Bergweiler and Cui (2022) proved that for every d∈(0,2]d\in(0,2] there is a transcendental meromorphic function whose inverse has three singular values and whose Julia set has Hausdorff dimension exactly dd, and noted that it “seems likely” that the interval (1,2](1,2] is also realized in the Speiser class S2\mathcal{S}_2 of functions whose inverse has two singular values. The class S2\mathcal{S}_2 is completely classified: its members are exactly the maps L(eaz)L(e^{az}) with a≠0a\ne 0 and LL a fractional linear transformation, having no critical points and two asymptotic values. Within this class the interval (1/2,1](1/2,1] is realized by the tangent family λtan⁡z\lambda\tan z (Barański 1995), and the value 22 is realized by every entire member such as λez\lambda e^z (McMullen 1987), but no member of S2\mathcal{S}_2 is known to have Julia-set dimension strictly between 11 and 22. The problem is to prove or refute that every d∈(1,2]d\in(1,2] occurs as dim⁡J(f)\dim J(f) for some f∈S2f\in\mathcal{S}_2 — equivalently, that the Möbius-exponential family L∘exp⁡L\circ\exp realizes every Julia-set dimension in (1,2)(1,2).

Background

Complex dynamics studies the behaviour of points under repeated application of a holomorphic map. For a transcendental meromorphic function ff (meromorphic on the whole plane, so with an essential singularity at ∞\infty), the Fatou set F(f)F(f) is the largest open set on which the family of iterates fnf^n is normal, and the Julia set J(f)=C^∖F(f)J(f)=\widehat{\mathbb C}\setminus F(f), where C^=C∪{∞}\widehat{\mathbb C}=\mathbb C\cup\{\infty\} is the Riemann sphere, is its complement, the locus of chaotic behaviour. A standard measure of the fractal size of J(f)J(f) is its Hausdorff dimension dim⁡J(f)\dim J(f), a number in [0,2][0,2].

For transcendental maps the key dynamical data of ff are the singular values of its inverse: a point v∈C^v\in\widehat{\mathbb C} is a critical value if v=f(z)v=f(z) for some zz with f′(z)=0f'(z)=0, and an asymptotic value if f(z(t))→vf(z(t))\to v along some curve z(t)→∞z(t)\to\infty. Write sing⁡(f−1)\operatorname{sing}(f^{-1}) for the set of critical and asymptotic values. The Speiser class S\mathcal S consists of the transcendental meromorphic functions for which sing⁡(f−1)\operatorname{sing}(f^{-1}) is finite, with Sq\mathcal S_q the subclass having exactly qq singular values; the Eremenko–Lyubich class B⊃S\mathcal B\supset\mathcal S requires only that sing⁡(f−1)∖{∞}\operatorname{sing}(f^{-1})\setminus\{\infty\} be bounded. Off its singular values, ff is a covering map, so small qq means high rigidity; the classes Sq\mathcal S_q are the finite-parameter worlds of transcendental dynamics, and the monodromy theorem forces q≥2q\ge 2.

The possible Hausdorff dimensions of Julia sets have been mapped for the wide class B\mathcal B: Stallard constructed, for every d∈(1,2)d\in(1,2), a transcendental entire function with dim⁡J(f)=d\dim J(f)=d, and, for every d∈(0,1)d\in(0,1), a transcendental meromorphic one; together with the classical facts J(ez)=CJ(e^z)=\mathbb C and J(tan⁡z)=R^J(\tan z)=\widehat{\mathbb R} (the circle R∪{∞}\mathbb R\cup\{\infty\}), every d∈(0,2]d\in(0,2] is realized inside B\mathcal B. Bergweiler and Cui (2022) then showed that three singular values already suffice in the Speiser class: for every d∈(0,2]d\in(0,2] there exists f∈S3f\in\mathcal S_3 with dim⁡J(f)=d\dim J(f)=d.

The minimal class S2\mathcal S_2 is completely classified: by a classical observation of Eremenko, restated by Bergweiler and Cui, every f∈S2f\in\mathcal S_2 has the form f(z)=L(eaz)f(z)=L(e^{az}) with a≠0a\ne 0 and LL a fractional linear (Möbius) transformation — a map with no critical points and exactly two asymptotic values, L(0)L(0) and L(∞)L(\infty). The two standard subfamilies are the exponentials λez\lambda e^z (asymptotic values 00 and ∞\infty) and the tangent maps λtan⁡z\lambda\tan z (asymptotic values ±iλ\pm i\lambda). For this class the following is known. First, dim⁡J(f)>1/2\dim J(f)>1/2 for every f∈S2f\in\mathcal S_2 (Barański in the hyperbolic setting, and Mayer in general, as cited by Bergweiler–Cui). Second, Barański proved that for fλ(z)=λtan⁡zf_\lambda(z)=\lambda\tan z the function λ↦dim⁡J(fλ)\lambda\mapsto\dim J(f_\lambda) is real-analytic on the disc 0<∣λ∣<10<|\lambda|<1 and near real λ\lambda with ∣λ∣>1|\lambda|>1, satisfies dim⁡J(fλ)=1/2+O(∣λ∣)\dim J(f_\lambda)=1/2+O(\sqrt{|\lambda|}) near λ=0\lambda=0, and is strictly increasing along the real segment (0,1)(0,1); combined with continuity of the dimension at hyperbolic parameters (Kotus–Urbański; hyperbolic means the closure of the forward orbits of the singular values stays disjoint from the Julia set, giving uniform expansion there), the real tangent segment realizes exactly the interval (1/2,1](1/2,1], while for real ∣λ∣≥1|\lambda|\ge 1 one has J(λtan⁡z)=R^J(\lambda\tan z)=\widehat{\mathbb R}, of dimension 11. Third, dim⁡J(λez)=2\dim J(\lambda e^z)=2 for every λ≠0\lambda\ne 0 (McMullen), and in fact every entire member of S2\mathcal S_2 — that is, every map αeaz+β\alpha e^{az}+\beta — has dim⁡J=2\dim J=2, since entire functions of finite order in B\mathcal B have dim⁡J=2\dim J=2 (Theorem 9.6 of the Bergweiler–Rempe survey). By contrast, the escaping set I(f)={z:fn(z)→∞}I(f)=\{z: f^n(z)\to\infty\} behaves dichotomically in S2\mathcal S_2: Bergweiler–Cui record that dim⁡I(f)∈{1/2,2}\dim I(f)\in\{1/2,2\} for every f∈S2f\in\mathcal S_2, so the Julia-set dimension is the only invariant of the class with room between the endpoints.

The gap is the interval (1,2)(1,2): no f∈S2f\in\mathcal S_2 is known with dim⁡J(f)\dim J(f) strictly between 11 and 22, and Bergweiler and Cui write: "It seems likely that for d∈(1,2]d\in(1,2] there also exists f∈S2f\in\mathcal S_2 such that dim⁡J(f)=d\dim J(f)=d."

Problem Statement

Let S2\mathcal S_2 be the class of transcendental meromorphic functions f:C→C^f:\mathbb C\to\widehat{\mathbb C} whose inverse has exactly two singular values (critical or asymptotic); equivalently, by the classification of the class, f(z)=L(eaz)f(z)=L(e^{az}) for some a∈C∖{0}a\in\mathbb C\setminus\{0\} and some fractional linear transformation LL. Prove, or refute: for every d∈(1,2]d\in(1,2] there exists f∈S2f\in\mathcal S_2 such that the Hausdorff dimension of the Julia set of ff equals dd.

The known boundary of the question: dim⁡J(f)>1/2\dim J(f)>1/2 for every f∈S2f\in\mathcal S_2; every d∈(1/2,1]d\in(1/2,1] is attained within the real tangent family fλ(z)=λtan⁡zf_\lambda(z)=\lambda\tan z, 0<λ≤10<\lambda\le 1; and d=2d=2 is attained, e.g. by λez\lambda e^z (indeed by every entire member of S2\mathcal S_2). The open core is the interval (1,2)(1,2): no f∈S2f\in\mathcal S_2 with dim⁡J(f)∈(1,2)\dim J(f)\in(1,2) is currently known, so it is open whether even a single such value, let alone all of them, is realized. In view of the classification, the question is exactly whether the Möbius-exponential family L∘exp⁡L\circ\exp realizes every Julia-set dimension in (1,2)(1,2) — necessarily through members with two finite asymptotic values, since the members with an infinite asymptotic value are the entire ones, all of dimension 22.

References

  1. Walter Bergweiler and Weiwei Cui, The Hausdorff dimension of Julia sets of meromorphic functions in the Speiser class, Mathematische Zeitschrift 302 (2022), no. 4, 2193–2205. DOI: 10.1007/s00209-022-03142-0. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.00938
  2. Walter Bergweiler and Weiwei Cui, The Hausdorff dimension of escaping sets of meromorphic functions in the Speiser class, International Mathematics Research Notices 2024 (2024), no. 9, 7281–7306. DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnad126. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.06270
  3. Krzysztof Barański, Hausdorff dimension and measures on Julia sets of some meromorphic maps, Fundamenta Mathematicae 147 (1995), no. 3, 239–260. DOI: 10.4064/fm-147-3-239-260. https://doi.org/10.4064/fm-147-3-239-260
  4. A. Eremenko, Transcendental meromorphic functions with three singular values, Illinois Journal of Mathematics 48 (2004), no. 2, 701–709. DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1258138408. https://doi.org/10.1215/ijm/1258138408 (preprint: arXiv:math/0309025, under the title "Meromorphic functions with three singular values")
  5. Curt McMullen, Area and Hausdorff dimension of Julia sets of entire functions, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 300 (1987), no. 1, 329–342. DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1987-0871679-3. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9947-1987-0871679-3
  6. Volker Mayer, The size of the Julia set of meromorphic functions, Mathematische Nachrichten 282 (2009), no. 8, 1189–1194. DOI: 10.1002/mana.200710794. https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.200710794
  7. Gwyneth M. Stallard, The Hausdorff dimension of Julia sets of entire functions IV, Journal of the London Mathematical Society (2) 61 (2000), no. 2, 471–488. DOI: 10.1112/s0024610799008601. https://doi.org/10.1112/s0024610799008601
  8. Gwyneth M. Stallard, The Hausdorff dimension of Julia sets of hyperbolic meromorphic functions II, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 20 (2000), no. 3, 895–910. DOI: 10.1017/s0143385700000481. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143385700000481
  9. Janina Kotus and Mariusz Urbański, Virtual centers of hyperbolic components in the tangent family: Hausdorff dimension outlook, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 26 (2006), no. 3, 769–782. DOI: 10.1017/S0143385706000034. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385706000034
  10. Walter Bergweiler and Lasse Rempe, The escaping set in transcendental dynamics, Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 127 (2025), no. 1–4, 1–141. DOI: 10.1365/s13291-025-00300-1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11370
  11. Magnus Aspenberg and Weiwei Cui, Hausdorff dimension of escaping sets of meromorphic functions II, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 43 (2023), no. 5, 1471–1491. DOI: 10.1017/etds.2022.5. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11283