A 1999 report established that a graphite anode filled with a Y–Ni intermetallic (YNi2) catalyst, evaporated in a d.c. arc under helium, produces gram-scale soot containing roughly 40% single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), assigned from Raman spectroscopy as principally armchair tubes of n = 8–11, and proposed that a large temperature gradient between the plasma and the cooled chamber wall together with the Y–Ni alloy are the two controlling factors. The paper itself acknowledged that these interpretations rested on uncalibrated estimates: the role of the Y–Ni catalyst was not established experimentally, the temperature-gradient growth picture was conjectural, the chirality distribution was not quantified, and yield, reproducibility, and purification effects were unresolved. This problem asks for a quantitative, experimentally grounded account of Y–Ni-catalyzed arc SWCNT synthesis linking the catalyst's chemical state, the discharge thermal and flow environment, the resulting chirality distribution, and the yield. Later literature has corrected the armchair assignment (arc soot is majority semiconducting), measured and modeled the growth zone, and standardized content quantification, but the atomistic mechanism of the Ni/Y catalyst and chirality control in arc synthesis remain open.

Background

A single-wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) is a graphene sheet rolled into a cylinder one atom thick; the rolling direction is fixed by a chiral index pair (n,m)(n,m), and armchair tubes (with n=mn=m) are metallic while most other chiralities are semiconducting, so the (n,m)(n,m) distribution determines a sample's electronic usefulness. SWCNTs were first made in bulk by two routes: laser ablation of a metal-catalyzed graphite target, which yielded crystalline ropes of predominantly near-armchair tubes, and d.c. arc discharge between graphite electrodes, in which an anode doped with a transition-metal catalyst (Co, Ni) evaporates into a hot plasma and nanotubes condense in the soot deposited on the chamber walls; the inert background (buffer) gas, its pressure, the discharge current, and the thermal environment around the plasma control how much product forms and where. In 1999, Shi and co-workers reported a d.c. arc route using a graphite anode filled with a Y–Ni alloy (YNi2) powder at 40 A and 500 torr of helium: 1.5 g of soot collected per 5 cm of anode consumed, estimated by transmission electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy (comparing radial breathing mode spectra at 632.8 nm and 514.5 nm excitations against calculated frequencies for armchair tubes) to contain about 40% SWCNTs, organized in bundles of tens of tubes about 1.3 nm in diameter. The radial breathing mode (RBM) is a low-frequency Raman vibration unique to SWCNTs whose frequency scales inversely with tube diameter, and resonance effects make it sensitive to specific (n,m)(n,m) species. From the observed dependence of soot character on helium pressure (100–700 torr) — judged qualitatively by the 'stickiness' of the soot deposited on the chamber wall, which the authors used as an indicator of conditions near the wall — and its insensitivity to discharge current (40–100 A), the authors proposed that the large temperature gradient between the electrodes and the water-cooled oven wall, and the presence of the Y–Ni alloy in the anode, are the two most important factors governing SWCNT formation. However, the paper's own evidence base was qualitative: the ~40% content was a visual estimate, the armchair assignment left at least one observed Raman peak unassigned, the yield came from a single run, no control anodes (Y alone, Ni alone, or a simple Y+Ni mixture) were run, and no temperature or flow measurements were made inside the discharge region. The acknowledged gaps therefore define a coherent mechanistic question: what, physically and chemically, does the Y–Ni catalyst do during the arc, how do the thermal field and buffer gas govern where and how efficiently tubes grow, what chirality distribution actually results, and how reproducible and quantifiable is the product.

Problem Statement

Establish a quantitative, experimentally validated mechanism for the growth of single-wall carbon nanotubes catalyzed by Y-Ni (YNi2) anode material in a d.c. arc discharge, in which four linked, source-derived questions are answered: (1) what is the chemical state and phase of the Ni and Y species during the discharge, and through what microscopic pathway does the Y-Ni catalyst nucleate SWCNTs and govern their diameters - including whether the intermetallic, rather than the separate metals or their simple mixture, is essential (the 1999 paper ran no Y-only, Ni-only, or Y+Ni control anodes); (2) how do the buffer-gas pressure, discharge current, and the spatial temperature gradient between the plasma and the cooled wall determine where in the chamber SWCNTs form and with what efficiency; (3) what is the full chirality (n,m) distribution of the arc-produced soot - the original 'principally armchair' assignment being an uncalibrated resonance-Raman inference that left observed peaks unassigned - and how narrowly can this distribution be controlled by the synthesis variables; and (4) what is the reproducible SWCNT content and yield of the process, measured by calibrated quantitative metrics, and how does post-synthesis purification alter the measured content and composition. These four questions are components of one objective, all four required for a complete answer: a mechanistic account connecting catalyst chemistry, discharge thermal environment, and product structure, such that the yield, diameter, and chirality of arc-grown SWCNTs could be predicted and, within the intrinsic limits of the method, deliberately controlled.

References

  1. Z. Shi, Y. Lian, X. Zhou, Z. Gu, Y. Zhang, S. Iijima, L. Zhou, K. T. Yue, S. Zhang, 'Mass-production of single-wall carbon nanotubes by arc discharge method', Carbon 37 (1999) 1449-1453, DOI 10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00007-X, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00007-X
  2. S. Iijima, T. Ichihashi, 'Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter', Nature 363 (1993) 603-605, DOI 10.1038/363603a0, https://doi.org/10.1038/363603a0
  3. D. S. Bethune, C. H. Kiang, M. S. de Vries, G. Gorman, R. Savoy, J. Vazquez, R. Beyers, 'Cobalt-catalysed growth of carbon nanotubes with single-atomic-layer walls', Nature 363 (1993) 605-607, DOI 10.1038/363605a0, https://doi.org/10.1038/363605a0
  4. A. Thess, R. Lee, P. Nikolaev, H. Dai, P. Petit, J. Robert, C. Xu, Y. H. Lee, S. G. Kim, A. G. Rinzler, D. T. Colbert, G. E. Scuseria, D. Tomanek, J. E. Fischer, R. E. Smalley, 'Crystalline Ropes of Metallic Carbon Nanotubes', Science 273 (1996) 483-487, DOI 10.1126/science.273.5274.483, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5274.483
  5. A. M. Rao, E. Richter, S. Bandow, B. Chase, P. C. Eklund, K. A. Williams, S. Fang, K. R. Subbaswamy, M. Menon, A. Thess, R. E. Smalley, G. Dresselhaus, M. S. Dresselhaus, 'Diameter-Selective Raman Scattering from Vibrational Modes in Carbon Nanotubes', Science 275 (1997) 187-191, DOI 10.1126/science.275.5297.187, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5297.187
  6. M. Keidar, A. Waas, 'On the conditions of carbon nanotube growth in the arc discharge', Nanotechnology 15 (2004) 1571-1575, DOI 10.1088/0957-4484/15/11/034, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/15/11/034
  7. A. G. Ryabenko, T. V. Dorofeeva, G. I. Zvereva, 'UV-VIS-NIR spectroscopy study of sensitivity of single-wall carbon nanotubes to chemical processing and Van-der-Waals SWNT/SWNT interaction. Verification of the SWNT content measurements by absorption spectroscopy', Carbon 42 (2004) 1523-1535, DOI 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.02.005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.02.005
  8. M. Keidar, 'Factors affecting synthesis of single wall carbon nanotubes in arc discharge', Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 40 (2007) 2388-2393, DOI 10.1088/0022-3727/40/8/S18, https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/8/S18
  9. I. Levchenko, K. Ostrikov, M. Keidar, U. Cvelbar, 'Modes of nanotube growth in plasmas and reasons for single-walled structure', Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 41 (2008) 132004, DOI 10.1088/0022-3727/41/13/132004, https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/13/132004
  10. Y. Su, Z. Yang, H. Wei, E. S. W. Kong, Y. Zhang, 'Synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes with selective diameter distributions using DC arc discharge under CO mixed atmosphere', Applied Surface Science 257 (2011) 3123-3127, DOI 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.127
  11. N. S. Jacobsen, P. Pantano, 'Determining the percentages of semi-conducting and metallic single-walled carbon nanotubes in bulk soot', Carbon 49 (2011) 1998-2006, DOI 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.01.025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.01.025
  12. M. Kundrapu, J. Li, A. Shashurin, M. Keidar, 'A model of carbon nanotube synthesis in arc discharge plasmas', Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 45 (2012) 315305, DOI 10.1088/0022-3727/45/31/315305, https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/45/31/315305
  13. M. S. Jeong, J. H. Han, Y. C. Choi, 'Influence of the purification process on the semiconducting content of single-walled carbon nanotubes synthesized by arc discharge', Carbon 57 (2013) 338-345, DOI 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.01.081, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.01.081
  14. N. Arora, N. N. Sharma, 'Arc discharge synthesis of carbon nanotubes: Comprehensive review', Diamond and Related Materials 50 (2014) 135-150, DOI 10.1016/j.diamond.2014.10.001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2014.10.001
  15. R. Das, Z. Shahnavaz, Md. E. Ali, M. M. Islam, S. B. Abd Hamid, 'Can We Optimize Arc Discharge and Laser Ablation for Well-Controlled Carbon Nanotube Synthesis?', Nanoscale Research Letters 11 (2016) 516, DOI 10.1186/s11671-016-1730-0, https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1730-0
  16. X. Fang, A. Shashurin, G. Teel, M. Keidar, 'Determining synthesis region of the single wall carbon nanotubes in arc plasma volume', Carbon 107 (2016) 273-280, DOI 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.061, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.061
  17. L. Fang, C. Zhao, Y. Chen, L. Sheng, K. An, L. Yu, W. Ren, X. Zhao, 'Single-chirality separation of ultra-thin semiconducting arc discharge single-walled carbon nanotubes', Carbon 91 (2015) 408-415, DOI 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.007
  18. S. Forel, A. Castan, H. Amara, I. Florea, F. Fossard, L. Catala, C. Bichara, T. Mallah, V. Huc, A. Loiseau, C.-S. Cojocaru, 'Tuning bimetallic catalysts for a selective growth of SWCNTs', Nanoscale 11 (2019) 4091-4100, DOI 10.1039/c8nr09589b, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr09589b (preprint arXiv:1812.06118, https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06118)
  19. A. Kalam, T. Mieno, 'Pressure and discharge current dependence of production rate of single-walled carbon nanotubes by the bipolar pulsed arc-discharge method', Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures 26 (2018) 458-464, DOI 10.1080/1536383X.2018.1448387, https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2018.1448387
  20. Z. Shi, Y. Lian, F. H. Liao, X. Zhou, Z. Gu, Y. Zhang, S. Iijima, H. Li, K. T. Yue, S.-L. Zhang, 'Large scale synthesis of single-wall carbon nanotubes by arc-discharge method', Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 61 (2000) 1031-1036, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3697(99)00358-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(99)00358-3 (same group's large-scale follow-up to the source paper)