Growth mechanism, structure–process relations, and tip-oxidation kinetics of single-walled carbon nanohorns synthesized by CO$_2$ laser ablation of graphite

Single-walled carbon nanohorns (SWCNHs) — horn-shaped single-graphene-sheet particles that self-assemble into spherical 'dahlia' aggregates during catalyst-free CO$_2$ laser ablation of graphite — were discovered by Iijima and co-workers in 1999, who measured their structure (cone caps of about $20^\circ$, tubular parts 2–3 nm wide), their thermal robustness in vacuum, and the oxidative opening of their tips, but left the underlying physics and chemistry unresolved. This problem records the still-open core of that paper's unfinished agenda: establish a validated microscopic mechanism (an atomistic pathway with kinetics) for how conical horn structures nucleate and grow in the non-thermal-equilibrium carbon plume; obtain a quantitative mapping from controllable synthesis parameters to horn-level structure (dimensions, wall registry, cone-cap pentagon arrangement); model the origin of the observed distorted horn cross-sections and of the inter-wall spacing variation within aggregates; and determine quantitative oxidation kinetics and stability limits of the horn tips. Later work (2000–2020) has supplied proposals and constraints — graphitic-patch collision simulations, in situ plume growth-rate measurements, buffer-gas morphology control, nanowindow oxidation protocols — but no validated mechanism or horn-level parameter map, so the core remains open.

Background

Carbon nanohorns arose from the study of curved $sp^2$ carbon: fullerenes (closed cages built from hexagons and twelve pentagons) and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs, graphene sheets rolled into cylinders, typically made by arc discharge or laser vaporization with metal catalysts). A conical graphene tip is geometrically constrained: by Euler's theorem, a cone of aperture $\theta$ closed smoothly by a graphene sheet requires a definite number of pentagonal rings in its cap, five pentagons giving $\theta \approx 19^\circ$. In 1999, S. Iijima, M. Yudasaka and co-workers reported ('Nano-aggregates of single-walled graphitic carbon nano-horns', Chem. Phys. Lett. 309, 165) that CO$_2$ laser ablation (vaporization of a graphite target by a pulsed CO$_2$ laser, here in argon at 760 Torr at room temperature, without any metal catalyst) yields gram-scale quantities of a new morphology: near-spherical 'dahlia' aggregates about 80 nm across, made of many horn-shaped sheaths, each a single graphene sheet consisting of a sharp conical cap (aperture about $20^\circ$, tip radius comparable to C60) and a short tubular part 2–3 nm in diameter, with adjacent horns in the aggregate separated by roughly 0.35 nm (the inter-wall spacing, set by van der Waals attraction between graphitic surfaces, the same weak intermolecular attraction that binds graphite layers; 'wall registry' denotes the relative in-plane orientation of adjacent graphitic walls). Electron diffraction and electron energy loss spectroscopy (a technique measuring energy transferred to electrons, which reveals elemental composition and bonding) confirmed the single-sheet, pure-carbon character. The authors also observed that the aggregates resist vacuum heating to $1800^\circ\mathrm{C}$ but that the horn tips open on heating in oxygen, and they mapped, at a qualitative level, how laser intensity and ambient pressure change the aggregate morphology. Crucially, the synthesis proceeds in a laser-produced plume far from thermal equilibrium, and the paper explicitly left open the microscopic questions it raised: no mechanistic pathway, kinetic model, or atomistic sequence was given for cone formation; no quantitative dependence of horn dimensions, wall registry, or cone-cap pentagon arrangement on controllable parameters (gas pressure and species, plume temperature, laser pulse shape, local carbon flux) was established; the observed distortion of the horn tubular cross-sections was noted with a suggested but unmodeled balance between inter-horn van der Waals attraction and tube stiffness; the inter-wall spacing and its variation with layer number and the associated van der Waals energetics were deferred; and the stability limits and oxidation kinetics of the horn tips were described only qualitatively, without activation energies, reaction rates, or systematic oxidation thresholds. These questions matter because SWCNHs became a workhorse nanocarbon for adsorption, catalysis, electrochemistry and drug delivery, where cone-cap topology, inter-wall spacing, and the controllable opening of tips by oxidation directly determine performance; reviews of the field (e.g. Karousis et al., Chem. Rev. 2016) continue to describe synthesis empirically rather than mechanistically.

Problem Statement

The overarching objective is a predictive, mechanism-level understanding of how single-walled carbon nanohorn structure forms during catalyst-free CO$_2$ laser ablation of graphite and how it responds to processing and oxidative environments — the agenda the 1999 discovery paper explicitly left unresolved. Concretely: (1) establish the microscopic growth mechanism of the single-graphene-sheet conical horns — an atomistic pathway and kinetic model for nucleation and cap formation in the non-thermal-equilibrium laser plume, explaining how the roughly $20^\circ$ cone caps (with their pentagon arrangement) and the 2–3 nm tubular sections form and why the horns self-assemble into radial dahlia aggregates; (2) determine quantitatively how horn dimensions, wall registry, and cone-cap pentagon arrangement depend on controllable parameters such as ambient gas species and pressure, plume temperature, laser pulse shape, and local carbon flux; (3) explain the origin of the observed distortion of the horn tubular cross-sections, i.e. model the competition between inter-horn van der Waals attraction and intrinsic tube stiffness, and (4) quantify the inter-wall spacing within aggregates and its variation with layer number together with the governing van der Waals energetics; and (5) determine the stability limits and oxidation kinetics of the horn tips — activation energies, reaction rates, and systematic oxidation thresholds for the oxidative tip opening that the source paper observed qualitatively. Items (1)–(5) are each independent research sub-questions, and all five are jointly required for the overarching objective: items (1)–(4) advance the formation-side understanding (mechanism plus its parameter dependence and structural signatures), and item (5) is the stability-side completion that controls post-synthesis tip opening; together they constitute the quantitative description of nanohorn formation and reactivity that the 1999 paper introduced but could not supply.

References

1. S. Iijima, M. Yudasaka, R. Yamada, S. Bandow, K. Suenaga, F. Kokai, K. Takahashi, 'Nano-aggregates of single-walled graphitic carbon nano-horns', Chemical Physics Letters 309 (1999) 165–170. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00642-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00642-9
2. T. Kawai, Y. Miyamoto, O. Sugino, Y. Koga, 'Nanotube and nanohorn nucleation from graphitic patches: Tight-binding molecular-dynamics simulations', Physical Review B 66 (2002) 033404. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.033404, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.033404
3. D. Kasuya, M. Yudasaka, K. Takahashi, F. Kokai, S. Iijima, 'Selective Production of Single-Wall Carbon Nanohorn Aggregates and Their Formation Mechanism', The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 106 (2002) 4947–4951. DOI: 10.1021/jp020387n, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp020387n
4. F. Kokai, K. Takahashi, D. Kasuya, M. Yudasaka, S. Iijima, 'Growth dynamics of single-wall carbon nanotubes and nanohorn aggregates by CO2 laser vaporization at room temperature', Applied Surface Science 197–198 (2002) 650–655. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00434-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00434-8
5. S. Bandow, F. Kokai, K. Takahashi, M. Yudasaka, L. C. Qin, S. Iijima, 'Interlayer spacing anomaly of single-wall carbon nanohorn aggregate', Chemical Physics Letters 321 (2000) 514–519. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00353-5, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00353-5
6. E. Bekyarova, K. Kaneko, D. Kasuya, K. Murata, M. Yudasaka, S. Iijima, 'Oxidation and Porosity Evaluation of Budlike Single-Wall Carbon Nanohorn Aggregates', Langmuir 18 (2002) 4138–4141. DOI: 10.1021/la0117348, https://doi.org/10.1021/la0117348
7. D. B. Geohegan, A. A. Puretzky, D. Styers-Barnett, H. Hu, B. Zhao, H. Cui, C. M. Rouleau, G. Eres, J. J. Jackson, R. F. Wood, S. Pannala, J. C. Wells, 'In situ time-resolved measurements of carbon nanotube and nanohorn growth', physica status solidi (b) 244 (2007) 3944–3949. DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200776204, https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.200776204
8. A. A. Puretzky, D. J. Styers-Barnett, C. M. Rouleau, H. Hu, B. Zhao, I. N. Ivanov, D. B. Geohegan, 'Cumulative and continuous laser vaporization synthesis of single wall carbon nanotubes and nanohorns', Applied Physics A 93 (2008) 849–855. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-008-4744-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-008-4744-3
9. M. Zhang, M. Yudasaka, K. Ajima, J. Miyawaki, S. Iijima, 'Light-Assisted Oxidation of Single-Wall Carbon Nanohorns for Abundant Creation of Oxygenated Groups That Enable Chemical Modifications with Proteins To Enhance Biocompatibility', ACS Nano 1 (2007) 265–272. DOI: 10.1021/nn700130f, https://doi.org/10.1021/nn700130f
10. F. Kokai, N. Tachi, K. Kobayashi, A. Koshio, 'Structural characterization of single-wall carbon nanohorn aggregates hybridized with carbon nanocapsules and their formation mechanism', Applied Surface Science 255 (2009) 9622–9625. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.04.076, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.04.076
11. N. Sano, T. Ishii, H. Tamon, 'Transformation from single-walled carbon nanotubes to nanohorns by simple heating with Pd at 1600°C', Carbon 49 (2011) 3698–3700. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.058, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.058
12. J. Xu, H. Tomimoto, T. Nakayama, 'What is inside carbon nanohorn aggregates?', Carbon 49 (2011) 2074–2078. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.01.042, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.01.042
13. R. Yuge, M. Yudasaka, K. Toyama, T. Yamaguchi, S. Iijima, T. Manako, 'Buffer gas optimization in CO2 laser ablation for structure control of single-wall carbon nanohorn aggregates', Carbon 50 (2012) 1925–1933. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.043, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.043
14. L. Hawelek, A. Brodka, J. C. Dore, A. C. Hannon, S. Iijima, M. Yudasaka, T. Ohba, K. Kaneko, A. Burian, 'Structural Modeling of Dahlia-Type Single-Walled Carbon Nanohorn Aggregates by Molecular Dynamics', The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 117 (2013) 9057–9061. DOI: 10.1021/jp408319t, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp408319t
15. N. Karousis, I. Suarez-Martinez, C. P. Ewels, N. Tagmatarchis, 'Structure, Properties, Functionalization, and Applications of Carbon Nanohorns', Chemical Reviews 116 (2016) 4850–4883. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00611, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00611
16. R. Yuge, F. Nihey, K. Toyama, M. Yudasaka, 'Carbon nanotubes forming cores of fibrous aggregates of carbon nanohorns', Carbon 122 (2017) 665–668. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.015
17. N. Tanigaki, K. Murata, T. Hayashi, K. Kaneko, 'Mild oxidation-production of subnanometer-sized nanowindows of single wall carbon nanohorn', Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 529 (2018) 332–336. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.06.023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.06.023
18. P. J. F. Harris, 'Nanotubes with horns: a clue to the growth mechanism?', Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures 28 (2020) 541–544. DOI: 10.1080/1536383X.2020.1718110, https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2020.1718110