For a curve Γ=(t,−γ(t))\Gamma=(t,-\gamma(t)), the curved bilinear Hilbert transform is HΓ(f,g)(x)=p.v.∫Rf(x−t) g(x+γ(t)) dttH_\Gamma(f,g)(x)=\mathrm{p.v.}\int_{\mathbb{R}} f(x-t)\,g(x+\gamma(t))\,\frac{dt}{t}. Lie (2018) proved that for every γ\gamma in the class NFC\mathcal{NF}^C of smooth "non-flat" curves near zero and infinity, HΓH_\Gamma maps Lp×Lq→LrL^p\times L^q\to L^r boundedly for all Hölder exponents 1/p+1/q=1/r1/p+1/q=1/r with 1<p<∞1<p<\infty, 1<q≤∞1<q\le\infty, 1≤r<∞1\le r<\infty, and showed this range is optimal up to endpoints: r≥1r\ge 1 is sharp for the class as a whole, while the boundary points of the Banach triangle were left undecided. The problem is to determine these endpoints for every γ∈NFC\gamma\in\mathcal{NF}^C: prove or disprove that HΓH_\Gamma maps L∞×Lq→LqL^\infty\times L^q\to L^q (1≤q<∞1\le q<\infty, weak type included where strong type fails) and L1×L∞→L1L^1\times L^\infty\to L^1 (strong or weak type), thereby deciding boundedness at every point of the closed Banach triangle. Later literature — sharp ranges for the companion maximal function, quasi-Banach ranges for convex-curve subclasses, variable and hybrid curves, and trilinear analogues — leaves precisely this endpoint boundary of the singular operator untouched.

Background

The classical bilinear Hilbert transform is the bilinear singular integral

BHT(f,g)(x)=p.v.∫Rf(x−t) g(x+t) dtt,\mathrm{BHT}(f,g)(x)=\mathrm{p.v.}\int_{\mathbb{R}} f(x-t)\,g(x+t)\,\frac{dt}{t},

where p.v.\mathrm{p.v.} denotes the Cauchy principal value. In breakthrough work, Lacey and Thiele proved that BHT\mathrm{BHT} is bounded from Lp(R)×Lq(R)L^p(\mathbb{R})\times L^q(\mathbb{R}) to Lr(R)L^r(\mathbb{R}) whenever the exponents are Hölder indices, i.e. 1/p+1/q=1/r1/p+1/q=1/r, with 1<p,q≤∞1<p,q\le\infty and 2/3<r<∞2/3<r<\infty. A natural curved analogue replaces the linear arguments x−tx-t and x+tx+t by a nonlinear path: for a curve Γ=(t,−γ(t))\Gamma=(t,-\gamma(t)) one sets

HΓ(f,g)(x)=p.v.∫Rf(x−t) g(x+γ(t)) dtt.H_\Gamma(f,g)(x)=\mathrm{p.v.}\int_{\mathbb{R}} f(x-t)\,g(x+\gamma(t))\,\frac{dt}{t}.

These operators are motivated by the study of the Cauchy transform along Lipschitz curves, by the LrL^r-norm convergence of non-conventional bilinear polynomial averages in ergodic theory, and by nonlinear extensions of Roth's theorem in additive combinatorics; the curvature of γ\gamma destroys the modulation symmetry that powers the classical theory and demands genuinely new time-frequency analysis.

The natural class of curves is Lie's NFC\mathcal{NF}^C: γ\gamma is CNC^N-smooth (N≥4N\ge 4) with no critical points near zero and infinity; under dyadic rescaling it is asymptotically self-similar in the sense that γ(2−jt)/(2−jγ′(2−j))\gamma(2^{-j}t)/(2^{-j}\gamma'(2^{-j})) approaches a fixed profile Q(t)Q(t) with Q′′Q'' bounded away from zero (the "non-flatness" — the curve deviates from any straight line at every scale); and a doubling-type variation condition holds. The class contains every real polynomial with no constant and no linear term, every finite real combination of powers tαt^\alpha with α∈(0,∞)∖{1}\alpha\in(0,\infty)\setminus\{1\}, and combinations ∣t∣α∣log⁡∣t∣∣β|t|^\alpha|\log|t||^\beta with α∉{−1,0,1}\alpha\notin\{-1,0,1\}; NFC\mathcal{NF}^C additionally allows adding a constant.

The mapping theory of HΓH_\Gamma was built in stages: Li proved the L2×L2→L1L^2\times L^2\to L^1 bound for monomial curves and, crucially, constructed for every degree d≥2d\ge 2 a polynomial curve on which the operator is unbounded from Lp×Lq→LrL^p\times L^q\to L^r for all p,q>1p,q>1 whenever r<(d−1)/dr<(d-1)/d; Lie extended the L2×L2→L1L^2\times L^2\to L^1 bound to all of NFC\mathcal{NF}^C; Li and Xiao obtained uniform-in-coefficient bounds for polynomial curves for r>(d−1)/dr>(d-1)/d; and Lie (2018) established the full interior range 1<p<∞1<p<\infty, 1<q≤∞1<q\le\infty, 1≤r<∞1\le r<\infty. Because the degree-dd counterexamples above approach threshold 11 as d→∞d\to\infty, the restriction r≥1r\ge 1 is optimal for the class as a whole — no uniform quasi-Banach extension (output exponent below 11) is possible over NFC\mathcal{NF}^C.

Viewing the associated trilinear form Λ(f,g,h)=∫HΓ(f,g) h\Lambda(f,g,h)=\int H_\Gamma(f,g)\,h, the admissible Banach-range triples form a closed triangle in the coordinates (1/p,1/q,1/r′)(1/p,1/q,1/r') with 1/p+1/q+1/r′=11/p+1/q+1/r'=1, the "Banach triangle", whose vertices correspond to (p,q,r)=(1,∞,1)(p,q,r)=(1,\infty,1), (∞,1,1)(\infty,1,1) and (∞,∞,∞)(\infty,\infty,\infty). Lie's theorem covers the open triangle together with the q=∞q=\infty and r=1r=1 edges; since L∞×L∞→L∞L^\infty\times L^\infty\to L^\infty fails (with one input identically 11 the operator reduces, up to a sign, to the classical Hilbert transform of the other input, which is unbounded from L∞L^\infty to L∞L^\infty), the undecided boundary is exactly the p=∞p=\infty edge — HΓ:L∞×Lq→LqH_\Gamma:L^\infty\times L^q\to L^q for 1≤q<∞1\le q<\infty — together with the vertex HΓ:L1×L∞→L1H_\Gamma:L^1\times L^\infty\to L^1. The companion (sub)bilinear maximal function MΓ(f,g)(x)=sup⁡ε>012ε∫−εε∣f(x−t) g(x+γ(t))∣ dtM_\Gamma(f,g)(x)=\sup_{\varepsilon>0}\frac{1}{2\varepsilon}\int_{-\varepsilon}^{\varepsilon}|f(x-t)\,g(x+\gamma(t))|\,dt was subsequently settled completely by Gaitan and Lie: it is bounded on the full range 1<p,q≤∞1<p,q\le\infty, 1≤r≤∞1\le r\le\infty, failing exactly at the corner vertices (1,∞,1)(1,\infty,1) and (∞,1,1)(\infty,1,1) — which isolates the singular-integral endpoints as the one remaining gap. That endpoints are genuinely delicate here is underscored by the classical flat case, where the optimality of the Lacey–Thiele range is still open and near-boundary estimates are known to carry at worst double-logarithmic losses whose complete removal is itself open (Di Plinio–Thiele).

Problem Statement

Let NFC\mathcal{NF}^C be the class of smooth non-flat curves near zero and infinity defined by Lie (2018) (containing all real polynomials with no constant and no linear term, finite real combinations of powers tαt^\alpha with α∈(0,∞)∖{1}\alpha\in(0,\infty)\setminus\{1\}, and combinations ∣t∣α∣log⁡∣t∣∣β|t|^\alpha|\log|t||^\beta with α∉{−1,0,1}\alpha\notin\{-1,0,1\}, up to additive constants), and for γ∈NFC\gamma\in\mathcal{NF}^C let

HΓ(f,g)(x)=p.v.∫Rf(x−t) g(x+γ(t)) dtt.H_\Gamma(f,g)(x)=\mathrm{p.v.}\int_{\mathbb{R}} f(x-t)\,g(x+\gamma(t))\,\frac{dt}{t}.

It is known that HΓH_\Gamma maps Lp(R)×Lq(R)→Lr(R)L^p(\mathbb{R})\times L^q(\mathbb{R})\to L^r(\mathbb{R}) boundedly for all Hölder exponents 1/p+1/q=1/r1/p+1/q=1/r with 1<p<∞1<p<\infty, 1<q≤∞1<q\le\infty, 1≤r<∞1\le r<\infty, and that r≥1r\ge 1 is optimal for the class as a whole; the point (∞,∞,∞)(\infty,\infty,\infty) (i.e. L∞×L∞→L∞L^\infty\times L^\infty\to L^\infty) is known to fail. Determine the endpoint behavior on the remaining boundary of the closed Banach triangle, for every γ∈NFC\gamma\in\mathcal{NF}^C:

  1. Prove or disprove that HΓH_\Gamma maps L∞(R)×Lq(R)→Lq(R)L^\infty(\mathbb{R})\times L^q(\mathbb{R})\to L^q(\mathbb{R}) boundedly for each 1<q<∞1<q<\infty, and decide the endpoint (p,q,r)=(∞,1,1)(p,q,r)=(\infty,1,1), i.e. L∞×L1→L1L^\infty\times L^1\to L^1, at least in weak type (i.e. boundedness into the weak space L1,∞L^{1,\infty}).
  2. Prove or disprove the vertex bound HΓ:L1(R)×L∞(R)→L1(R)H_\Gamma:L^1(\mathbb{R})\times L^\infty(\mathbb{R})\to L^1(\mathbb{R}), in strong or weak type.

A complete answer decides, at every boundary point of the closed Banach triangle {(1/p,1/q,1/r′):1/p+1/q+1/r′=1, 1≤p,q,r≤∞}\{(1/p,1/q,1/r'): 1/p+1/q+1/r'=1,\ 1\le p,q,r\le\infty\}, whether HΓH_\Gamma is bounded for each curve class member, jointly completing the LpL^p-mapping theory of the curved bilinear Hilbert transform on NFC\mathcal{NF}^C; the two items above are the two undecided pieces of that single boundary. Bounds may depend on the curve γ\gamma, as in the interior theorem.

References

  1. Victor Lie. On the Boundedness of the Bilinear Hilbert Transform along "non-flat" smooth curves. The Banach triangle case (LrL^r, 1≤r<∞1\leq r<\infty). Revista Matemática Iberoamericana 34(1):331–353, 2018. DOI: 10.4171/rmi/987; arXiv:1512.09356. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.09356
  2. Victor Lie. On the boundedness of the bilinear Hilbert transform along "non-flat" smooth curves. American Journal of Mathematics 137(2):313–363, 2015. DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2015.0013; arXiv:1110.3517. https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3517
  3. Xiaochun Li. Bilinear Hilbert transforms along curves I. The monomial case. Analysis & PDE 6(1):197–220, 2013. DOI: 10.2140/apde.2013.6.197; arXiv:0805.0107. https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.0107
  4. Xiaochun Li, Lechao Xiao. Uniform estimates for bilinear Hilbert transforms and bilinear maximal functions associated to polynomials. American Journal of Mathematics 138(4):907–962, 2016. DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2016.0030; arXiv:1308.3518. https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.3518
  5. Alejandra Gaitan, Victor Lie. The Boundedness of the (Sub)Bilinear Maximal Function along "non-flat" smooth curves. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications 26(4), Article 69, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00041-020-09770-6; arXiv:1903.11002. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.11002
  6. Junfeng Li, Haixia Yu. Bilinear Hilbert Transforms and (Sub)Bilinear Maximal Functions along Convex Curves. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 310(2):375–446, 2021. DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2021.310.375; arXiv:2006.04346. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.04346
  7. Dong Dong. On the bilinear Hilbert transform along two polynomials. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 147(10):4245–4258, 2019. DOI: 10.1090/proc/14518; arXiv:1708.01326. https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.01326
  8. Jingwei Guo, Lechao Xiao. Bilinear Hilbert Transforms Associated with Plane Curves. Journal of Geometric Analysis 26(2):967–995, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s12220-015-9580-z; arXiv:1403.5353. https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5353
  9. Michael Lacey, Christoph Thiele. LpL^p estimates on the bilinear Hilbert transform for 2<p<∞2<p<\infty. Annals of Mathematics (2) 146(3):693–724, 1997. DOI: 10.2307/2952458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952458
  10. Michael Lacey, Christoph Thiele. On Calderón's conjecture. Annals of Mathematics (2) 149(2):475–496, 1999. DOI: 10.2307/120971. https://doi.org/10.2307/120971
  11. Francesco Di Plinio, Christoph Thiele. Endpoint bounds for the bilinear Hilbert transform. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 368(6):3931–3972, 2016. DOI: 10.1090/tran/6548; arXiv:1403.5978. https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5978
  12. Victor Lie. A unified approach to three themes in harmonic analysis (I & II). Advances in Mathematics 437, Article 109385, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2023.109385; arXiv:1902.03807. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.03807
  13. Alejandra Gaitan, Victor Lie. Non-zero to zero curvature transition: Operators along hybrid curves with no quadratic (quasi-)resonances. Advances in Mathematics 478, Article 110356, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2025.110356; arXiv:2402.03451. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03451
  14. Bingyang Hu, Victor Lie. On the boundedness of the curved trilinear Hilbert transform and the curved nn-linear maximal operator in the quasi-Banach regime. arXiv:2511.07373 (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07373
  15. Lars Becker, Ben Krause. On multilinear maximal operators along homogeneous curves. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 342(2):207–216, 2026. DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2026.342.207; arXiv:2508.09080. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09080