For the incompressible Euler equations on the periodic box Q=[0,2π]dQ=[0,2\pi]^d, d≥2d\ge 2, weak solutions issuing from every divergence-free v0∈L2v_0\in L^2 exist, but the known constructions violate the energy inequality. The problem, posed explicitly by Wiedemann (2011) and Székelyhidi–Wiedemann (2012), asks whether every such initial datum admits a global weak solution whose kinetic energy never exceeds its initial value (E(t)≤E(0)E(t)\le E(0) for all t≥0t\ge 0, i.e. an admissible solution). As of 2026 this is open: admissible solutions are known only on L2L^2-dense (in 2D: Baire-generic) classes of data, and no counterexample datum is known either.

Background

The incompressible Euler equations ∂tv+div(v⊗v)+∇p=0\partial_t v+\mathrm{div}(v\otimes v)+\nabla p=0, div v=0\mathrm{div}\,v=0 describe an ideal (inviscid) fluid. On the periodic box Q=[0,2π]dQ=[0,2\pi]^d with d≥2d\ge 2, write H(Q)H(Q) for the space of QQ-periodic, mean-zero, divergence-free vector fields in L2L^2 (the natural energy space for the problem; the mean-zero condition is harmless by Galilean invariance). A weak solution with initial datum v0∈H(Q)v_0\in H(Q) is a field v∈L∞((0,∞);H(Q))v\in L^\infty((0,\infty);H(Q)) satisfying the equations in the sense of distributions, with the initial datum included in the distributional identity through test functions on [0,∞)[0,\infty) (as in Wiedemann's formulation, in which the solutions lie in C([0,∞);Hw(Q))C([0,\infty);H_w(Q)) and attain v(0)=v0v(0)=v_0), so that E(0)=12∥v0∥L22E(0)=\frac12\|v_0\|_{L^2}^2; its kinetic energy is E(t)=12∫Q∣v(x,t)∣2 dxE(t)=\frac12\int_Q|v(x,t)|^2\,dx. For the viscous Navier–Stokes equations, Leray (1934) constructed global weak solutions satisfying the energy inequality E(t)≤E(0)E(t)\le E(0) for arbitrary L2L^2 data, and this remains the foundational existence theory of mathematical fluid dynamics. For Euler the analogous statement is open. A weak Euler solution is called admissible (or energy admissible) if E(t)≤E(0)E(t)\le E(0) for all t≥0t\ge 0. Admissibility carries a strong uniqueness consequence: by weak–strong uniqueness, any admissible solution coincides with the classical solution for as long as the latter exists, and in two dimensions the classical Yudovich theory (1963) provides a unique global admissible solution whenever the vorticity ω=curl v\omega=\mathrm{curl}\,v is bounded. Since the 2000s, convex integration (De Lellis–Székelyhidi, 'On admissibility criteria for weak solutions of the Euler equations', 2010) has produced 'wild' Euler solutions — one starts from a strict subsolution, a smoother relaxed field whose defect relative to the kinetic energy is pointwise positive, and adds oscillations to obtain infinitely many exact weak solutions with prescribed energy profiles. This mechanism, however, always produces infinitely many solutions from a given construction, so it can never work for data on which uniqueness holds; Székelyhidi–Wiedemann ('Young measures generated by ideal incompressible fluid flows', 2012) deduced from the DiPerna–Majda theory of measure-valued solutions (objects recording the oscillation and concentration behavior of weakly convergent approximate-solution sequences, which exist and are admissible for all L2L^2 data) that an L2L^2-dense set of initial data carries infinitely many admissible weak solutions, and stated that improving this to a larger class is 'a very delicate issue'. Wiedemann (2011) closed the admissibility-free question: for every v0∈H(Q)v_0\in H(Q) there exist infinitely many global weak solutions with bounded energy (even E(t)→0E(t)\to 0), but necessarily with a discontinuous energy increase at t=0t=0, so no energy inequality. Recent 2D progress connects admissibility with anomalous dissipation (nonvanishing energy dissipation in the vanishing-viscosity limit): De Rosa–Park (2025) showed that for 2D data whose vorticity is a measure with positive singular part (e.g. vortex-sheet type data), vanishing-viscosity limits converge to an admissible weak solution; Galeati (2026) proved that a residual set in the sense of Baire (a countable intersection of open dense sets, i.e. a generic set in the topological sense) of L2L^2 divergence-free 2D data carries a unique global energy-conserving weak solution recovered by vanishing viscosity — yet for a given arbitrary datum even L2L^2-compactness of vanishing-viscosity sequences is not known. In d≥3d\ge 3 there is no analogue: only dense classes of data (smooth, Hölder, vortex-sheet, or LpL^p-vorticity type) are covered, and even for smooth data a global-in-time admissible continuation past a potential finite-time singularity is not constructed, since that is entangled with the open blow-up problem.

Problem Statement

On the periodic box Q=[0,2π]dQ=[0,2\pi]^d with d≥2d\ge 2, let H(Q)H(Q) denote the space of QQ-periodic, mean-zero, divergence-free L2L^2 vector fields. Does every initial datum v0∈H(Q)v_0\in H(Q) admit a global-in-time weak solution v∈L∞((0,∞);H(Q))v\in L^\infty((0,\infty);H(Q)) of the incompressible Euler equations with v(0)=v0v(0)=v_0 that is admissible in the energy sense, i.e. whose kinetic energy E(t)=12∫Q∣v(x,t)∣2 dxE(t)=\frac12\int_Q|v(x,t)|^2\,dx satisfies E(t)≤E(0)E(t)\le E(0) for all t≥0t\ge 0? Any answer must be consistent with the known constraints: for smooth data the admissible solution must coincide with the classical solution by weak–strong uniqueness (globally in 2D for bounded vorticity by Yudovich's theorem), while infinitely many admissible solutions exist for dense classes of rough data such as LpL^p-vorticity or vortex-sheet data. Both the two-dimensional case (where currently only a Baire-generic set of data is covered) and the case d≥3d\ge 3 are open.

References

  1. Emil Wiedemann, Existence of weak solutions for the incompressible Euler equations, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré C, Anal. Non Linéaire 28 (2011) 727–730. DOI: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2011.05.002; arXiv:1102.3614, https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.3614
  2. Camillo De Lellis and László Székelyhidi Jr., On admissibility criteria for weak solutions of the Euler equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 195 (2010) 225–260. DOI: 10.1007/s00205-008-0201-x; arXiv:0712.3288, https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3288
  3. László Székelyhidi Jr. and Emil Wiedemann, Young measures generated by ideal incompressible fluid flows, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 206 (2012) 333–366. DOI: 10.1007/s00205-012-0540-5; arXiv:1101.3499, https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.3499
  4. R. J. DiPerna and A. J. Majda, Oscillations and concentrations in weak solutions of the incompressible fluid equations, Comm. Math. Phys. 108 (1987) 667–689. DOI: 10.1007/BF01214424, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01214424
  5. Jean Leray, Sur le mouvement d'un liquide visqueux emplissant l'espace, Acta Math. 63 (1934) 193–248. DOI: 10.1007/BF02547354, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547354
  6. V. I. Yudovich, Non-stationary flow of an ideal incompressible liquid, USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 3 (1963) 1407–1456. DOI: 10.1016/0041-5553(63)90247-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(63)90247-7
  7. Camillo De Lellis and László Székelyhidi Jr., Dissipative continuous Euler flows, Invent. Math. 193 (2013) 377–407. DOI: 10.1007/s00222-012-0429-9; arXiv:1202.1751, https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.1751
  8. Sara Daneri, Cauchy problem for dissipative Hölder solutions to the incompressible Euler equations, Comm. Math. Phys. 329 (2014) 745–786. DOI: 10.1007/s00220-014-1973-5; arXiv:1302.0988, https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.0988
  9. Francisco Mengual and László Székelyhidi Jr., Dissipative Euler flows for vortex sheet initial data without distinguished sign, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (2023) 163–221. DOI: 10.1002/cpa.22038; arXiv:2005.08333, https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.08333
  10. Francisco Mengual, Non-uniqueness of admissible solutions for the 2D Euler equation with LpL^p vortex data, Comm. Math. Phys. 405 (2024). DOI: 10.1007/s00220-024-05065-9; arXiv:2304.09578, https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09578
  11. Calvin Khor and Changxing Miao, Construction of solutions to the 3D Euler equations with initial data in HβH^\beta for β>0\beta>0, Commun. Inf. Syst. 25 (2025) 389–425. DOI: 10.4310/cis.250823005729; arXiv:2207.14041, https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.14041
  12. Luigi De Rosa and Jaemin Park, No anomalous dissipation in two-dimensional incompressible fluids, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 57 (2025) 5771–5790. DOI: 10.1137/25m1773167; arXiv:2403.04668, https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04668
  13. Lucio Galeati, The 2D Euler equations are well-posed for generic initial data in L2L^2, preprint (2026). arXiv:2604.14100, https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14100