For the stationary nonlinear Dirac equation −i∑k=13αk∂ku+mβu=f(x,∣u∣)u+ωu-i\sum_{k=1}^3\alpha_k\partial_k u+m\beta u=f(x,|u|)u+\omega u in R3\mathbb{R}^3 with prescribed L2L^2-mass ∫R3∣u∣2 dx=a2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|u|^2\,dx=a^2 and frequency ω\omega as an unknown Lagrange multiplier, the known existence and multiplicity results for non-autonomous nonlinearities f(x,⋅)f(x,\cdot) satisfying hypotheses (f1)–(f5) of arXiv:2308.05393 — like their perturbative predecessors for special weighted or autonomous nonlinearities — are obtained by perturbation/Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction near the vacuum and are restricted to sufficiently small prescribed mass a>0a>0. The open problem is to determine, for non-autonomous nonlinearities satisfying (f1)–(f5), whether normalized solutions exist for prescribed masses beyond this small-mass regime — in particular for arbitrary prescribed mass aa — and whether the known infinite multiplicity persists there.

Background

A solitary wave of a nonlinear Dirac equation in 3+13+1 dimensions is a solution of the time-dependent equation of the form ψ(t,x)=e−iωtu(x)\psi(t,x)=e^{-i\omega t}u(x); substituting this ansatz into the Soler-type model (the classical nonlinear Dirac field model of relativistic quantum physics) i∂tψ=−i∑k=13αk∂kψ+mβψ−f(x,∣ψ∣)ψi\partial_t\psi=-i\sum_{k=1}^3\alpha_k\partial_k\psi+m\beta\psi-f(x,|\psi|)\psi leads to the stationary equation −i∑k=13αk∂ku+mβu=f(x,∣u∣)u+ωu-i\sum_{k=1}^3\alpha_k\partial_k u+m\beta u=f(x,|u|)u+\omega u on R3\mathbb{R}^3, where uu takes values in C4\mathbb{C}^4, m>0m>0 is the particle mass, and α1,α2,α3,β\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3,\beta are the 4×44\times 4 Dirac matrices. A normalized solution is a pair (u,ω)(u,\omega) solving the stationary equation subject to a prescribed L2L^2-norm (the mass or charge) ∫R3∣u∣2 dx=a2\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|u|^2\,dx=a^2, with the frequency ω∈R\omega\in\mathbb{R} arising as a Lagrange multiplier (the solutions constructed in arXiv:2308.05393 satisfy m−Cap−2≤ωa≤2ca/a2<mm-Ca^{p-2}\le\omega_a\le 2c_a/a^2<m for small aa); this fixed-charge formulation is the one relevant to relativistic density functional theory, where the particle number, not the frequency, is the physical datum. The natural energy space is the Sobolev space H1/2(R3;C4)H^{1/2}(\mathbb{R}^3;\mathbb{C}^4), and under the L2L^2-preserving dilation uλ(x)=λ3/2u(λx)u_\lambda(x)=\lambda^{3/2}u(\lambda x) a power nonlinearity ∣u∣p−2u|u|^{p-2}u has critical exponent p=8/3p=8/3, the mass-critical exponent for the Dirac problem (growth 2<p<8/32<p<8/3 is mass-subcritical, p>8/3p>8/3 mass-supercritical). The central analytic obstruction is strong indefiniteness: the free Dirac operator has spectrum (−∞,−m]∪[m,∞)(-\infty,-m]\cup[m,\infty) with a spectral gap at zero energy, so the constrained energy functional is unbounded both above and below on the L2L^2-sphere and direct minimization is unavailable. Earlier strongly indefinite normalized problems were treated by Buffoni, Esteban and Séré (Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 2006) by penalization, and Nolasco (Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C 2021) constructed a normalized solitary wave for the Maxwell–Dirac system. For the Dirac equation itself in R3\mathbb{R}^3, Ding, Yu and Zhao (J. Geom. Anal. 2023) proved the first L2L^2-normalized solitary-wave existence result, for a weighted single power K(x)∣u∣p−2uK(x)|u|^{p-2}u with 2<p<8/32<p<8/3 and a compactness-restoring weight K∈L∞K\in L^\infty, by a perturbation argument. Bahrouni, Guo, Hajaiej and Yu (arXiv:2308.05393, 2023) generalized this to genuinely non-autonomous nonlinearities f(x,∣u∣)uf(x,|u|)u satisfying hypotheses (f1)–(f5): smoothness and positivity of f(x,⋅)f(x,\cdot); a two-sided growth pinching 2<p≤q<32<p\le q<3 with f(x,t)/tq−2f(x,t)/t^{q-2} nonincreasing and f(x,t)/tp−2f(x,t)/t^{p-2} nondecreasing in tt; decay of r(x)=f(x,1)r(x)=f(x,1) at infinity; and a lower bound F(x,t)≥L∣x∣−τtαF(x,t)\ge L|x|^{-\tau}t^\alpha (with F(x,t)=∫0tf(x,s)s dsF(x,t)=\int_0^t f(x,s)s\,ds, α∈(0,8/3)\alpha\in(0,8/3), τ∈(0,(8−3α)/2)\tau\in(0,(8-3\alpha)/2)) holding almost everywhere on an exterior cone S={tx∣t≥1, x∈Bd(x0)}S=\{tx\mid t\ge1,\ x\in B_d(x_0)\} with 0<d<∣x0∣0<d<|x_0| and for 0≤t≤t00\le t\le t_0, which restores compactness through the nonlinearity's slow decay at small amplitudes. Their Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 establish, via Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction (splitting uu into spectral components of the linearized Dirac operator and solving a fixed-point equation for the infinite-dimensional part) combined with the Ljusternik–Schnirelmann category/genus theory (a topological multiplicity machine counting critical points via the genus of symmetric sets), the existence of a normalized solution, infinitely many distinct normalized solutions, and bifurcation on the left in the sense of the source's Definition 1.1 (along solutions with ∥un∥H1/2→0\|u_n\|_{H^{1/2}}\to0; the conclusion proved at the end of its Section 3.2 is that the fixed number mm is a bifurcation point on the left, reached as a→0+a\to0^+ with ωa→m\omega_a\to m and ∥ua∥→0\|u_a\|\to0) — but all statements hold only for prescribed mass a>0a>0 small enough. Existence and multiplicity for large prescribed mass lie outside the reach of the perturbative scheme.

Problem Statement

For the nonlinear Dirac equation in R3\mathbb{R}^3 with non-autonomous nonlinearity,

−i∑k=13αk∂ku+mβu=f(x,∣u∣)u+ωu,∫R3∣u∣2 dx=a2,-i\sum_{k=1}^3\alpha_k\partial_k u+m\beta u=f(x,|u|)u+\omega u,\qquad \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|u|^2\,dx=a^2,

where a>0a>0 is a prescribed mass, ω∈R\omega\in\mathbb{R} is an unknown Lagrange multiplier, and ff satisfies the non-autonomous hypotheses (f1)–(f5) of Bahrouni–Guo–Hajaiej–Yu (positivity; two-sided pinching 2<p≤q<32<p\le q<3 with monotone ratios f(x,t)/tq−2f(x,t)/t^{q-2}, f(x,t)/tp−2f(x,t)/t^{p-2}; decay of f(x,1)f(x,1) at infinity; and the lower bound F(x,t)≥L∣x∣−τtαF(x,t)\ge L|x|^{-\tau}t^\alpha on F(x,t)=∫0tf(x,s)s dsF(x,t)=\int_0^t f(x,s)s\,ds, holding almost everywhere on an exterior cone and for 0≤t≤t00\le t\le t_0), determine the existence and multiplicity of L2L^2-normalized solutions u∈H1/2(R3;C4)u\in H^{1/2}(\mathbb{R}^3;\mathbb{C}^4) beyond the perturbative regime — specifically:

  1. Do L2L^2-normalized solutions exist for prescribed masses aa beyond the "any fixed a>0a>0 small enough" regime of the source's Theorems 1.1–1.2, in particular for arbitrary prescribed mass?
  2. Do the infinitely many distinct normalized solutions established by the source's Theorem 1.2 for small aa persist in that non-perturbative mass range?

References

  1. Anouar Bahrouni, Qi Guo, Hichem Hajaiej, Yuanyang Yu, "Existence and Multiplicity of Normalized Solutions for Dirac Equations with non-autonomous nonlinearities" (2023), arXiv:2308.05393, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2308.05393, https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05393
  2. Yanheng Ding, Yuanyang Yu, Fukun Zhao, "L2L^2-Normalized Solitary Wave Solutions of a Nonlinear Dirac Equation", The Journal of Geometric Analysis 33, article 69 (2023), DOI 10.1007/s12220-022-01117-5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-022-01117-5
  3. Boris Buffoni, Maria J. Esteban, Eric Séré, "Normalized Solutions to Strongly Indefinite Semilinear Equations", Advanced Nonlinear Studies 6 (2006), 323–347, DOI 10.1515/ans-2006-0212, https://doi.org/10.1515/ans-2006-0212
  4. Margherita Nolasco, "A normalized solitary wave solution of the Maxwell-Dirac equations", Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré C, Analyse non linéaire 38 (2021), 1681–1702, DOI 10.1016/j.anihpc.2020.12.006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2020.12.006
  5. Vittorio Coti Zelati, Margherita Nolasco, "Normalized solutions for a nonlinear Dirac equation", Journal of Differential Equations 414 (2025), 746–772, DOI 10.1016/j.jde.2024.09.029, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2024.09.029 (preprint arXiv:2310.07512)
  6. Pan Chen, Yanheng Ding, Qi Guo, Hua-Yang Wang, "Nonrelativistic limit of normalized solutions to a class of nonlinear Dirac equations", Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations 63, article 90 (2024), DOI 10.1007/s00526-024-02702-y, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-024-02702-y (preprint arXiv:2310.08478)
  7. Hao Wang, Xiaojun Chang, "Normalized solutions for a nonlinear Dirac equation with an inhomogeneous nonlinearity" (2026), arXiv:2606.22727, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2606.22727, https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22727
  8. Pan Chen, Qi Guo, Yuanyang Yu, "Limit Behavior of Multiple Bound States of Nonlinear Dirac Equations", The Journal of Geometric Analysis 36, article 131 (2026), DOI 10.1007/s12220-026-02397-x, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-026-02397-x
  9. Yuxia Guo, Yuanyang Yu, "Multiple Normalized Solutions for First Order Hamiltonian Systems", SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 56 (2024), 3861–3885, DOI 10.1137/23M1584575, https://doi.org/10.1137/23M1584575
  10. Zhentao He, Chao Ji, "Normalized solutions of nonlinear Dirac equations on noncompact metric graphs with localized nonlinearities", Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 206 (2026), article 103837, DOI 10.1016/j.matpur.2025.103837, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2025.103837 (preprint arXiv:2505.15100)
  11. Zhentao He, Chao Ji, "Nonrelativistic limit of normalized solutions of nonlinear Dirac equations on noncompact metric graphs with localized nonlinearities" (2025), arXiv:2510.15378, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2510.15378, https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15378