Laughlin's 2017 proposal for 'pumped thermal grid storage with heat exchange' stores electricity by running a closed-cycle Brayton machine with argon (or nitrogen) as a heat pump between a hexane cold store near 180 K and a molten solar-salt hot store between 495 K and 823 K, with heat transferred through very large counterflow heat exchangers and charge/discharge obtained by reversing the flows. Its analysis predicts a round-trip efficiency bound near 0.75, an engine cost near USD 0.27 per watt, and a storage-medium cost near USD 13 per kWh — competitive with pumped hydroelectricity — but explicitly leaves the engineering validation open: the cost estimates omit balance-of-plant; the required very large heat exchangers do not exist as products; the maximum safe operating temperature of solar salt in air was unknown; the turbomachinery efficiency headroom was undemonstrated; the efficiency penalty of reversible (bi-directional) airfoils was unknown; and the technology, the paper concludes, can only be judged by building machines and testing them. The open core is the construction-level validation of the architecture itself — whether a grid-scale machine of this class realizes its predicted round-trip efficiency and cost, including manufacturable very large counterflow heat exchangers and turbomachinery that keeps high efficiency when reversed.

Background

Deep decarbonization of electricity supply requires storing energy at grid scale over hours to days. The dominant bulk technology, pumped hydroelectricity, is geographically constrained, and lithium-ion batteries remain expensive per stored kWh for long durations. This motivated Carnot batteries, also called pumped thermal electricity storage (PTES) or pumped heat energy storage (PHES): electricity drives a heat pump that moves heat from a cold thermal store to a hot one, and a heat engine returns electricity on discharge. In a Brayton-type Carnot battery the working fluid is a permanent gas (argon, nitrogen, air, or CO2) circulated in a closed loop through compressor and turbine stages (the gas-turbine thermodynamic cycle); the round-trip efficiency (RTE, electrical energy delivered per cycle divided by electrical energy absorbed) is limited by the polytropic efficiencies of the compressor and turbine — the small-stage aerodynamic efficiencies of the real compression and expansion processes — and by the entropy generated when heat moves between the working gas and the storage media. Earlier PTES designs, such as Howes's pumped heat electricity storage device, stored heat in packed beds of rock operated as thermoclines (stores in which hot and cold material coexist in one vessel, separated by a stratified mixing zone), with the gas passing directly through the bed.

Laughlin (2017) proposed a different realization, 'pumped thermal grid storage with heat exchange'. A closed-cycle Brayton machine using argon (or nitrogen) as the working gas exchanges heat with two liquids through very large counterflow shell-and-tube heat exchangers (tubes carrying one fluid nested inside a shell carrying the other in opposite directions) instead of thermoclines: molten solar salt — the 60:40 NaNO3-KNO3 eutectic used as the storage fluid in concentrating-solar-power plants — on the hot side between its melting point (about 495 K) and 823 K, a limit set by reversible nitrate/nitrite decomposition and by creep of inexpensive steel; and liquid hexane on the cold side near its 180 K melting point, with waste heat rejected near ambient. Charging and discharging reverse the direction of heat and fluid flow, the same machine serving as heat pump and engine. The paper accounts for losses through an entropy device, the fictive temperature TfT_f defined by 1/Tf=ΔS/Estore1/T_f=\Delta S/E_{store} (total entropy generated per unit stored energy), and derives for prototype parameters (compressor polytropic efficiency 0.91, turbine 0.93, temperature ratio 1.66 across the hot store) an RTE bound of roughly 0.75, refined in the paper's discussion to roughly 0.72 once the storage-side dump temperature is required to lie at or above ambient; the assumed polytropic efficiencies are the best of present-day aviation gas-turbine practice. Cost is estimated by scaling present-day power-turbine prices and the heat-exchanger steel mass, giving roughly USD 0.27 per engine watt and a marginal storage-medium cost of roughly USD 13 per kWh, with the nitrate eutectic near-optimal among candidate salts.

The paper is explicit that this is a thermodynamic bound and a price-based estimate, not a validated engineering design, and it enumerates the unvalidated elements: (i) the cost model omits flow handling, cooling structures, tanks, insulation, pumps, site preparation, and small-loss accounting, so the true economics require construction-level validation; (ii) very large heat exchangers of the required specification do not exist as products, their automated manufacture being argued only as straightforward in principle; (iii) the maximum safe operating temperature of solar salt in air was not known, leaving the upper thermal envelope of the design uncertain; (iv) there were theoretical indications that the compressor and turbine efficiencies could each improve by about one percentage point, but this was not established; (v) the efficiency compromise required for truly reversible airfoils — a single blading set working as a compressor in one flow direction and as a turbine in the other, rather than two dedicated machine sets — was unknown; and (vi) the technology would be judged definitively only by building machines and testing them.

The post-2017 literature has substantially quantified three of these unknowns — the maximum safe operating temperature of solar salt in air (measured by the molten-salt community, largely independent of the pumped-thermal literature), the practically achievable compressor and turbine polytropic efficiencies, and the efficiency penalty of reversible (bi-directional) turbomachinery (the latter two quantified at the computational and techno-economic level; references 5, 7, and 8) — and kW- to MW-scale demonstrations exist for related pumped-thermal configurations of other architectures. The commercial descendant of the architecture, Malta Inc., has published no utility-scale plant performance data, its first announced commercial deployment being an industrial process-heat pump. No grid-scale machine of the heat-exchange Brayton architecture itself is known to have been built and performance-tested.

Problem Statement

Determine, at engineering (construction) fidelity, whether the heat-exchange Brayton pumped-thermal storage architecture of Laughlin (2017) — a closed-cycle Brayton machine using argon (or nitrogen) as working gas, a molten solar-salt hot store between 495 K and 823 K, a liquid-hexane cold store near 180 K, and very large counterflow heat exchangers between the working gas and the storage liquids, with charge and discharge obtained by reversing the heat and fluid flow directions — achieves its predicted round-trip efficiency (electrical energy delivered per cycle divided by electrical energy absorbed; the source's bound is ηstore<0.75\eta_{store} < 0.75 for the prototype parameters, refined by the source to ηstore<0.72\eta_{store} < 0.72 once the storage-side dump temperature is required to lie at or above ambient) and its predicted cost (near USD 0.27 per engine watt and USD 12.7 per stored kWh), by resolving the load-bearing unknowns the source itself identified:

(i) the construction-level cost of a plant of this class, including the balance-of-plant categories the source omitted (flow handling, cooling structures, tanks, insulation, pumps, site preparation, and small-loss accounting), yielding defensible values of cost per engine watt and per stored joule;

(ii) whether very large counterflow heat exchangers of the required specification — long stainless-steel tube bundles transferring heat between the working gas and the salt and hexane stores at the design temperatures — can be manufactured as costed products, including the automated manufacture the source argued for only in principle;

(iii) the maximum temperature at which solar salt (the 60:40 NaNO3-KNO3 molten-nitrate eutectic) can be operated safely in contact with air over service lifetimes, which sets the upper thermal envelope of the hot store;

(iv) the practically achievable compressor and turbine polytropic efficiencies (the small-stage aerodynamic efficiencies of the real compression and expansion processes) in this closed-cycle application, including the roughly one-percentage-point improvements the source indicated theoretically but did not establish;

(v) the efficiency compromise required for a single reversible turbomachine — one set of airfoils operating as a compressor in one flow direction and as a turbine in the reverse direction — or the cost consequence of using two dedicated machine sets instead (about USD 0.05 per engine watt on the source's prototype parameters); and

(vi) measured charge-discharge performance of a built machine of this architecture, which the source identifies as the definitive test of the technology.

Each item bounds the same two quantities — the achievable round-trip efficiency and the specific cost of a real plant. The source's own benchmarks are the reference points — round-trip efficiency approaching the source's bound (ηstore<0.75\eta_{store} < 0.75 for the prototype parameters, refined by the source to ηstore<0.72\eta_{store} < 0.72 under the ambient-dump-temperature constraint), at a cost competitive with pumped hydroelectricity on the source's estimates of about USD 0.27 per engine watt and about USD 12.7 per stored kWh — and the source itself calls these estimates crude, with very large error bars.

References

  1. R. B. Laughlin, 'Pumped thermal grid storage with heat exchange', Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 9, 044103 (2017). doi:10.1063/1.4994054, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4994054
  2. Jonathan Howes, 'Concept and Development of a Pumped Heat Electricity Storage Device', Proceedings of the IEEE 100, 493 (2012). doi:10.1109/jproc.2011.2174529, https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2011.2174529
  3. Tristan R. Davenne and Benjamin M. Peters, 'An Analysis of Pumped Thermal Energy Storage With De-coupled Thermal Stores', Frontiers in Energy Research 8, 160 (2020). doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00160, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00160
  4. Andreas V. Olympios, Joshua D. McTigue, Pau Farres-Antunez, Alessio Tafone, Alessandro Romagnoli, Yongliang Li, Yulong Ding, Wolf-Dieter Steinmann, Liang Wang, Haisheng Chen, Christos N. Markides, 'Progress and prospects of thermo-mechanical energy storage — a critical review', Progress in Energy 3, 022001 (2021). doi:10.1088/2516-1083/abdbba, https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/abdbba
  5. Paul Harris, Tom Wolf, Jim Kesseli, Robert B. Laughlin, 'An Investigation of Reversing Axial Turbomachinery for Thermal Energy Storage Application', Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2020, GT2020-15286 (2020). doi:10.1115/gt2020-15286, https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2020-15286
  6. R. B. Laughlin, 'Mass grid storage with reversible Brayton engines', in Thermal, Mechanical, and Hybrid Chemical Energy Storage Systems, Elsevier, pp. 27-64 (2021). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-819892-6.00002-2, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819892-6.00002-2
  7. J. D. Chiapperi, E. M. Greitzer, C. S. Tan, 'Attributes of Bi-Directional Turbomachinery for Pumped Thermal Energy Storage', Journal of Turbomachinery 145, 031007 (2023; published online 2022). doi:10.1115/1.4055647, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055647
  8. Simone Parisi, Nishith B. Desai, Fredrik Haglind, 'Techno-Economic Analysis of Using Reversible Turbomachinery for Pumped Thermal Energy Storage Systems', Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 146, 051003 (2024). doi:10.1115/1.4065041, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065041
  9. Matteo Benvenuti, Guido Francesco Frate, Lorenzo Ferrari, 'Capital cost reduction in thermomechanical energy storage: An analysis of similitude-based reversible Brayton systems', Energy Conversion and Management 321, 119050 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119050, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119050
  10. Simone Parisi, Roberto Agromayor, Angelo La Seta, Kenny Krogh Nielsen, Fredrik Haglind, 'Advancing non-dimensional models for radial turbomachinery applied to pumped thermal energy storage', Energy Conversion and Management 342, 120085 (2025). doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120085, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120085
  11. Senchun Miao, Boyan Chen, Xiaoze Du, Jiangbo Wu, Zhengjing Shen, 'Technical feasibility analysis of using axial compressor as turbine for pumped thermal energy storage systems with air and sCO2 working fluids', Energy 353, 141003 (2026). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2026.141003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2026.141003
  12. Veronika Anna Sötz, Alexander Bonk, Thomas Bauer, 'With a view to elevated operating temperatures in thermal energy storage — Reaction chemistry of Solar Salt up to 630 °C', Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 212, 110577 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110577, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110577
  13. Alexander Bonk, Markus Braun, Veronika A. Sötz, Thomas Bauer, 'Solar Salt — Pushing an old material for energy storage to a new limit', Applied Energy 262, 114535 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114535, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114535
  14. Sebastian Kunkel, Felix Seeliger, Andrea Hanke, Thomas Bauer, Alexander Bonk, 'Demonstration of the stabilization of solar salt at 620 °C with a semi-closed configuration in a 100 kg-scale', Heliyon 9, e22363 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22363, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22363
  15. Cristina Prieto, Anton Lopez-Roman, Luisa F. Cabeza, 'Experimental evaluation of the thermal degradation of solar salt under different gas covers', Journal of Energy Storage 72, 108412 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.est.2023.108412, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108412
  16. Muhammad Tahir Ameen, Zhiwei Ma, Andrew Smallbone, Rose Norman, Anthony Paul Roskilly, 'Demonstration system of pumped heat energy storage (PHES) and its round-trip efficiency', Applied Energy 333, 120580 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120580, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120580
  17. Jan Rudolf Eggers, Michael von der Heyde, Sören Hendrik Thaele, Helen Niemeyer, Tobias Borowitz, 'Design and performance of a long duration electric thermal energy storage demonstration plant at megawatt-scale', Journal of Energy Storage 55, 105780 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.105780, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105780
  18. Vaclav Novotny, Vit Basta, Petr Smola, Jan Spale, 'Review of Carnot Battery Technology Commercial Development', Energies 15, 647 (2022). doi:10.3390/en15020647, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020647
  19. Andrea Vecchi, Kai Knobloch, Ting Liang, Harriet Kildahl, Adriano Sciacovelli, Kurt Engelbrecht, Yongliang Li, Yulong Ding, 'Carnot Battery development: A review on system performance, applications and commercial state-of-the-art', Journal of Energy Storage 55, 105782 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.105782, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105782
  20. Ayah Marwan Rabi, Jovana Radulovic, James M. Buick, 'Pumped Thermal Energy Storage Technology (PTES): Review', Thermo 3, 396-411 (2023). doi:10.3390/thermo3030024, https://doi.org/10.3390/thermo3030024
  21. Finn Runkel, Janina Hippler-Nettlau, 'Replacing Fossil-Fueled Combined Heat and Power Plants with Malta's Pumped Heat Energy Storage Technology to Provide Clean Power and District Heat', International Sustainable Energy Conference — Proceedings, vol. 1 (2024). doi:10.52825/isec.v1i.1222, https://doi.org/10.52825/isec.v1i.1222
  22. D. Salomone-González, J. González-Ayala, A. Medina, J. M. M. Roco, P. L. Curto-Risso, A. Calvo Hernández, 'Pumped heat energy storage with liquid media: Thermodynamic assessment by a Brayton-like model', Energy Conversion and Management 224, 113540 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113540, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113540
  23. Janna Martinek, Jennie Jorgenson, Joshua D. McTigue, 'On the operational characteristics and economic value of pumped thermal energy storage', Journal of Energy Storage 52, 105005 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.105005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105005
  24. Zhuoqun Shi, Liang Wang, Xipeng Lin, Zhiwei Ge, Lin Lin, Wenbo Li, Huilong Tian, Zhitao Zuo, Yulong Ding, Haisheng Chen, 'Advances in pumped thermal energy storage: A comprehensive review', Journal of Energy Storage 173, 122814 (2026). doi:10.1016/j.est.2026.122814, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2026.122814