Problem record for the open question left by Hytönen–Lappas (arXiv:2006.15858). The Bochner–Riesz conjecture predicts that for 0<κ<(d−1)/20<\kappa<(d-1)/2 the Bochner–Riesz means BκB^\kappa, the Fourier multiplier with symbol (1−∣ξ∣2)+κ(1-|\xi|^2)_+^\kappa, are bounded on Lp(Rd)L^p(\mathbb{R}^d) exactly for p∈(2d/(d+1+2κ), 2d/(d−1−2κ))p\in(2d/(d+1+2\kappa),\,2d/(d-1-2\kappa)); equivalently, the multipliers SτS_\tau localized to a τ\tau-neighborhood of the unit sphere satisfy the uniform decay estimate ∥Sτ∥Lp→Lp≤Cϵτ−ϵ\|S_\tau\|_{L^p\to L^p}\le C_\epsilon\tau^{-\epsilon} for all 0<τ<10<\tau<1 on the full range 2d/(d+1)<p<2d/(d−1)2d/(d+1)<p<2d/(d-1). The necessity of the range and the case d=2d=2 (Carleson–Sjölin) are classical; in every dimension d≥3d\ge 3 the conjecture remains open, the best partial ranges being due to Lee, Bourgain–Guth, and Guth–Hickman–Iliopoulou, and the weighted boundedness and compactness results built on the decay estimate (Lacey–Mena–Reguera; Hytönen–Lappas) remain conditional on it. A resolution would imply the Fourier restriction conjecture.

Background

The question studied here comes from the summability theory of Fourier integrals. For a function ff on Rd\mathbb{R}^d, truncating its Fourier transform to the unit ball gives the ball multiplier, whose LpL^p boundedness was famously disproved for every p≠2p\ne2 in dimensions d≥2d\ge2 by C. Fefferman (1971). The Bochner–Riesz means are the smoothed truncations that restore summability: for a summability index κ>0\kappa>0, BκB^\kappa is the Fourier multiplier operator — an operator of the form Tf^(ξ)=m(ξ)f^(ξ)\widehat{Tf}(\xi)=m(\xi)\hat f(\xi) — with symbol m(ξ)=(1−∣ξ∣2)+κm(\xi)=(1-|\xi|^2)_+^\kappa, where t+=max⁡(t,0)t_+=\max(t,0). Uniform LpL^p bounds for the dilated means are equivalent to convergence of the means to ff in LpL^p, so the sharp pp-range of boundedness is the sharp pp-range of Fourier summability; the threshold is governed by the Gaussian curvature of the unit sphere, across which the symbol decays at rate κ\kappa.

The necessity of the boundedness range is classical (from Fefferman's counterexample and its refinements): BκB^\kappa can be bounded on LpL^p only if κ>d ∣1/p−1/2∣−1/2\kappa>d\,|1/p-1/2|-1/2. The Bochner–Riesz conjecture asserts that this necessary condition is sharp: for 0<κ<(d−1)/20<\kappa<(d-1)/2,

Bκ:Lp(Rd)↦Lp(Rd)if and only ifp∈(2dd+1+2κ, 2dd−1−2κ),B^\kappa:L^p(\mathbb{R}^d)\mapsto L^p(\mathbb{R}^d)\quad\text{if and only if}\quad p\in\left(\frac{2d}{d+1+2\kappa},\,\frac{2d}{d-1-2\kappa}\right),

equivalently ∣1/p−1/2∣<(1+2κ)/(2d)|1/p-1/2|<(1+2\kappa)/(2d). For d=2d=2 this is a theorem, proved by Carleson–Sjölin (1972) with an alternative proof by Córdoba (1979). For d≥3d\ge3 only subranges are known. Writing q=max⁡(p,p′)q=\max(p,p'), where p′p' denotes the Hölder conjugate of pp, the classical L2L^2 restriction theorem for the sphere (Tomas, 1975) combined with summability arguments gives the conjectured bound for q≥2(d+1)/(d−1)q\ge2(d+1)/(d-1); Lee (2004) extended this to q≥2(d+2)/dq\ge2(d+2)/d using sharp bilinear restriction estimates; Bourgain–Guth (2011) reached q>2(4d+3)/(4d−3)q>2(4d+3)/(4d-3), q>(2d+1)/(d−1)q>(2d+1)/(d-1), and q>4(d+1)/(2d−1)q>4(d+1)/(2d-1) for d≡0,1,2(mod3)d\equiv0,1,2\pmod3 respectively; Guth–Hickman–Iliopoulou (2019), via sharp LpL^p estimates for Hörmander-type oscillatory integral operators (operators Tλf(x)=∫eiλφ(x,y)a(x,y)f(y) dyT_\lambda f(x)=\int e^{i\lambda\varphi(x,y)}a(x,y)f(y)\,dy with non-degenerate phase, the operators introduced into this problem by Carleson and Sjölin), improved the bounds for d≥4d\ge4. All known ranges remain strictly inside the conjectured one: in d=3d=3 boundedness is known only for q>10/3q>10/3 where the conjecture predicts q>3q>3.

The conjecture has an equivalent single-scale form. Let χ\chi be a Schwartz cutoff function with 1[−1/4,1/4]≤χ≤1[−1/2,1/2]\mathbf 1_{[-1/4,1/4]}\le\chi\le\mathbf 1_{[-1/2,1/2]} and let SτS_\tau be the Fourier multiplier with symbol χ((∣ξ∣−1)/τ)\chi((|\xi|-1)/\tau), that is, a smooth restriction of ff to frequencies in a thin annulus of width τ\tau around the unit sphere. Lacey–Mena–Reguera (2019) record the equivalent conjecture that for every pp with 2d/(d+1)<p<2d/(d−1)2d/(d+1)<p<2d/(d-1) and every ϵ>0\epsilon>0,

∥Sτ∥Lp(Rd)→Lp(Rd)≤Cϵ τ−ϵ,0<τ<1.\|S_\tau\|_{L^p(\mathbb{R}^d)\to L^p(\mathbb{R}^d)}\le C_\epsilon\,\tau^{-\epsilon},\qquad 0<\tau<1.

The equivalence goes through the classical decomposition Bκ=T0+∑i≥12−iκDil⁡1−2−iS2−iB^\kappa=T^0+\sum_{i\ge1}2^{-i\kappa}\operatorname{Dil}_{1-2^{-i}}S_{2^{-i}}, where T0T^0 is a Fourier multiplier with Schwartz symbol supported near the origin and Dil⁡s\operatorname{Dil}_s is the dilation f(x)↦f(x/s)f(x)\mapsto f(x/s): decay of SτS_\tau with loss ϵ\epsilon at exponent pp sums to boundedness of BκB^\kappa at pp for every κ>ϵ\kappa>\epsilon. The decay formulation makes visible why the problem is hard: it is a Fourier restriction statement for the sphere. Indeed Tao (1999) proved that the Bochner–Riesz conjecture implies the restriction conjecture for the sphere — the conjectured sharp estimates for the extension operator that maps a function on the sphere to the inverse Fourier transform of its product with surface measure — which in turn drives the Kakeya conjecture on the overlap of thin tubes pointing in different directions. The strongest available methods — multilinear restriction (Bennett–Carbery–Tao, 2006), the broad–narrow decomposition, polynomial partitioning (partitioning physical space by zero sets of polynomials, as in Guth, 2018), and the decoupling method (Bourgain–Demeter, 2015) — improve the known ranges in restricted dimension or exponent regimes but stop strictly short of the conjectured boundary in every d≥3d\ge3.

The present record arises from the weighted endpoint of this theory. A Muckenhoupt ApA_p weight is a nonnegative locally integrable function ww on Rd\mathbb{R}^d with (\fintQw)(\fintQw1−p′)p−1≤C(\fint_Q w)(\fint_Q w^{1-p'})^{p-1}\le C uniformly over cubes QQ (\fintQ\fint_Q denoting the average over QQ), and RHrRH_r denotes the reverse Hölder class, (\fintQwr)1/r≤C\fintQw\left(\fint_Q w^r\right)^{1/r}\le C\fint_Q w. For bb in BMO\mathrm{BMO} (bounded mean oscillation), the commutator of bb with an operator TT is [b,T]f=b Tf−T(bf)[b,T]f=b\,Tf-T(bf). Lacey–Mena–Reguera (2019) proved sparse (i.e. domination by sums over sparse families of cubes, from which weighted bounds follow), and consequently weighted, bounds for Bochner–Riesz multipliers: in d=2d=2 unconditionally, but in d≥3d\ge3 only under the hypothesis that the decay estimate above holds at some exponent 1<p0<21<p_0<2, the resulting range of pp and the weight classes As∩RHrA_s\cap RH_r depending on this p0p_0. Hytönen–Lappas (2020), extending the classical weighted extrapolation machinery to compactness of operators (an operator is compact if it maps bounded sets to sets with compact closure), used exactly this input to deduce weighted compactness of commutators of Bochner–Riesz multipliers with CMO\mathrm{CMO} symbols (the closure of compactly supported smooth functions in BMO\mathrm{BMO}) in d≥3d\ge3 — again conditional on the same decay hypothesis. The unresolved analytic core beneath the entire weighted chain is the decay conjecture, hence the Bochner–Riesz conjecture, in dimensions d≥3d\ge3.

Problem Statement

Determine, for each dimension d≥3d\ge3, whether the Bochner–Riesz conjecture holds: is it true that for every 0<κ<(d−1)/20<\kappa<(d-1)/2 the multiplier operator BκB^\kappa with symbol (1−∣ξ∣2)+κ(1-|\xi|^2)_+^\kappa is bounded on Lp(Rd)L^p(\mathbb{R}^d) for all

p∈(2dd+1+2κ, 2dd−1−2κ),p\in\left(\frac{2d}{d+1+2\kappa},\,\frac{2d}{d-1-2\kappa}\right),

equivalently for all pp with ∣1/p−1/2∣<(1+2κ)/(2d)|1/p-1/2|<(1+2\kappa)/(2d)? The necessity of this range is classical and the case d=2d=2 is settled (Carleson–Sjölin), so the open content is sufficiency in d≥3d\ge3. An equivalent target is the uniform local decay estimate for the thin-annulus multipliers SτS_\tau with symbol χ((∣ξ∣−1)/τ)\chi((|\xi|-1)/\tau), where χ\chi is any Schwartz cutoff with 1[−1/4,1/4]≤χ≤1[−1/2,1/2]\mathbf 1_{[-1/4,1/4]}\le\chi\le\mathbf 1_{[-1/2,1/2]}:

∥Sτ∥Lp(Rd)→Lp(Rd)≤Cϵ τ−ϵ,0<τ<1,\|S_\tau\|_{L^p(\mathbb{R}^d)\to L^p(\mathbb{R}^d)}\le C_\epsilon\,\tau^{-\epsilon},\qquad 0<\tau<1,

required for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and every pp in the full range 2d/(d+1)<p<2d/(d−1)2d/(d+1)<p<2d/(d-1). Resolving either formulation in d≥3d\ge3 settles the other; in particular, it would remove the dependence on an admissible p0p_0 — the hypothesis that the decay estimate holds for some 1<p0<21<p_0<2 — from the weighted boundedness and weighted compactness results for Bochner–Riesz multipliers and their commutators (Lacey–Mena–Reguera, Theorem 6.1; Hytönen–Lappas).

References

  1. T. Hytönen and S. Lappas, Extrapolation of compactness on weighted spaces II: Off-diagonal and limited range estimates, preprint (2020), arXiv:2006.15858, https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.15858
  2. L. Carleson and P. Sjölin, Oscillatory integrals and a multiplier problem for the disc, Studia Mathematica 44 (1972), 287–299, doi:10.4064/sm-44-3-287-299, https://doi.org/10.4064/sm-44-3-287-299
  3. A. Córdoba, A note on Bochner–Riesz operators, Duke Mathematical Journal 46 (1979), 505–511, doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-79-04625-8, https://doi.org/10.1215/s0012-7094-79-04625-8
  4. C. Fefferman, The multiplier problem for the ball, Annals of Mathematics (2) 94 (1971), 330–336, doi:10.2307/1970864, https://doi.org/10.2307/1970864
  5. P. A. Tomas, A restriction theorem for the Fourier transform, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 81 (1975), 477–478, doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1975-13790-6, https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9904-1975-13790-6
  6. J. Bourgain and L. Guth, Bounds on oscillatory integral operators based on multilinear estimates, Geometric and Functional Analysis 21 (2011), 1239–1295, doi:10.1007/s00039-011-0140-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-011-0140-9
  7. S. Lee, Improved bounds for Bochner–Riesz and maximal Bochner–Riesz operators, Duke Mathematical Journal 122 (2004), 205–232, doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-04-12217-1, https://doi.org/10.1215/s0012-7094-04-12217-1
  8. S. Lee, Square function estimates for the Bochner–Riesz means, Analysis & PDE 11 (2018), 1535–1586, doi:10.2140/apde.2018.11.1535, https://doi.org/10.2140/apde.2018.11.1535
  9. M. T. Lacey, D. Mena and M. C. Reguera, Sparse bounds for Bochner–Riesz multipliers, Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications 25 (2019), 523–537, doi:10.1007/s00041-017-9590-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00041-017-9590-2
  10. T. Tao, The Bochner–Riesz conjecture implies the restriction conjecture, Duke Mathematical Journal 96 (1999), 363–375, doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-99-09610-2, https://doi.org/10.1215/s0012-7094-99-09610-2
  11. T. Tao, Recent progress on the restriction conjecture, preprint (2003), arXiv:math/0311181, https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0311181
  12. L. Guth, J. Hickman and M. Iliopoulou, Sharp estimates for oscillatory integral operators via polynomial partitioning, Acta Mathematica 223 (2019), 251–376, doi:10.4310/acta.2019.v223.n2.a2, https://doi.org/10.4310/acta.2019.v223.n2.a2
  13. L. Guth, Restriction estimates using polynomial partitioning II, Acta Mathematica 221 (2018), no. 1, 81–142, doi:10.4310/acta.2018.v221.n1.a3, https://doi.org/10.4310/acta.2018.v221.n1.a3 (preprint: arXiv:1603.04250, https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04250)
  14. L. Guth, H. Wang and R. Zhang, A sharp square function estimate for the cone in R3\mathbb{R}^3, Annals of Mathematics (2) 192 (2020), no. 2, 551–581, doi:10.4007/annals.2020.192.2.6, https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2020.192.2.6
  15. J. Bennett, A. Carbery and T. Tao, On the multilinear restriction and Kakeya conjectures, Acta Mathematica 196 (2006), 261–302, doi:10.1007/s11511-006-0006-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11511-006-0006-4
  16. J. Bourgain and C. Demeter, The proof of the l2l^2 decoupling conjecture, Annals of Mathematics (2) 182 (2015), 351–389, doi:10.4007/annals.2015.182.1.9, https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2015.182.1.9
  17. T. Hytönen and S. Lappas, Extrapolation of compactness on weighted spaces, Revista Matemática Iberoamericana 39 (2021), no. 1, 91–122, doi:10.4171/rmi/1325, https://doi.org/10.4171/rmi/1325