The first detailed study of molecular-beam-epitaxial (MBE) growth of GaAs and lattice-matched GaAs/(Al,Ga)As superlattices on the high-index (211)A and (211)B orientations (Subbanna, Kroemer and Merz, 1986) left two coupled anomalies unexplained. First, reflection electron diffraction during growth reveals residual submicroscopic faceting of the arsenic-terminated (211)B surface — much weaker on gallium-terminated (211)A — which correlates with broadened low-temperature photoluminescence (PL) linewidths. Second, superlattices with GaAs well widths of 2–12 nm show integrated PL intensities roughly a factor of ten higher than otherwise identical (100)-oriented superlattices grown simultaneously side-by-side. The origin of the faceting, the growth conditions that would eliminate it, and the physical mechanism of the PL enhancement were not established. Neither core has been resolved by the later literature: the piezoelectric mechanism identified for strained (211) structures does not apply to the lattice-matched system, the valence-band and corrugation-based mechanisms were established for (111) wells or address anisotropy and energy shifts rather than the integrated-intensity anomaly and do not treat the (211)B polarity asymmetry, and the II–VI-on-(211)B literature manages {211}B morphology without treating GaAs homoepitaxy or the PL anomaly. The surviving open problem is to determine the crystallographic and thermodynamic/kinetic origin of (211)B faceting and the growth conditions that suppress it, and to identify — or refute — the mechanism of the anomalous PL yield of (211) GaAs/(Al,Ga)As quantum wells relative to (100).

Background

Molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) is an ultrahigh-vacuum growth technique in which beams of gallium, aluminum, and arsenic atoms are deposited onto a heated single-crystal GaAs wafer, building epitaxial films with atomic-layer control of composition and thickness. Alternating thin GaAs layers and aluminum-containing (Al,Ga)As barriers form quantum wells and superlattices (periodic multi-layer structures) in which charge carriers are quantum-confined; their low-temperature photoluminescence (PL, light emitted after optical excitation) is dominated by sharp excitonic recombination lines, where an exciton is a Coulomb-bound electron–hole pair. PL linewidth and intensity are standard figures of merit for interface quality: rough or defective interfaces broaden the exciton lines and introduce nonradiative recombination paths that quench emission.

Nearly all GaAs/(Al,Ga)As heterostructure work uses substrates cut with the (100) surface orientation, the plane on which MBE growth of GaAs is smoothest and best controlled. In zincblende crystals — the cubic, diamond-like lattice structure of GaAs and of most III–V compound semiconductors — a high-index plane inclined to the dense (100) and (111) planes, for example (211), has two inequivalent polar variants: (211)A, effectively gallium-terminated, and (211)B, effectively arsenic-terminated. High-index orientations were studied intensively in the 1980s because surface bonding and adsorption sites differ from (100), which alters dopant incorporation (silicon becomes amphoteric on some orientations, i.e. it can act as donor or acceptor), and because lattice-mismatched layers grown on them develop built-in piezoelectric fields (electric fields generated by strain in crystals lacking inversion symmetry).

Subbanna, Kroemer and Merz, Journal of Applied Physics 59, 488 (1986), reported the first detailed MBE study of GaAs layers and lattice-matched GaAs/(Al,Ga)As superlattices (the lattice constants of GaAs and AlAs differ by less than 0.2%, so the layers are essentially unstrained) on (211)A and (211)B GaAs substrates. Growth on (211)A was nearly as well behaved as on (100); on (211)B, reflection high-energy electron diffraction during growth (RHEED) indicated residual submicroscopic faceting — the nominal (211)B surface breaking up into microscopic inclined facets of other orientations — which correlated with broadened low-temperature PL spectra. Such faceting is the classic signature of a non-singular surface: a plane that is unstable, either thermodynamically (its surface energy favors decomposition into facets of nearby stable orientations) or kinetically (growth does not maintain a planar front), under the given growth conditions. Growing a GaAs/(Al,Ga)As superlattice buffer layer first drastically improved the visible morphology (the (211)A surface became essentially featureless), but the submicroscopic faceting of (211)B persisted in the diffraction data.

The same study found a striking optical anomaly: superlattices with GaAs well widths from 2 to 12 nm grown on (211) substrates showed integrated low-temperature PL intensities about a factor of ten higher than otherwise identical superlattices grown simultaneously side-by-side on (100) substrates. The authors could not determine whether this reflects differences in interface roughness (and hence in nonradiative interface recombination), in the band structure and optical matrix elements of [211]-oriented wells, or in pump-light absorption; the residual background impurity level of their MBE system (mid-101510^{15} cm−3^{-3}) additionally prevented resolving the excitonic fine structure of (211)B layers. The 1986 report attributes this enhancement to (211) superlattices without separating the (211)A and (211)B variants, so which polar variant carries it — and hence which side-by-side comparison is decisive — is itself part of the open problem.

Later work clarified one adjacent puzzle: strained structures grown along (211) can show order-of-magnitude optical enhancements because lattice mismatch generates strong piezoelectric fields along the [211] axis, producing an intrinsic Stark effect (Sela et al., 1991). This mechanism, however, requires strain and therefore does not apply to the lattice-matched GaAs/(Al,Ga)As system, in which no such field exists. Two further adjacent results bear on the source anomalies without settling them: the enhanced optical transition rate of (111)-oriented GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells was traced to the large anisotropy of the GaAs heavy-hole effective mass (Hayakawa et al., 1988), and macrostep arrays — regular nanometer-scale surface steps — were shown by electron diffraction and transmission electron microscopy to form during MBE growth on (211), (311) and (111) GaAs surfaces (on (311)A by decomposition of the high-surface-energy plane into lower-energy {331} facets), corrugating the GaAs/AlAs interfaces and producing lateral quantum-size effects (Nötzel et al., 1991, 1992; Ploog and Nötzel, 1993). Meanwhile, the (211)B orientation itself became technologically important as the substrate orientation of choice for II–VI MBE (growth of compounds of group-II and group-VI elements) — CdTe and HgCdTe infrared-detector material on (211)B GaAs — where managing {211}B surface and interface morphology remains an active engineering topic, and first-principles calculations of {211}-surface reconstructions and facet stability now exist. What has remained unavailable since 1986 is an identification of the specific facets that form during MBE growth of GaAs on (211)B, the growth conditions that suppress them, and a verified mechanism for the anomalous PL yield of lattice-matched (211) GaAs/(Al,Ga)As quantum wells.

Problem Statement

For homoepitaxial MBE growth of GaAs and lattice-matched GaAs/(Al,Ga)As quantum wells and superlattices on GaAs(211) substrates, determine and resolve the two coupled anomalies left open by Subbanna, Kroemer and Merz (1986), whose common objective is a mechanistic understanding of growth and optical response on the non-singular (211) surface sufficient to produce high-optical-quality (211)B material: (1) Faceting origin and elimination: identify which crystallographic facets constitute the residual submicroscopic faceting observed by reflection high-energy electron diffraction during MBE growth on GaAs(211)B (and largely absent on (211)A); establish whether the driving force is thermodynamic (surface-energy instability of the nominal (211)B plane under the relevant arsenic chemical potential) or kinetic (anisotropic migration and attachment of adsorbed atoms on the growing surface); and establish whether growth conditions exist — substrate temperature, As/Ga flux ratio, growth rate, buffer-layer design — under which facet-free (211)B GaAs layers and GaAs/(Al,Ga)As superlattices are obtained, with low-temperature PL linewidths free of facet-induced broadening, comparable to (100) and (211)A references grown side-by-side — the integrated-intensity enhancement of component (2) is a separate question, expected to persist in facet-free material unless component (2) concludes otherwise. (2) Mechanism of the anomalous photoluminescence yield: determine why lattice-matched GaAs/(Al,Ga)As superlattices with GaAs well widths of 2–12 nm grown on (211) substrates exhibit integrated low-temperature PL intensities roughly a factor of ten higher than otherwise identical (100)-oriented superlattices grown simultaneously side-by-side, the enhancement being reported for (211) without the source separating the (211)A and (211)B variants — that is, decide between the candidate explanations (orientation-dependent interface roughness and nonradiative interface recombination; orientation-dependent band structure, oscillator strength (the intrinsic strength of the optical transition) and pump absorption; other recombination-dynamics effects), or demonstrate by controlled measurement that the reported enhancement arises from an experimental or apparatus artifact. Both components remain open gaps of the same source study, in which the only correlation stated by the source is that between the (211)B submicroscopic faceting and the broadened low-temperature PL spectra of (211)B.

References

  1. S. Subbanna, H. Kroemer, J. L. Merz, 'Molecular-beam-epitaxial growth and selected properties of GaAs layers and GaAs/(Al,Ga)As superlattices with the (211) orientation', Journal of Applied Physics 59, 488–494 (1986). DOI: 10.1063/1.336658, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.336658
  2. S. Subbanna, H. Kroemer, J. L. Merz, 'Summary Abstract: Growth and selected properties of GaAs layers and GaAs/(Al,Ga)As superlattices with the (211) orientation', Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B 4, 515–516 (1986). DOI: 10.1116/1.583412, https://doi.org/10.1116/1.583412
  3. Toshiaki Fukunaga, Takeshi Takamori, Hisao Nakashima, 'Photoluminescence from AlGaAs-GaAs single quantum wells grown on variously oriented GaAs substrates by MBE', Journal of Crystal Growth 81, 85–90 (1987). DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(87)90370-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(87)90370-8
  4. Toshiro Hayakawa, Kosei Takahashi, Masafumi Kondo, Takahiro Suyama, Saburo Yamamoto, Toshiki Hijikata, 'Enhancement in Optical Transition in (111)-Oriented GaAs-AlGaAs Quantum Well Structures', Physical Review Letters 60, 349–352 (1988). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.349, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.349
  5. P. N. Uppal, J. S. Ahearn, S. P. Svensson, R. Herring, 'Lattice-matched and lattice-mismatched growth on novel GaAs substrate orientations', Journal of Crystal Growth 95, 281–287 (1989). DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(89)90402-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(89)90402-8
  6. I. Sela, D. E. Watkins, B. K. Laurich, D. L. Smith, S. Subbanna, H. Kroemer, 'Excitonic optical nonlinearity induced by internal field screening in (211) oriented strained-layer superlattices', Applied Physics Letters 58, 684–686 (1991). DOI: 10.1063/1.104568, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.104568
  7. M. D. Lange, R. Sporken, K. K. Mahavadi, J. P. Faurie, Y. Nakamura, N. Otsuka, 'Molecular beam epitaxy and characterization of CdTe(211) and CdTe(133) films on GaAs(211)B substrates', Applied Physics Letters 58, 1988–1990 (1991). DOI: 10.1063/1.105041, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.105041
  8. R. Nötzel, N. N. Ledentsov, L. Däweritz, M. Hohenstein, K. Ploog, 'Direct synthesis of corrugated superlattices on non-(100)-oriented surfaces', Physical Review Letters 67, 3812–3815 (1991). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.3812, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.3812
  9. R. Nötzel, N. N. Ledentsov, L. Däweritz, K. Ploog, M. Hohenstein, 'Semiconductor quantum-wire structures directly grown on high-index surfaces', Physical Review B 45, 3507–3515 (1992). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.3507, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.45.3507
  10. P. Castrillo, M. I. Alonso, G. Armelles, M. Ilg, K. Ploog, 'Piezoelectric-field-induced localization of barrier states in {211}-oriented InAs/GaAs superlattices', Physical Review B 47, 12945–12948 (1993). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.12945, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.12945
  11. Jeffrey S. Gold, T. H. Myers, N. C. Giles, K. A. Harris, L. M. Mohnkern, R. W. Yanka, 'Photoluminescence from heteroepitaxial (211)B CdTe grown on (211)B GaAs by molecular beam epitaxy', Journal of Applied Physics 74, 6866–6871 (1993). DOI: 10.1063/1.355088, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.355088
  12. K. H. Ploog, R. Nötzel, 'Do Periodic Interface Corrugations Cause the Unusual Optical Properties of GaAs/AlAs Heterostructures Grown on Non-(100)-Oriented Substrates?', in: Semiconductor Interfaces at the Sub-Nanometer Scale, NATO ASI Series, vol. 243, pp. 231–239, Springer, Dordrecht (1993). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2034-0_24, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2034-0_24
  13. L. Pavesi, M. Henini, D. Johnston, 'Influence of the As overpressure during the molecular beam epitaxy growth of Si-doped (211)A and (311)A GaAs', Applied Physics Letters 66, 2846–2848 (1995). DOI: 10.1063/1.113449, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.113449
  14. Pallab Bhattacharya, 'MBE growth and device applications of lattice-matched and strained heterostructures on (n11)-oriented and patterned substrates', Microelectronics Journal 26, 887–896 (1995). DOI: 10.1016/0026-2692(95)00050-X, https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2692(95)00050-X
  15. J. Arriaga, D. A. Contreras-Solorio, 'Electronic structure of (211) AlAs/GaAs superlattices', Proceedings of SPIE 2730, 583–586 (1996). DOI: 10.1117/12.231022, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.231022
  16. K. Fujita, H. Ohnishi, P. O. Vaccaro, T. Watanabe, 'MBE growth of AlGaAs/GaAs double-heterostructure light emitting diodes on GaAs(111)A and (211)A substrates using all-silicon doping', Microelectronics Journal 28, 1019–1023 (1997). DOI: 10.1016/S0026-2692(96)00143-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2692(96)00143-7
  17. M. Jaime-Vasquez, R. N. Jacobs, C. Nozaki, J. D. Benson, L. A. Almeida, J. Arias, J. Pellegrino, 'Understanding the Evolution of CdTe Buffer Layer Surfaces on ZnTe/Si(211) and GaAs(211)B During Cyclic Annealing', Journal of Electronic Materials 41, 2975–2980 (2012). DOI: 10.1007/s11664-012-2169-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-012-2169-4
  18. Arndt Jenichen, Cornelia Engler, 'Reconstructions and surface facets of the GaAs(112)A and (112)B surfaces: First-principles DFT supercell calculations', Surface Science 608, 204–211 (2013). DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2012.10.011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2012.10.011
  19. N. Florini, G. P. Dimitrakopulos, J. Kioseoglou, S. Germanis, C. Katsidis, Z. Hatzopoulos, N. T. Pelekanos, Th. Kehagias, 'Structure, strain, and composition profiling of InAs/GaAs(211)B quantum dot superlattices', Journal of Applied Physics 119, 034304 (2016). DOI: 10.1063/1.4940419, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4940419
  20. Emrah Sasmaz, Melih Kaldirım, Süleyman Umut Eker, Alp Tolungüç, Selçuk Özer, 'Optimization of Growth Parameters for Molecular Beam Epitaxial Growth of (211)B CdTe Layers on GaAs Substrates', Journal of Electronic Materials 48, 6069–6073 (2019). DOI: 10.1007/s11664-019-07556-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-019-07556-1
  21. In Won Yeu, Gyuseung Han, Jaehong Park, Cheol Seong Hwang, Jung-Hae Choi, 'Equilibrium crystal shape of GaAs and InAs considering surface vibration and new (111)B reconstruction: ab-initio thermodynamics', Scientific Reports 9, 1127 (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37910-y, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37910-y
  22. W. W. Pan, R. J. Gu, Z. K. Zhang, W. Lei, G. A. Umana-Membreno, D. J. Smith, J. Antoszewski, L. Faraone, 'Defect Engineering in MBE-Grown CdTe Buffer Layers on GaAs (211)B Substrates', Journal of Electronic Materials 51, 4869–4883 (2022). DOI: 10.1007/s11664-022-09725-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-022-09725-1
  23. Wenwu Pan, Shuo Ma, Xiao Sun, Shimul Kanti Nath, Songqing Zhang, Renjie Gu, Zekai Zhang, Lorenzo Faraone, Wen Lei, 'Structural properties of MBE-grown CdTe (133)B buffer layers on GaAs (211)B substrates with CdZnTe/CdTe superlattice-based dislocation filtering layers', Journal of Applied Physics 133, 185301 (2023). DOI: 10.1063/5.0143854, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0143854