Schulte, Lisdat, Schmidt, Sterr and Hammerer (Nature Communications 11, 5955, 2020) showed with an analytic model of the closed servo loop of an optical atomic clock that, for cyclic Ramsey interrogation of a single ensemble with dead time and Brownian local-oscillator noise, spin squeezing improves clock stability only below a critical atom number (about 1000 for a strontium lattice clock with current lasers, and below 100,000 even with a tenfold better laser). They posed four linked open questions: incorporating excess anti-squeezing from imperfect state preparation into the colored-noise closed-loop model; whether alternative interrogation and estimation protocols (Rabi, adaptive or nonlinear/Bayesian estimators, continuous weak measurement) escape the critical-size limitation; whether the limitation persists in multi-ensemble, cascaded, or dead-time-free (anti-synchronized) architectures with realistic laser noise and dead time; and the experimental demonstration of a stability improvement from squeezed states in a dead-time-free dual-ensemble clock. Later work has resolved parts of this landscape: optimal Bayesian and variational estimators for single-ensemble closed loops (2021-2025), squeezing-enhanced synchronous clock comparisons reaching 1.1×10−181.1\times10^{-18} precision with 2.0(2) dB gain beyond the standard quantum limit (2023-2025), and zero-dead-time clock operation at 10−1910^{-19} stability with uncorrelated atoms (2025). The surviving open core is the subject of this record: a closed-loop theory of squeezing benefit that includes state-preparation imperfections and multi-ensemble/dead-time-free architectures, and its experimental validation in an anti-synchronized clock.

Background

An optical atomic clock ties the frequency of a local oscillator (LO) - an ultra-stable laser - to a narrow reference transition in atoms. In each operation cycle the LO interrogates the atoms, typically by a Ramsey sequence: a first pulse prepares an atomic superposition, during a free interrogation time TT frequency errors of the LO accumulate as a phase on that superposition, and a second pulse converts the phase into a population difference; a servo loop then feeds the measured frequency error back to keep the LO on resonance. Clock instability is quantified by the Allan deviation σy(τ)\sigma_y(\tau) of the fractional frequency fluctuations at averaging time τ\tau. Its fundamental floor for uncorrelated atoms is the standard quantum limit (SQL), set by quantum projection noise (QPN) - the binomial fluctuation of projecting NN independent atoms onto a measurement outcome - giving σy∝1/NTτ\sigma_y \propto 1/\sqrt{N T \tau}. Spin squeezing, a form of many-body entanglement that redistributes collective-spin fluctuations so that the measured quadrature carries reduced noise while the conjugate quadrature carries increased noise (anti-squeezing), can beat the SQL; the metrological gain is conventionally quantified by the Wineland parameter, the ratio of squeezed-state to coherent-state phase sensitivity at equal contrast, expressed in dB. Squeezed states of clock atoms are produced by quantum non-demolition (QND) measurement - an off-resonant probe of the collective spin that yields information while preserving the state - or by atom-atom interactions.

Two realities of clock operation complicate this quantum-enhancement picture. First, the LO has colored (approximately Brownian) frequency noise: the phase accumulated during interrogation diffuses, so extending TT eventually drives the servo out of lock (the laser coherence-time limit) and produces phase ambiguities known as fringe hops. Second, atoms cannot be interrogated continuously - state preparation and readout occupy part of each cycle - so the LO is intermittently unreferenced by the atoms; the aliasing of LO noise into the measurement band caused by this dead time is the Dick effect. Schulte et al. (2020) constructed an analytic model of this closed servo loop for cyclic Ramsey interrogation of a single atomic ensemble and found that squeezing improves stability only below a critical atom number NcritN_{\rm crit}: roughly 10310^3 for a strontium optical lattice clock with current lasers, and below 10510^5 even with a tenfold improvement in laser stability. Above NcritN_{\rm crit}, the interrogation time compatible with squeezing becomes short enough that LO noise dominates and erases the quantum advantage; non-scalable small ensembles such as ion clocks, in contrast, can already benefit.

The analysis rested on two idealizations whose removal defines the open problem. First, state preparation was assumed unitary; yet non-unitary squeezing operations leave excess anti-squeezing that rotation errors convert into added phase noise, which Braverman, Kawasaki and Vuletic (2018) showed degrades clock stability in the white-noise limit - but this effect has not been incorporated into the closed-loop model with realistic colored laser noise. Second, only the single-ensemble cyclic Ramsey architecture was treated. Architectures designed to defeat LO noise exist and are partially demonstrated: multi-ensemble or cascaded clocks, in which several atomic ensembles with different interrogation times or roles share one LO (proposed by Borregaard and Sorensen, 2013, among others), and dead-time-free operation, in which two ensembles are interrogated anti-synchronously (interleaved, out of phase) so that the LO is referenced continuously - demonstrated without entanglement by Schioppo et al. (2017). Experiments established the ingredients of an entangled clock - notably squeezing directly on an optical clock transition via cavity QND measurement (Pedrozo-Penafiel et al. 2020) - but converting squeezing into improved clock stability inside a realistic closed loop remains the open target.

Problem Statement

Under which operating conditions does spin squeezing improve the stability of an optical atomic clock running as a closed servo loop with realistic colored local-oscillator noise and dead time? The source work poses this as four linked open directions toward a quantitative, experimentally validated account of the operational regime in which entanglement enhances clock stability:

(i) Extend the closed-loop stability model to imperfect state preparation: incorporate excess anti-squeezing (with its associated contrast loss and rotation-error noise) together with realistic colored laser noise, and quantify how the critical atom number and the optimal achievable stability change relative to the ideal-preparation analysis.

(ii) Within the same closed-loop framework, determine whether alternative interrogation and estimation protocols - Rabi interrogation, adaptive or nonlinear (e.g. Bayesian) estimators, and continuous weak measurement - are subject to the same critical-ensemble-size restriction found for cyclic Ramsey interrogation, or can circumvent it.

(iii) Extend the analysis to multi-ensemble, cascaded, and dead-time-free (anti-synchronized) architectures, explicitly including dead time and realistic LO noise, and establish whether a critical ensemble size persists in these architectures and under what conditions squeezing regains an advantage for arbitrarily large ensembles.

(iv) Demonstrate experimentally a stability improvement from squeezed states in a dead-time-free (anti-synchronized) dual-ensemble clock, a setting whose underlying method is already established with uncorrelated atoms.

A complete answer states the clock stability, or equivalently the metrological gain in dB relative to the coherent-state standard quantum limit under identical conditions, as a function of atom number, LO noise spectrum, dead-time fraction, and squeezing/anti-squeezing parameters for the baseline single-ensemble cyclic-Ramsey protocol and for each protocol and architecture named in directions (ii) and (iii), recovering the single-ensemble cyclic-Ramsey result of Schulte et al. as the limiting case; for direction (iv), which calls for an experimental demonstration, a quantitative design and feasibility analysis of the anti-synchronized dual-ensemble clock - its predicted stability curve under those same parameters and the operating conditions and resources under which squeezing is expected to improve stability - discharges the direction in this record. All four directions (i)-(iv) are required, direction (ii) included: where a direction spans sub-questions already settled in the cited literature - for (ii), the optimal Bayesian and variational estimators for the single-ensemble closed loop - the settled sub-questions are reported as the baseline rather than re-derived, and the sub-questions still open within that direction must be resolved. Each component removes a specific idealization (perfect preparation, one protocol, one ensemble, theory only) standing between the existing closed-loop model and a realistic, validated prediction of squeezing benefit.

References

  1. M. Schulte, C. Lisdat, P. O. Schmidt, U. Sterr, K. Hammerer, 'Prospects and challenges for squeezing-enhanced optical atomic clocks', Nature Communications 11, 5955 (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19403-7; arXiv:1911.00882. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19403-7
  2. B. Braverman, A. Kawasaki, V. Vuletic, 'Impact of non-unitary spin squeezing on atomic clock performance', New Journal of Physics 20, 103019 (2018). DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aae563. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aae563
  3. M. Schioppo, R. C. Brown, W. F. McGrew, N. Hinkley, R. J. Fasano, K. Beloy, T. H. Yoon, G. Milani, D. Nicolodi, J. A. Sherman, N. B. Phillips, C. W. Oates, A. D. Ludlow, 'Ultrastable optical clock with two cold-atom ensembles', Nature Photonics 11, 48-52 (2017). DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.231. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.231
  4. J. Borregaard, A. S. Sorensen, 'Efficient atomic clocks operated with several atomic ensembles', Physical Review Letters 111, 090802 (2013). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.090802. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.090802
  5. E. Pedrozo-Penafiel, S. Colombo, C. Shu, A. F. Adiyatullin, Z. Li, E. Mendez, B. Braverman, A. Kawasaki, D. Akamatsu, Y. Xiao, V. Vuletic, 'Entanglement on an optical atomic-clock transition', Nature 588, 414-418 (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-3006-1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3006-1
  6. William J. Eckner, Nelson Darkwah Oppong, Alec Cao, Aaron W. Young, William R. Milner, John M. Robinson, Jun Ye, Adam M. Kaufman, 'Realizing spin squeezing with Rydberg interactions in an optical clock', Nature 621, 734-739 (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06360-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06360-6
  7. John M. Robinson, Maya Miklos, Yee Ming Tso, Colin J. Kennedy, Tobias Bothwell, Dhruv Kedar, James K. Thompson, Jun Ye, 'Direct comparison of two spin-squeezed optical clock ensembles at the 10−1710^{-17} level', Nature Physics 20, 208-213 (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41567-023-02310-1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02310-1
  8. Y. A. Yang, Maya Miklos, Yee Ming Tso, Stella Kraus, Joonseok Hur, Jun Ye, 'Clock precision beyond the standard quantum limit at the 10−1810^{-18} level', Physical Review Letters 135, 193202 (2025). DOI: 10.1103/6v93-whwq; arXiv:2505.04538. https://doi.org/10.1103/6v93-whwq
  9. R. Kaubruegger, D. V. Vasilyev, M. Schulte, K. Hammerer, P. Zoller, 'Quantum variational optimization of Ramsey interferometry and atomic clocks', Physical Review X 11, 041045 (2021). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.041045. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.041045
  10. T. Kielinski, K. Hammerer, 'Bayesian frequency metrology with optimal Ramsey interferometry in optical atomic clocks', Reports on Progress in Physics 88, 124001 (2025). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/ae213d; arXiv:2505.04287. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ae213d
  11. Daniel Benedicto Orenes, Robert J. Sewell, Jerome Lodewyck, Morgan W. Mitchell, 'Improving short-term stability in optical lattice clocks by quantum nondemolition measurement', Physical Review Letters 128, 153201 (2022). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.153201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.153201
  12. Weidong Li, Shuyuan Wu, Augusto Smerzi, Luca Pezze, 'Improved absolute clock stability by the joint interrogation of two atomic ensembles', Physical Review A 105, 053116 (2022). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.053116. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.053116
  13. Deshui Yu, Shougang Zhang, Jingbiao Chen, 'Clock laser noise constraining synchronous comparison of spin-squeezed optical clocks', Physics Letters A 552, 130634 (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2025.130634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2025.130634
  14. Xiao-Yong Liu, Peng Liu, Jie Li, Yu-Chen Zhang, Yuan-Bo Wang, Zhi-Peng Jia, Xiang Zhang, Xian-Qing Zhu, De-Quan Kong, Wen-Lan Song, Guo-Zhen Niu, Yu-Meng Yang, Pei-Jun Feng, Xiang-Pei Liu, Xing-Yang Cui, Ping Xu, Xiao Jiang, Juan Yin, Sheng-Kai Liao, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Han-Ning Dai, Yu-Ao Chen, Jian-Wei Pan, 'Zero-dead-time strontium lattice clock with a stability at the 10−1910^{-19} level', Physical Review Letters 135, 263402 (2025). DOI: 10.1103/zbpb-6qxb; arXiv:2509.15100. https://doi.org/10.1103/zbpb-6qxb
  15. Robin Corgier, Marco Malitesta, Augusto Smerzi, Luca Pezze, 'Quantum-enhanced differential atom interferometers and clocks with spin-squeezing swapping', Quantum 7, 965 (2023). DOI: 10.22331/q-2023-03-30-965. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-03-30-965
  16. Raphael Kaubruegger, Adam M. Kaufman, 'Progress in quantum metrology and applications for optical atomic clocks', arXiv:2512.02202 (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02202
  17. Simone Colombo, Edwin Pedrozo-Penafiel, Vladan Vuletic, 'Entanglement-enhanced optical atomic clocks', Applied Physics Letters 121, 210502 (2022). DOI: 10.1063/5.0121372. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0121372
  18. Jungeng Zhou, Jiahao Huang, Jinye Wei, Chengyin Han, Chaohong Lee, 'Credible-interval-based adaptive Bayesian quantum frequency estimation for entanglement-enhanced atomic clocks', Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 69, 230312 (2026). DOI: 10.1007/s11433-025-2840-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2840-8