The equation of state of cold dense quark matter — and with it the stiffness of neutron-star cores, the location of quark–hadron phase boundaries, and the viability of quark–hadron continuity — is governed in effective models by a handful of in-medium four-quark couplings: the vector-isoscalar coupling gVg_V (the effective repulsion between quarks), the flavor-non-singlet vector-isovector couplings gτ(3)g_\tau^{(3)} and gτ(8)g_\tau^{(8)}, and the diquark pairing coupling HH. Their values at the baryon densities nB∼5n_B \sim 5–10 n010\,n_0 (n0n_0 = nuclear saturation density), where quark matter is expected to form in compact stars, are presently fitted to neutron-star observations rather than derived from QCD: lattice QCD is blocked by the fermion sign problem at real baryon chemical potential, and perturbative QCD is controlled only at densities far above ∼40 n0\sim 40\,n_0. The single-gluon-exchange estimate of Song, Baym, Hatsuda, and Kojo (2019), using a massive gluon propagator and a frozen infrared coupling αs\alpha_s, reproduces the phenomenologically required repulsion but leaves nonperturbative corrections beyond that single diagram uncontrolled. The problem is to determine these in-medium couplings and their density dependence microscopically from nonperturbative gluon exchange in QCD — including multi-gluon exchange, in-medium gluon polarization, and the infrared behavior of αs\alpha_s and the quark–gluon vertex — with controlled uncertainties, and to establish how they map onto the vector and pairing couplings of hadronic descriptions.

Background

The matter in neutron-star cores is the densest strongly interacting matter directly accessible to observation. Its energy per baryon as a function of baryon density nBn_B — the equation of state (EoS) — determines the stellar mass–radius relation. Nuclear physics is anchored at the saturation density n0≃0.16 fm−3n_0 \simeq 0.16\ \mathrm{fm}^{-3} of atomic nuclei, where neutron-rich matter is described with controlled errors by chiral effective field theory (an expansion in powers of momenta over the chiral symmetry-breaking scale, with low-energy constants fitted to few-nucleon data). Shapiro-delay timing — measuring the general-relativistic delay of radio pulses as they pass near the pulsar's white-dwarf companion, which weighs the system — of the millisecond pulsar PSR J0740+6620 demonstrated a ≃2.14 M⊙\simeq 2.14\,M_{\odot} neutron star (Cromartie et al. 2020), and multimessenger observations now demand a stiff EoS — rapidly rising pressure — at supra-nuclear density.

At nB≳5n_B \gtrsim 5–10 n010\,n_0 the relevant degrees of freedom are expected to become deconfined quarks. At asymptotically high density (nB≳40 n0n_B \gtrsim 40\,n_0) the EoS is computable in perturbative QCD (pQCD, the expansion in the running strong coupling αs\alpha_s; Kurkela, Romatschke, Vuorinen 2009). In the neutron-star window between a few n0n_0 and tens of n0n_0, however, no controlled first-principles method exists: lattice QCD, the standard nonperturbative tool, suffers the fermion sign problem (a complex Monte Carlo measure) at real baryon chemical potential, and at momentum transfers of order the quark Fermi momentum (≲500\lesssim 500 MeV) the coupling αs\alpha_s is large and its infrared behavior poorly known.

In this window, dense quark matter is modeled by Nambu–Jona-Lasinio (NJL)-type theories: local four-fermion interactions among quarks in scalar, vector, and diquark (quark–quark) channels, meant to represent the low-momentum content of gluon exchange. The vector-isoscalar coupling gVg_V multiplies a repulsive energy gVnq2g_V n_q^2 (nqn_q = quark number density) and stiffens the EoS; the flavor-non-singlet vector-isovector couplings gτ(3)g_\tau^{(3)} and gτ(8)g_\tau^{(8)} act on flavor-density differences such as nu−ndn_u - n_d (the quark-matter analogue of the nuclear symmetry energy); the diquark coupling HH sets the strength of attractive quark–quark correlations that drive color superconductivity — BCS-like Cooper pairing of quarks near the Fermi surface in a two-flavor (2SC) or three-flavor color-flavor-locked (CFL) pattern with gaps of order 10–100 MeV. In the quark–hadron crossover (QHC) constructions of the EoS, which interpolate between chiral-EFT nuclear matter and pQCD, supporting stars of two solar masses requires gV/G0≃0.6g_V/G_0 \simeq 0.6–1.31.3 and H/G0≃1.35H/G_0 \simeq 1.35–1.651.65, where G0G_0 is the scalar coupling fixed in the vacuum pion sector (Kojo, Hou, Okafor, Togashi 2021; Kojo, Baym, Hatsuda 2021). These bands are phenomenological fits constrained by neutron-star observations, not QCD predictions.

Song, Baym, Hatsuda, and Kojo (2019) made the first microscopic estimate of gVg_V: they matched the interaction energy gVnq2g_V n_q^2 to the quark exchange energy computed from explicit single-gluon exchange in Landau gauge (a standard fixed-gauge convention in which the nonperturbative gluon propagator is commonly quoted), with the gluon propagator parametrized by a nonperturbative dynamical gluon mass mg=200m_g = 200–600600 MeV (as found in zero-density lattice simulations and Dyson–Schwinger studies (systems of integral equations for the full quark and gluon propagators)) and an infrared-frozen coupling αs∼2\alpha_s \sim 2–44. This reproduces the required gV∼0.6g_V \sim 0.6–1.3 G01.3\,G_0 at 5n05n_0 and suggests the density dependence

gV(pF)≃4παs3(9mg2+8pF2),g_V(p_F) \simeq \frac{4\pi\alpha_s}{3\left(9m_g^2 + 8p_F^2\right)},

where pFp_F is the quark Fermi momentum. The same framework gives Fierz-related isovector couplings gτ(3)=gτ(8)=32gVg_\tau^{(3)} = g_\tau^{(8)} = \tfrac{3}{2}g_V at single-gluon exchange (a Fierz transformation reorganizes a Dirac–color interaction into its spin–flavor–color channels) and, from the vacuum NN–Δ\Delta baryon mass splitting, a rough low-density anchor for HH. But the authors stress that at nB≳5n0n_B \gtrsim 5n_0 the nonperturbative contributions beyond the single-gluon-exchange diagram — multi-gluon exchange, in-medium gluon polarization (the density-dependent modification of the gluon propagator: electric Debye and magnetic Meissner screening masses, and Landau damping — the absorption of gluons by excitations at the quark Fermi surface — all of order αs μ\sqrt{\alpha_s}\,\mu, with μ\mu the quark chemical potential), the momentum-dependent gluon mass function, and the running and possible infrared freezing or divergence of αs\alpha_s, which could range anywhere from 0 to 10 — are not under control. A microscopic determination also bears on quark–hadron continuity, the conjecture (reviewed in Baym, Hatsuda, Kojo, Powell, Song, Takatsuka 2018) that dense hadronic and quark matter join without a sharp phase transition, so that quark-level and nucleon-meson-level vector and pairing couplings should map onto one another.

Problem Statement

Determine microscopically, from QCD, the in-medium effective quark couplings of cold (zero-temperature) dense quark matter and their density dependence at the baryon densities nB∼5n_B \sim 5–10 n010\,n_0 (extending to ∼20 n0\sim 20\,n_0) where quark matter is expected to form in neutron-star cores — specifically: (i) the vector-isoscalar coupling gVg_V that encodes the effective repulsion between quarks and stiffens the equation of state; (ii) the flavor-non-singlet (vector-isovector) couplings gτ(3)g_\tau^{(3)} and gτ(8)g_\tau^{(8)}; and (iii) the diquark pairing coupling HH in the scalar and axial-vector quark–quark channels. The determination comprises the three couplings (i)–(iii) and their density dependence; a treatment of nonperturbative gluon exchange beyond the single-gluon-exchange diagram, whose scope includes multi-gluon exchange, in-medium gluon polarization functions (Debye/Meissner screening and Landau damping), the momentum-dependent gluon mass function, and the infrared behavior of the strong coupling αs\alpha_s and the quark–gluon vertex; and the mapping of these quark-level couplings onto the vector and pairing couplings of hadronic (nucleon-meson) effective descriptions, as a test of quark–hadron continuity, each with controlled uncertainties. These three couplings are physically linked: they are the vector and diquark vertices of one and the same in-medium quark–quark scattering amplitude, and the common objective is to derive that amplitude's low-momentum content from QCD rather than fit it to neutron-star observations.

References

  1. Yifan Song, Gordon Baym, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Toru Kojo, "Effective repulsion in dense quark matter from nonperturbative gluon exchange", Phys. Rev. D 100, 034018 (2019), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034018, arXiv:1905.01005, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.01005
  2. Toru Kojo, Defu Hou, Jude Okafor, Hajime Togashi, "Phenomenological QCD equations of state for neutron star dynamics: Nuclear-2SC continuity and evolving effective couplings", Phys. Rev. D 104, 063036 (2021), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063036, arXiv:2012.01650, https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.01650
  3. Toru Kojo, Gordon Baym, Tetsuo Hatsuda, "Implications of NICER for Neutron Star Matter: The QHC21 Equation of State", Astrophys. J. 934, 46 (2022), DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7876, arXiv:2111.11919, https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11919
  4. Aleksi Kurkela, Paul Romatschke, Aleksi Vuorinen, "Cold Quark Matter", Phys. Rev. D 81, 105021 (2010), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.105021, arXiv:0912.1856, https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.1856
  5. Gordon Baym, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Toru Kojo, Philip D. Powell, Yifan Song, Tatsuyuki Takatsuka, "From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review", Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 056902 (2018), DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/aaae14, arXiv:1707.04966, https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.04966
  6. Konstantin Otto, Micaela Oertel, Bernd-Jochen Schaefer, "Nonperturbative quark matter equations of state with vector interactions", Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 229, 3629 (2020), DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2020-000155-y, arXiv:2007.07394, https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07394
  7. Jens Braun, Benedikt Schallmo, "From quarks and gluons to color superconductivity at supranuclear densities", Phys. Rev. D 105, 036003 (2022), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.036003, arXiv:2106.04198, https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04198
  8. Jens Braun, Andreas Geissel, Benedikt Schallmo, "Speed of sound in dense strong-interaction matter", SciPost Phys. Core 7, 015 (2024), DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.7.2.015, arXiv:2206.06328, https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06328
  9. Jens Braun, Marc Leonhardt, Martin Pospiech, "Fierz-complete NJL model study III: Emergence from quark-gluon dynamics", Phys. Rev. D 101, 036004 (2020), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.036004, arXiv:1909.06298, https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06298
  10. Hao-Ran Zhang, Bo-Lin Li, Zhu-Fang Cui, "A Poincaré-covariant study of strange quark stars", arXiv:2604.20159, https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20159
  11. Jan-Erik Christian, Ishfaq Ahmad Rather, Hosein Gholami, Marco Hofmann, "Comprehensive analysis of constructing hybrid stars with a renormalization group-consistent Nambu-Jona-Lasino model", A&A 701, A145 (2025), DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555009, arXiv:2503.13626, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13626
  12. Toru Kojo, "Stiffening of matter in quark–hadron continuity: A mini-review", Journal of Subatomic Particles and Cosmology 4, 100088 (2025), DOI: 10.1016/j.jspc.2025.100088, arXiv:2412.20442, https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20442
  13. Mia Kumamoto, Sanjay Reddy, "Kohn-Luttinger effect in dense matter and its implications for neutron stars", Phys. Rev. C 110, 025804 (2024), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.110.025804, arXiv:2405.12243, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.12243
  14. M. B. Albino, R. Fariello, F. S. Navarra, "Tidal Deformability of Quark Stars with Repulsive Interactions", Phys. Rev. D 104, 083011 (2021), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083011, arXiv:2106.12956, https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.12956
  15. H. T. Cromartie, E. Fonseca, S. M. Ransom, P. B. Demorest, Z. Arzoumanian, H. Blumer, P. R. Brook, M. E. DeCesar, T. Dolch, J. A. Ellis, R. D. Ferdman, E. C. Ferrara, N. Garver-Daniels, P. A. Gentile, M. L. Jones, M. T. Lam, D. R. Lorimer, R. S. Lynch, M. A. McLaughlin, C. Ng, D. J. Nice, T. T. Pennucci, R. Spiewak, I. H. Stairs, K. Stovall, J. K. Swiggum, W. W. Zhu, "Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar", Nature Astron. 4, 72 (2020), DOI: 10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2, arXiv:1904.06759, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.06759
  16. Daiki Suenaga, Toru Kojo, "Gluon propagator in two-color dense QCD: Massive Yang-Mills approach at one-loop", Phys. Rev. D 100, 076017 (2019), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.076017, arXiv:1905.08751, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08751