For the classical two-parameter Hénon family fa,b(x,y)=(1+y−ax2,  bx)f_{a,b}(x,y)=(1+y-ax^2,\;bx) of planar diffeomorphisms, Kiriki and Soma (2013), after proving that the family contains a generically unfolding cubic (order-2) homoclinic tangency at parameters arbitrarily close to (−2,0)(-2,0) in the reparametrized coordinates φa,b\varphi_{a,b} introduced below (the point (2,0)(2,0) in the classical (a,b)(a,b) coordinates), explicitly posed the question: does the original Hénon family have a homoclinic tangency of every finite order nn? Order 1 (quadratic) and order 2 (cubic) are settled, but for every order n≥3n\ge 3 (quartic and higher) no existence result, impossibility result, or restatement is known in the later literature; the question remains open.

Background

The Hénon family, introduced by Hénon (1976) as a basic model of dissipative planar chaos, consists of the polynomial diffeomorphisms fa,b(x,y)=(1+y−ax2,  bx)f_{a,b}(x,y)=(1+y-ax^2,\;bx) with b≠0b\neq 0; Kiriki and Soma use the equivalent reparametrized form φa,b(x,y)=(y,  a−bx+y2)\varphi_{a,b}(x,y)=(y,\;a-bx+y^2), obtained from the classical formula by (a,b)↦(−a,−b)(a,b)\mapsto(-a,-b) and the linear coordinate change (x,y)↦(−ab−1y,  −ax)(x,y)\mapsto(-ab^{-1}y,\;-ax). For b≠0b\neq 0 each φa,b\varphi_{a,b} is a diffeomorphism of the plane, and its fixed points are pa,b±=(ya,b±,ya,b±)p_{a,b}^{\pm}=(y_{a,b}^{\pm},y_{a,b}^{\pm}) with ya,b±=12(1+b±(1+b)2−4a)y_{a,b}^{\pm}=\frac{1}{2}\bigl(1+b\pm\sqrt{(1+b)^2-4a}\bigr), so there are two of them whenever (1+b)2−4a>0(1+b)^2-4a>0 (this discriminant is written in the φ\varphi-coordinates; the corresponding condition for the classical fa,bf_{a,b} is (1−b)2+4a>0(1-b)^2+4a>0). For (a,b)(a,b) sufficiently close to (−2,0)(-2,0) with b≠0b\neq 0, both fixed points pa,b±p_{a,b}^{\pm} are saddles: the derivative at the fixed point has one eigenvalue λ\lambda with ∣λ∣<1|\lambda|<1 and one eigenvalue γ\gamma with ∣γ∣>1|\gamma|>1, and there ∣λγ∣<1|\lambda\gamma|<1, so both are dissipative saddles. A saddle then has a stable manifold Ws(p)W^s(p) (the set of points whose forward orbits converge to pp) and an unstable manifold Wu(p)W^u(p) (points whose backward orbits converge to pp), both injectively immersed curves. A homoclinic point is a point of Ws(p)∩Wu(p)W^s(p)\cap W^u(p) other than pp itself; it is a homoclinic tangency when the two curves touch non-transversally there.

The order of a tangency measures the degree of contact: in local Cn+1C^{n+1} coordinates near the tangency in which the two manifold arcs are the graphs y=0y=0 and y=α(x)y=\alpha(x) with α(0)=0\alpha(0)=0, the tangency has order nn when α′(0)=⋯=α(n)(0)=0\alpha'(0)=\cdots=\alpha^{(n)}(0)=0 and α(n+1)(0)≠0\alpha^{(n+1)}(0)\neq 0. Order 1 is called quadratic, order 2 cubic, order 3 quartic. A tangency in a family unfolds generically when the parameter moves the manifolds apart at nonzero speed: for a quadratic tangency in a one-parameter family this is ∂μα(μ0,0)≠0\partial_\mu\alpha(\mu_0,0)\neq 0, and for a cubic tangency in a two-parameter family the analogous condition is the nonvanishing of a mixed parameter-derivative determinant. A saddle is dissipative when ∣λγ∣<1|\lambda\gamma|<1, so first returns near it contract area.

Homoclinic tangencies are the organizing centers of non-hyperbolic dynamics. Newhouse domains are open regions of the space of CrC^r surface diffeomorphisms in which maps having homoclinic tangencies are dense. Gonchenko, Shilnikov and Turaev, in a long program on systems with structurally unstable Poincaré homoclinic orbits (see their Chaos 1996 survey and their Newhouse-domain papers), proved a striking hierarchy property in this setting: within Newhouse domains, diffeomorphisms having homoclinic tangencies of any prescribed finite order are dense (Gonchenko–Turaev–Shil'nikov 2001; Gonchenko–Turaev–Shilnikov 2007, the last also covering area-preserving maps). These, however, are genericity statements in the infinite-dimensional space of all surface diffeomorphisms, where one may freely perturb; they say nothing about any fixed finite-parameter family.

Kiriki and Soma (2008) showed what a generically unfolding cubic homoclinic tangency of a dissipative saddle implies for a two-parameter family: by renormalization (rescaling first-return maps near the tangency toward a one-dimensional limiting map), one obtains cubic dynamics — persistent antimonotonic tangencies (the concurrent creation and annihilation of periodic orbits along one-parameter paths, at cubic rather than quadratic degeneracies) and cubic polynomial-like strange attractors (attracting invariant sets equal to the closure of a saddle's unstable manifold on which some iterate is conjugate, up to scale, to a one-dimensional cubic polynomial map) supporting SRB measures, i.e. invariant measures with absolutely continuous conditional measures on unstable manifolds. Kiriki and Soma (2013) then instantiated the theory inside the Hénon family: using the Gonchenko–Shilnikov–Turaev mechanism, which creates a cubic homoclinic tangency from a cyclic pair of quadratic heteroclinic tangencies between two saddle fixed points, they proved (Theorem A) that there exists a parameter pair (a∗,b∗)(a_*,b_*) with b∗>0b_*>0 arbitrarily close to (−2,0)(-2,0) such that φa∗,b∗\varphi_{a_*,b_*} has a cubic homoclinic tangency of its dissipative saddle fixed point pa∗,b∗+p^+_{a_*,b_*} that unfolds generically with respect to the two-parameter family, and they deduced (Corollary B) that the Hénon family exhibits cubic dynamics.

For order 1 the situation is classical: quadratic homoclinic tangencies of the Hénon map at explicit parameter values, unfolding generically in one-parameter subfamilies, have been certified by the computer-assisted proof of Wilczak and Zgliczyński (2009), and quadratic tangencies are ubiquitous in the family's non-hyperbolic parameter regions. The Gonchenko–Shilnikov–Turaev density theorems leave open, however, whether the specific two-parameter Hénon family itself realizes tangencies of arbitrarily high order, since a two-parameter slice cannot inherit a density statement that requires arbitrarily many independent perturbation directions. This is precisely the gap Kiriki and Soma pointed at immediately after Theorem A.

Problem Statement

Does the classical Hénon family fa,b(x,y)=(1+y−ax2,  bx)f_{a,b}(x,y)=(1+y-ax^2,\;bx), b≠0b\neq 0 (equivalently, in the reparametrized form φa,b(x,y)=(y,  a−bx+y2)\varphi_{a,b}(x,y)=(y,\;a-bx+y^2) used in the source work), contain a homoclinic tangency of every finite order? That is, for each integer n≥1n\ge 1, is there a parameter value (a,b)(a,b) such that the corresponding map has a saddle fixed point pp whose stable and unstable manifolds have a homoclinic tangency of order nn — in local Cn+1C^{n+1} coordinates near the tangency with the manifold arcs given as y=0y=0 and y=α(x)y=\alpha(x), the conditions α(0)=α′(0)=⋯=α(n)(0)=0\alpha(0)=\alpha'(0)=\cdots=\alpha^{(n)}(0)=0 and α(n+1)(0)≠0\alpha^{(n+1)}(0)\neq 0? Orders n=1n=1 (quadratic) and n=2n=2 (cubic, near (−2,0)(-2,0) in the φ\varphi-coordinates) are known; the open core is every order n≥3n\ge 3 (quartic and higher), with no restriction on the region of the (a,b)(a,b)-parameter plane. No generic-unfolding requirement is imposed for n≥3n\ge 3: the source defines generic unfolding only for a quadratic tangency in a one-parameter family and for a cubic tangency in a two-parameter family, so generic unfolding enters only as part of the known results at orders n=1n=1 and n=2n=2.

References

  1. M. Hénon, "A two-dimensional mapping with a strange attractor", Communications in Mathematical Physics 50 (1976), no. 1, 69–77. DOI: 10.1007/BF01608556, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01608556
  2. S. V. Gonchenko, L. P. Shilnikov, D. V. Turaev, "Dynamical phenomena in systems with structurally unstable Poincaré homoclinic orbits", Chaos 6 (1996), no. 1, 15–31. DOI: 10.1063/1.166154, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166154
  3. S. V. Gonchenko, D. V. Turaev, L. P. Shil'nikov, "Homoclinic tangencies of an arbitrary order in Newhouse domains", Journal of Mathematical Sciences (New York) 105 (2001), no. 1, 1738–1778. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011359428672, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011359428672
  4. Sergey Gonchenko, Dmitry Turaev, Leonid Shilnikov, "Homoclinic tangencies of arbitrarily high orders in conservative and dissipative two-dimensional maps", Nonlinearity 20 (2007), no. 2, 241–275. DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/20/2/002, https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/20/2/002
  5. Shin Kiriki, Teruhiko Soma, "Persistent antimonotonic bifurcations and strange attractors for cubic homoclinic tangencies", Nonlinearity 21 (2008), no. 5, 1105–1140. DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/21/5/011, https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/21/5/011
  6. Shin Kiriki, Teruhiko Soma, "Existence of generic cubic homoclinic tangencies for Hénon maps", Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 33 (2013), no. 4, 1029–1051. DOI: 10.1017/S0143385712000168, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385712000168 (arXiv:math/0608386, https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0608386)
  7. Daniel Wilczak, Piotr Zgliczyński, "Computer Assisted Proof of the Existence of Homoclinic Tangency for the Hénon Map and for the Forced Damped Pendulum", SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems 8 (2009), no. 4, 1632–1663. DOI: 10.1137/090759975, https://doi.org/10.1137/090759975 (arXiv:0905.3924, https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.3924)
  8. Shinobu Hashimoto, "Moduli of surface diffeomorphisms with cubic tangencies", Tokyo Journal of Mathematics 42 (2019), no. 2. DOI: 10.3836/tjm/1502179278, https://doi.org/10.3836/tjm/1502179278 (arXiv:1804.08400, https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.08400)
  9. Sergey Gonchenko, Ming-Chia Li, Mikhail Malkin, "Criteria on existence of horseshoes near homoclinic tangencies of arbitrary orders", Dynamical Systems 33 (2018), no. 3, 441–463. DOI: 10.1080/14689367.2017.1381232, https://doi.org/10.1080/14689367.2017.1381232
  10. Julia Xénelkis de Hénon, "Hénon Maps: A List of Open Problems", Arnold Mathematical Journal 10 (2024), no. 4, 585–620. DOI: 10.1007/s40598-024-00252-x, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40598-024-00252-x