In 1971 Weinberg showed that the exchange of unlimited numbers of soft, massless virtual pions multiplies the component of a hard-hadron scattering amplitude belonging to the (N/2,N/2)(N/2,N/2) representation of chiral SU(2)×SU(2)SU(2)\times SU(2) by a damping factor DND_N expressible as oscillatory moments of a probability distribution P(π⃗ 2)\mathscr{P}(\vec{\pi}^{\,2}): the vacuum distribution of the (ultraviolet-cutoff) pion field, whose moments are the vacuum expectation values of products of field components at a spacetime point. All quantitative conclusions rest on assumed qualitative properties of P\mathscr{P} — differentiability with vanishing derivatives, smoothness, and flatness over ranges of π⃗ 2\vec{\pi}^{\,2} much larger than the Fπ2F_\pi^2 scale of the damping integrals — motivated only by the free-field Gaussian. The open problem is a first-principles determination of P(π⃗ 2)\mathscr{P}(\vec{\pi}^{\,2}) from the nonperturbative chiral theory (today, QCD treated nonperturbatively), in order to verify or refute those assumptions, fix the parity-dependent constants cc in the large-NN law DN∼c/(N+1)D_N\sim c/(N+1) and the finite-NN corrections, decide the fate of the strong-damping limit DN→1/(N+1)D_N\to 1/(N+1) (NN even), 00 (NN odd) as the cutoff Λ→∞\Lambda\to\infty and of the resulting multiplicative conservation law, and extend the approach to SU(3)×SU(3)SU(3)\times SU(3) and to massive pions. No published work determines or refutes this problem; it remains open.

Background

At the end of the current-algebra era, Weinberg studied how the exchange of unlimited numbers of soft (very low-momentum), massless virtual pions modifies an arbitrary 'hard' hadron reaction — a process slow enough that the pions see the hadrons as static sources. 'Chiral SU(2)×SU(2)SU(2)\times SU(2)' is the symmetry algebra generated by the isospin currents and the axial-vector currents of the strong interaction; its irreducible representations are labeled (N/2,N/2)(N/2,N/2), and the terms of the SS matrix (the scattering operator) can be decomposed accordingly. In a first paper (Weinberg, 1970), using an eikonal approximation (a high-energy/short-wavelength expansion that sums repeated exchange along a fast particle's trajectory) and a pion field of the CCWZ type — the canonically preferred nonlinear pion field defined by Coleman, Wess and Zumino and by Callan, Coleman, Wess and Zumino (1969), for which the chiral Lagrangian takes its standard geometric form — he found that multipion exchange multiplies each (N/2,N/2)(N/2,N/2) term by a damping factor DN≲1D_N\lesssim 1. Brown (1970) then showed that those tree-level results depended spuriously on the definition of the pion field, and Weinberg conceded the point.

The 1971 paper rederives the effect keeping all multipion interactions and loops, so that the answer is field-redefinition covariant. The vacuum expectation values that enter are reexpressed through a probability distribution P(π⃗)\mathscr{P}(\vec{\pi}): by definition, the mean of any product of components of the pion field π⃗(0)\vec{\pi}(0) at a point, computed in the full interacting vacuum, equals the corresponding moment of P\mathscr{P}; isospin conservation forces P\mathscr{P} to depend only on π⃗ 2\vec{\pi}^{\,2}. If one keeps only tree graphs, P\mathscr{P} is the free-field Gaussian with width set by the ultraviolet cutoff Λ\Lambda on the virtual-pion momenta, ⟨πa(0)πb(0)⟩=(Λ2/8π2)δab\langle\pi_a(0)\pi_b(0)\rangle=(\Lambda^2/8\pi^2)\delta_{ab}; the paper deliberately does not assume this form, using it only as a qualitative guide. The damping factors are oscillatory integrals of P(π⃗ 2)\mathscr{P}(\vec{\pi}^{\,2}) against phases whose scale is set by the pion decay constant Fπ=190F_\pi=190 MeV (the normalization of the axial current). Under two qualitative assumptions — that P(π⃗ 2) π⃗ 2P(\vec{\pi}^{\,2})\,\vec{\pi}^{\,2} (where PP denotes P\mathscr{P} written as a function of the scalar π⃗ 2\vec{\pi}^{\,2}, the source's own notation) is at least twice differentiable with derivatives vanishing at large π⃗ 2\vec{\pi}^{\,2} (infinite differentiability for the sharper remainder estimate), and, for the strong-damping limit, that P\mathscr{P} is smooth and flat over a range of π⃗ 2\vec{\pi}^{\,2} much larger than the Fπ2F_\pi^2 scale of the phase, expected when Λ≫Fπ\Lambda\gg F_\pi — integration by parts and the Riemann–Lebesgue lemma (the theorem that the Fourier-type integral of a smooth, decaying function vanishes at high oscillation frequency) give DN∼c/(N+1)D_N\sim c/(N+1) for N→∞N\to\infty through even or odd values, with parity-dependent constants cc given by convergent sums of the oscillatory integrals, and, in the limit Λ→∞\Lambda\to\infty, DN→1/(N+1)D_N\to 1/(N+1) for even NN and 00 for odd NN. If the odd-NN terms really vanish, the whole SS matrix must obey a multiplicative conservation law, exp⁡(iπ e⃗⋅B⃗x) S=±S\exp(i\pi\,\vec{e}\cdot\vec{B}_x)\,S=\pm S for any unit isospin vector e⃗\vec{e}, where B⃗x\vec{B}_x is the net chiral boost generator (the sum of all final-hadron chiral-boost matrices minus that of all initial-hadron ones, acting as a net axial charge) — a selection rule saying that amplitudes conserve a Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-valued quantum number counting the parity of the chiral representation.

The paper is explicit that evaluating these vacuum expectation values with all graphs is 'a formidable requirement' that limits it to qualitative results: nothing is known about the actual shape of P(π⃗ 2)\mathscr{P}(\vec{\pi}^{\,2}) beyond the free-field suggestion. The question this raises — compute P\mathscr{P} from first principles, or otherwise decide whether its qualitative properties hold — remains open. Modern context bears on it: chiral perturbation theory (the systematic low-energy effective field theory of QCD founded by Weinberg's 1979 'Phenomenological Lagrangians') computes chiral vacuum expectation values order by order but is controlled only below the natural cutoff ∼4πFπ\sim 4\pi F_\pi; the 1990s disoriented-chiral-condensate program studied pion-field distributions, but in dynamical collision fireballs rather than the vacuum; and Banks and Fischler (2016), citing the 1970–71 papers, note that the corresponding massless-particle SS-matrix questions 'have never been completely solved'. Real pions, of course, are massive — the source works in the chiral limit throughout.

Problem Statement

Determine, from first principles within the chiral theory of the pion (in modern terms, QCD treated nonperturbatively), the probability distribution P(π⃗ 2)\mathscr{P}(\vec{\pi}^{\,2}) introduced by Weinberg's 1971 statistical approach to soft-pion unitarity damping — the vacuum distribution, at fixed ultraviolet cutoff Λ\Lambda and for a specified (e.g. CCWZ) pion-field definition, whose moments are the vacuum expectation values of products of the components of π⃗(0)\vec{\pi}(0) — or at least the load-bearing qualitative properties named in component (1) below; and use that determination to settle the status of the damping mechanism. The components of this task, which share the single objective of replacing the paper's assumed qualitative properties of P\mathscr{P} by a first-principles determination, are: (1) verify or refute the assumed regularity of P(π⃗ 2) π⃗ 2P(\vec{\pi}^{\,2})\,\vec{\pi}^{\,2} (twice differentiability with vanishing first derivative, and infinite differentiability with all derivatives vanishing, at large π⃗ 2\vec{\pi}^{\,2}) and the strong-damping assumption that P\mathscr{P} is smooth and flat over a range of π⃗ 2\vec{\pi}^{\,2} much larger than the Fπ2F_\pi^2 scale entering the damping integrals, expected when Λ≫Fπ\Lambda\gg F_\pi; (2) determine the parity-dependent constants cc in the large-NN law DN∼c/(N+1)D_N\sim c/(N+1) for N→∞N\to\infty through even and odd values, and the finite-NN corrections to it; (3) decide whether, in the Λ→∞\Lambda\to\infty limit, DN→1/(N+1)D_N\to 1/(N+1) for even NN and 00 for odd NN, and hence whether hard-hadron amplitudes obey the multiplicative conservation law exp⁡(iπ e⃗⋅B⃗x) S=±S\exp(i\pi\,\vec{e}\cdot\vec{B}_x)\,S=\pm S — including whether that limit is a well-defined limit of the underlying theory at all — and work out the phenomenological consequences for hadron production and scattering if it holds; (4) extend the statistical approach to other chiral groups such as SU(3)×SU(3)SU(3)\times SU(3) and to non-zero pion mass. A first-principles determination, at finite cutoff Λ\Lambda, of P(π⃗ 2)\mathscr{P}(\vec{\pi}^{\,2}) or of the load-bearing qualitative properties named in component (1), or a refutation of a load-bearing property or of the existence of the Λ→∞\Lambda\to\infty limit — which would refute the mechanism in its strong (infinite-cutoff) form while settling what survives at finite cutoff — resolves the task; components (2) and (3) are consequences to be drawn from that determination where it supports them, and component (4) is an optional extension of the approach to other chiral groups and to non-zero pion mass.

References

  1. Steven Weinberg, 'Summing Soft Pions. II. Statistical Approach to Unitarity Damping', Physical Review D 4, 2993–2997 (1971). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.4.2993, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.4.2993
  2. Steven Weinberg, 'Summing Soft Pions', Physical Review D 2, 674–684 (1970). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.674, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.674
  3. Lowell S. Brown, 'On Summing Soft Pions', Physical Review D 2, 3083–3085 (1970). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.3083, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.3083
  4. Steven Weinberg, 'Reply to "On Summing Soft Pions"', Physical Review D 2, 3085 (1970). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.3085, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.3085
  5. Sidney R. Coleman, J. Wess, Bruno Zumino, 'Structure of Phenomenological Lagrangians. I', Physical Review 177, 2239–2247 (1969). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.177.2239, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.177.2239
  6. Curtis G. Callan Jr., Sidney R. Coleman, J. Wess, Bruno Zumino, 'Structure of Phenomenological Lagrangians. II', Physical Review 177, 2247–2250 (1969). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.177.2247, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.177.2247
  7. Ira S. Gerstein, Roman Jackiw, Benjamin W. Lee, Steven Weinberg, 'Chiral Loops', Physical Review D 3, 2486–2492 (1971). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.3.2486, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.3.2486
  8. Robert Perrin, 'Multiple Pion Production', Physical Review D 3, 1667–1669 (1971). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.3.1667, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.3.1667
  9. I. J. Ketley, T. P. Martin, J. G. Taylor, 'Summing soft mesons', Nuclear Physics B 34, 567–597 (1971). DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(71)90348-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(71)90348-8
  10. M. R. Pennington, Carl Rosenzweig, 'The ππ total cross section: Its scale and massless pion limit', Nuclear Physics B 57, 305–316 (1973). DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(73)90345-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(73)90345-3
  11. S. P. Auerbach, Carl Rosenzweig, M. R. Pennington, 'Topics in the S-matrix theory of massless particles', Annals of Physics 85, 214–250 (1974). DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(74)90281-4, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(74)90281-4
  12. Steven Weinberg, 'Phenomenological Lagrangians', Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 96, 327–340 (1979). DOI: 10.1016/0378-4371(79)90223-1, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(79)90223-1
  13. Mladen Martinis, Vesna Mikuta-Martinis, 'Disoriented chiral condensate and charge neutral particle fluctuations in heavy ion collisions', Fizika B 13, 383–396 (2004). arXiv: nucl-th/0309078, https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0309078
  14. Tom Banks, Willy Fischler, 'Soft Gravitons and the Flat Space Limit of Anti-deSitter Space' (2016). arXiv: 1611.05906, https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.05906
  15. Daniel Kapec, Y. T. Albert Law, Sruthi A. Narayanan, 'Soft scalars and the geometry of the space of celestial conformal field theories', Physical Review D 107, 046024 (2023). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.046024, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.046024 (preprint: arXiv:2205.10935, under the shortened title 'Soft Scalars and the Geometry of the Space of Celestial CFTs', https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10935)
  16. Sruthi Annapoorny Narayanan, 'Soft Travels to the Celestial Sphere', PhD thesis, Harvard University (2023). https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37375719, INSPIRE record: https://inspirehep.net/literature/2725767