Entanglement of quantum fields across a causal horizon diverges in the ultraviolet as Sent=c0A0Λ2+c1log⁡Λ+c2S_{\mathrm{ent}} = c_0 A_0 \Lambda^2 + c_1 \log \Lambda + c_2, yet low-energy perturbations of the vacuum change it by exactly the Bekenstein-Hawking amount δSent=δA/4G\delta S_{\mathrm{ent}} = \delta A/4G, independent of the number and type of matter species. The open problem left by this result (Bianchi, 2012) is the fate of the ultraviolet-divergent piece in a complete theory of quantum gravity: whether it is renormalized into Newton's constant and constitutes the microscopic origin of the full horizon entropy rather than only of its low-energy variations, whether it can be changed by any physical process and therefore contribute to horizon thermodynamics, how it could be probed, and what species-dependent high-energy contributions arise (heuristically a chemical-potential term δS=2π(δA/8πG+μ δN)\delta S = 2\pi(\delta A/8\pi G + \mu\,\delta N) with NN the number of matter species unfrozen at high energy).

Background

A black hole in equilibrium is a thermal object, and its entropy is given by the Bekenstein-Hawking formula SBH=A/4GS_{\mathrm{BH}} = A/4G, where AA is the area of the event horizon and GG is Newton's constant (units with c=ℏ=κ=1c = \hbar = \kappa = 1). Explaining the microscopic origin of this entropy is a long-standing problem at the interface of quantum field theory and quantum gravity.

In quantum field theory, the vacuum is entangled across any dividing surface: tracing out the degrees of freedom on one side leaves a mixed reduced state whose von Neumann entropy is the entanglement entropy. This entropy is divergent, because the vacuum has correlations at arbitrarily short distances, and in four spacetime dimensions it has the structure Sent=c0A0Λ2+c1log⁡Λ+c2S_{\mathrm{ent}} = c_0 A_0 \Lambda^2 + c_1 \log \Lambda + c_2, where Λ\Lambda is a high-energy cutoff, A0A_0 is the area of the dividing surface, and c2c_2 is the finite part (Bombelli, Koul, Lee and Sorkin, 1986). Taking this entanglement entropy as the origin of black hole entropy historically faced three difficulties: the divergence; the need to tune the cutoff to the Planck scale to reproduce the prefactor 1/41/4; and the fact that this tuning depends on the number of matter species that become dynamically active ('unfrozen') as one goes to higher energies. Susskind and Uglum (1994) and Jacobson (1994) showed that the divergent entanglement contribution is equivalent to quantum corrections of the gravitational coupling, so that the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy A/4GrenA/4G_{\mathrm{ren}} built with the renormalized Newton constant carries the same species dependence — the 'induced gravity' viewpoint — and Solodukhin's review (2011) systematized these divergences, their renormalization, and the logarithmic terms. Whether this renormalization picture fully accounts for the entropy in a fundamental theory, and how the species scaling is resolved there, has remained unsettled.

Bianchi (2012) showed that the cutoff and species puzzles disappear for variations rather than absolute values. The near-horizon geometry of any non-extremal black hole (or of a cosmological horizon), as seen by a suitably localized observer, is that of a Rindler horizon — the causal horizon of a uniformly accelerated observer in flat spacetime. By the Bisognano-Wichmann theorem (the algebraic result underlying the Unruh effect, whereby such an observer perceives the Minkowski vacuum as a thermal state), the vacuum restricted to one side of the horizon is the Gibbs state ρ0=e−2πK/Z\rho_0 = e^{-2\pi K}/Z, where KK is the boost Hamiltonian generating horizon-time translations. A low-energy excited state perturbs only the infrared modes, so the first-order change of the entanglement entropy is δSent=−Tr(δρlog⁡ρ0)=2π Tr(K δρ)\delta S_{\mathrm{ent}} = -\mathrm{Tr}(\delta\rho \log \rho_0) = 2\pi\,\mathrm{Tr}(K\,\delta\rho), i.e. proportional to the boost-energy flux through the horizon. Because gravitons couple universally to the total energy-momentum tensor (the equivalence principle, in particle-physics language), this flux can be re-expressed through the deflection of the light rays that define the horizon, giving δSent=δA/4G\delta S_{\mathrm{ent}} = \delta A/4G: the Bekenstein-Hawking variation, finite and species-independent, with gravitons contributing even in the absence of matter. The derivation holds for perturbations of low energy compared with the cutoff and of short wavelength compared with the horizon curvature scale, and for non-extremal horizons.

By construction the result is silent about the ultraviolet-divergent vacuum piece: the background area A0A_0 is unchanged in the process, and only the event-horizon area changes. In loop quantum gravity, a non-perturbative approach in which geometry is quantized so that there are no degrees of freedom above a scale set by the Immirzi parameter γ\gamma (a quantization ambiguity of the theory), the horizon entropy can be computed non-perturbatively and is finite, with the variation δS\delta S independent of γ\gamma (Bianchi, 2012, companion computation). Bianchi's paper closes by asking what becomes of the divergent part in such a complete framework — whether it can ever be changed in a physical process (only then could it contribute to horizon thermodynamics), and whether crossing particle-production thresholds at high energy adds chemical-potential-like terms to horizon thermodynamics. Later developments — Jacobson's entanglement-equilibrium program (the hypothesis that the vacuum maximizes entanglement, from which Einstein's equation follows), the holographic generalized-entropy framework (built on the generalized entropy A/4G+SbulkA/4G + S_{\mathrm{bulk}}, the horizon-area term plus the entropy of bulk quantum fields), and the swampland species-scale literature (conjectural constraints tying the number of particle species to the species scale, the energy at which quantum gravity becomes strong) — each touches part of this question; none settles it.

Problem Statement

Determine the fate of the ultraviolet-divergent contribution to horizon entanglement entropy, c0A0Λ2+c1log⁡Λc_0 A_0 \Lambda^2 + c_1 \log \Lambda, in a complete (non-perturbative or UV-complete) theory of quantum gravity, and thereby whether entanglement is the microscopic origin of the full Bekenstein-Hawking entropy and not only of its low-energy variations. Specifically, within a stated UV-complete framework or a controlled model of one: (1) UV status — whether the divergent terms are absorbed into the renormalized Newton constant, rendered finite by quantum-gravitational degrees of freedom, or absent altogether, with the computation showing explicitly what replaces c0A0Λ2+c1log⁡Λc_0 A_0 \Lambda^2 + c_1 \log \Lambda; (2) changeability — whether any physical process can vary the ultraviolet contribution (only then can it contribute to horizon thermodynamics), with either an exhibited process or a proof of impossibility within the framework, together with an identification of how the term could be probed theoretically or experimentally; (3) species dependence — the precise form, magnitude, and physical implications of the high-energy contributions associated with crossing particle thresholds, i.e. whether the horizon entropy variation acquires a chemical-potential term δS=2π(δA/8πG+μ δN)\delta S = 2\pi(\delta A/8\pi G + \mu\,\delta N) with NN the number of unfrozen matter species, and how such terms scale with the species content and the species scale of the ultraviolet theory. These sub-questions jointly serve one objective: a UV-complete account of horizon entropy in which the status of the divergent entanglement piece is settled and shown to be consistent with the perturbative variation result.

References

  1. E. Bianchi, 'Black hole entropy from graviton entanglement' (2012), arXiv:1211.0522, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.1211.0522, https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.0522
  2. L. Bombelli, R. K. Koul, J. Lee, R. D. Sorkin, 'A Quantum Source of Entropy for Black Holes', Phys. Rev. D 34, 373 (1986), DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.34.373, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.34.373
  3. L. Susskind, J. Uglum, 'Black Hole Entropy in Canonical Quantum Gravity and Superstring Theory', Phys. Rev. D 50, 2700 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9401070, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2700, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9401070
  4. T. Jacobson, 'Black Hole Entropy and Induced Gravity' (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9404039, https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9404039
  5. S. N. Solodukhin, 'Entanglement entropy of black holes', Living Rev. Relativity 14, 8 (2011), arXiv:1104.3712, DOI 10.12942/lrr-2011-8, https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3712
  6. E. Bianchi, 'Entropy of Non-Extremal Black Holes from Loop Gravity' (2012), arXiv:1204.5122, https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.5122
  7. T. Jacobson, A. Satz, 'Black hole entanglement entropy and the renormalization group', Phys. Rev. D 87, 084047 (2013), arXiv:1212.6824, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.084047, https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.6824
  8. A. Ghosh, K. Noui, A. Perez, 'Statistics, holography, and black hole entropy in loop quantum gravity', Phys. Rev. D 89, 084069 (2014), arXiv:1309.4563, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084069, https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4563
  9. G. Chirco, C. Rovelli, P. Ruggiero, 'Thermally correlated states in Loop Quantum Gravity', Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 035011 (2015), arXiv:1408.0121, DOI 10.1088/0264-9381/32/3/035011, https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.0121
  10. T. Jacobson, 'Entanglement Equilibrium and the Einstein Equation', Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 201101 (2016), arXiv:1505.04753, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.201101, https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04753
  11. N. Engelhardt, A. C. Wall, 'Quantum extremal surfaces: holographic entanglement entropy beyond the classical regime', JHEP 01 (2015) 073, arXiv:1408.3203, DOI 10.1007/JHEP01(2015)073, https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.3203
  12. H. Casini, D. A. Galante, R. C. Myers, 'Comments on Jacobson's "Entanglement equilibrium and the Einstein equation"', JHEP 03 (2016) 194, arXiv:1601.00528, DOI 10.1007/JHEP03(2016)194, https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.00528
  13. M. Varadarajan, 'A Note on Entanglement Entropy, Coherent States and Gravity', Gen. Rel. Grav. 48, 35 (2016), arXiv:1602.00106, DOI 10.1007/s10714-016-2030-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-016-2030-9
  14. E. Bianchi, P. Donà, I. Vilensky, 'Entanglement entropy of Bell-network states in loop quantum gravity: Analytical and numerical results', Phys. Rev. D 99, 086013 (2019), arXiv:1812.10996, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.086013, https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.10996
  15. E. Bianchi, A. Satz, 'Entropy of a subalgebra of observables and the geometric entanglement entropy', Phys. Rev. D 99, 085001 (2019), arXiv:1901.06454, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.085001, https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06454
  16. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, H. Maxfield, 'The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole', JHEP 12 (2019) 063, arXiv:1905.08762, DOI 10.1007/JHEP12(2019)063, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08762
  17. G. Penington, 'Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox', JHEP 09 (2020) 002, arXiv:1905.08255, DOI 10.1007/JHEP09(2020)002, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08255
  18. N. Cribiori, D. Lüst, G. Staudt, 'Black hole entropy and moduli-dependent species scale', Phys. Lett. B 838, 138113 (2023), arXiv:2212.10286, DOI 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138113, https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10286
  19. N. Cribiori, D. Lüst, C. Montella, 'Species entropy and thermodynamics', JHEP 10 (2023) 059, arXiv:2305.10489, DOI 10.1007/JHEP10(2023)059, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10489
  20. J. Calderón-Infante, M. Delgado, A. M. Uranga, 'Emergence of Species Scale Black Hole Horizons', JHEP 01 (2024) 003, arXiv:2310.04488, DOI 10.1007/JHEP01(2024)003, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04488
  21. J. Y. L. Jones, Y. K. Yazdi, 'Spectral Spacetime Entropy for Quasifree Theories' (2026), arXiv:2602.16782, https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16782