Bloch's theorem states that every function holomorphic in the unit disk and normalized by f′(0)=1f'(0)=1 maps some subdomain univalently onto a Euclidean disk whose radius is bounded below by a universal constant. The optimal such constant is the Bloch constant BB; the corresponding constant when the disk need only be covered (not univalently) is the Landau constant LL. Both constants were introduced by Landau in 1929, and their exact values remain unknown despite nearly a century of work. The best current bounds are 0.4483127…≤B<0.4718617…0.4483127\ldots\le B<0.4718617\ldots and 0.51<L≤0.5432590…0.51<L\le 0.5432590\ldots, the lower bounds being due to Wikström (2026); the upper bound for LL is the value conjectured to be exact by Rademacher (1943), while the upper bound for BB lies only marginally below the Ahlfors–Grunsky value 0.4718617…0.4718617\ldots that was long conjectured to be exact (Zhang, 2026). The problem is to determine the exact values of BB and LL; the exact value of the closely related univalent Bloch constant UU is likewise unknown.

Background

Let D={z∈C:∣z∣<1}\mathbb{D}=\{z\in\mathbb{C}:|z|<1\} be the unit disk and let A1\mathcal{A}_1 denote the class of functions holomorphic in D\mathbb{D} satisfying the normalization f′(0)=1f'(0)=1. A map is called univalent (or schlicht) on a set if it is one-to-one there. Bloch's theorem (Bloch, 1925) asserts that for every f∈A1f\in\mathcal{A}_1 there exists a subdomain of D\mathbb{D} on which ff is univalent and whose image is a Euclidean disk; such a disk in f(D)f(\mathbb{D}) is called a schlicht disk. Writing BfB_f for the radius of the largest schlicht disk contained in the image f(D)f(\mathbb{D}), and LfL_f for the radius of the largest disk of any kind contained in f(D)f(\mathbb{D}) (dropping the univalence requirement on the preimage), Landau (1929) defined the Bloch constant B=inf⁡{Bf:f∈A1}B=\inf\{B_f:f\in\mathcal{A}_1\}, the Landau constant L=inf⁡{Lf:f∈A1}L=\inf\{L_f:f\in\mathcal{A}_1\}, and the univalent Bloch constant U=inf⁡{Bf:f∈A1, f univalent in D}U=\inf\{B_f:f\in\mathcal{A}_1,\ f \text{ univalent in } \mathbb{D}\}, and proved the first numerical estimates 0.39≤B≤L<0.5550.39\le B\le L<0.555 and U>0.566U>0.566. These constants measure the universal covering capability of normalized holomorphic maps and are fundamental objects of geometric function theory; they satisfy the chain B≤Bℓ≤L≤UB\le B_\ell\le L\le U, where BℓB_\ell is the locally univalent Bloch constant obtained by restricting the infimum to functions with nonvanishing derivative in D\mathbb{D} — a constant introduced by Pommerenke (1970), who proved Bℓ>1/2B_\ell>1/2.

The conjectured answers come from explicit extremal constructions. Ahlfors and Grunsky (1937) computed the function in A1\mathcal{A}_1 corresponding to the simply connected Riemann surface over the plane, without singular points, whose points above the vertices of the equilateral-triangle tiling are simple critical points; this construction yields the upper bound

B≤B′=π 21/4 Γ(1/3)Γ(1/4)(Γ(11/12)Γ(1/12))1/2≈0.4718617,B\le B'=\sqrt{\pi}\,2^{1/4}\,\frac{\Gamma(1/3)}{\Gamma(1/4)}\left(\frac{\Gamma(11/12)}{\Gamma(1/12)}\right)^{1/2}\approx 0.4718617,

where Γ\Gamma is Euler's Gamma function, and they conjectured that B′B' is the exact value of BB. That Ahlfors–Grunsky conjecture was later disproved: a recent construction exhibits normalized functions with Bf<B′B_f<B', giving the strict upper bound B<0.4718616521…B<0.4718616521\ldots (Zhang, 2026). Rademacher (1943) analogously proved

L≤Γ(1/3)Γ(5/6)Γ(1/6)≈0.5432590,L\le\frac{\Gamma(1/3)\Gamma(5/6)}{\Gamma(1/6)}\approx 0.5432590,

conjecturing sharpness. On the lower-bound side, Ahlfors (1938) extended the Schwarz lemma to conformal metrics ds=p(z)∣dz∣ds=p(z)|dz| on the disk — metrics admitting, at every point, a supporting metric whose Gaussian curvature is at most −1-1 — and obtained B≥3/4B\ge\sqrt{3}/4 and L≥1/2L\ge 1/2. Refining this method has produced only small gains relative to the gaps: Bonk (1990) first broke the 3/4\sqrt{3}/4 barrier with B≥3/4+10−14B\ge\sqrt{3}/4+10^{-14}, Chen and Gauthier (1996) reached B>3/4+2×10−4B>\sqrt{3}/4+2\times10^{-4}, and a computer-assisted refinement of Bonk's method, whose numerical estimates are rigorously enclosed by interval arithmetic, currently gives B≥3/4+0.0153=0.4483127…B\ge\sqrt{3}/4+0.0153=0.4483127\ldots (Wikström, 2026), still about 0.0240.024 short of the Ahlfors–Grunsky value; for the Landau constant the best lower bound is now L>0.51L>0.51 (Wikström, 2026), superseding L>1/2+2×10−8L>1/2+2\times10^{-8} (Chen and Shiba, 2004, who also proved Bℓ>1/2+2×10−8B_\ell>1/2+2\times10^{-8}). For the univalent Bloch constant the best current estimates are 0.5708858<U≤0.65639370.5708858<U\le 0.6563937 (Skinner, 2009; Carroll and Ortega-Cerdà, 2009).

The difficulty appears specific to holomorphic maps of the disk: the analogous constants for meromorphic functions on the whole plane have been determined exactly — π/2\pi/2 for the locally univalent class (Minda, 1982) and arctan⁡8\arctan\sqrt{8} for the full meromorphic class (Bonk and Eremenko, 2000) — using negative-curvature and spherical geometry with no known counterpart in the analytic disk setting. A conjectural route to the classical constants, recounted by Faulhuber (2017), connects them through Baernstein's program to extremal problems for heat kernels on flat tori, but this program itself remains unresolved.

Problem Statement

Determine the exact values of the classical Bloch constant BB and Landau constant LL for the normalized analytic class A1={f holomorphic in D:f′(0)=1}\mathcal{A}_1=\{f \text{ holomorphic in } \mathbb{D}:f'(0)=1\}, where D={z∈C:∣z∣<1}\mathbb{D}=\{z\in\mathbb{C}:|z|<1\} is the unit disk and

B=inf⁡{Bf:f∈A1},L=inf⁡{Lf:f∈A1},B=\inf\{B_f:f\in\mathcal{A}_1\},\qquad L=\inf\{L_f:f\in\mathcal{A}_1\},

BfB_f is the radius of the largest schlicht disk (a disk in f(D)f(\mathbb{D}) that is the univalent image of some subdomain of D\mathbb{D}) and LfL_f is the radius of the largest disk contained in f(D)f(\mathbb{D}). Concretely, the problem is to prove, for each of BB and LL, a sharp two-sided equality — in particular to determine the exact value of BB, now known to lie strictly below the Ahlfors–Grunsky value B′=π 21/4Γ(1/3)Γ(1/4)Γ(11/12)Γ(1/12)≈0.4718617B'=\sqrt{\pi}\,2^{1/4}\frac{\Gamma(1/3)}{\Gamma(1/4)}\sqrt{\frac{\Gamma(11/12)}{\Gamma(1/12)}}\approx 0.4718617 (Zhang, 2026), and to decide whether LL equals Rademacher's value Γ(1/3)Γ(5/6)Γ(1/6)≈0.5432590\frac{\Gamma(1/3)\Gamma(5/6)}{\Gamma(1/6)}\approx 0.5432590, or to identify the true values if Rademacher's conjecture fails. The two determinations are the joint objective — they concern the same extremal covering phenomenon, are linked by the inequality B≤LB\le L, and share the same conjectured structure and method barriers. The exact value of the univalent Bloch constant U=inf⁡{Bf:f∈A1 univalent}U=\inf\{B_f:f\in\mathcal{A}_1 \text{ univalent}\}, currently known only to satisfy 0.5708858<U≤0.65639370.5708858<U\le 0.6563937, is a natural companion question for the univalent subclass, recorded here as background context.

References

  1. Ali, Md Firoz; Azim, Shaesta — Bloch and Landau constants for meromorphic functions (2026), arXiv:2603.05047, https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05047
  2. Ahlfors, Lars V.; Grunsky, Helmut — Über die Blochsche Konstante, Mathematische Zeitschrift 42 (1937) 671–673, DOI 10.1007/BF01160101, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01160101
  3. Landau, Edmund — Über die Blochsche Konstante und zwei verwandte Weltkonstanten, Mathematische Zeitschrift 30 (1929) 608–634, DOI 10.1007/BF01187791, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01187791
  4. Ahlfors, Lars V. — An extension of Schwarz's lemma, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 43 (1938) 359–364, DOI 10.1090/s0002-9947-1938-1501949-6, https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9947-1938-1501949-6
  5. Rademacher, Hans — On the Bloch-Landau constant, American Journal of Mathematics 65 (1943) 387–390, DOI 10.2307/2371963, https://doi.org/10.2307/2371963
  6. Bloch, André — Les théorèmes de M. Valiron sur les fonctions entières et la théorie de l'uniformisation, Annales de la Faculté des sciences de Toulouse 17 (1925) 1–22, DOI 10.5802/afst.335, https://doi.org/10.5802/afst.335
  7. Minda, C. David — Bloch constants for meromorphic functions, Mathematische Zeitschrift 181 (1982) 83–92, DOI 10.1007/BF01214983, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01214983
  8. Pommerenke, Ch. — On Bloch functions, Journal of the London Mathematical Society (2) 2 (1970) 689–695, DOI 10.1112/jlms/2.part_4.689, https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/2.part_4.689
  9. Bonk, Mario — On Bloch's constant, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 110 (1990) 889–894, DOI 10.1090/s0002-9939-1990-0979048-8, https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-1990-0979048-8
  10. Bonk, M.; Eremenko, A. — Covering properties of meromorphic functions, negative curvature and spherical geometry, Annals of Mathematics (2) 152 (2000) 551–592, DOI 10.2307/2661392, https://doi.org/10.2307/2661392
  11. Chen, Huaihui; Gauthier, Paul M. — On Bloch's constant, Journal d'Analyse Mathématique 69 (1996) 275–291, DOI 10.1007/BF02787110, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02787110
  12. Chen, Huaihui; Shiba, Masakaru — On the locally univalent Bloch constant, Journal d'Analyse Mathématique 94 (2004) 159–170, DOI 10.1007/BF02789045, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789045
  13. Wikström, Frank — An improved lower bound for Bloch's constant (2026), arXiv:2608.17660, https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17660
  14. Carroll, Tom; Ortega-Cerdà, Joaquim — The univalent Bloch–Landau constant, harmonic symmetry and conformal glueing, Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 92 (2009) 396–406, DOI 10.1016/j.matpur.2009.05.008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2009.05.008
  15. Skinner, Brian — The univalent Bloch constant problem, Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations 54 (2009) 951–955, DOI 10.1080/17476930903197199, https://doi.org/10.1080/17476930903197199
  16. Bhowmik, Bappaditya; Sen, Sambhunath — Landau and Bloch constants for meromorphic functions, Monatshefte für Mathematik 201 (2023) 359–373, DOI 10.1007/s00605-023-01839-w, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00605-023-01839-w
  17. Bhowmik, Bappaditya; Sen, Sambhunath — Improved Bloch and Landau constants for meromorphic functions, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 66 (2023) 1269–1273, DOI 10.4153/s0008439523000346, https://doi.org/10.4153/s0008439523000346
  18. Eremenko, Alexandre — Ahlfors' contribution to the theory of meromorphic functions (2021), arXiv:2110.06778, https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06778
  19. Faulhuber, Markus — Extremal determinants of Laplace-Beltrami operators for rectangular tori (2017), arXiv:1709.06006, https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.06006
  20. Wikström, Frank — A computer-assisted lower bound for Landau's constant (2026), arXiv:2609.23236, https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23236
  21. Zhang, Teng — The Bloch constant is strictly smaller than the Ahlfors–Grunsky value (2026), arXiv:2610.16808, https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16808