Colloidal CdTe quantum dots (QDs) infiltrated into a 25 μm porous silicon oxide film retain their luminescence, but their two-photon-excited photoluminescence (2PL) peak is red-shifted by about 20 nm relative to the one-photon and two-photon emission peak of the same dots on glass (548 nm) under pulsed 1064 nm excitation. The 2011 source paper conjectured, without temperature measurement or control experiments, that this shift is a thermal artifact — heating from infrared absorption in the composite shifting the CdTe absorption edge. The literature contains no test of this conjecture for this system, while related work documents both genuine host–QD optical coupling in porous silicon hosts and intrinsic size-selective two-photon excitation as competing mechanisms. The open problem is a mechanism-level, quantitative account of how porous-oxide embedding modifies the linear and two-photon-excited luminescence of CdTe QDs, with the origin of the composite-induced 2PL red shift as its sharp, testable core.

Background

Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) are nanocrystals small enough that quantum confinement makes their optical transitions size-tunable; CdTe QDs of a few nanometers emit in the visible (here, a band peaked at 548 nm). Photoluminescence (PL) is optically excited emission; it can also be driven by two-photon absorption (2PA), in which two infrared photons are simultaneously absorbed through a virtual state, with the absorption rate proportional to intensity squared. 2PA is described by a coefficient β\beta in the attenuation law dI/dz=−αI−βI2dI/dz=-\alpha I-\beta I^{2}. Two-photon luminescence (2PL) under near-infrared excitation is attractive for solid-state emitters and biomedical imaging because excitation light penetrates deeply and avoids autofluorescence. Prior to the source work, 2PL of CdTe QDs had been studied mainly in suspension: Pan, Ishikawa, and Tamai used two-photon-induced luminescence to detect optical trapping (manipulation of particles by focused laser light) of CdTe QDs, finding one- and two-photon-excited emission at essentially the same wavelength, and Padilha et al. measured degenerate and nondegenerate 2PA spectra of semiconductor QDs. For solid-state use the dots must be embedded in a matrix. Porous silicon oxide — porous silicon that has been oxidized — is a convenient dielectric host: a 25 μm film with an open pore network that can be infiltrated from colloidal solution. The host itself, however, radiates: silicon-oxide defect bands (near 455 and 613 nm) overlap the QD emission, and the composite absorbs the infrared excitation that the free dots alone do not. Piskunov, Maslennikov, Golovan, Kashkarov, Ostapenko, Rodt, and Bimberg (Laser Physics 21, 614–618, 2011) infiltrated thioglycolic-acid-capped (surface-coated with thioglycolic-acid ligand molecules) CdTe QDs into such a film and reported: (1) cathodoluminescence (electron-beam-excited luminescence) at about 550 nm at several points across the film cross-section, taken as evidence that dots are optically active through the film; (2) a composite PL spectrum decomposing into host bands at 455 and 613 nm plus the QD band at 548 nm, coincident with free dots on glass; (3) a 2PL spectrum of the composite red-shifted by about 20 nm relative to the free-QD 2PL/PL peak under 1064 nm, 32 ps excitation at 10 Hz, attributed by the authors to a shift of the CdTe absorption edge caused by sample heating from infrared absorption in the composite — an attribution offered without any temperature measurement, heating estimate, or deliberate-heating control experiment; and (4) β=8.0±0.5\beta=8.0\pm0.5 cm/GW for the free QD layer on glass, more than four times the crystalline-CdTe value of β=1.8\beta=1.8 cm/GW, obtained by fitting the 2PL intensity versus incident pulse intensity with a two-photon attenuation model and an assumed 25 μm layer thickness. The mechanistic question sits inside a broader recognized gap that the paper states in its introduction: production technologies and the optical properties of II–VI QDs embedded in dielectric matrices remained insufficiently studied. Related later results frame what is at stake: temperature-dependent PL of CdTe QDs has a known, size-dependent peak-position temperature coefficient, so a thermal origin of a 20 nm shift is quantitatively testable; in perovskite nanocrystal ensembles, two-photon excitation enhances size selection and can intrinsically red-shift 2PL relative to one-photon PL; and porous-silicon hosts can couple optically to embedded dots — two-photon-pumped QDs in porous-silicon microcavities show Purcell-enhanced emission (spontaneous-emission rate enhanced by a resonant cavity), and porous-embedded CdSe/Zn QDs show Rabi splitting (a resolved splitting of the emission line signaling coherent strong coupling between emitters and an optical mode) with porous-silicon array modes. In the 2011 data the free dots showed identical one- and two-photon peaks, so any explanation of the shift must be specific to the embedded composite.

Problem Statement

For colloidal CdTe quantum dots embedded in a porous silicon oxide film, determine — with quantitative consistency — the physical origin of the composite-induced red shift (approximately 20 nm from the 548 nm free-QD peak) of the two-photon luminescence spectrum under pulsed 1064 nm excitation (32 ps pulse duration, 10 Hz repetition rate): in particular, whether it is caused by sample heating from infrared absorption in the composite, shifting the CdTe absorption edge as conjectured by Piskunov et al. (2011); by intrinsic electronic or optical coupling of the dots to the porous oxide host; or by other intrinsic ensemble effects such as size-selective two-photon excitation (preferential excitation of the larger dots within a size-distributed ensemble) or reabsorption — any such mechanism being admissible only insofar as its effect is specific to the embedded composite (that is, created or enhanced by the host), since the free dots on glass showed identical one- and two-photon peaks. The common objective is a mechanism-level, quantitative account of how porous-oxide embedding modifies the one- and two-photon-excited luminescence of these CdTe QDs; its completion boundary is the demonstrated origin of the composite-induced 2PL red shift — either a quantitative identification of the dominant mechanism or a quantitative demonstration that the conjectured thermal mechanism is excluded.

References

  1. N. A. Piskunov, E. D. Maslennikov, L. A. Golovan, P. K. Kashkarov, I. A. Ostapenko, S. Rodt, D. Bimberg, 'Luminescence of the cadmium telluride quantum dots in the porous silicon oxide', Laser Physics 21(3), 614–618 (2011). DOI: 10.1134/S1054660X1106003X, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054660X1106003X
  2. Lingyun Pan, Atsushi Ishikawa, Naoto Tamai, 'Detection of optical trapping of CdTe quantum dots by two-photon-induced luminescence', Physical Review B 75, 161305 (2007). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.161305, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.161305
  3. L. A. Padilha, J. Fu, D. J. Hagan, E. W. Van Stryland, C. L. Cesar, L. C. Barbosa, C. H. B. Cruz, D. Buso, A. Martucci, 'Frequency degenerate and nondegenerate two-photon absorption spectra of semiconductor quantum dots', Physical Review B 75, 075325 (2007). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.075325, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.075325
  4. Jayakrishna Khatei, C. S. Suchand Sandeep, Reji Philip, K. S. R. Koteswara Rao, 'Near-resonant two-photon absorption in luminescent CdTe quantum dots', Applied Physics Letters 100, 081901 (2012). DOI: 10.1063/1.3687695, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3687695
  5. N. Vyhnan, Y. Khalavka, 'Size-dependent temperature sensitivity of photoluminescence peak position of CdTe quantum dots', Luminescence 29, 952–954 (2013). DOI: 10.1002/bio.2600, https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.2600
  6. Junsheng Chen, Pavel Chábera, Torbjörn Pascher, Maria E. Messing, Richard Schaller, Sophie Canton, Kaibo Zheng, Tõnu Pullerits, 'Enhanced Size Selection in Two-Photon Excitation for CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals', The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 8, 5119–5124 (2017). DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02178, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02178
  7. Magda A. Antoniak, Joanna Grzyb, Marcin Nyk, 'Preserved two-photon optical properties of hydrophilic proteins-conjugated quantum dots', Journal of Luminescence 209, 57–60 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.01.029, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.01.029
  8. Dmitriy Dovzhenko, Victor Krivenkov, Irina Kriukova, Pavel Samokhvalov, Alexander Karaulov, Igor Nabiev, 'Enhanced spontaneous emission from two-photon-pumped quantum dots in a porous silicon microcavity', Optics Letters 45(19), 5364–5367 (2020). DOI: 10.1364/ol.400300, https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.400300
  9. Atzin David Ruiz Pérez, Ma. Del Rocío Nava Lara, Jorge-Alejandro Reyes-Esqueda, 'Strong Coupling of porous-embedded CdSe/Zn Quantum Dots and Pseudo-Bandgap Edge States of a Porous-Silicon Conjugated-Fibonacci Array', OSA Advanced Photonics Congress 2021 (NOMA). DOI: 10.1364/noma.2021.nof2c.4, https://doi.org/10.1364/noma.2021.nof2c.4
  10. Á. Guillén-Cervantes, H. Silva-López, M. Becerril-Silva, J. S. Arias-Cerón, E. Campos-Gonzalez, A. C. Medina-Torres, O. Zelaya-Ángel, 'Photoluminescence of CdTe nanocrystals grown by pulsed laser ablation on a template of Si nanoparticles', Applied Physics A 118, 1039–1042 (2014). DOI: 10.1007/s00339-014-8866-5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-014-8866-5