For , , and curvatures , does the complete hyperbolic space admit an isometric immersion into the space form whose normal bundle is flat? Local solutions are abundant — Cartan (1919–20) showed that local immersions of into exist in profusion and all have flat normal bundle — but no complete example is known in any codimension or target curvature, and Dajczer–Onti–Vlachos (2021) proved that any such immersion must have a second fundamental form of exponential growth. The classical instance (, ), a conjectural higher-dimensional Hilbert theorem recorded in Yau's problem list and by Moore and Gromov, is claimed — in an as-yet unrefereed 2025 preprint by J. D. Moore — to have a negative answer (no isometric immersion of into at all). That preprint remains unrefereed and independently unverified and covers only the Euclidean target at codimension , so this instance still belongs to the open question; for the general problem, the known results are necessary conditions rather than answers — by the structure theory of Dajczer–Onti–Vlachos, any such immersion (even a local one) requires codimension when , and the second fundamental form of any complete example must grow exponentially.
Background
An isometric immersion is a smooth immersion whose pullback metric equals the given Riemannian metric of , so that bends extrinsically without distorting its intrinsic distances. A space form is the complete simply connected -dimensional Riemannian manifold of constant sectional curvature : the Euclidean space for , the sphere for , and the hyperbolic space for . The extrinsic bending is measured by the second fundamental form , a symmetric bilinear form with values in the normal bundle (the subbundle of the ambient tangent bundle orthogonal to ), and the normal bundle carries an induced connection whose curvature is called the normal curvature; the immersion has flat normal bundle when vanishes identically, which on a simply connected domain means a globally orthonormal parallel normal frame exists.
The founding result of this circle of problems is Hilbert's theorem (1901): the complete hyperbolic plane admits no isometric immersion into . Élie Cartan (1919–20) extended the local theory: for , open subsets of admit no isometric immersion into at all, while local immersions into exist in abundance (via Cartan–Kähler theory; they depend on functions of one variable and correspond to higher-dimensional analogues of the sine-Gordon equation) and all of them have flat normal bundle. So codimension is the critical local codimension, and the natural global question — raised in Moore's 1972 work, recorded in one of Yau's problem lists, and repeated in Gromov's 2017 survey — is whether the complete can be isometrically immersed in ; non-existence was frequently conjectured. Partial confirmations of the conjecture: Xavier (1985) and Nikolayevsky (1998) proved that quotients with nontrivial cannot be isometrically immersed in , and Nikolayevsky's argument shows in the flat-normal-bundle setting that a complete with immersed in , , must be the simply connected ; Bolotov (2007) ruled out flat-normal-bundle immersions of into Euclidean space with bounded mean curvature. A construction of Rozendorn (whose extrinsic geometry was analyzed by Aminov, 2009) gives a complete immersion of into with bounded second fundamental form but non-flat normal bundle, showing that the flat-normal-bundle hypothesis is essential for all known obstructions.
Dajczer, Onti and Vlachos (2021) posed the problem in its general space-form form and proved (Theorem 1) that if a complete with admits an isometric immersion into with and flat normal bundle, then and the norm of must grow at least exponentially: there are and with for all large , where is the closed geodesic ball of radius . Since the volume of hyperbolic geodesic balls itself grows exponentially, this necessary condition is not obviously contradictory, and the existence question — the subject of this problem — remains open. In a November 2025 preprint, J. D. Moore (who had himself conjectured the non-existence in ) announced a proof of the Main Theorem that for every there is no isometric immersion of into whatsoever, via the Allendoerfer–Weil Gauss–Bonnet formula for Riemannian polyhedra applied to families of asymptotic polyhedra and averaged over metric connections; this preprint is unrefereed and covers only the Euclidean target at codimension .
Problem Statement
Let and be integers and let be real numbers, where denotes the complete simply connected hyperbolic -space of constant sectional curvature and denotes the complete simply connected space form of constant sectional curvature (Euclidean space if , the sphere if , hyperbolic space if ).
Does there exist an isometric immersion with flat normal bundle (i.e. with vanishing curvature of the induced normal connection)? Equivalently: characterize the parameter values with for which such an immersion exists.
Any answer is constrained by the known necessary conditions of Dajczer–Onti–Vlachos: their structure theory forces codimension when , already for local immersions, and the second fundamental form of any complete such immersion must have exponential growth. The instance , (target ) is the classical higher-dimensional Hilbert conjecture, claimed settled negatively — without any flatness hypothesis — by Moore's 2025 preprint; since that preprint is unrefereed and independently unverified, this instance remains part of the open question.
References
- M. Dajczer, C.-R. Onti, Th. Vlachos, Isometric immersions with flat normal bundle between space forms, Archiv der Mathematik 116 (2021), 577–583. DOI: 10.1007/s00013-020-01565-x (preprint arXiv:2008.03929). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00013-020-01565-x
- J. D. Moore, Submanifolds of Constant Negative Curvature: A Generalization of Hilbert's Theorem, preprint, arXiv:2512.00973 (2025), 46 pp. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00973
- D. Hilbert, Ueber Flächen von constanter Gaussscher Krümmung, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 2 (1901), 87–99. DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1901-1500557-5. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9947-1901-1500557-5
- É. Cartan, Sur les variétés de courbure constante d'un espace euclidien ou non-euclidien, Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France 47 (1919), 125–160 (continuation: vol. 48 (1920), 132–208). DOI: 10.24033/bsmf.997. https://doi.org/10.24033/bsmf.997
- J. D. Moore, Isometric immersions of space forms in space forms, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 40 (1972), 157–166. DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1972.40.157. https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1972.40.157
- Y. A. Nikolayevsky, Non-immersion theorem for a class of hyperbolic manifolds, Differential Geometry and its Applications 9 (1998), 239–242. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-2245(97)00017-X. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-2245(97)00017-X
- F. Xavier, A non-immersion theorem for hyperbolic manifolds, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 60 (1985), 280–283. DOI: 10.1007/BF02567414. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02567414
- D. V. Bolotov, On isometric immersions with flat normal connection of the hyperbolic space L^n into Euclidean space E^{n+m}, Mathematical Notes 82 (2007), 13–15 (English edition; DOI of the translation: 10.1134/S0001434607070024, Springer DOI: 10.1007/s11072-007-0005-y). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001434607070024
- M. Gromov, Geometric, algebraic, and analytic descendants of Nash isometric embedding theorems, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 54 (2017), 173–245. DOI: 10.1090/bull/1551. https://doi.org/10.1090/bull/1551
- D. Brander, Results related to generalizations of Hilbert's non-immersibility theorem for the hyperbolic plane, Electronic Research Announcements in Mathematical Sciences 15 (2008), 8–16. arXiv:0710.0507. https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.0507
- Yu. A. Aminov, Extrinsic geometric properties of the Rozendorn surface, an isometric immersion of the Lobachevskiĭ plane in E^5, Sbornik: Mathematics 200 (2009), 1575–1586. DOI: 10.1070/SM2009v200n11ABEH004051. https://doi.org/10.1070/SM2009v200n11ABEH004051