A 2013 study introduced a hybrid microcontinuum–ultrasonic method that quantifies the incubation (precursor) stage of fatigue damage in glass-fiber-reinforced polymer composites by a length-scale-dependent 'damage entropy' parameter extracted from high-frequency scanning-acoustic-microscopy data. The method left its physical foundations unresolved: the two nonlocal length-scale parameters of the formulation (the second-order factor τ₀ and the fourth-order factor ν₀ of the bi-Helmholtz-type nonlocal operator, with intrinsic length scales τ = τ₀·ℓ and ν = ν₀·ℓ) were fixed by assumption and held constant — one arbitrarily selected, the other computed from it under a mathematical admissibility condition — and no physically grounded functional relationship between them or to measurable quantities was established; moreover, the picosecond-scale time-of-flight fluctuations that non-constant parameters would induce were reported to be beyond the resolution of the instrumentation used. The open problem is to establish the functional interdependency of the nonlocal parameters and its measurable ultrasonic signature, determine whether that signature is experimentally accessible, map damage entropy quantitatively onto specific micro-damage mechanisms, and determine the sensitivity and resolution limits of the method. Later work by the same group extended the damage-entropy framework to woven carbon-fiber composites and to online guided-wave monitoring, but the core parameter-interdependency, picosecond-sensitivity, mechanistic-interpretation, and detection-limit questions remain untouched.

Background

Structural health monitoring (SHM) and nondestructive evaluation (NDE) of fiber-reinforced polymer composites conventionally report the location, size, and shape of discrete discontinuities such as cracks and delaminations. Much harder is quantifying the material state during the 'incubation' or precursor stage of fatigue damage — the long initial phase (in the source experiments, up to roughly 90% of fatigue life before visible damage) in which distributed micro-scale degradation (matrix microcracking, fiber–matrix debonding, micro-buckling, pre-delamination) accumulates without forming a macroscopic defect. Precursor damage of this kind is largely insensitive to conventional low-frequency ultrasonic inspection.

Banerjee and Ahmed (2013) proposed a 'top-down' alternative: instead of bottom-up multi-scale modeling, they hybridized a microcontinuum field theory with measured high-frequency ultrasonic data. Microcontinuum (micromorphic) theory, in the sense of Eringen, extends classical continuum mechanics by attaching internal length scales to the medium, so that the stress at a point depends on the material state in a finite neighborhood; this is captured through nonlocal parameters. In the open-access continuation of the framework (Patra & Banerjee 2017), the nonlocal constitutive law is written with a bi-Helmholtz-type operator L=(1+τ02ℓ2∇2+ν04ℓ4∇4)L = (1 + \tau_0^2 \ell^2 \nabla^2 + \nu_0^4 \ell^4 \nabla^4) carrying two intrinsic length-scale parameters, τ = τ₀·ℓ and ν = ν₀·ℓ, where ℓ is a characteristic length scale; τ₀ was arbitrarily selected (τ₀ = 0.0017) and ν₀ was computed from it under the Lazar et al. admissibility condition τ₀ > √2·ν₀ (giving ν₀ = 0.0012) and kept constant. Fusing this theory with time-of-flight (TOF — the travel time of an ultrasonic pulse through the specimen, from which wave speeds and their fluctuations are inferred) and imaging data from a scanning acoustic microscope (SAM — an instrument that focuses ultrasound, here at 50 and 100 MHz, into a specimen and records reflected signals point by point) on fatigued glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) laminates, they defined an intrinsic, length-scale-dependent parameter called 'damage entropy' intended to track the incubation damage state quantitatively. In the 2017 continuation this 'nonlocal damage entropy' is defined as NLDE=∑i∣(τa2+τs2)/(2τa2)∣i\mathrm{NLDE} = \sum_i \left| (\tau_a^2 + \tau_s^2) / (2 \tau_a^2) \right|_i, where τ_a is the nonlocal parameter of the pristine specimen ('intrinsic material property adjuster'), τ_s is the parameter at each fatigue interval ('intrinsic material state parameter'), and both are extracted per pixel by matching the nonlocal dispersion curves to the TOF-derived ultrasonic wave velocities measured by SAM.

The authors themselves listed what remained unresolved. The interdependency of the two nonlocal length-scale parameters was assumed rather than derived: no functional relationship grounded in measurable physics was established — in the accessible formulation the fourth-order factor is computed from the chosen second-order factor under the admissibility condition τ₀ > √2·ν₀, and both are then held constant as assumptions — and non-constant parameters may influence picosecond-level TOF fluctuations that the available hardware could not resolve. The physical meaning of damage entropy in terms of specific micro-damage mechanisms stayed qualitative. The sensitivity and resolution limits of the method — the smallest detectable damage at a given ultrasonic frequency — were not systematically established. (Two further items in that discussion — converting the offline SAM technique into an online SHM system and fully automating the process for certification — are engineering-development goals; a companion study by the same group already demonstrated an online route using guided coda waves at far lower frequencies, so they are not part of the scientific core stated here.)

Problem Statement

For the hybrid microcontinuum–high-frequency-ultrasonic quantification of incubation-stage fatigue damage in fiber-reinforced polymer composites, establish the physical foundations of the damage-entropy parameter that the 2013 source study left as calibrated assumptions. The single overarching objective is to convert the empirical damage-entropy measure into a physically grounded, quantitatively validated multi-scale damage-state indicator, and it comprises four jointly supporting questions: (i) Determine, within the hybrid microcontinuum formulation, whether the two nonlocal length-scale parameters — the second-order factor τ₀ and the fourth-order factor ν₀ of the bi-Helmholtz operator (fixed in the accessible formulation of the framework at τ₀ = 0.0017, arbitrarily selected, and ν₀ = 0.0012, computed under the admissibility condition τ₀ > √2·ν₀ and kept constant) — are independent calibration constants or are tied to each other beyond that admissibility condition and to measurable material/ultrasonic quantities (deriving the functional relationship in the latter case), and what TOF signature non-constant parameters would produce at the picosecond scale; (ii) determine whether that predicted signature is experimentally accessible on fatigued composites — what time-of-flight resolution and measurement scheme would be required to verify or refute it, conventional scanning acoustic microscopy being insufficient at the picosecond scale — with due control of noise, dispersion, attenuation, and coupling artifacts wherever such measurements are performed; (iii) map the damage-entropy parameter quantitatively onto specific micro-damage mechanisms — matrix microcracking, fiber–matrix debonding, fiber micro-buckling, pre-delamination — across the fatigue life, replacing the current qualitative interpretation; and (iv) establish the sensitivity and resolution limits of the method, namely the smallest detectable damage size as a function of ultrasonic frequency and the minimum frequency required to resolve damage at a given length scale. Each of (i)–(iv) is independently resolvable. The online-SHM hardware integration and full process automation are excluded as separate engineering objectives (an online guided-wave route already exists in the literature).

References

  1. Sourav Banerjee and Riaz Ahmed, 'Precursor/incubation of multi-scale damage state quantification in composite materials: using hybrid microcontinuum field theory and high-frequency ultrasonics', IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 60(6), 1141–1151, 2013. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2677, https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2677
  2. Sourav Banerjee and Riaz Ahmed, 'Errata: Precursor/incubation of multi-scale damage state quantification in composite materials: Using hybrid microcontinuum field theory and high-frequency ultrasonics [Jun 13 1141–1151]', IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 61(7), 1242, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.3024, https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2014.3024
  3. Subir Patra and Sourav Banerjee, 'Progressive damage state evolution and quantification in composites', Proc. SPIE 9805 (Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 2016), 98050M, 2016. DOI: 10.1117/12.2219325, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2219325
  4. Subir Patra and Sourav Banerjee, 'Ultrasonic measurement and detection of precursor delamination damage in composite under tension–torsion loading', 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Control, Measurement and Instrumentation (CMI), pp. 489–493, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/CMI.2016.7413796, https://doi.org/10.1109/CMI.2016.7413796
  5. Subir Patra and Sourav Banerjee, 'Material State Awareness for Composites Part I: Precursor Damage Analysis Using Ultrasonic Guided Coda Wave Interferometry (CWI)', Materials 10(12), 1436, 2017. DOI: 10.3390/ma10121436, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10121436
  6. Subir Patra and Sourav Banerjee, 'Material State Awareness for Composites Part II: Precursor Damage Analysis and Quantification of Degraded Material Properties Using Quantitative Ultrasonic Image Correlation (QUIC)', Materials 10(12), 1444, 2017. DOI: 10.3390/ma10121444, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10121444
  7. Sourav Banerjee and Subir Patra, 'Nonlocal and Coda Wave Quantification of Damage Precursors in Composite from Nonlinear Ultrasonic Response', in Nonlinear Ultrasonic and Vibro-Acoustical Techniques for Nondestructive Evaluation, Springer, 2018, pp. 583–626. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94476-0_15, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94476-0_15
  8. Subir Patra, 'Ultrasonic Analysis and Tools for Quantitative Material State Awareness of Engineered Materials', doctoral dissertation, 2018. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/967e91552c2477e2292348b4732c52dbd8401bce
  9. C. Rossignol, J. M. Rampnoux, T. Dehoux, S. Dilhaire, and B. Audoin, 'Picosecond ultrasonics time resolved spectroscopy using a photonic crystal fiber', Ultrasonics 44, e1283–e1287, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.082, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.082
  10. Sourav Banerjee, Ana Tudor, Corey Leydig, Thomas Ferguson, Tally Bovender, Darun Barazanchy, Josh Widosky, and Paul Ziehl, 'Automated guided wave characterization of Marcelling: In-plane fiber waviness in thermoplastic composites', Ultrasonics 164, 108031, 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2026.108031, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2026.108031