For fixed real σ\sigma, the sets {ζ(σ+it)∣t∈R}\{\zeta(\sigma+it)\mid t\in\mathbb{R}\} and {log⁡ζ(σ+it)∣t∈R}\{\log\zeta(\sigma+it)\mid t\in\mathbb{R}\} are classical objects of value-distribution theory. Bohr and Courant (1914) and Bohr (1916) proved both are dense in C\mathbb{C} for 1/2<σ≤11/2<\sigma\leq 1, and work of Garunkštis and Steuding shows that for σ<1/2\sigma<1/2 the values of ζ\zeta are not dense under the Riemann Hypothesis, leaving the critical line σ=1/2\sigma=1/2 as the sole unresolved case. Endo and Inoue (Forum Mathematicum, 2021) posed this remaining case as their Problem 1: is the set {log⁡ζ(1/2+it)∣t∈R}\{\log\zeta(1/2+it)\mid t\in\mathbb{R}\} dense in the complex plane? They resolved the analogous questions for iterated integrals of log⁡ζ\log\zeta — under the Riemann Hypothesis the first vertical integral has dense values, and for m≥2m\geq 2 denseness of the mm-th iterated integral is equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis — but left the base case m=0m=0 open. No later work settles the denseness question for log⁡ζ\log\zeta (or even for ζ\zeta) at σ=1/2\sigma=1/2, so the problem remains open.

Background

The Riemann zeta-function is ζ(s)=∑n≥1n−s\zeta(s)=\sum_{n\geq 1}n^{-s} for complex s=σ+its=\sigma+it with σ>1\sigma>1, extended by analytic continuation to a meromorphic function on the plane. The vertical strip 0<σ<10<\sigma<1 is called the critical strip, and the line σ=1/2\sigma=1/2 the critical line; the Riemann Hypothesis (RH) asserts that all nontrivial zeros of ζ\zeta lie on this line. Since ζ\zeta has zeros on the critical line itself, log⁡ζ(1/2+it)\log\zeta(1/2+it) is understood, as is standard in this literature, at ordinates tt with ζ(1/2+it)≠0\zeta(1/2+it)\neq 0, the logarithm being fixed by continuous variation of the argument; the denseness question asks whether these values come arbitrarily close to every point of C\mathbb{C}.

A classical program studies how the values of ζ\zeta and log⁡ζ\log\zeta on vertical lines are spread out in the plane. Bohr and Courant (1914) proved that for every fixed 1/2<σ≤11/2<\sigma\leq 1 the set {ζ(σ+it)}\{\zeta(\sigma+it)\} is dense in C\mathbb{C}, and Bohr (1916) strengthened this to denseness of {log⁡ζ(σ+it)}\{\log\zeta(\sigma+it)\} in C\mathbb{C} for the same σ\sigma-range. The method represents log⁡ζ(σ+it)\log\zeta(\sigma+it), well inside the strip, through its Euler product over primes, so that its behavior is governed by the frequencies e−itlog⁡pe^{-it\log p} for primes pp; by Kronecker's theorem — the classical fact that a linear flow with rationally independent frequencies is dense on a torus — the prime phases can be tuned almost independently, forcing the values to be everywhere dense. Exactly at σ=1/2\sigma=1/2 this mechanism collapses: the prime sum is no longer absolutely convergent, the approximating product loses the uniformity the argument needs, and the zeros of ζ\zeta sitting on the line itself create logarithmic singularities along the path of variation. Bohr and Jessen (1930–1932) developed this into an exact limit theorem for the value distribution of log⁡∣ζ(σ+it)∣\log|\zeta(\sigma+it)| for σ>1/2\sigma>1/2, the starting point of the probabilistic theory of the zeta-function.

The picture off the line is otherwise complete. Garunkštis and Steuding (2014) showed that, assuming RH, for fixed σ<1/2\sigma<1/2 the values ζ(σ+it)\zeta(\sigma+it) are not dense in C\mathbb{C}, and that the pair (ζ(1/2+it),ζ′(1/2+it))(\zeta(1/2+it),\zeta'(1/2+it)) is not dense in C2\mathbb{C}^{2}; hence the critical line is the only vertical line whose value-denseness is undecided. The closest approach to it is due to Kowalski and Nikeghbali (2012), who studied the distribution of log⁡ζ(1/2+it)\log\zeta(1/2+it) through mod-Gaussian convergence — a probabilistic scheme in which normalized characteristic functions of a sequence of random variables converge to a Gaussian kernel — and gave an explicit sufficient condition (non-vanishing of a certain limiting function, their Corollary 9) under which the values ζ(1/2+it)\zeta(1/2+it) would be dense in C\mathbb{C}; the condition is strong and remains unverified, so it settles nothing.

Endo and Inoue (2021) introduced the mm-times iterated integrals of log⁡ζ\log\zeta on vertical lines, ηm(σ+it)=∫0tηm−1(σ+it′) dt′+cm(σ)\eta_{m}(\sigma+it)=\int_{0}^{t}\eta_{m-1}(\sigma+it')\,dt'+c_{m}(\sigma) with η0=log⁡ζ\eta_{0}=\log\zeta, precisely to obtain new information on this last case. Their Theorem 2 shows unconditionally that the analogous horizontal iterated integrals have dense values for 1/2≤σ<11/2\leq\sigma<1. Their Theorem 1 shows that if ζ\zeta has at most finitely many zeros with real part greater than σ\sigma — in particular under RH at σ=1/2\sigma=1/2 — then the values of the first vertical integral ∫0tlog⁡ζ(1/2+it′) dt′\int_{0}^{t}\log\zeta(1/2+it')\,dt' are dense in C\mathbb{C}, and that for every m≥2m\geq 2 the denseness of {ηm(1/2+it)}\{\eta_{m}(1/2+it)\} is equivalent to RH. These results give strong indirect evidence but leave the original question — the case m=0m=0 — open, which is precisely the problem stated here.

Problem Statement

Endo–Inoue Problem 1 (verbatim from the source, with the branch convention made explicit): Is the set

{log⁡ζ(1/2+it)∣t∈R}\{\log\zeta(1/2+it)\mid t\in\mathbb{R}\}

dense in the complex plane? Here log⁡ζ(1/2+it)\log\zeta(1/2+it) is understood at ordinates tt with ζ(1/2+it)≠0\zeta(1/2+it)\neq 0, the logarithm being fixed by continuous variation of the argument along the critical line, and denseness means: for every w∈Cw\in\mathbb{C} and every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there exists a real tt with ζ(1/2+it)≠0\zeta(1/2+it)\neq 0 such that the continuously-varied value log⁡ζ(1/2+it)\log\zeta(1/2+it) lies within ε\varepsilon of ww. This is the σ=1/2\sigma=1/2 case — the only one not settled by Bohr (1916) for 1/2<σ≤11/2<\sigma\leq 1 and by Garunkštis–Steuding (2014) for σ<1/2\sigma<1/2 under RH — of the classical problem on denseness of the values of log⁡ζ\log\zeta on vertical lines. An answer is either a proof that the value set is dense in C\mathbb{C}, or a proof that it is not (i.e., that some nonempty open subset of C\mathbb{C} contains no value log⁡ζ(1/2+it)\log\zeta(1/2+it)). A positive answer would in particular imply denseness of the values ζ(1/2+it)\zeta(1/2+it) in C∖{0}\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}, the companion classical open problem for ζ\zeta itself.

References

  1. Kenta Endo, Shōta Inoue, 'On the value-distribution of iterated integrals of the logarithm of the Riemann zeta-function I: Denseness', Forum Mathematicum 33(1) (2021) 167–176. DOI: 10.1515/forum-2020-0075, https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2020-0075 (preprint arXiv:2004.00823, https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.00823)
  2. H. Bohr, R. Courant, 'Neue Anwendungen der Theorie der Diophantischen Approximationen auf die Riemannsche Zetafunktion', Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 144 (1914) 249–274. DOI: 10.1515/crll.1914.144.249, https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1914.144.249
  3. H. Bohr, 'Zur Theorie der Riemann'schen Zetafunktion im Kritischen Streifen', Acta Mathematica 40 (1916) 67–100. DOI: 10.1007/bf02418541, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02418541
  4. H. Bohr, B. Jessen, 'Über die Werteverteilung der Riemannschen Zetafunktion, Erste Mitteilung', Acta Mathematica 54 (1930) 1–35. DOI: 10.1007/bf02547516, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02547516
  5. H. Bohr, B. Jessen, 'Über die Werteverteilung der Riemannschen Zetafunktion, Zweite Mitteilung', Acta Mathematica 58 (1932) 1–55. DOI: 10.1007/bf02547773, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02547773
  6. R. Garunkštis, J. Steuding, 'On the roots of the equation ζ(s)=a', Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg 84 (2014) 1–15. DOI: 10.1007/s12188-014-0093-7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12188-014-0093-7
  7. E. Kowalski, A. Nikeghbali, 'Mod-Gaussian convergence and the value distribution of ζ(1/2+it) and related quantities', Journal of the London Mathematical Society 86(1) (2012) 291–319. DOI: 10.1112/jlms/jds003, https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/jds003 (preprint arXiv:0912.3237, https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3237)
  8. Shōta Inoue, 'On the logarithm of the Riemann zeta-function and its iterated integrals', Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze (2024) 491–533. DOI: 10.2422/2036-2145.202201_008, https://doi.org/10.2422/2036-2145.202201_008 (preprint arXiv:1909.03643, https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03643)
  9. Kenta Endo, Shōta Inoue, Masahiro Mine, 'On the value-distribution of iterated integrals of the logarithm of the Riemann zeta-function II: probabilistic aspects', preprint (2021). arXiv:2105.04781, https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.04781
  10. Shōta Inoue, 'Extreme values for iterated integrals of the logarithm of the Riemann zeta-function', Acta Arithmetica 205 (2022) 97–119. DOI: 10.4064/aa210916-10-9, https://doi.org/10.4064/aa210916-10-9 (preprint arXiv:2009.04099, https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04099)
  11. Kenta Endo, 'Universality Theorem for the Iterated Integrals of the Logarithm of the Riemann Zeta-Function', Lithuanian Mathematical Journal 62(3) (2022) 315–332. DOI: 10.1007/s10986-022-09568-7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10986-022-09568-7 (preprint arXiv:2105.06848, https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.06848)
  12. Keita Nakai, 'Universality for the iterated integrals of logarithms of L-functions in the Selberg class', Lithuanian Mathematical Journal 65(1) (2025) 83–98. DOI: 10.1007/s10986-025-09665-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10986-025-09665-3
  13. Youness Lamzouri, Stephen Lester, Maksym Radziwiłł, 'Discrepancy bounds for the distribution of the Riemann zeta-function and applications', Journal d'Analyse Mathématique 139(2) (2019) 453–494. DOI: 10.1007/s11854-019-0063-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11854-019-0063-1