A finite projective plane is said to admit a Singer group when a subgroup of its collineation group acts sharply transitively (simply transitively) on the point set. The classical conjecture, going back to a question of Hall from 1947 and strongly supported by results of Wagner and Ostrom, asserts that every finite projective plane with a cyclic Singer group is Desarguesian, i.e. the classical plane over a finite field. Connes and Consani showed that this question embeds naturally in hyperring theory: their classification of finite commutative hyperfield extensions of the Krasner hyperfield K\mathbb{K} has three cases — group hyperfields K[G]\mathbb{K}[G] built from finite abelian groups, quotients Fqm/Fq×F_{q^m}/F_q^{\times} of finite fields, whose associated geometry is Desarguesian, and one remaining case, in which the hyperfield's multiplicative group is the incidence group of a finite non-Desarguesian projective plane with a simply transitive abelian group of collineations. Cases (1) and (2) are completely classified; case (3) is open and is equivalent to the existence of a non-Desarguesian finite projective plane admitting an abelian Singer group. The open case is: does a finite hyperfield extension of the Krasner hyperfield of type (3) exist — equivalently, is there a non-Desarguesian finite projective plane with an abelian collineation group acting sharply transitively on its points? No such hyperfield is known to exist, and no proof of non-existence is known.

Background

A projective plane is an incidence structure of points and lines in which any two points lie on a unique line, any two lines meet in a unique point, and there exist four points no three of which are collinear. A finite projective plane of order nn has n2+n+1n^2+n+1 points and equally many lines. The Desarguesian plane PG(2,Fq)\mathrm{PG}(2,\mathbb{F}_q) over the finite field Fq\mathbb{F}_q is the standard model; a plane is called Desarguesian when it is isomorphic to such a plane (equivalently, when it is coordinatized by a field, or satisfies the classical Desargues configuration), and a long-standing theme of finite geometry is to understand how far non-Desarguesian (i.e. non-classical) finite planes can deviate from it. A collineation of a plane is an incidence-preserving permutation of its points and lines; a group of collineations is sharply transitive (or simply transitive, or regular) on points when it maps any point to any other point in exactly one way. A collineation group acting sharply transitively on the points of a finite plane is called a Singer group of the plane, and a cyclic one a Singer cycle, since Singer showed in 1938 that every Desarguesian finite plane carries such a cyclic group. Hall conjectured in 1947 that the converse holds for cyclic groups: a finite projective plane admitting a Singer cycle is Desarguesian. The conjecture is open; finiteness is essential, since Hall constructed infinite non-Desarguesian planes with infinite cyclic Singer groups. By a result of Karzel (1965), as recorded by Thas (2016), a finite abelian Singer group is automatically cyclic, so the conjecture is equivalent to the statement that every finite plane with an abelian Singer group is Desarguesian; equivalently, no non-Desarguesian finite projective plane admits an abelian collineation group acting sharply transitively on points. No example of such a plane is known, and, as recorded by Thas, even the possible prime-power order of the underlying plane is undetermined. The problem predates Connes and Consani; they connected it to hyperring theory. A hyperring is an algebraic structure like a ring but with a multivalued addition: the sum of two elements is a nonempty subset of the hyperring, with associativity, commutativity, and distributivity adapted accordingly. A hyperfield is a hyperring in which the nonzero elements form a group under multiplication and the additive structure satisfies field-like axioms. The Krasner hyperfield K\mathbb{K} is the hyperfield on the set {0,1}\{0,1\} with usual multiplication and multivalued addition given by 1+1={0,1}1+1=\{0,1\} and 1+0=11+0=1. The hyperfield K\mathbb{K} encodes the crude additive structure of any field, and a morphism of hyperrings (in the sense of Connes and Consani, where the multivalued sum of images must be contained in the image of the sum) mediates between field arithmetic and sign-like or incidence-like combinatorics. Connes and Consani classified the finite commutative hyperfield extensions of K\mathbb{K} (Theorem 3.11): each such extension is either of type (1), the hyperfield K[G]\mathbb{K}[G] attached to a finite abelian group GG, whose associated projective geometry is a single line; of type (2), a quotient Fqm/Fq×F_{q^m}/F_q^{\times} of a finite field by its multiplicative subgroup Fq×F_q^{\times}, whose associated geometry is the Desarguesian space PG(m−1,q)\mathrm{PG}(m-1,q) — for m=3m=3 a Desarguesian plane with its (cyclic) Singer group Fq3×/Fq×F_{q^3}^{\times}/F_q^{\times}; or of type (3), a hyperfield whose multiplicative group is the incidence group (i.e. the group of points of the plane, with left and right translations automorphisms of the incidence structure) of a finite non-Desarguesian projective plane with a simply transitive abelian group of collineations. Types (1) and (2) are fully determined; type (3) corresponds exactly to the hypothetical non-Desarguesian plane with an abelian Singer group, and no example is known. This bridge makes the classification a question of both finite geometry and modern algebra.

Problem Statement

Does there exist a non-Desarguesian finite projective plane admitting an abelian collineation group acting sharply transitively (i.e. simply transitively) on its points? Equivalently, in the language of hyperfields introduced by Connes and Consani, does case (3) of their classification of finite commutative hyperfield extensions of the Krasner hyperfield K\mathbb{K} contain a genuine example — namely, an extension whose multiplicative group is the incidence group of such a plane? A complete answer either constructs such a plane or hyperfield, or proves that none exists, thereby completing the classification of finite commutative hyperfield extensions of the Krasner hyperfield and establishing the abelian (equivalently cyclic) Singer-group conjecture for finite projective planes.

References

  1. Alain Connes and Caterina Consani, "The hyperring of adèle classes", Journal of Number Theory 131 (2011), 159–194, arXiv:1001.4260, doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2010.09.001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2010.09.001
  2. James Singer, "A theorem in finite projective geometry and some applications to number theory", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 43 (1938), 377–385, doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-1938-1501951-4, https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9947-1938-1501951-4
  3. Marshall Hall, Jr., "Cyclic projective planes", Duke Mathematical Journal 14 (1947), 1079–1090, doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-47-01482-8, https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-47-01482-8
  4. A. Wagner, "On perspectivities of finite projective planes", Mathematische Zeitschrift 71 (1959), 113–123, doi:10.1007/BF01181392, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01181392
  5. T. G. Ostrom and A. Wagner, "On projective and affine planes with transitive collineation groups", Mathematische Zeitschrift 71 (1959), 186–199, doi:10.1007/BF01181398, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01181398
  6. A. Wagner, "On collineation groups of projective spaces. I", Mathematische Zeitschrift 76 (1961), 411–426, doi:10.1007/BF01210987, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01210987
  7. Helmut Karzel, "Projektive Räume mit einer kommutativen transitiven Kollineationsgruppe", Mathematische Zeitschrift 87 (1965), 74–77, doi:10.1007/BF01109933, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01109933
  8. Albrecht Beutelspacher, "Projective planes", in Handbook of Incidence Geometry (F. Buekenhout, ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1995, pp. 107–136, doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-88355-1.50006-2, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-88355-1.50006-2
  9. Koen Thas and Don B. Zagier, "Finite projective planes, Fermat curves, and Gaussian periods", Journal of the European Mathematical Society 10 (2008), no. 1, 173–190, doi:10.4171/jems/107, https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/107
  10. Chat Yin Ho, "Finite projective planes with abelian transitive collineation groups", Journal of Algebra 208 (1998), 533–550, doi:10.1006/jabr.1998.7514, https://doi.org/10.1006/jabr.1998.7514
  11. Nick Gill, "Nilpotent Singer groups", The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 13 (2006), no. 1, Article R94, arXiv:math/0606247, doi:10.37236/1120, https://doi.org/10.37236/1120
  12. Nick Gill, "Transitive projective planes", Advances in Geometry 7 (2007), no. 4, 475–528, arXiv:math/0603266, doi:10.1515/advgeom.2007.030, https://doi.org/10.1515/advgeom.2007.030
  13. Yiwei Huang and Bernhard Schmidt, "Uniqueness of some cyclic projective planes", Designs, Codes and Cryptography 50 (2009), no. 2, 253–266, doi:10.1007/s10623-008-9229-z, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-008-9229-z
  14. Nick Gill, "Transitive projective planes and insoluble groups", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 368 (2016), no. 5, 3017–3057, arXiv:0903.3302, doi:10.1090/tran/6366, https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/6366
  15. Koen Thas, "The Connes–Consani plane connection", Journal of Number Theory 167 (2016), 407–429, arXiv:1407.0607, doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2016.03.007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2016.03.007
  16. Binzhou Xia, "New necessary conditions for the existence of finite non-Desarguesian flag-transitive projective planes", European Journal of Combinatorics 110 (2023), 103687, doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2023.103687, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejc.2023.103687
  17. William M. Kantor, "Soft planes and groups", arXiv:2408.11923 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11923
  18. Alain Connes, "An essay on the Riemann Hypothesis", in Open Problems in Mathematics (J. F. Nash, Jr. and M. Th. Rassias, eds.), Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 225–257, arXiv:1509.05576, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32162-2_5, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32162-2_5