A 2007 PNAS study (Hsu et al.) demonstrated, by residue-specific NMR, that an engineered immunoglobulin-like domain can reach its native tertiary fold while covalently tethered to the ribosome, and that transient, localized contacts between the folded domain and the ribosome surface cause selective line broadening. The paper closed by defining the outstanding objective: a detailed, residue-specific description of the steps of cotranslational folding, including how auxiliary factors such as molecular chaperones help an elongating chain fold into a specific structure and avoid misfolding. Major parts of the agenda have since been achieved - in vivo production of labeled ribosome–nascent-chain complexes (RNCs), length-resolved elongation snapshots, structural ensembles of folding intermediates, quantitative folding-versus-ribosome-binding energetics, and peptide- to residue-level chaperone mechanisms - but the unifying core remains open: no general rules specify which sequence or structural features let a domain fold cotranslationally rather than be inhibited by ribosome-surface binding, interaction energetics are quantified only for a few systems, and residue-level observation under near-cellular conditions including chaperones is still lacking.

Background

In the cell, a protein folds while it is being made. The ribosome (a roughly 2.4 MDa RNA–protein machine) synthesizes polypeptides vectorially, N-terminus first, through a roughly 100 Å exit tunnel, so the nascent chain encounters confinement and the ribosome surface rather than free solution - a situation termed cotranslational folding. A ribosome–nascent-chain complex (RNC) is a ribosome with the growing chain still attached via its C-terminus to a transfer RNA at the peptidyl transferase center; such complexes can be trapped at defined chain lengths by translation-stalling constructs. Classical protein-folding studies instead refold full-length purified proteins after chemical denaturation, so the cotranslational regime - an evolving free-energy landscape coupled to chain elongation - remained largely inaccessible at atomic resolution. NMR spectroscopy is the technique of choice for residue-specific information on dynamic systems, but a tethered ~2.4 MDa ribosome was expected to broaden resonances beyond detection. Hsu, Fucini, Cabrita, Launay, Dobson and Christodoulou (PNAS 2007) overcame this by selectively isotope-labeling only the nascent chain in a cell-free system, using SOFAST-HMQC (a rapid-acquisition 1H–15N backbone correlation experiment that, roughly speaking, records a fingerprint peak for each labeled amide), verifying ribosome attachment by 15N-filtered X-STE diffusion NMR (which measures how slowly the labeled species tumbles and diffuses) and by puromycin-induced release (an antibiotic that cleaves the chain from tRNA). Their construct encoded domains 5 and 6 of the gelation factor ABP-120, a tandem immunoglobulin (Ig) repeat designated Ig2: the N-terminal domain (NTD) adopted its native fold on the ribosome with chemical shifts matching the isolated domain, while the C-terminal domain (CTD) was designed to lack its final beta-strand and remained unfolded and flexible. A set of colocalized residues, mostly in loops of the N-terminal hemisphere of the NTD, showed selective resonance line broadening (extra peak width and intensity loss, the NMR signature of motion slowed into the microsecond-to-millisecond exchange regime), indicating specific but transient interactions of the folded domain with the ribosome surface that disappeared upon puromycin release. Trigger factor - the first chaperone that nascent bacterial chains normally meet, which binds at the tunnel exit and prefers hydrophobic substrate segments - was absent from the purified RNCs, so the observed folding occurred without it. The authors' conclusion states the research objective: residue-specific NMR of nascent chains opens the way to a detailed description of the steps of cotranslational folding, including how auxiliary factors such as molecular chaperones help an elongating chain fold correctly and avoid misfolding. The corresponding open agenda comprises four linked strands: (1) whether native tertiary folding on the ribosome generalizes across protein topologies, sequence contexts, and chain lengths, and what features govern it; (2) quantitative mechanisms, kinetics, and thermodynamics of the transient ribosome–nascent-chain interactions detected as line broadening, and how they reshape folding pathways; (3) the roles of ribosome-associated factors, above all trigger factor, in modulating the balance between cotranslational folding, ribosomal contacts, and misfolding, at comparable residue-level resolution; and (4) methodological extension to larger or weakly expressed chains, to in-situ-like conditions containing auxiliary factors and cellular components, and to length-resolved series that map structure emerging stepwise during elongation. These strands share one scientific objective: to explain, quantitatively and residue by residue, how the translating ribosome and its associated factors determine the folding fate of an emerging chain. Methodological vocabulary relevant to this agenda includes paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE), an NMR effect in which a nearby paramagnetic spin label broadens resonances in a distance-dependent way; hydrogen–deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS), which reports local structural protection in peptides by measuring backbone-amide exchange; optical tweezers, which apply and measure piconewton forces on single tethered molecules; and single-molecule FRET, which reports nanometer-scale distance changes on single molecules via fluorophore pairs.

Problem Statement

Establish a quantitative, residue-level mechanistic account of cotranslational protein folding on the ribosome, generalizing beyond the engineered Ig2 model system of Hsu et al. (2007) and holding together four linked strands of one objective: (1) Generality and determinants - synthesize, from the protein folds, sequence contexts, and nascent-chain lengths examined to date, which domains attain native tertiary structure while covalently tethered to the ribosome and which sequence or structural features are reported to govern this ability versus inhibition by ribosome-surface binding, and state explicitly which generalizations remain untested. (2) Interaction energetics - synthesize, in mechanism, kinetics, and thermodynamics, what is established about how the transient, localized contacts between nascent chain and ribosome surface (the NMR line-broadening-detected interactions of the source study) reshape the folding free-energy landscape and folding pathway as a function of chain length, and state where per-residue energetic rules remain untested. (3) Chaperone modulation - synthesize, at comparable residue-level resolution, the established mechanisms by which ribosome-associated auxiliary factors, in particular the chaperone trigger factor and other ribosome-associated folding factors, modulate the balance between cotranslational folding, transient ribosomal contacts, and misfolding, and state what remains untested. (4) Methodological reach - propose how residue-specific observation can be extended to larger or weakly expressed nascent chains and to in-situ-like conditions in which auxiliary factors and cellular components are present, including length- or time-resolved series that map the stepwise emergence of structure during elongation. The four strands are tightly coupled facets of the single scientific objective stated in the Background: to explain, quantitatively and residue by residue, how the translating ribosome and its associated factors determine the folding fate of an emerging chain. The account is grounded in the cited literature and existing ribosome-nascent-chain data; newly executed measurements are not required. Strands 1 and 2, together with parts of strands 3 and 4, already have partial solutions in the literature that further work builds on rather than re-derives.

References

  1. Hsu STD, Fucini P, Cabrita LD, Launay H, Dobson CM, Christodoulou J (2007) Structure and dynamics of a ribosome-bound nascent chain by NMR spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16516–16521. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704664104, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704664104
  2. Cabrita LD, Hsu ST, Launay H, Dobson CM, Christodoulou J (2009) Probing ribosome-nascent chain complexes produced in vivo by NMR spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903750106, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903750106
  3. Eichmann C, Preissler S, Riek R, Deuerling E (2010) Cotranslational structure acquisition of nascent polypeptides monitored by NMR spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.0914300107, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914300107
  4. Holtkamp W, Kokic G, Jäger M, Mittelstaet J, Komar AA, Rodnina MV (2015) Cotranslational protein folding on the ribosome monitored in real time. Science. doi:10.1126/science.aad0344, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad0344
  5. Cabrita LD, Cassaignau AME, Launay HMM, Waudby CA, Wlodarski T, Camilloni C, Karyadi ME, Robertson AL, Wang X, Wentink AS, Goodsell L, Woolhead CA, Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM, Christodoulou J (2016) A structural ensemble of a ribosome-nascent chain complex during cotranslational protein folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol. doi:10.1038/nsmb.3182, https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3182
  6. Deckert A, Waudby CA, Wlodarski T, Wentink AS, Wang X, Kirkpatrick JP, Paton JF, Camilloni C, Kukic P, Dobson CM, Vendruscolo M, Cabrita LD, Christodoulou J (2016) Structural characterization of the interaction of α-synuclein nascent chains with the ribosomal surface and trigger factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.1519124113, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519124113
  7. Cassaignau AME, Włodarski T, Chan SHS, Woodburn LF, Bukvin IV, Streit JO, Cabrita LD, Waudby CA, Christodoulou J (2021) Interactions between nascent proteins and the ribosome surface inhibit co-translational folding. Nat Chem Biol. doi:10.1038/s41557-021-00796-x, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00796-x
  8. Waudby CA, Burridge C, Cabrita LD, Christodoulou J (2022) Thermodynamics of co-translational folding and ribosome-nascent chain interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102357, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102357
  9. Tan R, Hoare M, Welle KA, Swovick K, Hryhorenko JR, Ghaemmaghami S (2023) Folding stabilities of ribosome-bound nascent polypeptides probed by mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.2303167120, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2303167120
  10. Samatova E, Komar AA, Rodnina MV (2024) How the ribosome shapes cotranslational protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102740, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102740
  11. Roeselová A, Maslen SL, Shivakumaraswamy S, Pellowe GA, Howell S, Joshi D, Redmond J, Kjær S, Skehel JM, Balchin D (2024) Mechanism of chaperone coordination during cotranslational protein folding in bacteria. Mol Cell. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.06.002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2024.06.002
  12. Wales TE, Pajak A, Roeselová A, Shivakumaraswamy S, Howell S, Kjær S, Hartl FU, Engen JR, Balchin D (2024) Resolving chaperone-assisted protein folding on the ribosome at the peptide level. Nat Struct Mol Biol. doi:10.1038/s41594-024-01355-x, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-024-01355-x
  13. Herling TW, Cassaignau AME, Wentink AS, Peter QAE, Kumar PC, Kartanas T, Schneider MM, Cabrita LD, Christodoulou J, Knowles TPJ (2024) Thermodynamic profiles for cotranslational trigger factor substrate recognition. Sci Adv. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adn4824, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn4824
  14. Till K, Seinen AB, Wruck F, Sunderlikova V, Galmozzi CV, Katranidis A, Bukau B, Kramer G, Tans SJ (2025) Trigger factor accelerates nascent chain compaction and folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.2422678122, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422678122
  15. Pellowe GA, Voisin TB, Karpauskaite L, Maslen SL, Roeselová A, Skehel JM, Roustan C, George R, Nans A, Kjær S, Taylor IA, Balchin D (2025) The human ribosome modulates multidomain protein biogenesis by delaying cotranslational domain docking. Nat Struct Mol Biol. doi:10.1038/s41594-025-01676-5, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-025-01676-5
  16. Lentzsch AM, Lee JH, Shan SO (2025) Mechanistic insights into protein biogenesis and maturation on the ribosome. J Mol Biol. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169056
  17. Chan SHS, Streit JO, Włodarski T, Mitropoulou AN, Cassaignau AME, Bukvin IV, Waudby CA, Cabrita LD, Christodoulou J (2026) Structures of protein folding intermediates on the ribosome. Nat Struct Mol Biol. doi:10.1038/s41594-026-01814-7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-026-01814-7
  18. Roeselová A, Pajak A, Wales TE, Pellowe GA, Kjær S, Engen JR, Balchin D (2026) Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry analysis of ribosome-nascent chain complexes to study protein biogenesis at the peptide level. Nat Protoc. doi:10.1038/s41596-025-01279-w, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-025-01279-w