The first pairs of closed, aspherical, smooth 4-manifolds that are homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic — counterexamples to the smooth analogue of the Borel conjecture in dimension four — were constructed by Davis, Hayden, Huang, Ruberman, and Sunukjian by applying the reflection group trick to an exotic pair of compact 4-manifolds XX and X′X'. Their paper leaves two questions open about the universal Davis covers D(X~)D(\widetilde{X}) and D(X~′)D(\widetilde{X}'), where X~\widetilde{X} and X~′\widetilde{X}' are the universal covers of XX and X′X': the authors conjecture that both open contractible 4-manifolds fail to be simply connected at infinity and hence are not homeomorphic to R4\mathbb{R}^4 (in particular, neither is an exotic R4\mathbb{R}^4), and they ask whether D(X~)D(\widetilde{X}) and D(X~′)D(\widetilde{X}') are diffeomorphic to each other — that is, whether the exotic smooth structure distinguishing the closed quotients persists or disappears after passing to the universal covers. This problem asks for a resolution of both questions.

Background

A closed manifold is called aspherical when its universal cover is contractible; its homotopy type is then determined by its fundamental group. The Borel conjecture predicts that closed aspherical manifolds are topologically rigid — every homotopy equivalence between them is homotopic to a homeomorphism — and its smooth analogue asks whether homotopy-equivalent closed aspherical smooth manifolds must be diffeomorphic. The smooth analogue holds in dimensions at most 2 and for orientable 3-manifolds (by geometrization), and fails in dimensions at least 5; Davis, Hayden, Huang, Ruberman, and Sunukjian settled the remaining case by constructing the first pairs of closed, aspherical, smooth 4-manifolds that are homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic.

Their construction starts from a pair of compact smooth 4-manifolds with boundary, XX and X′X', each built from the Akbulut cork (a standard contractible compact smooth 4-manifold with boundary) by attaching a thickened once-punctured torus, so that both are homotopy equivalent to the 2-torus T2T^2; X′X' is obtained from XX by removing the interior of the cork and regluing it by a boundary involution that extends to a homeomorphism but not to a diffeomorphism (a cork twist), following Hayden and Piccirillo's trace-embedding examples. Freedman's classification theory gives a homeomorphism X≅X′X\cong X', while adjunction inequalities from Stein (complex-geometric) structures show that H2(X′)H_2(X') is generated by a smoothly embedded torus whereas every homologically essential smoothly embedded surface in XX has genus at least 2.

To produce closed examples, the authors apply Davis's reflection group trick. Given a flag triangulation TT of ∂X\partial X (a simplicial complex is flag when every set of pairwise-adjacent vertices spans a simplex), the 1-skeleton of TT defines a right-angled Coxeter group W(T)W(T): the group generated by one order-two reflection for each vertex of TT, with commuting relations along edges. The associated Davis complex D(X)D(X) is the noncompact manifold obtained by gluing a countable collection of copies of XX and −X-X along the mirror panels of ∂X\partial X according to the Coxeter relations. Quotienting D(X)D(X) by a torsion-free finite-index subgroup of WW yields closed aspherical smooth 4-manifolds Q(X)Q(X) and Q(X′)Q(X') that are homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic.

This problem concerns the universal covers of these manifolds, as posed in Remark 4.3 of that paper. Let X~\widetilde{X} and X~′\widetilde{X}' be the universal covers of XX and X′X'. Lifting the triangulation of ∂X\partial X to ∂X~\partial\widetilde{X} defines another right-angled Coxeter group W~\widetilde{W} and Davis complexes D(X~)D(\widetilde{X}) and D(X~′)D(\widetilde{X}'), and D(X~)D(\widetilde{X}) is the universal cover of D(X)D(X), hence of the closed aspherical manifold Q(X)Q(X); similarly for X′X'. Both are open contractible smooth 4-manifolds. A noncompact space is simply connected at infinity when loops can be killed off outside sufficiently large compact subsets: for every compact KK there is a larger compact LL such that the induced map π1(M∖L)→π1(M∖K)\pi_1(M\setminus L)\to\pi_1(M\setminus K) is trivial. For open contractible nn-manifolds with n≥4n\ge 4, simple connectivity at infinity is the precise obstruction to being homeomorphic to Rn\mathbb{R}^n (Stallings for n≥5n\ge 5; Freedman's classification in dimension 4). An open 4-manifold that is homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic to the standard R4\mathbb{R}^4 is called an exotic R4\mathbb{R}^4.

In Davis's classical construction, when the input is a compact contractible manifold whose boundary is not simply connected, the resulting contractible Davis complex fails to be simply connected at infinity — the mechanism behind the first closed aspherical manifolds not covered by Euclidean space. In the present situation the building blocks X~\widetilde{X} are themselves simply connected and noncompact, so the classical argument does not decide the end topology. Moreover, the authors' own obstruction distinguishes only the intermediate covers D(X)D(X) and D(X′)D(X') (via the genera of their essential surfaces) and says nothing about the simply connected covers, where all pieces are contractible. The end topology and smooth type of D(X~)D(\widetilde{X}) and D(X~′)D(\widetilde{X}') are therefore open.

Problem Statement

As posed in Remark 4.3 of "Exotic aspherical 4-manifolds" (arXiv:2411.19400), determine the end topology and the smooth type of the universal Davis covers D(X~)D(\widetilde{X}) and D(X~′)D(\widetilde{X}'), where XX and X′X' are the compact smooth 4-manifolds used to construct the first exotic pair of closed aspherical 4-manifolds (each obtained from the Akbulut cork by attaching a thickened once-punctured torus, hence homotopy equivalent to T2T^2, with X′X' obtained from XX by the cork twist), X~\widetilde{X} and X~′\widetilde{X}' are their universal covers, and D(X~)D(\widetilde{X}), D(X~′)D(\widetilde{X}') are the associated Davis complexes — open contractible smooth 4-manifolds that universally cover the closed aspherical manifolds Q(X)Q(X) and Q(X′)Q(X'). The problem has two linked parts:

(a) The authors conjecture that D(X~)D(\widetilde{X}) and D(X~′)D(\widetilde{X}') are not simply connected at infinity, and hence that neither is homeomorphic to R4\mathbb{R}^4 (so, in particular, neither is an exotic R4\mathbb{R}^4). Prove or refute this conjecture.

(b) Determine whether the open contractible manifolds D(X~)D(\widetilde{X}) and D(X~′)D(\widetilde{X}') are diffeomorphic to each other — that is, whether the exotic smooth structure distinguishing the closed quotients Q(X)Q(X) and Q(X′)Q(X') persists or disappears after passing to the universal Davis covers.

The common objective is a complete determination of the topology at infinity and the diffeomorphism type of these two explicitly constructed manifolds; parts (a) and (b) are facets of that objective.

References

  1. Michael Davis, Kyle Hayden, Jingyin Huang, Daniel Ruberman, Nathan Sunukjian, "Exotic aspherical 4-manifolds", arXiv:2411.19400 (v1 2024, v3 revised 5 May 2026; to appear in Annals of Mathematics), doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.19400, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19400
  2. Michael W. Davis, "Groups generated by reflections and aspherical manifolds not covered by Euclidean space", Annals of Mathematics (2) 117 (1983), 293–324, doi:10.2307/2007079, https://doi.org/10.2307/2007079
  3. Michael Hartley Freedman, "The topology of four-dimensional manifolds", Journal of Differential Geometry 17 (1982), 357–453, doi:10.4310/jdg/1214437136, https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1214437136
  4. John Stallings, "The Piecewise-Linear Structure of Euclidean Space", Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 58 (1962), 481–488, doi:10.1017/s0305004100036756, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305004100036756
  5. Kyle Hayden, Lisa Piccirillo, "The trace embedding lemma and spinelessness", Journal of Differential Geometry 131 (2025), 133–163, doi:10.4310/jdg/1755543268, https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1755543268
  6. Selman Akbulut, Daniel Ruberman, "Absolutely exotic compact 4-manifolds", Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 91 (2016), 1–19, doi:10.4171/CMH/375, https://doi.org/10.4171/CMH/375
  7. Bakul Sathaye, "Link Obstruction to Riemannian smoothings of locally CAT(0) 4-manifolds", arXiv:1707.03433 (2017), doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.03433, https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.03433