The MIT bag model confines quarks to a finite spatial cavity and is the simplest setting in which to ask how confinement modifies the semiclassical instanton content of the vacuum inside a hadron. A 1997 study by A. A. Abrikosov (Jr.) solved exactly the massless scalar propagator in a spherical bag pierced by an SU(2) instanton and computed its matrix elements, but for spinor quarks it gave only a heuristic estimate — replacing current quark masses by bag-level energies in the 't Hooft density factor — suggesting that the instanton density inside a closed hadronic volume could be enhanced by roughly three orders of magnitude. The estimate is uncontrolled: the fermion zero modes and the explicit chiral-symmetry breaking of the bag boundary are not treated, instantons with radii comparable to the bag radius are outside the small-radius expansion, and the divergent integral over instanton sizes lacks a dynamical cutoff. All three gaps — the fermionic computation, the large-instanton suppression mechanism, and the resulting finite-volume size distribution — remain open in the literature.

Background

An instanton is a localized classical solution of Euclidean Yang--Mills theory (the theory continued to imaginary time, in which quantum tunneling between topologically distinct vacua appears as a classical field configuration) carrying topological charge — the BPST pseudoparticle — and it dominates the semiclassical, low-energy structure of QCD. In the dilute-instanton approximation the weight of an instanton of radius ρ\rho in the infinite-volume vacuum is suppressed, for each light quark flavor, by a factor miρm_{i}\rho arising from the fermion zero modes — exact zero-energy solutions of the Dirac equation that the instanton's topology forces in the massless theory — the celebrated 't Hooft determinant, so that light current quark masses strongly suppress the instanton density. The MIT bag model is an idealized model of confinement in which quarks are free inside a finite spatial cavity (the bag) and are confined by boundary conditions on its surface; these boundary conditions quantize the quark spectrum (lowest energies of order RB−1R_{B}^{-1} for a bag of radius RBR_{B}) and break chiral symmetry explicitly (the boundary condition acts differently on left- and right-handed quark components, so the symmetry relating them is violated by the setup itself rather than by the dynamics). Because the bag is the simplest confinement implement available, it is natural to ask how instantons behave when confined to the same finite volume: in infinite volume the instanton density grows with size, and something must curtail this growth inside a hadron. In the source's own analysis of instantons in closed domains three aspects are singled out — deformations of the pseudoparticle and of the bag itself (which depend on the boundary conditions for gauge fields and are of secondary influence while ρ<RB\rho<R_{B}), the changed spectrum of quantum fluctuations in the bounded region (a Casimir effect that modifies the running of the coupling and freezes α(ρ)\alpha(\rho) at ρ∼RB\rho\sim R_{B}), and the interaction with matter, whose fermionic states are quantized so that pseudoparticles feel the boundary even when their own deformations are negligible. The propagator algebra of Brown, Carlitz, Creamer and Lee for scalar fields in pseudoparticle fields (based on a conformal factorization of the covariant Laplacian) provides the infinite-space technology, and the work of Wipf and Duerr on gauge theories in a bag established how bag boundary conditions break axial flavor symmetry and modify fermionic determinants. Building on his exact solution of the massless scalar propagator in the fundamental representation of SU(2) (the smallest nontrivial representation of the gauge group, the one in which quark fields transform) in a bag with an instanton, Abrikosov computed the leading ρ2/RB2\rho^{2}/R_{B}^{2} corrections to the scalar matrix elements (matter lowers the instanton action at this order) and estimated, for spinor quarks, that replacing the current masses mim_{i} by bag-level energies Mi∼RB−1M_{i}\sim R_{B}^{-1} in ∏i(miρ)\prod_{i}(m_{i}\rho) enhances the instanton density by (M/m)Nf(M/m)^{N_{f}}, of order 10310^{3} for two light flavors. The estimate simultaneously highlights the unresolved physics: the bag destroys the exact fermion zero modes through its chiral-symmetry-breaking boundary conditions, so the determinant factor must be recomputed nonperturbatively; and instantons with ρ∼RB\rho\sim R_{B} involve deformations of the instanton and of the bag, backreaction, and Casimir (quantum-fluctuation) energies that are outside the controlled small-ρ\rho treatment.

Problem Statement

Complete the semiclassical account of instantons confined in a finite hadronic (bag) volume, in the setting of the source: an SU(2) instanton of radius ρ\rho inside a spherical bag of radius RBR_{B}, with Dirichlet-type boundary conditions on the bag surface for the scalar fields and MIT-bag boundary conditions for the spinor fields, and matter in the fundamental representation of SU(2); the regime of small ρ2/RB2\rho^{2}/R_{B}^{2} is where controlled results exist, and the treatment must extend to instanton radii comparable to RBR_{B}. The single overarching objective is a controlled determination of how the confining volume reshapes the instanton ensemble, and it comprises three interlinked components: (1) Fermionic sector — compute the full nonperturbative spinor propagator matrix elements, or equivalently the quark functional determinant, in the instanton-plus-bag background, correctly accounting for the fermion zero modes of the infinite-volume instanton, which cease to exist as exact normalizable modes in the bag because its boundary conditions break chiral symmetry explicitly, so that the infinite-volume zero-mode bookkeeping cannot simply be imported into the finite volume; this replaces the heuristic estimate in which the current quark masses mim_{i} in the 't Hooft factor ∏i(miρ)\prod_{i}(m_{i}\rho) are substituted by bag-level energies Mi∼RB−1M_{i}\sim R_{B}^{-1}. (2) Infrared completion — determine the dynamical mechanism that suppresses instantons with radii ρ\rho comparable to RBR_{B}, treating all of: instanton deformations, backreaction on the bag, and Casimir (quantum-fluctuation) energy contributions, and thereby provide a controlled prescription for the upper cutoff of the divergent integral over instanton sizes in the finite-volume context, i.e. a definite statement of the ρ\rho-dependence at which the suppression sets in and the size integral converges. (3) Size distribution — derive the resulting instanton size distribution inside the confining volume and establish whether the closed volume enhances or suppresses the instanton density relative to the infinite-volume vacuum. The components are scientifically linked in the source's own formulation: the correction δSN\delta S_{N} to the instanton action inside the bag decomposes into deformation, Casimir and matter contributions, the matter contribution is expressed through matrix elements of the propagator with and without the instanton in the bag eigenmode basis, and this correction modifies the pseudoparticle density relative to its vacuum value da(ρ)da(\rho). Thus the fermionic determinant fixes the small-ρ\rho weight, the large-ρ\rho mechanism fixes the upper end of the size integral, and together they determine the distribution and its observable effects.

References

  1. A. A. Abrikosov, Jr., 'Instantons in the bag model. An approach and possible effects of the finite volume', Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 54 (1997) 189-193. DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5632(97)00038-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(97)00038-8
  2. A. A. Abrikosov, 'Scalar propagator in an instanton field in a closed volume', JETP Lett. 63 (1996) 869-872. DOI: 10.1134/1.567105, https://doi.org/10.1134/1.567105
  3. A. A. Abrikosov, Jr., 'Instantons in the Bag Model: Matrix Elements of Scalar Propagator', in: M. Bordag (ed.), Quantum Field Theory Under the Influence of External Conditions, Teubner-Texte zur Physik vol. 30 (1996) 86-93. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-01204-7_14, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01204-7_14, INSPIRE: https://inspirehep.net/literature/411253
  4. A. Wipf and S. Duerr, 'Gauge theories in a bag', Nucl. Phys. B 443 (1995) 201-232. DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00114-8, arXiv:hep-th/9412018, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9412018
  5. A. A. Abrikosov, Jr., 'Modified spectral boundary conditions in the bag model', J. Phys. A 39 (2006) 6109-6115. DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/39/21/S01, arXiv:hep-th/0512311, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0512311
  6. A. A. Abrikosov, Jr. and A. Wipf, 'The integral form of APS boundary conditions in the bag model', J. Phys. A 40 (2007) 5163-5172. DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/40/19/016, arXiv:hep-th/0611121, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0611121
  7. G. Esposito and K. Kirsten, 'Chiral bag boundary conditions on the ball', Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 085014. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.085014, arXiv:hep-th/0207109, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0207109
  8. A. C. Kalloniatis and S. N. Nedelko, 'Quark determinant in domain-like gluon fields', eConf C030614:012 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0310306, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0310306
  9. G. Münster and Ch. Kamp, 'Distribution of instanton sizes in a simplified instanton gas model', Eur. Phys. J. C 17 (2000) 447-454. DOI: 10.1007/s100520000506, arXiv:hep-th/0005084, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0005084
  10. G. Münster and C. Kamp, 'Dynamical suppression of large instantons', Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 106 (2002) 584-585. DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01785-6, arXiv:hep-lat/0111017, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0111017
  11. N. O. Agasian and S. M. Fedorov, 'Instantons in the nonperturbative QCD vacuum', Phys. Atom. Nucl. 67 (2004) 376-390. DOI: 10.1134/1.1648927, https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1648927, arXiv:hep-ph/0209015, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0209015
  12. M. García Pérez, T. G. Kovács and P. van Baal, 'Comments on the instanton size distribution', Phys. Lett. B 472 (2000) 295-301. DOI: 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01451-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01451-3, arXiv:hep-ph/9911485, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9911485
  13. D. Klabučar, K. Kumerički, B. Melić and I. Picek, 'On the instanton-induced portion of the nucleon strangeness', Eur. Phys. J. C 9 (1999) 589-599. DOI: 10.1007/s100529900056, arXiv:hep-ph/9807357, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9807357
  14. D. Klabucar, K. Kumericki, D. Mekterovic and B. Podobnik, 'On the instanton-induced portion of the nucleon strangeness II: the MIT model beyond the linearized approximation', Eur. Phys. J. C 29 (2003) 71-78. DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s2003-01218-1, arXiv:hep-ph/0304083, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0304083
  15. H. Forkel, 'Instantons and nucleon magnetism', in: Hadron Physics 2000 (World Scientific, 2001), pp. 228-237. DOI: 10.1142/9789812811653_0006, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812811653_0006, arXiv:hep-ph/0009274, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0009274
  16. A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A. S. Schwartz and Yu. S. Tyupkin, 'Pseudoparticle solutions of the Yang-Mills equations', Phys. Lett. B 59 (1975) 85-87. DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(75)90163-X, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(75)90163-X
  17. G. 't Hooft, 'Computation of the quantum effects due to a four-dimensional pseudoparticle', Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 3432-3450. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3432, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3432
  18. A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn and V. F. Weisskopf, 'New extended model of hadrons', Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 3471-3495. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3471, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3471
  19. L. S. Brown, R. D. Carlitz, D. B. Creamer and C. Lee, 'Propagation functions in pseudoparticle fields', Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 1583-1597. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.17.1583, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.17.1583
  20. M. Musakhanov, 'Gluons, Heavy and Light Quarks in the QCD Vacuum', EPJ Web Conf. 182 (2018) 02092. DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201818202092, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818202092, arXiv:1802.06211, https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06211
  21. F. Canfora, L. Rosa and J. Zanelli, 'Theta term in a bounded region', Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 105008. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.105008, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.105008, arXiv:1105.2490, https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2490