Trimodal amplitude-modulation atomic force microscopy (Ebeling, Eslami and Solares, ACS Nano 2013) drives three cantilever eigenmodes as independent controls for topography, indentation-depth modulation and compositional contrast, and can reveal nanoparticles buried tens of nanometers beneath soft polymer surfaces; however, it remains a qualitative contrast technique. The open problem is to convert this demonstrated depth-modulation capability into a quantitative subsurface metrology: a validated forward model of the coupled multimode dynamics including adhesion, capillary and thin-film forces and realistic viscoelastic contact mechanics, together with an inversion that turns the measured amplitude, phase and frequency-shift channels at controlled indentation depths into absolute local material-property maps of known effective depth, with experimental validation on reference soft-matter samples and non-destructive operation as desirable corroborating steps. Quantitative mapping is mature only for surfaces, quantitative subsurface reconstruction exists only for rigid materials, and soft-matter subsurface imaging remains at the feature-detection level, so the core problem is open.

Background

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) maps a surface by raster-scanning a sharp tip mounted on a microcantilever. In tapping mode (amplitude modulation, AM), the cantilever oscillates at its fundamental flexural resonance and a feedback loop holds the oscillation amplitude at a setpoint by adjusting tip height; the phase lag of the oscillation relative to the drive provides a contrast channel sensitive to the mechanical character of the material. A cantilever also has higher flexural eigenmodes (resonances with progressively larger effective force constants), and multifrequency AFM drives several of them simultaneously: in bimodal AFM the first eigenmode handles topography while a higher eigenmode, driven open-loop (OL, without feedback) or with frequency modulation (FM, tracking of the resonance-frequency shift), supplies compositional contrast (Garcia and Herruzo, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012). Ebeling, Eslami and Solares (ACS Nano 2013) extended this to a trimodal scheme in which three eigenmodes act as three largely independent control 'knobs': the first for topography, the second as the compositional-contrast channel, and the highest driven eigenmode as a knob setting the peak tip indentation during each tip–sample impact, and hence the probing depth. In experiments on ultrathin films of PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane, a soft silicone elastomer) containing buried glass nanoparticles, raising the third-eigenmode free amplitude from 0 to 27 nm reduced the apparent film height from about 34 nm to about 10 nm and brought single buried nanoparticles (mean diameter about 14 nm) into view in the second-eigenmode phase channel with roughly 30 nm lateral resolution; the indentation was reversible and the simplest control architecture (AM-OL-OL) was stable. The demonstration was, however, qualitative. The paper's simulations used a repulsive standard-linear-solid contact model (the simplest spring–dashpot combination exhibiting creep and stress relaxation) and omitted adhesion, capillary and thin-fluid-film forces; tip–sample forces are strongly nonlinear and depend on the history of preceding impacts, and the measured amplitude, phase and frequency-shift signals are averages over many nonidentical impacts whose penetration is neither spatially uniform nor precisely controlled. Converting these observables into absolute material properties at a known depth was therefore not established. Related AFM subsurface approaches — contact-resonance AFM (tracking the resonance frequency of the cantilever while in continuous contact, which responds to tip–sample contact stiffness), ultrasonic AFM variants and force-volume spectroscopy — likewise detect buried features mostly qualitatively, and quantitative nanomechanical mapping by bimodal AFM is mature only for the surface, not the subsurface, of soft matter (Benaglia et al. 2018, 2019; Garcia 2020).

Problem Statement

Establish quantitative, depth-controlled subsurface compositional mapping of soft matter by trimodal (multifrequency) atomic force microscopy, as articulated in the outlook of Ebeling, Eslami and Solares (2013). The core open problem is to convert the demonstrated qualitative trimodal depth-modulation capability into a quantitative, generalizable subsurface AFM metrology for soft matter: (i) formulate and validate a forward model of the coupled three-eigenmode cantilever dynamics that includes the interaction physics omitted in the original demonstration — adhesion, capillary and thin-fluid-film forces, and contact mechanics beyond a linear-standard-solid repulsive term — for viscoelastic, compliant matrices; and (ii) develop an inversion methodology that converts the measured observables (amplitude, phase and/or frequency-shift channels of the contrast eigenmode, acquired at multiple indentation depths set by the depth-control eigenmode) into absolute local material properties — for example elastic moduli or viscoelastic storage and loss components — with quantified uncertainty and a known effective probing depth, where meeting this core requires that the coupled-dynamics model reproduce the multimode dynamics in the established and limiting cases for which reference behavior is known and that the inversion demonstrably recover ground-truth properties fixed independently of the inversion itself, with the achieved recovery accuracy over a range of depths and material contrasts reported quantitatively.

Experimental validation of the model-plus-inversion on reference soft-matter samples with buried features of independently known properties and depths (for example, particles or layers in a polymer matrix), demonstrating agreement between recovered and reference values over a range of depths and material contrasts while remaining non-destructive to sample and probe, and characterization of the operational envelope of the metrology — the stability of the eigenmode control architecture (AM/OL/FM combinations), the sensitivity-versus-stability tradeoff of the contrast eigenmode at small free amplitudes, and the scan-speed versus depth-resolution and tip-wear tradeoffs — are desirable corroborating steps consistent with the secondary items of the source's outlook, not jointly necessary completion requirements for the core problem above.

References

  1. Daniel Ebeling, Babak Eslami, Santiago De Jesus Solares (2013), 'Visualizing the Subsurface of Soft Matter: Simultaneous Topographical Imaging, Depth Modulation, and Compositional Mapping with Triple Frequency Atomic Force Microscopy', ACS Nano 7(11):10387–10396, DOI:10.1021/nn404845q, https://doi.org/10.1021/nn404845q
  2. Ricardo Garcia, Elena T. Herruzo (2012), 'The emergence of multifrequency force microscopy', Nature Nanotechnology 7:217–226, DOI:10.1038/nnano.2012.38, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.38
  3. Babak Eslami, Daniel Ebeling, Santiago D. Solares (2014), 'Trade-offs in sensitivity and sampling depth in bimodal atomic force microscopy and comparison to the trimodal case', Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 5:1144–1151, DOI:10.3762/bjnano.5.125, https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.5.125
  4. Santiago D. Solares (2014), 'Probing viscoelastic surfaces with bimodal tapping-mode atomic force microscopy: Underlying physics and observables for a standard linear solid model', Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 5:1649–1663, DOI:10.3762/bjnano.5.176, https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.5.176
  5. Santiago D. Solares, Sangmin An, Christian J. Long (2014), 'Multi-frequency tapping-mode atomic force microscopy beyond three eigenmodes in ambient air', Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 5:1637–1648, DOI:10.3762/bjnano.5.175, https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.5.175
  6. Sangmin An, Santiago D. Solares, Sergio Santos, Daniel Ebeling (2014), 'Energy transfer between eigenmodes in multimodal atomic force microscopy', Nanotechnology 25:475701, DOI:10.1088/0957-4484/25/47/475701, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/47/475701
  7. Santiago D. Solares (2015), 'Trimodal Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy. Simultaneous 4D Mapping of Conservative and Dissipative Probe-Sample Interactions of Energy-Relevant Materials', DOE project report, DOI:10.2172/1215400, https://doi.org/10.2172/1215400
  8. A. P. Perrino, Y. K. Ryu, C. A. Amo, M. P. Morales, R. Garcia (2016), 'Subsurface imaging of silicon nanowire circuits and iron oxide nanoparticles with sub-10 nm spatial resolution', Nanotechnology 27:275703, DOI:10.1088/0957-4484/27/27/275703, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/27/275703
  9. Gheorghe Stan, Ebony Mays, Hui Jae Yoo, Sean W. King (2016), 'Nanoscale tomographic reconstruction of the subsurface mechanical properties of low-k high-aspect ratio patterns', Nanotechnology 27:485706, DOI:10.1088/0957-4484/27/48/485706, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/48/485706
  10. Simone Benaglia, Victor G. Gisbert, Alma P. Perrino, Carlos A. Amo, Ricardo Garcia (2018), 'Fast and high-resolution mapping of elastic properties of biomolecules and polymers with bimodal AFM', Nature Protocols 13(12):2890–2907, DOI:10.1038/s41596-018-0070-1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0070-1
  11. Simone Benaglia, Carlos A. Amo, Ricardo Garcia (2019), 'Fast, quantitative and high resolution mapping of viscoelastic properties with bimodal AFM', Nanoscale 11(32):15289–15297, DOI:10.1039/c9nr04396a, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr04396a
  12. Weijie Zhang, Yuhang Chen, Yaoping Hou, Wenting Wang, Huarong Liu, Lei Zheng (2019), 'Subsurface imaging of rigid particles buried in a polymer matrix based on atomic force microscopy mechanical sensing', Ultramicroscopy 207:112832, DOI:10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.112832, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.112832
  13. Ricardo Garcia (2020), 'Nanomechanical mapping of soft materials with the atomic force microscope: methods, theory and applications', Chemical Society Reviews 49:5850–5884, DOI:10.1039/d0cs00318b, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00318b
  14. Chengfu Ma, Walter Arnold (2020), 'Nanoscale ultrasonic subsurface imaging with atomic force microscopy', Journal of Applied Physics 128:170901, DOI:10.1063/5.0019042, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0019042
  15. Hossein J. Sharahi, Mohsen Janmaleki, Laurene Tetard, Seonghwan Kim, Hamed Sadeghian, Gerard J. Verbiest (2021), 'Acoustic subsurface-atomic force microscopy: Three-dimensional imaging at the nanoscale', Journal of Applied Physics 129:030901, DOI:10.1063/5.0035151, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0035151
  16. Ilya A. Morozov (2021), 'Atomic force microscopy nanoindentation kinetics and subsurface visualization of soft inhomogeneous polymer', Microscopy Research and Technique 84(9):1959–1966, DOI:10.1002/jemt.23751, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23751
  17. Gheorghe Stan, Cristian V. Ciobanu, Sean W. King (2022), 'Resolving the Subsurface Structure and Elastic Modulus of Layered Films via Contact Resonance Atomic Force Microscopy', ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 14(49):55238–55248, DOI:10.1021/acsami.2c17962, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c17962
  18. Amir Farokh Payam, Ali Passian (2023), 'Imaging beyond the surface region: Probing hidden materials via atomic force microscopy', Science Advances 9(26):eadg8292, DOI:10.1126/sciadv.adg8292, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg8292
  19. Pengtao Lou, Zhuanfang Bi, Guangyi Shang (2024), 'Accurate detection of subsurface microcavity by bimodal atomic force microscopy', Nanotechnology 35(35):355704, DOI:10.1088/1361-6528/ad544e, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ad544e
  20. Mingyu Duan, Zhongwei Li, Hui Li, Yuan-Liu Chen (2026), 'Quantitative contact-resonance AFM reconstruction for artifact-reduced modulus and subsurface imaging on textured surfaces', Ultramicroscopy 285:114403, DOI:10.1016/j.ultramic.2026.114403, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2026.114403