For n≥10n\ge 10 points in general position in the complex projective plane, Nagata's conjecture (1959) predicts that every non-empty linear system L(d;m1,…,mn)\mathcal{L}(d;m_1,\dots,m_n) of plane curves of degree d>0d>0 with multiplicities mim_i at the points satisfies n d>m1+⋯+mn\sqrt{n}\,d>m_1+\cdots+m_n. Equivalently, the Nagata ray nH−E1−⋯−En\sqrt{n}H-E_1-\cdots-E_n is nef on the blow-up XnX_n of P2\mathbb{P}^2 at the points, and the Seshadri constant of P2\mathbb{P}^2 at nn general points is at least 1/n1/\sqrt{n}. The conjecture is proved for n≤9n\le 9 (classical) and for square nn (Nagata's theorem), but it remains open for every non-square n≥10n\ge 10, including n=10n=10 even in the homogeneous form. The source record, Ciliberto–Harbourne–Miranda–Roé's "Variations on Nagata's Conjecture", embeds this question in the study of the boundary of the cone of curves of XnX_n: good rays (rational non-effective boundary rays) were constructed there for all n≥10n\ge 10, and the wonderful-ray existence question it posed (irrational nef rays of self-intersection zero) was resolved affirmatively for all n≥10n\ge 10 in 2022 - but the Nagata ray itself, the conjecture's core, is still not known to be nef. The problem asks for a proof or refutation of Nagata's conjecture in full generality.

Background

A classical interpolation problem asks which linear systems of plane curves exist through points in general position. Fix nn points x1,…,xnx_1,\dots,x_n in general position in the complex projective plane P2\mathbb{P}^2 (that is, avoiding all algebraic coincidences: the configuration lies outside a countable union of proper closed subsets of (P2)n(\mathbb{P}^2)^n), and non-negative integers m1,…,mnm_1,\dots,m_n. The linear system L(d;m1,…,mn)\mathcal{L}(d;m_1,\dots,m_n) is the vector space of plane curves of degree dd having multiplicity at least mim_i at xix_i; it may be empty. The standard model is the surface XnX_n obtained by blowing up P2\mathbb{P}^2 at the points (replacing each point by the line of directions through it); the system corresponds to the divisor class dH−∑imiEidH-\sum_i m_iE_i, where HH is the pull-back of a line and the EiE_i are the exceptional curves, with self-intersection d2−∑imi2d^2-\sum_i m_i^2. Blowing up introduces infinitely many curves of self-intersection −1-1 (lines through pairs of points, conics through five points, and so on). A naive parameter count predicts dim⁡L=d(d+3)/2−∑imi(mi+1)/2\dim\mathcal{L}=d(d+3)/2-\sum_i m_i(m_i+1)/2; systems exceeding the prediction are called special, and the Segre–Harbourne–Gimigliano–Hirschowitz (SHGH) conjecture - open for over half a century - asserts that every special system with general base points is (−1)(-1)-special, that is, forced by a curve of self-intersection −1-1 contained in it. SHGH is known for n≤9n\le 9 (going back to Castelnuovo).

In 1959, while constructing his counterexamples to Hilbert's fourteenth problem on finite generation of invariant rings, Nagata proved by a degeneration argument that for n=k2≥9n=k^2\ge 9 general points every non-empty system satisfies d≥(m1+⋯+mn)/nd\ge(m_1+\cdots+m_n)/\sqrt n, and he conjectured the same bound for all n≥10n\ge 10. For non-square nn the inequality is automatically strict, since n\sqrt n is irrational. This is Nagata's conjecture (N). It is equivalent to the statement that the Nagata ray νn=n H−E1−⋯−En\nu_n=\sqrt n\,H-E_1-\cdots-E_n is nef (meets every effective curve non-negatively) on XnX_n, and to the lower bound ε≥1/n\varepsilon\ge 1/\sqrt n for the Seshadri constant of OP2(1)\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^2}(1) at the nn points, where ε=inf⁡CdC/∑imult⁡xiC\varepsilon=\inf_C d_C/\sum_i\operatorname{mult}_{x_i}C is the invariant measuring local positivity; for square nn the exact value ε=1/n\varepsilon=1/\sqrt n follows from Nagata's theorem.

The source record of this problem, "Variations on Nagata's Conjecture" by Ciliberto, Harbourne, Miranda and Roé, studies (N) through the geometry of the Mori cone NE‾(Xn)\overline{\mathrm{NE}}(X_n), the closed cone of effective curve classes. By Riemann–Roch, the nonnegative cone Qn={ξ:ξ⋅H≥0, ξ2≥0}\mathcal{Q}_n=\{\xi:\xi\cdot H\ge 0,\ \xi^2\ge 0\} (a quadric cone in the real Néron–Severi space) is contained in NE‾(Xn)\overline{\mathrm{NE}}(X_n), so all effectivity phenomena beyond Qn\mathcal{Q}_n concentrate on its boundary ∂Qn\partial\mathcal{Q}_n. The authors call a rational non-effective ray of ∂Qn\partial\mathcal{Q}_n a good ray and an irrational nef ray of ∂Qn\partial\mathcal{Q}_n a wonderful ray; (N) holds exactly when the Nagata ray - irrational of self-intersection zero when nn is not a square - is wonderful. Good rays themselves yield counterexamples to Hilbert's fourteenth problem by Nagata's original construction, and the paper produced good rays for every n≥10n\ge 10. De Fernex showed that for n≥10n\ge 10 the Mori cone is not even countably generated, and formulated conjectures, refined in the source paper into the Δ\Delta-conjecture and strong Δ\Delta-conjecture phrased via the de Fernex point Dn=(n−1;1n)D_n=(\sqrt{n-1};1^n), which imply (N) but remain unproven, as do the Strong Nagata conjecture (SN) and SHGH above them. The paper also proved (Proposition 6.1) that (N) for all n≤89n\le 89, combined with (SN) at n=10n=10, implies (N) for every n≥90n\ge 90, reducing the infinite problem to a finite verification range - conditional on an open strengthening at n=10n=10.

Problem Statement

Let nn be a positive integer, x1,…,xnx_1,\dots,x_n points in general position in the complex projective plane P2\mathbb{P}^2, and XnX_n the blow-up of P2\mathbb{P}^2 at these points, with hyperplane class HH and exceptional curves E1,…,EnE_1,\dots,E_n. Prove or disprove Nagata's conjecture:

(N) For every n≥9n\ge 9, every choice of nn points x1,…,xnx_1,\dots,x_n in general position, and every non-empty linear system L(d;m1,…,mn)\mathcal{L}(d;m_1,\dots,m_n) of plane curves of degree d≥1d\ge 1 with multiplicity at least mim_i at each xix_i,

n d ≥ m1+⋯+mn,\sqrt{n}\,d\ \ge\ m_1+\cdots+m_n,

with strict inequality whenever n≥10n\ge 10.

(The convention d≥1d\ge 1 is the standard one in this literature - the source paper's own follow-up work introduces its systems with d>0d>0 - and excludes only the trivial system of constants, the single degree-zero exception to strictness. For non-square nn with d≥1d\ge 1 the inequality is automatically strict because n\sqrt{n} is irrational, so strictness is substantive only at square n≥16n\ge 16, where it is part of Nagata's theorem.)

The open cases are exactly the non-square n≥10n\ge 10: the case n≤9n\le 9 is classical and the square case is Nagata's theorem. Equivalent formulations of the open content are: (i) the Nagata ray νn=n H−E1−⋯−En\nu_n=\sqrt{n}\,H-E_1-\cdots-E_n is nef on XnX_n for every n≥10n\ge 10; (ii) in the terminology of the source paper, the Nagata ray is a wonderful ray for every non-square n≥10n\ge 10; (iii) the Seshadri constant of P2\mathbb{P}^2 at nn general points is at least 1/n1/\sqrt{n} for every n≥10n\ge 10. A refutation consists of a single non-square n≥10n\ge 10 and an effective system with n d2<(m1+⋯+mn)2n\,d^2<(m_1+\cdots+m_n)^2; a proof must cover all non-square n≥10n\ge 10 and arbitrary multiplicity vectors, not only the homogeneous systems L(d;mn)\mathcal{L}(d;m^n). The reduction of the source paper - (N) for n≤89n\le 89 plus Strong Nagata at n=10n=10 implies (N) for all n≥90n\ge 90 - is context, not a restriction of the target.

References

  1. C. Ciliberto, B. Harbourne, R. Miranda, J. Roé, "Variations on Nagata's Conjecture", Clay Mathematics Proceedings 18 (2013), 185–203; arXiv:1202.0475, https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.0475
  2. M. Nagata, "On the 14-th Problem of Hilbert", American Journal of Mathematics 81 (1959), 766–772, DOI 10.2307/2372927, https://doi.org/10.2307/2372927
  3. C. Ciliberto, R. Miranda, J. Roé, "Irrational nef rays at the boundary of the Mori cone for very general blowups of the plane", Michigan Mathematical Journal 76 (2026), DOI 10.1307/mmj/20236356; arXiv:2201.08634, https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08634
  4. C. Ciliberto, R. Miranda, J. Roé, "Quadric cones on the boundary of the Mori cone for very general blowups of the plane", Collectanea Mathematica 76 (2025), 601–611, DOI 10.1007/s13348-024-00447-7; arXiv:2310.10507, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10507
  5. C. Ciliberto, R. Miranda, J. Roé, "Boundedness results for planar linear systems assuming the Segre–Harbourne–Gimigliano–Hirschowitz Conjecture", arXiv:2508.01462, https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01462
  6. T. de Fernex, "On the Mori cone of blow-ups of the plane", arXiv:1001.5243, https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.5243
  7. A. Laface, L. Ugaglia, M. Vilches, "Equivalent conjectures on blowing-ups of P^2", arXiv:2405.07716, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07716
  8. J. Roé, P. Supino, "Nagata type statements", arXiv:1707.00583, https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00583
  9. C. Ciliberto, O. Dumitrescu, R. Miranda, J. Roé, "Emptiness of homogeneous linear systems with ten general base points", in Classification of Algebraic Varieties, C. Faber, G. van der Geer, E. Looijenga (eds.), EMS Series of Congress Reports vol. 3 (2011), 189–195, DOI 10.4171/007-1/8; arXiv:0910.1171, https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.1171
  10. C. Ciliberto, R. Miranda, "Homogeneous interpolation on ten points", Journal of Algebraic Geometry 20 (2011), 685–726, DOI 10.1090/s1056-3911-2011-00545-6; arXiv:0812.0032, https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.0032
  11. M. Dumnicki, A. Küronya, C. Maclean, T. Szemberg, "Seshadri constants via Okounkov functions and the Segre-Harbourne-Gimigliano-Hirschowitz Conjecture", arXiv:1304.0249, https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0249