Pseudospin symmetry (PSS) — the empirical near-degeneracy of nuclear single-particle doublets such as (2d5/2,1g7/2)(2d_{5/2},1g_{7/2}) — shapes shell evolution far from stability, yet the mechanism of its breaking and of its accidental restoration in particular nuclei is only partly understood. Heitz, Ebran and Khan (Phys. Rev. C 111, 064306 (2025)) derived the first closed-form perturbative formulae for spin and pseudospin splittings in relativistic mean-field theory, built on a spin-symmetric relativistic harmonic-oscillator reference, and showed that the pseudospin splitting decomposes into a Σ\Sigma-driven term sensitive to mass number and surface diffusivity plus an almost constant Δ\Delta-driven term. Their study leaves open the quantitative, nucleus-specific account of accidental pseudospin restorations beyond leading order, and the explicit test calculations they themselves propose: pseudospin splittings in neutron-rich nuclei with large neutron skins (extreme diffusivity) and in bubble nuclei with central density depletion. The mechanism-resolved perturbative account and its extreme-diffuseness benchmarks remain unperformed.

Background

In nuclear structure theory, single-particle states are labeled (n,ℓ,j)(n,\ell,j) by radial quantum number nn, orbital angular momentum ℓ\ell and total angular momentum j=ℓ±1/2j=\ell\pm1/2. The spin-orbit interaction splits the two jj partners of a given (n,ℓ)(n,\ell) orbital into a 'spin doublet'; these splittings are large and generate the magic numbers (shell closures) that stabilize certain nuclei. In relativistic mean-field (RMF) theory, also called covariant density functional theory, nucleons obey a Dirac equation with a self-consistent scalar potential SS and vector potential VV. Two combinations control the spectrum: the central potential Σ=V+S\Sigma=V+S and their difference Δ=V−S\Delta=V-S, which drives spin-symmetry breaking (SS), i.e. the lifting of the spin-doublet degeneracy; the effective spin-orbit potential is proportional to (1/r) dΔ/dr(1/r)\,\mathrm{d}\Delta/\mathrm{d}r (Ebran et al., Phys. Rev. C 94, 024304 (2016)). (Care with signs is needed: the source paper's introduction defines Σ=V+S\Sigma=V+S and Δ=V−S\Delta=V-S, but its Fig. 1 caption and conclusion write Δ=S−V\Delta=S-V; a consistent convention must be fixed when reproducing its formulae.) The Dirac spinor has an upper component gg (which becomes the Schrödinger wave function in the non-relativistic limit) and a lower component ff.

Pseudospin symmetry (PSS), introduced in 1969, is the empirical near-degeneracy of the doublets (n,ℓ,ℓ+1/2)(n,\ell,\ell+1/2) and (n−1,ℓ+2,ℓ+3/2)(n-1,\ell+2,\ell+3/2), which acquire a common pseudo-orbital angular momentum ℓ~=ℓ+1\tilde{\ell}=\ell+1 and a pseudo-spin 1/21/2. A doublet counts as accidentally restored when its splitting is anomalously small relative to the smooth AA-dependent trend of the surrounding isotopic or isotonic chain — a local near-degeneracy of the kind the source reports in specific nuclei — rather than merely small in absolute terms. PSS underlies superdeformed and identical rotational bands and fingerprints shell evolution in exotic nuclei (Liang, Meng and Zhou, Phys. Rep. 570, 1 (2015)). Ginocchio (Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 436 (1997)) showed that PSS is a relativistic symmetry: exact PSS requires the central potential Σ\Sigma to vanish (or have vanishing gradient for bound states). Exact PSS is unphysical — it would render nucleons unbound — so PSS can only be realized approximately, and a PSS-preserving state cannot serve as the reference for perturbation theory. Liang et al. (Phys. Rev. C 83, 041301 (2011)) showed instead that a spin-symmetric relativistic harmonic oscillator (SS-RHO) — harmonic ΣHO\Sigma_{\mathrm{HO}}, constant Δ0\Delta_0 — is a well-defined reference state about which pseudospin breaking can be treated perturbatively.

Heitz, Ebran and Khan (Phys. Rev. C 111, 064306 (2025)) turned this into closed formulae: acting with self-consistent Σ\Sigma and Δ\Delta potentials from relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov (RHB: RMF plus pairing) calculations with the DD-MEV parametrization (a covariant density functional whose fit includes single-particle data) on the SS-RHO reference, they obtained first- and second-order expressions for the doublet splittings. For spin doublets only Δ\Delta and the lower component ff contribute; for pseudospin doublets both potentials and both components contribute, and after integration by parts the first-order pseudospin splitting is ΔEPSS=∫dr (Ga−Gb) dΣ/dr+∫dr (Fa−Fb) dΔ/dr\Delta E_{\mathrm{PSS}}=\int \mathrm{d}r\,(G_a-G_b)\,\mathrm{d}\Sigma/\mathrm{d}r+\int \mathrm{d}r\,(F_a-F_b)\,\mathrm{d}\Delta/\mathrm{d}r, where FF (GG) are radially cumulative integrals of ∣f∣2|f|^2 (∣g∣2|g|^2) over the doublet partners a,ba,b. The Σ\Sigma-driven term ΔEg\Delta E_g grows roughly linearly with mass number AA while the Δ\Delta-driven term ΔEf\Delta E_f stays almost constant and negative. Surface diffuseness of Σ\Sigma (how gradually the potential falls off at the nuclear surface) is the controlling knob: a more diffuse surface widens dΣ/dr\mathrm{d}\Sigma/\mathrm{d}r, making it probe the negative core lobe of Ga−GbG_a-G_b and reducing the splitting. In the benchmark neutron (2d5/2,1g7/2)(2d_{5/2},1g_{7/2}) doublet along the N=50N=50 isotonic chain (nuclei with fixed neutron number N=50N=50), second order acts as a near-uniform shift toward the fully self-consistent RHB values, so first order already captures the generic trends. Two density-profile extremes make the mechanism testable: neutron-rich nuclei develop a neutron skin — a dilute neutron excess at the surface, i.e. extreme diffusivity (Dobaczewski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 981 (1994)) — and 'bubble' (or semibubble) nuclei have a depleted central density, giving dΣ/dr<0\mathrm{d}\Sigma/\mathrm{d}r<0 at the center where Ga−Gb<0G_a-G_b<0, which the mechanism predicts should enhance the pseudospin splitting.

Problem Statement

Within the covariant perturbative framework of Heitz, Ebran and Khan (SS-RHO reference, self-consistent Σ\Sigma and Δ\Delta potentials), or an explicitly comparable mechanism-resolved covariant treatment, establish a quantitative theory of pseudospin-symmetry breaking that (1) explains, nucleus by nucleus across the nuclear chart, the observed splittings and the accidental (near-)restorations of PSS — identifying which features (surface diffusivity and shape of Σ\Sigma, nodal structure of the doublet wave functions, shell occupancy) produce near-degeneracy, and delimiting where first order suffices and where the second-order refinement is required; and (2) delivers explicit, falsifiable predictions for the pseudospin splittings of neutron-rich nuclei with developed neutron skins (the large-diffusivity limit) and of bubble nuclei with central density depletion (where the mechanism predicts an enhanced splitting), confronted with self-consistent RHB calculations and with available spectroscopic data. These two components serve one objective — a predictive, mechanism-level account of pseudospin breaking and restoration — since (1) certifies the framework that (2) stress-tests at the density-profile extremes. A solution to component (1) states the finite set of nuclei and doublets it treats, which must include at least the source's neutron (2d5/2,1g7/2)(2d_{5/2},1g_{7/2}) pair along the N=50N=50 isotonic chain together with one neutron-rich (large-skin) nucleus and one bubble nucleus, and, for each, confronts the first- and second-order splittings with the corresponding fully self-consistent RHB value, stating which order already reproduces it.

References

  1. L. Heitz, J.-P. Ebran, E. Khan, 'Patterns of spin and pseudospin symmetries in nuclear relativistic mean-field approaches', Phys. Rev. C 111, 064306 (2025). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.111.064306; arXiv:2501.19037; https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.19037
  2. J. N. Ginocchio, 'Pseudospin as a Relativistic Symmetry', Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 436 (1997). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.436; arXiv:nucl-th/9611044; https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9611044
  3. H. Liang, J. Meng, S.-G. Zhou, 'Hidden pseudospin and spin symmetries and their origins in atomic nuclei', Phys. Rep. 570, 1 (2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.005; arXiv:1411.6774; https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.6774
  4. H. Liang, P. Zhao, Y. Zhang, J. Meng, N. Van Giai, 'Perturbative interpretation of relativistic symmetries in nuclei', Phys. Rev. C 83, 041301 (2011). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.041301; arXiv:1004.2320; https://arxiv.org/abs/1004.2320
  5. J. Meng, K. Sugawara-Tanabe, S. Yamaji, A. Arima, 'Pseudospin symmetry in Zr and Sn isotopes from the proton drip line to the neutron drip line', Phys. Rev. C 59, 154 (1999). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.59.154; arXiv:nucl-th/9808026; https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9808026
  6. R. Lisboa, P. Alberto, B. V. Carlson, M. Malheiro, 'Temperature effects on nuclear pseudospin symmetry in the Dirac-Hartree-Bogoliubov formalism', Phys. Rev. C 96, 054306 (2017). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054306; arXiv:1708.09511; https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.09511
  7. Z. Z. Li, S. Y. Chang, Q. Zhao, W. H. Long, Y. F. Niu, 'Restoration of pseudo-spin symmetry in N=32 and N=34 isotones described by relativistic Hartree-Fock theory', Chin. Phys. C 43, 074107 (2019). DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/43/7/074107; arXiv:1905.02879; https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02879
  8. J. J. Li, W. H. Long, J. Margueron, N. Van Giai, '48Si: An atypical nucleus?', Phys. Lett. B 788, 192 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.11.034; arXiv:1807.10000; https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.10000
  9. W. H. Long, P. Ring, J. Meng, N. Van Giai, C. A. Bertulani, 'Nuclear halo structure and pseudospin symmetry', Phys. Rev. C 81, 031302 (2010). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.031302; arXiv:1001.4976; https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.4976
  10. H. Nakada, T. Inakura, 'Significance of tensor force in pseudospin symmetry', Phys. Rev. C 110, L051301 (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.110.L051301; arXiv:2407.05524; https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05524
  11. T. Shang, Q. Zhao, J. Li, 'Pseudospin symmetry: Microscopic origin of the ground-state inversion in neutron-rich odd-A Cu isotopes', Phys. Lett. B 850, 138527 (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138527; arXiv:2401.02028; https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02028
  12. C. R. Ding, C. C. Wang, J. M. Yao, H. Hergert, H. Z. Liang, S. K. Bogner, 'From spin to pseudospin symmetry: The origin of magic numbers in nuclear structure', Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 052501 (2026). DOI: 10.1103/8lzc-j1lx; arXiv:2504.09148; https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09148
  13. R. V. Jolos, E. A. Kolganova, 'Pseudospin symmetry and quasidouble magic nuclei', Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 115 (2025). DOI: 10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01595-5; https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01595-5
  14. J.-P. Ebran, A. Mutschler, E. Khan, D. Vretenar, 'Spin-orbit interaction in relativistic nuclear structure models', Phys. Rev. C 94, 024304 (2016). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.024304; arXiv:1607.06567; https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06567
  15. T. Otsuka, A. Gade, O. Sorlin, T. Suzuki, Y. Utsuno, 'Evolution of shell structure in exotic nuclei', Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015002 (2020). DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015002; arXiv:1805.06501; https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.06501
  16. J. Dobaczewski, I. Hamamoto, W. Nazarewicz, J. A. Sheikh, 'Nuclear shell structure at particle drip lines', Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 981 (1994). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.981; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.981
  17. C. Delafosse, D. Verney, P. Marević, et al., 'Pseudospin symmetry and microscopic origin of shape coexistence in the 78Ni region: A hint from lifetime measurements', Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 192502 (2018). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.192502; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.192502