Juhász and Powell (2024) proved that certain smoothly embedded genus-one tori in the 4-sphere with knot group Z\mathbb{Z} are topologically unknotted: Boyle's turned 1-twist-spun tori TK,1,1T_{K,1,1} for every classical knot KK, and the union of the Cochran–Davis genus-one Seifert surface (which admits no slice derivative) with a ribbon disc. Whether any of these tori is smoothly unknotted — that is, smoothly isotopic to the standard unknotted torus — is open. Hughes, Kim, and Miller (2025) posed the turned-torus case as an explicit open question and proved that the associated double branched covers are diffeomorphic to S2×S2S^2\times S^2, so no invariant of the cover can separate these surfaces from the standard torus. The problem is to decide the smooth isotopy class of exactly these topologically standard tori: either establish smooth unknottedness, or show that one of them is not smoothly isotopic to the standard torus.

Background

A knotted surface is a smoothly embedded closed surface in S4S^4; it is called smoothly (resp. topologically) unknotted if it is ambiently isotopic, in the smooth (resp. locally flat topological) category, to a standardly embedded surface of the same genus. A Z\mathbb{Z}-surface is a connected orientable surface Σ⊂S4\Sigma\subset S^4 whose knot group π1(S4∖Σ)\pi_1(S^4\setminus\Sigma) is infinite cyclic, i.e. isomorphic to Z\mathbb{Z}; for example, an unknotted surface has this property. The topological category is classified by surgery theory: Conway and Powell (2023) showed that every Z\mathbb{Z}-surface in S4S^4 of genus g∉{1,2}g\notin\{1,2\} is topologically unknotted, via the topological classification of such surfaces in terms of the equivariant intersection form (the intersection pairing on the homology of the infinite cyclic cover of the surface exterior) of their exteriors. The genus-one and genus-two cases remain open — the topological unknotting conjecture — and have an algebraic formulation (Conjecture 2.6 of Juhász–Powell, originating in the Conway–Powell program): every stably surface-hyperbolic hermitian sesquilinear form over the group ring Z[Z]\mathbb{Z}[\mathbb{Z}] of rank 2g2g with g∈{1,2}g\in\{1,2\} is already surface hyperbolic, where a form is surface hyperbolic if it is isometric to gg copies of the hyperbolic form H2\mathcal{H}_2, and stably surface hyperbolic if it becomes so after summing with copies of H2\mathcal{H}_2. Juhász and Powell verified topological standardness for several significant families of genus-one Z\mathbb{Z}-tori, giving evidence for this conjecture. Two families are central here. First, from twist-spinning: Artin associated to a knot K⊂S3K\subset S^3 a 2-knot — a 2-sphere smoothly embedded in S4S^4 — by spinning, Zeeman generalized this to kk-twist-spun knots, and Boyle's turned torus construction attaches a tube to a twist-spun knot, producing genus-one tori; the turned 1-twist-spun torus of KK is denoted TK,1,1T_{K,1,1} (also written σT±1(K)\sigma_T^{\pm1}(K)). Juhász–Powell proved TK,1,1T_{K,1,1} is topologically unknotted for every KK, answering a question of Boyle in the topological category. Second, Cochran and Davis (2015) constructed a ribbon knot (a knot bounding an immersed disc in the 4-ball with only ribbon-type singularities) with a genus-one Seifert surface FF (an oriented surface in S3S^3 whose boundary is the knot) admitting no slice derivative (a notion from higher-order knot concordance obstructing certain ways that FF could relate to a slice disk); the union Σ=F∪D\Sigma = F\cup D of FF with a ribbon disc DD (an embedded disc in the 4-ball bounded by the same knot, whose projection has only ribbon-type singularities) is a genus-one Z\mathbb{Z}-torus, also proved topologically unknotted. In the smooth category the status of both families is unknown: no smoothly knotted but topologically unknotted orientable surface in S4S^4 is currently known, and these tori are the principal explicit candidates. The natural detection route through the double cover of S4S^4 branched along the surface is provably blind here: Juhász–Powell showed the branched cover of TK,1,1T_{K,1,1} is (S2×S2)#X(S^2\times S^2)\#X for a homotopy 4-sphere XX (a smooth 4-manifold homotopy equivalent, but not known to be diffeomorphic, to S4S^4) whose Seiberg–Witten invariants (gauge-theoretic smooth invariants of 4-manifolds) agree with those of S2×S2S^2\times S^2, and Hughes–Kim–Miller (2025) strengthened this by proving XX is diffeomorphic to S4S^4 and that the double branched cover of every odd-twist turned torus (including TK,1,1T_{K,1,1}) is diffeomorphic to S2×S2S^2\times S^2; for the Cochran–Davis torus the cover arises from S2×S2S^2\times S^2 by knot surgery (the Fintushel–Stern operation replacing a tubular neighborhood of a torus with the exterior of a knot) along a 0-homologous torus. Thus any separation from the standard torus must come from surface-level smooth invariants or from an explicit smooth isotopy, not from invariants of the branched cover. Recently developed Real Seiberg–Witten invariants (an involution-equivariant refinement of Seiberg–Witten gauge theory for 4-manifolds with involution, in Atiyah's Real sense) and related Real Heegaard Floer invariants have produced exotic nonorientable surfaces and involutions in 4-manifolds, but have not been applied successfully to orientable Z\mathbb{Z}-tori with standard branched covers; and Galvin–Orson–Powell (2026) showed that topologically isotopic surfaces that are trivial in Z/2\mathbb{Z}/2-homology become smoothly isotopic after stabilizing the ambient manifold by connected sum with S2×S2S^2\times S^2, so these tori are smoothly standard after one stabilization — while the unstabilized question, which is the one at issue, remains open.

Problem Statement

Decide the smooth unknottedness of the topologically unknotted genus-one Z\mathbb{Z}-tori of Juhász–Powell. Specifically: (1) for every knot K⊂S3K\subset S^3, is the turned 1-twist-spun torus TK,1,1=σT±1(K)⊂S4T_{K,1,1}=\sigma_T^{\pm1}(K)\subset S^4 smoothly isotopic to the standard unknotted torus? (2) is the Cochran–Davis torus Σ=F∪D\Sigma=F\cup D, the union of the genus-one Seifert surface with no slice derivative with a ribbon disc, smoothly isotopic to the standard unknotted torus? An answer must either prove that these surfaces are smoothly unknotted, or exhibit a member of one of these families that is not smoothly isotopic to the standard torus, thereby refuting the smooth unknotting conjecture for genus-one Z\mathbb{Z}-tori at these candidates. Results that hold only after ambient stabilization by connected sum with S2×S2S^2\times S^2, or only in the locally flat topological category, do not by themselves constitute an answer; the question concerns smooth isotopy in S4S^4 itself.

References

  1. András Juhász and Mark Powell, Examples of topologically unknotted tori, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Series B 11 (2024) 1266–1293, DOI 10.1090/btran/202; arXiv:2312.06326, https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06326
  2. Anthony Conway and Mark Powell, Embedded surfaces with infinite cyclic knot group, Geometry & Topology 27 (2023) 739–821, DOI 10.2140/gt.2023.27.739, https://doi.org/10.2140/gt.2023.27.739; arXiv:2009.13461, https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.13461
  3. Mark Hughes, Seungwon Kim, and Maggie Miller, Branched covers of twist-roll spun knots and turned twisted tori, arXiv:2402.11706 (2024; v3 2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11706
  4. Tim D. Cochran and Christopher William Davis, Counterexamples to Kauffman's conjectures on slice knots, Advances in Mathematics 274 (2015) 263–284, DOI 10.1016/j.aim.2014.12.006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2014.12.006
  5. Jeffrey Boyle, The turned torus knot in S4S^4, Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications 2 (1993) 239–249, DOI 10.1142/S0218216593000155, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218216593000155
  6. Daniel Galvin, Patrick Orson, and Mark Powell, Smooth stable isotopy of topologically isotopic surfaces, arXiv:2606.06299 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06299
  7. Anthony Conway and Allison N. Miller, Immersed surfaces with knot group Z\mathbb{Z}, arXiv:2410.04635 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04635
  8. David Baraglia, Exotic embedded surfaces and involutions from Real Seiberg–Witten theory, International Journal of Mathematics 37 (2026), article 2650028, DOI 10.1142/S0129167X2650028X, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129167X2650028X; arXiv:2504.00281, https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00281