When the intracellular domain of the cell-adhesion receptor nephrin (NICD; residues 1077–1241, a net-negatively-charged intrinsically disordered region) is expressed in mammalian cells it forms liquid nuclear bodies by complex coacervation — phase separation driven by electrostatic co-assembly with positively charged partners. The 2016 study that established this left the cellular mechanism unresolved: the identities, stoichiometries, and in vivo valences of the endogenous positively charged partners (and their competition with RNA/DNA) are unknown; the atomic-level nature of the short-range aromatic/hydrophobic adhesions stabilizing the dense phase (side-chain contacts alone versus additional backbone-mediated cross-β elements) is undetermined; and the paradoxical behavior of the charge-blocked mutant CBNCB_N, which is more compact and phase-separates more weakly despite a large local negative-charge block, is unexplained.

Background

Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) of proteins and nucleic acids underlies many membrane-less organelles, also called biomolecular condensates — dynamic, dense, liquid-like droplets that concentrate specific macromolecules. Many condensate-forming proteins contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), protein segments that lack a stable folded structure. Complex coacervation is one route to LLPS in which oppositely charged macromolecules co-assemble into a polymer-rich dense phase, driven by electrostatic attraction and the release of counterions. Nephrin is a transmembrane adhesion receptor of the kidney podocyte slit diaphragm; its intracellular domain (NICD, residues 1077–1241 — not to be confused with the Notch intracellular domain, which shares the acronym) is a 165-residue IDR with a large net negative charge. Pak et al. (Molecular Cell, 2016) showed that NICD expressed in HeLa cells concentrates in nuclear bodies that recruit paraspeckle components (paraspeckles are nuclear bodies built on the long non-coding RNA NEAT1), and that the partitioning behavior of these bodies matches LLPS. Purified NICD alone did not phase separate under any of the buffer conditions tested, but it does so with synthetic polycationic partners — supercharged GFP variants (engineered GFP carrying net charges from +7 to +36) and oligoarginine peptides. Mutagenesis showed the driving force depends on overall amino-acid composition rather than the precise sequence: phase separation is promoted by one or more charge interaction elements (CIEs), defined as at least four consecutive residues whose five-residue sliding-window mean net charge per residue is below −0.35, together with aromatic (Tyr, Trp) and hydrophobic (Leu, Met) residues distributed across the chain. The data support a hierarchical model: long-range electrostatic repulsion among CIEs must be neutralized by multivalent cationic partners (acting as non-covalent crosslinks), after which short-range aromatic/hydrophobic adhesions further stabilize the dense liquid phase. Whether these adhesions arise from side-chain contacts alone or also from transient backbone-mediated architectures such as small cross-β elements (the extended-interchain-backbone-hydrogen-bonding motif of amyloid fibrils) was left open. A bioinformatic scan found 464 similar NICD-like acidic IDRs in 443 human proteins, enriched in nucleic-acid-binding and nuclear-body proteins. NICD sits apart from the two then-known IDR phase-separation archetypes: prion-like polar domains (e.g., FUS), whose phase behavior is governed by the sticker-and-spacer grammar in which aromatic 'sticker' residues drive adhesion, and blocky polyampholytes (e.g., Ddx4, LAF-1), which self-coacervate via internal charge blocks. In related membrane signaling, phosphorylated nephrin clusters with the adaptor Nck and the actin regulator N-WASP through modular SH2–phosphotyrosine and SH3–polyproline interactions; the 2016 study noted, but did not test, the proposal that basic regions of Nck and N-WASP additionally act as coacervation counterions for the acidic nephrin tail.

Problem Statement

The problem is to complete the mechanistic account of complex coacervation by the nephrin intracellular domain (NICD, residues 1077–1241) in cells, as posed by Pak et al. (2016): (1) Identify the endogenous positively charged partners that drive NICD complex coacervation in the nucleus, including their relative contributions, the stoichiometries and in vivo valences at which they act, and how they compete or cooperate with nucleic acids for NICD binding — candidate classes proposed in the source are basic nuclear proteins and RNA-/DNA-binding proteins. (2) Determine the atomic-level structural nature of the short-range adhesive interactions that stabilize the dense phase of NICD complex coacervates: whether side-chain aromatic/hydrophobic contacts alone suffice, or whether transient backbone-mediated architectures such as small cross-β strand elements contribute substantially. (3) Establish how the linear patterning of negative charges controls the driving force for complex coacervation, epitomized by the charge-blocked mutant CBNCB_N in which clustering of the negative charges into a single N-terminal block produces a more collapsed conformation and a weaker driving force for phase separation rather than a stronger one; the source notes the atomistic-simulation proposal that this collapse, deriving from intramolecular electrostatic contacts between the negative charge block and a region in the N-terminus, might limit the accessibility of charge interaction elements (CIEs) to multivalent counterions, but this mechanism remains a hypothesis to be tested. An answer should identify specific endogenous partners with in-cell stoichiometry and valence measurements together with their relative contributions and how they compete or cooperate with nucleic acids for NICD binding, sufficient to explain NICD nuclear-body formation, provide structural or mutational evidence that discriminates side-chain-only from backbone-mediated adhesion in the dense phase, and explain, through a quantitatively supported mechanism, how the linear patterning of negative charges controls the driving force for complex coacervation, as epitomized by why charge-blocked mutants such as CBNCB_N phase separate more weakly rather than more strongly despite their concentrated negative-charge block.

References

  1. Pak CW, Kosno M, Holehouse AS, Padrick SB, Mittal A, Ali R, Yunus AA, Liu DR, Pappu RV, Rosen MK. Sequence Determinants of Intracellular Phase Separation by Complex Coacervation of a Disordered Protein. Molecular Cell 63, 72–85 (2016). DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.042
  2. Banjade S, Rosen MK. Phase transitions of multivalent proteins can promote clustering of membrane receptors. eLife 3, e04123 (2014). DOI 10.7554/eLife.04123. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04123
  3. Kim S, Kalappurakkal JM, Mayor S, Rosen MK. Phosphorylation of nephrin induces phase separated domains that move through actomyosin contraction. Molecular Biology of the Cell 30, 2996–3012 (2019). DOI 10.1091/mbc.e18-12-0823. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e18-12-0823
  4. Chattaraj A, Youngstrom M, Loew LM. The Interplay of Structural and Cellular Biophysics Controls Clustering of Multivalent Molecules. Biophysical Journal 116, 560–572 (2019). DOI 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.01.001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.01.001
  5. Das RK, Pappu RV. Conformations of intrinsically disordered proteins are influenced by linear sequence distributions of oppositely charged residues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110, 13392–13397 (2013). DOI 10.1073/pnas.1304749110. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304749110
  6. Wang J, Choi J-M, Holehouse AS, Lee HO, Zhang X, Jahnel M, Maharana S, Lemaitre R, Pozniakovsky A, Drechsel D, Poser I, Pappu RV, Alberti S, Hyman AA. A Molecular Grammar Governing the Driving Forces for Phase Separation of Prion-like RNA Binding Proteins. Cell 174, 688–699 (2018). DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.006
  7. Murray DT, Kato M, Lin Y, Thurber KR, Hung I, McKnight SL, Tycko R. Structure of FUS Protein Fibrils and Its Relevance to Self-Assembly and Phase Separation of Low-Complexity Domains. Cell 171, 615–627 (2017). DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.048
  8. Murthy AC, Dignon GL, Kan Y, Zerze GH, Parekh SH, Mittal J, Fawzi NL. Molecular interactions underlying liquid−liquid phase separation of the FUS low-complexity domain. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 26, 637–648 (2019). DOI 10.1038/s41594-019-0250-x. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-019-0250-x
  9. Martin EW, Holehouse AS, Peran I, Farag M, Incicco JJ, Bremer A, Grace CR, Soranno A, Pappu RV, Mittag T. Valence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains. Science 367, 694–699 (2020). DOI 10.1126/science.aaw8653. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw8653
  10. Vernon RM, Chong PA, Tsang B, Kim TH, Bah A, Farber P, Lin H, Forman-Kay JD. Pi-Pi contacts are an overlooked protein feature relevant to phase separation. eLife 7, e31486 (2018). DOI 10.7554/eLife.31486. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31486
  11. Yeong V, Werth EG, Brown LM, Obermeyer AC. Formation of Biomolecular Condensates in Bacteria by Tuning Protein Electrostatics. ACS Central Science 6, 2301–2310 (2020). DOI 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01146. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c01146
  12. Rai SK, Khanna R, Avni A, Mukhopadhyay S. Heterotypic electrostatic interactions control complex phase separation of tau and prion into multiphasic condensates and co-aggregates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 120, e2216338120 (2023). DOI 10.1073/pnas.2216338120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216338120
  13. Peran I, Mittag T. Molecular structure in biomolecular condensates. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 60, 17–26 (2020). DOI 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.09.007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2019.09.007
  14. Mittag T, Pappu RV. A conceptual framework for understanding phase separation and addressing open questions and challenges. Molecular Cell 82, 2201–2214 (2022). DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.018
  15. Alberti S, Arosio P, Best RB, Boeynaems S, Cai D, Collepardo-Guevara R, Dignon GL, Dimova R, Elbaum-Garfinkle S, Fawzi NL, Fuxreiter M, Gladfelter AS, Honigmann A, Jain A, Joseph JA, Knowles TPJ, Lasker K, Lemke EA, Lindorff-Larsen K, Lipowsky R, Mittal J, Mukhopadhyay S, Myong S, Pappu RV, Rippe K, Shelkovnikova TA, Vecchiarelli AG, Wegmann S, Zhang H, Zhang M, Zubieta C, Zweckstetter M, Dormann D, Mittag T. Current practices in the study of biomolecular condensates: a community comment. Nature Communications 16, 7730 (2025). DOI 10.1038/s41467-025-62055-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62055-8
  16. Williamson CR, Pantic UV, Wang AY, Jones N. Revisiting nephrin signaling and its specialized effects on the uniquely adaptable podocyte. Biochemical Journal 482, 763–788 (2025). DOI 10.1042/bcj20230234. https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20230234