Quantitative microscopic mechanisms and controlled fabrication of electron-irradiation defects in freestanding monolayer hexagonal boron nitride

Freestanding monolayer hexagonal boron nitride ($h$-BN) can be prepared inside a transmission electron microscope and damaged atom by atom, and the 2009 experiments that established this found that electron irradiation preferentially produces boron monovacancies ($V_B$) with nitrogen-terminated zigzag pore edges, while leaving several central questions unresolved: the quantitative microscopic mechanism behind the boron-vacancy dominance (knock-on thresholds alone do not suffice), the dynamics of the boron–nitrogen divacancy ($V_{BN}$) and its evolution into larger boron-rich clusters such as $V_{3B+N}$, whether topological Stone–Wales-type bond-flip reconstructions can be induced at all, the theoretical description of local relaxations around $V_B$ and of the electronic and magnetic structure of nitrogen-terminated zigzag edges, and systematic exploration of irradiation parameters for controlled defect fabrication. Later work has resolved parts of this program — first-principles displacement thresholds and kinetic Monte Carlo models, measured displacement cross sections, in-situ vacancy dynamics, edge imaging, and parameter-dependent defect engineering — but the composite question retains a precise open core: a predictive, quantitative account of defect production in monolayer $h$-BN (including the roles of electronic excitation, charge state, and residual-gas chemistry), the atomically resolved pathways and barriers of divacancy evolution, the feasibility and activation barriers of bond-flip reconstructions in the pristine lattice, and a complete quantitative parameter-space map for deterministic defect fabrication.

Background

Hexagonal boron nitride ($h$-BN) is a two-dimensional crystal with the same honeycomb lattice as graphene, but with boron and nitrogen occupying the two inequivalent sublattices; because the two atomic species differ, every vacancy, edge, and reconstruction in $h$-BN has a chemical identity that graphene lacks. A monolayer can be made freestanding (suspended over vacuum) inside a transmission electron microscope (TEM) by irradiating a multilayer flake with energetic electrons, which eject atoms one by one until a single atomic plane remains — a layer-by-layer sputtering process. In TEM, atom ejection occurs mainly through the knock-on mechanism: a beam electron transfers momentum in a quasielastic collision to a nucleus, and the atom leaves its site once the transferred energy exceeds the displacement threshold energy, which depends on the atomic species, its bonding, and (for atoms at defect edges or under altered charge states) its local environment. The probability of ejection per unit electron dose is described by a displacement cross section. Imaging light atoms such as B and N individually requires aberration-corrected high-resolution TEM combined with exit-wave reconstruction, a technique that combines a through-focal series of images to recover the electron wave phase at the specimen, which scales with atomic number and thereby discriminates B from N sites.

In the source experiment (Jin, Lin, Suenaga and Iijima, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 195505 (2009)), a freestanding $h$-BN monolayer was fabricated by 120 keV electron irradiation and its triangular vacancy defects were elementally assigned. Vacancy notation: $V_B$ and $V_N$ denote missing single boron or nitrogen atoms; $V_{BN}$ is the nearest-neighbor B–N divacancy; $V_{3B+N}$ is a triangular cluster with three boron and one nitrogen atom missing. The observations were: (i) triangular vacancies all share one crystallographic orientation, identifying them as $V_B$ and its boron-rich growth products ($V_{3B+N}$, $V_{6B+3N}$), while the opposite-orientation family ($V_N$-based) is absent — notably, equilibrium formation-energy calculations had predicted $V_N$ to be energetically preferred, so the irradiation outcome is controlled by non-equilibrium kinetics, not thermodynamics; (ii) the N–N pair distances around $V_B$ (2.63–2.72 Å versus 2.49 Å in the pristine lattice) show a measurable outward relaxation and rule out N–N bond or pentagon-forming reconstruction; (iii) the zigzag-type edges of the triangular holes are terminated by nitrogen; and (iv) no Stone–Wales-type topological defects (bond rotations producing five- and seven-membered rings) and no stable $V_{BN}$ were observed. Stone–Wales transformations, well known in graphene, are predicted theoretically for $h$-BN but have not been observed in its pristine lattice, because rotating a B–N bond creates energetically costly like-atom (B–B or N–N) bonds. Earlier adjacent results include first-principles energetics of multivacancies in $h$-BN (Okada, 2009), which found the $V_{3B+N}$ triangle favorable under nitrogen- and electron-rich conditions; atomic-resolution imaging of atomically thin BN membranes under 80 kV electron irradiation, which established selective sputtering and nitrogen-terminated pore edges in few-layer material (Meyer et al., 2009); and electron-microscopy plus theory on irradiation defects in boron nitride nanotubes (Zobelli et al., 2006), where the nearest-neighbor B–N divacancy is the dominant point defect. What the source paper left open, and what this problem asks, spans the mechanism, the kinetics, the topology, the electronic structure, and the control of irradiation defects in monolayer $h$-BN — five facets of one objective: a quantitative microscopic understanding of how electron irradiation writes defects into this polar monolayer, sufficient to fabricate targeted defect types and densities at will. This objective has only grown in importance, since irradiation- and implantation-created defects in $h$-BN now underpin single-photon emitters, spin qubits, and atomically precise nanopores.

Problem Statement

Establish a quantitative, predictive microscopic description of defect production by electron irradiation in freestanding monolayer hexagonal boron nitride, sufficient to fabricate targeted defect types and densities in a controlled way. Concretely, building on the observations of Jin, Lin, Suenaga and Iijima (Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 195505, 2009), determine and verify: (1) the microscopic mechanism and relative weight of the processes that make boron monovacancies ($V_B$) dominate under electron irradiation — the sputtering (displacement) cross sections of B and N as functions of beam energy, the momentum-transfer distributions, the contribution of valence ionization and resulting charge states to the displacement thresholds (whether they lower them, raise them, or leave them unchanged), and the subsequent kinetic cascades that grow or annihilate defects — to the level of quantitative, experimentally testable prediction; (2) the stability, dynamics, and conversion pathways of the nearest-neighbor boron–nitrogen divacancy ($V_{BN}$), including the energy barriers and time scales on which it either heals or evolves into larger boron-rich clusters such as $V_{3B+N}$, verified at atomic resolution; (3) whether Stone–Wales-type or other bond-rotation topological reconstructions can be realized in pristine monolayer $h$-BN — under higher temperature, different beam energies, or alternative activation mechanisms — and the activation energies separating the non-observation under the original irradiation conditions from the theoretically predicted reconstructions — where, if no such reconstruction can be realized under any of these routes, a definite negative result together with the exclusion bound that rules it out resolves this facet; (4) theoretical descriptions that quantitatively reproduce the measured local atomic relaxations around $V_B$ and predict the electronic and magnetic properties of the experimentally realized nitrogen-terminated zigzag edges, compared against atomic-resolution measurements; and (5) a systematic experimental exploration of the irradiation parameter space — electron acceleration voltage, beam intensity, dose rate, and sample temperature — that maps these parameters onto the defect types and densities produced, enabling controlled fabrication. These five deliverables are facets of one objective: replacing the present semi-quantitative understanding of how an electron beam writes defects into a polar two-dimensional crystal with a predictive and controllable one. A resolution consists in the combined, mutually consistent quantitative account across all five facets, each resolved by a definite quantitative result for the quantities it names — whether positive or, where the facet is an existence question, a definite exclusion — rather than by any single fixed numeric threshold; establishing only a subset of the facets, however quantitatively, does not by itself resolve the task.

References

1. Chuanhong Jin, Fang Lin, Kazu Suenaga, Sumio Iijima, "Fabrication of a Freestanding Boron Nitride Single Layer and Its Defect Assignments", Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 195505 (2009). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.195505; https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.195505
2. J. Kotakoski, C. H. Jin, O. Lehtinen, K. Suenaga, A. V. Krasheninnikov, "Electron knock-on damage in hexagonal boron nitride monolayers", Phys. Rev. B 82, 113404 (2010). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.113404; https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.113404
3. S. Okada, "Atomic configurations and energetics of vacancies in hexagonal boron nitride: First-principles total-energy calculations", Phys. Rev. B 80, 161404 (2009). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.161404; https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.161404
4. A. Zobelli, C. P. Ewels, A. Gloter, G. Seifert, O. Stephan, S. Csillag, C. Colliex, "Defective Structure of BN Nanotubes: From Single Vacancies to Dislocation Lines", Nano Lett. 6, 1955 (2006). DOI: 10.1021/nl061081l; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/nl061081l
5. J. C. Meyer, A. Chuvilin, G. Algara-Siller, J. Biskupek, U. Kaiser, "Selective Sputtering and Atomic Resolution Imaging of Atomically Thin Boron Nitride Membranes", Nano Lett. 9, 2683 (2009). DOI: 10.1021/nl9011497; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/nl9011497
6. N. Alem, R. Erni, C. Kisielowski, M. D. Rossell, P. Hartel, B. Jiang, W. Gannett, A. Zettl, "Vacancy growth and migration dynamics in atomically thin hexagonal boron nitride under electron beam irradiation", Phys. Status Solidi RRL 5, 295 (2011). DOI: 10.1002/pssr.201105262; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pssr.201105262
7. T. Pham, A. Gibb, Z. Li, S. Gilbert, C. Song, S. G. Louie, A. Zettl, "Formation and Dynamics of Electron-Irradiation-Induced Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride at Elevated Temperatures", Nano Lett. 16, 7142 (2016). DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03442; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03442
8. Thuy An Bui, Gregor T. Leuthner, Jacob Madsen, Mohammad R. A. Monazam, Alexandru I. Chirita, Andreas Postl, Clemens Mangler, Jani Kotakoski, Toma Susi, "Creation of Single Vacancies in hBN with Electron Irradiation", Small 19, 2301926 (2023). DOI: 10.1002/smll.202301926; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smll.202301926 (preprint arXiv:2303.00497; https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.00497)
9. Toma Susi, Jannik C. Meyer, Jani Kotakoski, "Manipulating low-dimensional materials down to the level of single atoms with electron irradiation", Ultramicroscopy 180, 163 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.03.005; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.03.005 (preprint arXiv:1703.02429; https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.02429)
10. R. Wang, J. Yang, X. Wu, S. Wang, "Local charge states in hexagonal boron nitride with Stone–Wales defects", Nanoscale 8, 8210 (2016). DOI: 10.1039/c5nr09099g; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2016/nr/c5nr09099g
11. H. Hamdi, G. Thiering, Z. Bodrog, V. Ivády, A. Gali, "Stone–Wales defects in hexagonal boron nitride as ultraviolet emitters", npj Comput. Mater. 6, 178 (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41524-020-00451-y; https://www.nature.com/articles/s41524-020-00451-y
12. A. L. Gibb, N. Alem, J.-H. Chen, K. J. Erickson, J. Ciston, A. Gautam, M. Linck, A. Zettl, "Atomic Resolution Imaging of Grain Boundary Defects in Monolayer Chemical Vapor Deposition-Grown Hexagonal Boron Nitride", J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 6758 (2013). DOI: 10.1021/ja400637n; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja400637n
13. R. Zhao, J. Gao, Z. Liu, F. Ding, "The reconstructed edges of the hexagonal BN", Nanoscale 7, 9723 (2015). DOI: 10.1039/c5nr02143j; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2015/nr/c5nr02143j
14. F. Zheng, G. Zhou, Z. Liu, J. Wu, W. Duan, B.-L. Gu, S. Zhang, "Half metallicity along the edge of zigzag boron nitride nanoribbons", Phys. Rev. B 78, 205415 (2008). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.205415; https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.205415
15. Mehmet Dogan, Marvin L. Cohen, "Magnetic multilayer edges in Bernal-stacked hexagonal boron nitride", Phys. Rev. B 102, 155419 (2020). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.155419; https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.155419
16. P. Liu, H. Tian, W. Windl, G. Gu, G. Duscher, Y. Wu, M. Zhao, J. Guo, B. Xu, L. Liu, "Direct imaging of the nitrogen-rich edge in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride and its band structure tuning", Nanoscale 11, 20676 (2019). DOI: 10.1039/c9nr07147d; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2019/nr/c9nr07147d
17. M. Fischer, J. Caridad, A. Sajid, S. Ghaderzadeh, M. Ghorbani-Asl, L. Gammelgaard, P. Bøggild, K. S. Thygesen, A. Krasheninnikov, S. Xiao, M. Wubs, N. Stenger, "Controlled generation of luminescent centers in hexagonal boron nitride by irradiation engineering", Sci. Adv. 7, eabe7138 (2021). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe7138; https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abe7138
18. Dana O. Byrne, Frances I. Allen, "Atomic Engineering of Triangular Nanopores in Monolayer hBN: A Decoupled Seeding and Growth Approach", arXiv:2408.09355 (2024); https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09355
19. Dana O. Byrne, Stephanie M. Ribet, Demie Kepaptsoglou, Quentin M. Ramasse, Colin Ophus, Frances I. Allen, "Fabrication and characterization of boron-terminated tetravacancies in monolayer hBN using STEM, EELS and electron ptychography", arXiv:2504.14217 (2025); https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14217
20. Shrirang Chokappa, Manuel Längle, Barbara Maria Mayer, Vladimir Zobač, Jacob Madsen, Diana Propst, David Lamprecht, Philipp Irschik, Arixin Bo, Clara Kofler, Vinzent Hana, Fabian Kraft, Clemens Mangler, Lado Filipovic, Toma Susi, Jani Kotakoski, "Competition between vacancy creation and filling in defect-engineering of hBN", arXiv:2609.11666 (2026); https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11666
21. Umair Javed, Manuel Längle, Vladimír Zobač, Alexander Markevich, Barbara Maria Mayer, Clara Kofler, Martin Paul, Darwin Lorber, Nandhini Ravindran, Clemens Mangler, Toma Susi, Jani Kotakoski, "Origin of circular and triangular pores in electron-irradiated hexagonal boron nitride", Nat. Commun. 17, 9620 (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-026-76612-2; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-76612-2 (preprint arXiv:2507.13180; https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13180)
22. Rohit Babar, Ádám Ganyecz, Igor A. Abrikosov, Gergely Barcza, Viktor Ivády, "Carbon-contaminated topological defects in hexagonal boron nitride for quantum photonics", npj 2D Mater. Appl. 9, 33 (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41699-025-00559-z; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-025-00559-z (preprint arXiv:2403.00755; https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00755)