For positive integers d,md,m, let Ld(m10)\mathcal{L}_d(m^{10}) be the linear system of complex plane curves of degree dd passing with multiplicity at least mm through each of ten points in general position in the projective plane P2\mathbb{P}^2. Nagata's conjecture for ten general points predicts that Ld(m10)\mathcal{L}_d(m^{10}) is empty whenever d/m<10≈3.16228d/m<\sqrt{10}\approx 3.16228, or equivalently that the ten-point Seshadri constant of the plane equals 1/101/\sqrt{10}. The conjecture goes back to Nagata's 1959 counterexample to Hilbert's fourteenth problem, and the ten-point case is the critical open base case of the conjecture for all r≥10r\ge 10 points. The best known uniform emptiness threshold is 117/37≈3.16216117/37\approx 3.16216, established in 2009 by Ciliberto–Dumitrescu–Miranda–Roé and independently by Eckl; closing the remaining gap to 10\sqrt{10} (or exhibiting a counterexample) is the open problem.

Background

A linear system Ld(m1,…,mr)\mathcal{L}_d(m_1,\dots,m_r) of plane curves is the projective space of degree-dd curves in P2\mathbb{P}^2 having multiplicity at least mim_i at rr fixed points p1,…,prp_1,\dots,p_r; imposing a point of multiplicity mim_i is expected to cut the dimension by mi(mi+1)/2m_i(m_i+1)/2, giving an expected dimension max⁡{−1, d(d+3)/2−∑imi(mi+1)/2}\max\{-1,\,d(d+3)/2-\sum_i m_i(m_i+1)/2\}, where the value −1-1 means the system is expected to be empty. The points are called general (or very general) when they avoid every proper algebraic condition, i.e. no special position is imposed; a linear system of plane curves through general points is called special if its dimension exceeds the expected one. Equivalently, one studies the blow-up XrX_r of P2\mathbb{P}^2 at the points — the smooth surface obtained by replacing each pip_i with the set of tangent directions at pip_i — a rational surface whose Picard group (divisor classes modulo linear equivalence) is generated by the pull-back HH of a line and the exceptional divisors EiE_i (the curves replacing the points), so that Ld(m1,…,mr)\mathcal{L}_d(m_1,\dots,m_r) corresponds to the complete linear system ∣dH−∑imiEi∣|dH-\sum_i m_iE_i|. The Segre–Harbourne–Gimigliano–Hirschowitz (SHGH) conjecture predicts that speciality for general points is entirely explained by (−1)(-1)-curves (curves of self-intersection −1-1 on XrX_r) via the so-called (−1)(-1)-special systems; it is known for r≤9r\le 9 but open for ten and more points. The problem studied here originates in Nagata's 1959 negative solution of Hilbert's fourteenth problem: studying invariant rings led Nagata to prove that when rr is a perfect square at least 1616, the homogeneous system Ld(mr)\mathcal{L}_d(m^r) is empty whenever d/m<rd/m<\sqrt{r}, and the analogous statement was conjectured for every r≥10r\ge 10. In modern language the conjecture for rr general points is equivalent to the statement that the multi-point Seshadri constant of the hyperplane bundle — defined as ε(OP2(1);p1,…,pr)=inf⁡Cd/(∑imult⁡piC)\varepsilon(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^2}(1);p_1,\dots,p_r)=\inf_C d/(\sum_i\operatorname{mult}_{p_i}C), the infimum over all curves CC of degree dd through the points — equals 1/r1/\sqrt{r}; the upper bound ≤1/r\le 1/\sqrt{r} being easy, the conjecture amounts to the lower bound. For a finite set ZZ of points with homogeneous ideal I(Z)I(Z), the mm-th symbolic power I(mZ)I(mZ) is the ideal of plane curves vanishing to order at least mm at every point of ZZ, its initial degree α(I(mZ))\alpha(I(mZ)) is the smallest degree of a curve it contains, and the Waldschmidt constant is the limit α^(I(Z))=lim⁡m→∞α(I(mZ))/m\widehat\alpha(I(Z))=\lim_{m\to\infty}\alpha(I(mZ))/m. For r=10r=10 the conjectured critical ratio is 10≈3.162278\sqrt{10}\approx 3.162278, and the known uniform emptiness thresholds have crept up through Harbourne–Roé's 177/56≈3.1607177/56\approx 3.1607, Ciliberto–Miranda's 550/174≈3.1609550/174\approx 3.1609, Dumnicki's 313/99≈3.16162313/99\approx 3.16162, to 117/37≈3.162162117/37\approx 3.162162 (Ciliberto–Dumitrescu–Miranda–Roé, and independently Eckl), still strictly below 10\sqrt{10}. For bounded multiplicities the conjecture is verified computationally (Dumnicki's cutting-diagram method handles the homogeneous case up to m=42m=42), but the uniform statement over all pairs (d,m)(d,m) has resisted all methods: Cremona-transform techniques (Cremona transformations are birational self-maps of the plane, such as the standard quadratic map, which act on linear systems by changing degrees and multiplicities) and degeneration techniques tend to produce only rational thresholds, and the conjectural limit slope 10\sqrt{10} is irrational. The ten-point case is the base case of the general conjecture: Ciliberto–Harbourne–Miranda–Roé showed that Nagata's conjecture for n≤89n\le 89 points, combined with a stronger statement at n=10n=10, implies the conjecture for all n≥90n\ge 90.

Problem Statement

Prove or refute Nagata's conjecture for ten general points in the projective plane: for all pairs of positive integers (d,m)(d,m) with d/m<10d/m<\sqrt{10}, the homogeneous linear system Ld(m10)\mathcal{L}_d(m^{10}) — the system of plane curves of degree dd having multiplicity at least mm at each of ten points in general position — is empty. Equivalently, prove or refute that the multi-point Seshadri constant of the hyperplane bundle at ten general points equals 1/101/\sqrt{10}, i.e. ε(OP2(1);p1,…,p10)=1/10\varepsilon(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^2}(1);p_1,\dots,p_{10})=1/\sqrt{10}, or again equivalently that the initial degree of the mm-th symbolic power of the ideal of ten general points satisfies α(I(mZ))>m10\alpha(I(mZ))>m\sqrt{10} for every m≥1m\ge 1 (here Z={p1,…,p10}Z=\{p_1,\dots,p_{10}\} and I(mZ)I(mZ) is the ideal of curves vanishing to order at least mm at each pip_i). The single scientific objective is the exact determination of the critical emptiness ratio for ten general points; currently the best established uniform threshold is 117/37≈3.162162117/37\approx 3.162162, and the gap to 10≈3.162278\sqrt{10}\approx 3.162278 is precisely what remains. No narrowing of the multiplicities, degrees, point count, or answer form is intended: the statement must hold for all (d,m)(d,m), and a single explicit pair (d,m)(d,m) with d/m<10d/m<\sqrt{10} for which Ld(m10)\mathcal{L}_d(m^{10}) is nonempty for general points would refute the conjecture.

References

  1. M. Nagata, On the 14-th Problem of Hilbert, American Journal of Mathematics 81 (1959), 766–772. DOI: 10.2307/2372927, https://doi.org/10.2307/2372927
  2. M. Nagata, On rational surfaces, II, Memoirs of the College of Science, University of Kyoto, Series A 33 (1960), 271–293. DOI: 10.1215/kjm/1250775912, https://doi.org/10.1215/kjm/1250775912
  3. B. Harbourne, J. Roé, Computing multi-point Seshadri constants on P2\mathbb{P}^2, Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society – Simon Stevin 16 (2009), no. 5, 887–906. DOI: 10.36045/bbms/1260369405, arXiv:math/0309064, https://doi.org/10.36045/bbms/1260369405
  4. C. Ciliberto, R. Miranda, Homogeneous interpolation on ten points, preprint (2008). arXiv:0812.0032, https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.0032
  5. M. Dumnicki, Regularity and non-emptyness of linear systems in Pn\mathbb{P}^n, preprint (2008). arXiv:0802.0925, https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.0925
  6. M. Dumnicki, Cutting diagram method for systems of plane curves with base points, Annales Polonici Mathematici 90 (2007), 131–143. DOI: 10.4064/ap90-2-3, arXiv:math/0606716, https://doi.org/10.4064/ap90-2-3
  7. T. Eckl, Ciliberto–Miranda degenerations of CP2\mathbb{CP}^2 blown up in 10 points, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 215 (2011), 672–696. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2010.06.016, arXiv:0907.4425, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2010.06.016
  8. C. Ciliberto, O. Dumitrescu, R. Miranda, J. Roé, Emptiness of homogeneous linear systems with ten general base points, in: Classification of Algebraic Varieties, EMS Series of Congress Reports, European Mathematical Society (2010), 189–195. DOI: 10.4171/007-1/8, arXiv:0910.1171, https://doi.org/10.4171/007-1/8
  9. C. Ciliberto, B. Harbourne, R. Miranda, J. Roé, Variations on Nagata's Conjecture, preprint (2012). arXiv:1202.0475, https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.0475
  10. M. Dumnicki, A. Küronya, C. Maclean, T. Szemberg, Rationality of Seshadri constants and the Segre–Harbourne–Gimigliano–Hirschowitz conjecture, Advances in Mathematics 303 (2016), 1162–1170. DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2016.05.025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2016.05.025
  11. J. Roé, P. Supino, Nagata type statements, Banach Center Publications 116 (2018), 213–258. DOI: 10.4064/bc116-8, arXiv:1707.00583, https://doi.org/10.4064/bc116-8
  12. C. Ciliberto, R. Miranda, Non effective planar linear systems at the boundary of the Mori cone, preprint (2021). arXiv:2111.02923, https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02923
  13. A. Laface, L. Ugaglia, M. Vilches, Equivalent conjectures on blowing-ups of P2\mathbb{P}^2, preprint (2024). arXiv:2405.07716, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07716
  14. C. Ciliberto, R. Miranda, J. Roé, Boundedness results for planar linear systems assuming the Segre–Harbourne–Gimigliano–Hirschowitz Conjecture, Collectanea Mathematica (2026). DOI: 10.1007/s13348-025-00506-7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13348-025-00506-7