and Lei (2006) introduced a random-cluster model on the triangular lattice with three-body interactions: each up-pointing triangle is restricted to five states (empty, one of three single edges, or full) with weight proportional to qc(ω)s∣s(ω)∣a∣a(ω)∣e∣e(ω)∣q^{c(ω)} s^{|s(ω)|} a^{|a(ω)|} e^{|e(ω)|}, where q≥1q ≥ 1 is the cluster weight. Its dual parameters satisfy s∗/e∗=qs/as^*/e^* = qs/a and a∗/e∗=q2e/aa^*/e^* = q^2 e/a, so the self-dual locus is a=qea = qe; in the region ae≥2s2ae ≥ 2s^2 the measures have positive correlations and any bond-density discontinuity must lie on the self-dual curve. The open problem, stated explicitly in the source, is to determine rigorously the order and location of the transition at self-duality: prove discontinuity for large qq, determine the rigorous dividing value of qq (conjecturally 4, but possibly reduced for three-body interactions), and prove that continuous transitions occur exactly on the self-dual curve.

Background

The Fortuin–Kasteleyn random-cluster representation connects qq-state Potts models to dependent bond percolation with cluster weight qq, and for the standard nearest-neighbor model on planar lattices the interplay of duality and positive correlations now yields a complete picture: the phase transition is continuous for 1≤q≤41 ≤ q ≤ 4 and discontinuous for q>4q > 4. None of that machinery applies directly to the model studied here. Chayes and Lei, 'Random Cluster Models on the Triangular Lattice' (Journal of Statistical Physics 122:647–670, 2006), analyze a random-cluster model with genuine three-body interactions, defined as follows. On the triangular lattice, a bond configuration ωω occupies edges only in patterns that leave each up-pointing triangle in one of five states: empty (EE), exactly one occupied edge (S1S_1, S2S_2, S3S_3 — with a common weight ss in the isotropic case), or all three edges occupied (AA). The weight of a configuration in a finite volume is W(ω)∝qc(ω)⋅s∣s(ω)∣⋅a∣a(ω)∣⋅e∣e(ω)∣W(ω) ∝ q^{c(ω)} · s^{|s(ω)|} · a^{|a(ω)|} · e^{|e(ω)|}, where c(ω)c(ω) is the number of connected components (boundary conditions enter only here), ∣s(ω)∣|s(ω)|, ∣a(ω)∣|a(ω)|, ∣e(ω)∣|e(ω)| count triangles in the single-edge, full, and empty states respectively, the nonnegative parameters satisfy a+3s+e=1a + 3s + e = 1, and the cluster weight satisfies q≥1q ≥ 1. Infinite-volume measures are extracted by the usual wired and free boundary-condition limits (all boundary vertices identified into one, respectively left disconnected). For integer q≥2q ≥ 2 this is the graphical representation of a Potts spin model with two- and three-site interactions, −βH=Σuptriangles[J(δσxσy+δσyσz+δσxσz)+κδσxσyσz]−βH = Σ_{up triangles} [J(δ_{σ_x σ_y} + δ_{σ_y σ_z} + δ_{σ_x σ_z}) + κ δ_{σ_x σ_y σ_z}] with J>0J > 0 and κκ of either sign, where the sum runs over the up-pointing triangles of the lattice and δδ denotes the Kronecker delta between adjacent spins σσ. Planar duality maps the parameters to (a∗,s∗,e∗)(a^*, s^*, e^*) with s∗/e∗=qs/as^*/e^* = qs/a and a∗/e∗=q2e/aa^*/e^* = q^2 e/a (Theorem 3.1 of the source, matching equation (15) of Wu and Lin 1980), so the self-dual locus is the curve a=qea = qe. The key analytic region is q≥1q ≥ 1 together with ae≥2s2ae ≥ 2s^2: there the measures satisfy the FKG (Fortuin–Kasteleyn–Ginibre) lattice condition, i.e. have positive correlations (Theorem 3.4), and this region is invariant under duality — a property that fails for the full eight-state representation, whose positivity region (g≥0g ≥ 0 in the spin parametrization, where A=3S2+g(1+S)3A = 3S^2 + g(1+S)^3, S=eJ−1S = e^J − 1, g=eκ−1g = e^κ − 1) is not mapped into itself by duality. Within the positive-correlation region the source proves: (i) Proposition 3.10 — any discontinuity of the bond density must occur on the self-dual curve a=qea = qe; (ii) Proposition 3.9 — at any self-dual point that is a continuity point of the bond density, the percolation probability vanishes and correlation functions admit power-law lower bounds. For q=1q = 1 (percolation) the corresponding Section 2 of the source already proves that the transition occurs at the self-dual point with critical behavior, under the analogous positivity condition (Theorem 2.5). In the realm of positive correlations, percolation is synonymous with magnetization, so the bond-density/percolation questions below coincide with the order-of-transition questions for the associated Potts spin model. What remains open, explicitly recorded in the source's introduction, Section 3.4, and conclusion: the order of the transition at self-dual points for q>1q > 1, the rigorous dividing value of qq (the exact-solution analysis of Baxter, Temperley and Ashley 1978 suggests q=4q = 4 as on the square lattice, but the paper itself notes evidence for a reduced dividing value in a related square-lattice three-body model), a rigorous proof of discontinuity for large qq (expected to require adapting reflection-positivity methods, since 'certain modifications will be needed'), and the fact that continuous transitions occur exactly on the self-dual line rather than merely exhibiting criticality there. The later literature (Duminil-Copin–Sidoravicius–Tassion 2016; Duminil-Copin–Gagnebin–Harel–Manolescu–Tassion 2021; Ray–Spinka 2020; Duminil-Copin–Li–Manolescu 2018) settles the continuous/discontinuous dichotomy only for the standard nearest-neighbor model, on the square lattice and isoradial graphs; its proofs use structure absent here — a duality-invariant ferromagnetic region in the full state space and, in places, integrable inputs — and the source notes that the dual of the ferromagnetic region is not ferromagnetic in the full eight-state space, and that BK-type inequalities do not apply in the present Potts setting.

Problem Statement

Setting. On the infinite triangular lattice, consider the random-cluster model of Chayes–Lei: bond configurations ωω whose restriction to each up-pointing triangle is one of five states — empty (EE), exactly one occupied edge (S1S_1, S2S_2, S3S_3), or all three edges occupied (AA) — with finite-volume weight W(ω)∝qc(ω)⋅s∣s(ω)∣⋅a∣a(ω)∣⋅e∣e(ω)∣W(ω) ∝ q^{c(ω)} · s^{|s(ω)|} · a^{|a(ω)|} · e^{|e(ω)|}, where c(ω)c(ω) is the number of connected components (this is where boundary conditions enter) and ∣s(ω)∣|s(ω)|, ∣a(ω)∣|a(ω)|, ∣e(ω)∣|e(ω)| count up-pointing triangles in the single-edge states S1,S2,S3S_1, S_2, S_3, the full state AA, and the empty state EE, respectively. The parameters satisfy a,s,e≥0a, s, e ≥ 0 and a+3s+e=1a + 3s + e = 1, and the cluster weight satisfies q≥1q ≥ 1. Infinite-volume measures are obtained by the usual wired and free boundary-condition limits. The dual parameters satisfy s∗/e∗=qs/as^*/e^* = qs/a and a∗/e∗=q2e/aa^*/e^* = q^2 e/a; the self-dual locus is a=qea = qe. Throughout, work in the isotropic case (s1=s2=s3=ss_1 = s_2 = s_3 = s) and inside the positive-correlation region q≥1q ≥ 1, ae≥2s2ae ≥ 2s^2, where the FKG lattice condition holds, any bond-density discontinuity must lie on a=qea = qe (Proposition 3.10 of the source), and at self-dual continuity points the percolation probability — the probability that the origin belongs to an infinite occupied cluster — vanishes, with power-law lower bounds on correlations (Proposition 3.9). In this region percolation coincides with magnetization of the associated Potts spin model with two- and three-site interactions.

Problem. Determine the order and location of the percolation/magnetization phase transition at self-duality, specifically:

(1) Order. For each q≥1q ≥ 1, decide whether the bond density (the infinite-volume expected fraction of occupied edges) is continuous or discontinuous at the self-dual curve a=qea = qe, as the parameters traverse any FKG-monotone curve (a curve in parameter space along which the measure is monotone increasing) within the region that crosses that locus. In particular, prove that for all sufficiently large qq the transition is discontinuous — a jump in bond density and coexistence of multiple infinite-volume states at self-duality.

(2) Dividing value. Determine the rigorous dividing value qcq_c for this model: the threshold such that the transition is continuous for 1≤q<qc1 ≤ q < q_c and discontinuous for q>qcq > q_c (or prove that no single threshold exists, exhibiting the correct classification as a function of qq — and, at fixed qq, of the self-dual point, if the order of the transition is not the same at every point of the locus). The Baxter–Temperley–Ashley exact-solution argument suggests qc=4q_c = 4, as in the nearest-neighbor model, but this is unproved for the three-body model and the source itself records evidence for a reduced dividing value in a related square-lattice three-body model; the value must be derived for this model, not imported. The already-settled endpoint q=1q = 1 (percolation, continuous) is excluded from what needs proof.

(3) Location. Prove that whenever the transition is continuous it occurs exactly on the self-dual curve a=qea = qe — i.e., that there is no percolation strictly below self-duality in the continuous regime, so the percolation threshold and the self-dual crossing coincide for every FKG-monotone curve in the region — or else rigorously locate where continuous transitions occur.

Completion boundary. The problem is solved when the order of the transition at self-duality is determined for every q≥1q ≥ 1 in the region — equivalently, (1) and (2) are settled with whatever value or structure of qcq_c is true — together with (3) in the continuous cases. A proof of discontinuity for large qq alone, or of continuity on an interval of qq alone, is substantial partial progress but not a completion.

Scope note (per the source's own remarks). The source additionally poses extension directions that are source-faithful follow-on problems but lie outside this problem's completion boundary: extending correlation control beyond ae≥2s2ae ≥ 2s^2 to the entire self-dual curve; anisotropic triangle parameters (unequal single-edge weights s1,s2,s3s_1, s_2, s_3); and necessary-and-sufficient duality-invariant positivity criteria for the full eight-state representation including double-edge configurations.

References

  1. L. Chayes and H. K. Lei, 'Random Cluster Models on the Triangular Lattice', Journal of Statistical Physics 122:647–670 (2006). DOI 10.1007/s10955-005-8078-7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-005-8078-7; arXiv:cond-mat/0508254, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0508254. (Primary source.)
  2. R. J. Baxter, H. N. V. Temperley and S. E. Ashley, 'Triangular Potts model at its transition temperature, and related models', Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 358:535–559 (1978). DOI 10.1098/rspa.1978.0026, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1978.0026.
  3. F. Y. Wu and K. Y. Lin, 'On the triangular Potts model with two- and three-site interactions', Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 13:629–636 (1980). DOI 10.1088/0305-4470/13/2/026, https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/13/2/026.
  4. H. Duminil-Copin, V. Sidoravicius and V. Tassion, 'Continuity of the Phase Transition for Planar Random-Cluster and Potts Models with 1 ≤ q ≤ 4', Communications in Mathematical Physics 349:47–107 (2016). DOI 10.1007/s00220-016-2759-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-016-2759-8; arXiv:1505.04159, https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04159.
  5. H. Duminil-Copin, M. Gagnebin, E. Harel, I. Manolescu and V. Tassion, 'Discontinuity of the phase transition for the planar random-cluster and Potts models with q > 4', Annales scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure 54:1363–1413 (2021). DOI 10.24033/asens.2485, https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.2485; arXiv:1611.09877, https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09877.
  6. G. Ray and Y. Spinka, 'A Short Proof of the Discontinuity of Phase Transition in the Planar Random-Cluster Model with q > 4', Communications in Mathematical Physics 378:1977–1988 (2020). DOI 10.1007/s00220-020-03827-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-020-03827-9; arXiv:1904.10557, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10557.
  7. H. Duminil-Copin, J.-H. Li and I. Manolescu, 'Universality for the random-cluster model on isoradial graphs', Electronic Journal of Probability 23, paper no. 96, 70 pp. (2018). DOI 10.1214/18-EJP223, https://doi.org/10.1214/18-EJP223; arXiv:1711.02338, https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.02338.
  8. B. Bollobás and O. Riordan, 'Percolation on Self-Dual Polygon Configurations', in An Irregular Mind: Szemerédi is 70, Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies 21, Springer, pp. 131–217 (2010). DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-14444-8_3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14444-8_3; arXiv:1001.4674, https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.4674.
  9. J. van den Berg and A. Gandolfi, 'BK-type inequalities and generalized random-cluster representations', Probability Theory and Related Fields 157:157–181 (2013). DOI 10.1007/s00440-012-0452-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-012-0452-1; arXiv:1203.3665, https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.3665.
  10. S. Wang, W. Zhang and C. Ding, 'Percolation of the site random-cluster model by Monte Carlo method', Physical Review E 92:022127 (2015). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.022127, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.022127; arXiv:1411.4408, https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4408.