Near graphene's charge-neutrality point (CNP), charged-impurity disorder breaks the sheet into coexisting electron and hole puddles. Cho and Fuhrer (Phys. Rev. B 77, 081402(R) (2008)) showed that the magnetoresistivity near the CNP is well described by the exact effective-medium result for an equal-mobility electron-hole mixture only after adding an unexplained field-independent conductivity term σxx,1≈0.8 e2/h\sigma_{xx,1}\approx0.8\,e^{2}/h, that the description fails in the quantum regime (B≳0.8B\gtrsim0.8 T, T≲100T\lesssim100 K) where ρxx\rho_{xx} saturates near 0.4 h/e20.4\,h/e^{2} with σxy≈0\sigma_{xy}\approx0, and proposed — without proof — localized ν=+2\nu=+2 and ν=−2\nu=-2 quantum Hall puddles as the origin. In the subsequent literature, the puddle picture is confirmed for disordered samples, homogeneous symmetry-broken (ferromagnetic/canted-antiferromagnetic) ν=0\nu=0 states with counterpropagating spin-filtered edge conduction are established in clean samples and now imaged directly, but a quantitative microscopic theory of CNP magnetotransport through the classical-to-quantum crossover, including the residual field-independent term, and a spatially resolved test of the puddle picture in the quantum regime on disorder-dominated samples remain open.

Background

Graphene's electronic spectrum is that of massless Dirac fermions: the conduction and valence bands touch at the Dirac point, where the density of states vanishes. Gating a graphene device tunes the carrier density nn through this point, called the charge-neutrality point (CNP); experiments consistently show a finite minimum conductivity σxx,min\sigma_{xx,min} of order 4 e2/h4\,e^{2}/h there instead of an insulating state. A widely accepted explanation is that long-range charged-impurity disorder shifts the local Dirac point up and down across the sample, so that at zero average density the sheet breaks into mesoscopic electron-doped and hole-doped regions ("electron-hole puddles"), directly imaged by scanning single-electron-transistor microscopy (imaging with a nanoscale ultrasensitive charge sensor) and by scanning-tunneling microscopy (puddles of order 20-30 nm on SiO2_2). In a perpendicular magnetic field BB this spatially inhomogeneous two-carrier system has unusual magnetotransport. For a uniform conductor containing both electrons and holes of equal mobility μ\mu (the "two-fluid" model), ρxx(B)\rho_{xx}(B) grows as 1+(μB)21+(\mu B)^{2}. For a macroscopic mixture of electron and hole regions of equal mobility and equal concentration, exact effective-medium theory (EMT; the theory of transport in spatially inhomogeneous composites, here the exact solution of Guttal and Stroud) instead predicts σxx(B)=σxx(0)(1+(μB)2)−1/2\sigma_{xx}(B)=\sigma_{xx}(0)(1+(\mu B)^{2})^{-1/2} with vanishing Hall conductivity σxy=0\sigma_{xy}=0, i.e. a resistivity growing only linearly in BB at high field. Cho and Fuhrer measured ρxx(B)\rho_{xx}(B) and ρxy(B)\rho_{xy}(B) near the CNP of graphene on SiO2_2 from 1.6 to 300 K and found the two-fluid model fails while the inhomogeneous EMT form fits well — but only after adding a phenomenological field-independent term: σxx(B)=σxx,0(1+(μB)2)−1/2+σxx,1\sigma_{xx}(B)=\sigma_{xx,0}(1+(\mu B)^{2})^{-1/2}+\sigma_{xx,1}, with σxx,1≈0.8 e2/h\sigma_{xx,1}\approx0.8\,e^{2}/h (the arXiv versions state 0.81 e2/h0.81\,e^{2}/h; the published version is quoted as 0.88 e2/h0.88\,e^{2}/h), whose microscopic origin they could not identify. At low temperature and high field (B≳0.8B\gtrsim0.8 T, where the magnetic length ℓB=ℏ/eB\ell_{B}=\sqrt{\hbar/eB}, the characteristic radius of cyclotron motion, becomes shorter than the puddle size, and T≲100T\lesssim100-160 K) the data depart from even this modified semiclassical description: ρxx\rho_{xx} saturates near 0.4 h/e20.4\,h/e^{2} and σxy\sigma_{xy} shows a plateaulike region near zero. In graphene's quantum Hall effect the filling factor ν\nu (carrier density times magnetic flux quantum) takes half-integer values ν=4(n+1/2)\nu=4(n+1/2) because the n=0n=0 Landau level (the discrete cyclotron orbit band shared by electrons and holes) is shared by both carrier types. Exactly at the CNP the Fermi level lies in this n=0n=0 Landau level, and the ν=0\nu=0 state is special: candidate descriptions include homogeneous symmetry-broken states — a spin-polarized ferromagnet or canted antiferromagnet (CAF) whose opposing valley/spin components support counterpropagating, spin-filtered edge modes — and, in disordered samples, a percolating network of localized ν=+2\nu=+2 (electron) and ν=−2\nu=-2 (hole) quantum Hall puddles, with the dissipation occurring along the boundaries between them. Cho and Fuhrer's data were consistent with the puddle picture but could not distinguish it from the homogeneous broken-symmetry states.

Problem Statement

Provide a complete microscopic account of magnetotransport near the minimum-conductivity (charge-neutrality) point of spatially inhomogeneous graphene, as posed by Cho and Fuhrer (2008), with three jointly defining components. (1) Identify the microscopic origin of the small field-independent longitudinal conductivity term σxx,1≈0.8 e2/h\sigma_{xx,1}\approx0.8\,e^{2}/h that must be added to the exact equal-mobility effective-medium result σxx(B)=σxx,0(1+(μB)2)−1/2\sigma_{xx}(B)=\sigma_{xx,0}(1+(\mu B)^{2})^{-1/2}, σxy=0\sigma_{xy}=0 to fit the measured magnetoresistivity of graphene on SiO2_2 near the charge-neutrality point at temperatures where the semiclassical description otherwise holds — deciding among, or refuting, the candidate mechanisms of imperfect electron-hole balance, unequal electron and hole mobilities, and non-ideal sample geometry/contact effects. (2) Extend the theory of electron-hole-puddle transport into the quantum regime (magnetic length ℓB\ell_{B} shorter than the puddle size, roughly B≳0.8B\gtrsim0.8 T at low temperature), reproducing quantitatively the measured ρxx(B)\rho_{xx}(B) and ρxy(B)\rho_{xy}(B) through the classical-to-quantum crossover, including the low-temperature high-field saturation of ρxx\rho_{xx} to a value of order h/e2h/e^{2} and the plateaulike σxy≈0\sigma_{xy}\approx0 region. (3) Determine, by spatially resolved measurement correlated with transport or by an equivalent microscopic theory, whether this saturation and plateau regime in disorder-dominated graphene arises from localized ν=+2\nu=+2 and ν=−2\nu=-2 quantum Hall puddles separated by regions in which the fourfold-degenerate n=0n=0 Landau level crosses the Fermi level, or from homogeneous symmetry-broken quantum Hall states. The common objective is a single quantitative description of the conductivity tensor near the charge-neutrality point of disordered graphene that remains valid from the semiclassical puddle regime into the quantum Hall regime; the three components are linked pieces of that description, not independent questions.

References

  1. Sungjae Cho and Michael S. Fuhrer, 'Charge transport and inhomogeneity near the minimum conductivity point in graphene', Physical Review B 77, 081402(R) (2008). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.081402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.081402 (preprint arXiv:0705.3239, https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.3239, there titled 'Charge Transport and Inhomogeneity near the Charge Neutrality Point in Graphene')
  2. V. Guttal and D. Stroud, 'Model for a macroscopically disordered conductor with an exactly linear high-field magnetoresistance', Physical Review B 71, 201304 (2005). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.71.201304, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.201304
  3. S. Adam, E. H. Hwang, V. M. Galitski and S. Das Sarma, 'A self-consistent theory for graphene transport', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 18392 (2007). doi:10.1073/pnas.0704772104, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704772104
  4. E. H. Hwang, S. Adam and S. Das Sarma, 'Carrier Transport in Two-Dimensional Graphene Layers', Physical Review Letters 98, 186806 (2007). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.186806, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.186806
  5. J. Martin, N. Akerman, G. Ulbricht, T. Lohmann, J. H. Smet, K. von Klitzing and A. Yacoby, 'Observation of electron-hole puddles in graphene using a scanning single-electron transistor', Nature Physics 4, 144 (2008). doi:10.1038/nphys781, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys781
  6. Y. Zhang, V. W. Brar, C. Girit, A. Zettl and M. Crommie, 'Origin of spatial charge inhomogeneity in graphene', Nature Physics 5, 722 (2009). doi:10.1038/nphys1365, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1365
  7. S. Das Sarma, Shaffique Adam, E. H. Hwang and Enrico Rossi, 'Electronic transport in two dimensional graphene', Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 407 (2011). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.407, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.407
  8. J.-M. Poumirol, W. Escoffier, A. Kumar, M. Goiran, B. Raquet and J.-M. Broto, 'Electron-hole coexistence in disordered graphene probed by high-field magneto-transport', New Journal of Physics 12, 083006 (2010). doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083006 (preprint arXiv:1004.2356, https://arxiv.org/abs/1004.2356)
  9. J. Poumirol, W. Escoffier, A. Kumar, B. Raquet and M. Goiran, 'Impact of disorder on the ν=2\nu=2 quantum Hall plateau in graphene', Physical Review B 82, 121401(R) (2010). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.121401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.121401
  10. J. G. Checkelsky, L. Li and N. P. Ong, 'Zero-Energy State in Graphene in a High Magnetic Field', Physical Review Letters 100, 206801 (2008). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.206801, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.206801
  11. J. G. Checkelsky, L. Li and N. P. Ong, 'Divergent resistance at the Dirac point in graphene: Evidence for a transition in a high magnetic field', Physical Review B 79, 115434 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115434, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115434
  12. D. A. Abanin, K. S. Novoselov, U. Zeitler, P. A. Lee, A. K. Geim and L. S. Levitov, 'Dissipative Quantum Hall Effect in Graphene near the Dirac Point', Physical Review Letters 98, 196806 (2007). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.196806, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.196806
  13. H. A. Fertig and L. Brey, 'Luttinger Liquid at the Edge of Undoped Graphene in a Strong Magnetic Field', Physical Review Letters 97, 116805 (2006). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.116805, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.116805
  14. Maxim Kharitonov, 'Phase diagram for the ν=0\nu=0 quantum Hall state in monolayer graphene', Physical Review B 85, 155439 (2012). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.155439, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.155439
  15. D. A. Abanin, S. V. Morozov, L. A. Ponomarenko, R. V. Gorbachev, A. S. Mayorov, M. I. Katsnelson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. S. Novoselov, L. S. Levitov and A. K. Geim, 'Giant Nonlocality Near the Dirac Point in Graphene', Science 332, 328 (2011). doi:10.1126/science.1199595, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199595
  16. Sung Ju Hong, Christopher Belke, Johannes C. Rode, Benedikt Brechtken and Rolf J. Haug, 'Helical-edge transport near ν=0\nu=0 of monolayer graphene', Current Applied Physics 27, 25 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.cap.2021.04.001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2021.04.001 (preprint arXiv:1908.02420, https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.02420, there titled 'Disorder induced helical-edge transport near ν=0\nu=0 of monolayer graphene')
  17. Yong-Tao Cui, Bo Wen, Eric Y. Ma, Georgi Diankov, Zheng Han, Francois Amet, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, David Goldhaber-Gordon, Cory R. Dean and Zhi-Xun Shen, 'Unconventional Correlation between Quantum Hall Transport Quantization and Bulk State Filling in Gated Graphene Devices', Physical Review Letters 117, 186601 (2016). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.186601, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.186601 (preprint arXiv:1511.01541, https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.01541)
  18. Arthur Marguerite, John Birkbeck, Amit Aharon-Steinberg, Dorri Halbertal, Kousik Bagani, Ido Marcus, Yuri Myasoedov, Andre K. Geim, David J. Perello and Eli Zeldov, 'Imaging work and dissipation in the quantum Hall state in graphene', Nature 575, 628 (2019). doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1704-3, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1704-3
  19. T. Johnsen, C. Schattauer, S. Samaddar, A. Weston, M. Hamer, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. Gorbachev, F. Libisch and M. Morgenstern, 'Mapping quantum Hall edge states in graphene by scanning tunneling microscopy', Physical Review B 107, 115426 (2023). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.115426, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.115426 (preprint arXiv:2210.01831, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01831)
  20. Hongtao Yan, Chun-Chih Tseng, Anzhuoer Li, Manish Kumar, Kaile Wang, Shizai Chu, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Allan H. MacDonald, Matthew Yankowitz and Keji Lai, 'Microwave Imaging of Edge Conductivity in Graphene at Charge Neutrality and Quantum Hall States', Physical Review Letters 136, 176603 (2026). doi:10.1103/q8hg-pwbf, https://doi.org/10.1103/q8hg-pwbf (preprint arXiv:2602.17906, https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17906)
  21. P. S. Alekseev, A. P. Dmitriev, I. V. Gornyi and V. Yu. Kachorovskii, 'Strong magnetoresistance of disordered graphene', Physical Review B 87, 165432 (2013). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.165432, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.165432 (preprint arXiv:1210.6081, https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.6081)
  22. Na Xin, James Lourembam, P. Kumaravadivel, A. E. Kazantsev, Zefei Wu, Ciaran Mullan, Julien Barrier, Alexandra A. Geim, I. V. Grigorieva, A. Mishchenko, A. Principi, V. I. Falko, L. A. Ponomarenko, A. K. Geim and Alexey I. Berdyugin, 'Giant magnetoresistance of Dirac plasma in high-mobility graphene', Nature 616, 270 (2023). doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05807-0, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05807-0 (preprint arXiv:2302.06863, https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06863)
  23. J. Hu, J. Gou, M. Yang, G. J. Omar, J. Tan, S. Zeng, Y. Liu, K. Han, Z. Q. Lim, Z. Huang, A. T. S. Wee and Ariando, 'Room-Temperature Colossal Magnetoresistance in Terraced Single-Layer Graphene', Advanced Materials 32, 2002201 (2020). doi:10.1002/adma.202002201, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002201
  24. M. Kamada, V. Gall, J. Sarkar, M. Kumar, A. Laitinen, I. Gornyi and P. Hakonen, 'Strong magnetoresistance in a graphene Corbino disk at low magnetic fields', Physical Review B 104, 115432 (2021). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.115432, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.115432
  25. V. Gall, B. N. Narozhny and I. V. Gornyi, 'Corbino magnetoresistance in neutral graphene', Physical Review B 107, 235401 (2023). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.235401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.235401
  26. M. Yang, O. Couturaud, W. Desrat, C. Consejo, D. Kazazis, R. Yakimova, M. Syvajarvi, M. Goiran, J. Beard, P. Frings, M. Pierre, A. Cresti, W. Escoffier and B. Jouault, 'Puddle-Induced Resistance Oscillations in the Breakdown of the Graphene Quantum Hall Effect', Physical Review Letters 117, 237702 (2016). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.237702, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.237702 (preprint arXiv:1611.08179, https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08179)