Miller, Sheffield, and Werner determined the continuum law of divide-and-color interfaces ("CLE percolations"): coloring the loops of a non-simple conformal loop ensemble CLEκ′_{\kappa'}, κ′∈(4,8)\kappa' \in (4,8), independently red/blue with probabilities pp and 1−p1-p yields interfaces that are SLEκ(ρ;κ−6−ρ)_\kappa(\rho;\kappa-6-\rho) curves with an explicit p↦ρp \mapsto \rho map, a continuum Edwards-Sokal coupling relating CLEκ′_{\kappa'} and CLE16/κ′_{16/\kappa'} through q=4cos⁡2(4π/κ′)q = 4\cos^2(4\pi/\kappa'), and arctan-type arm exponents for the fuzzy Potts (divide-and-color) models. However, every discrete consequence — including the half-plane one-arm exponent of Statement 1.1 for square-lattice Bernoulli percolation and the fuzzy Potts arm exponents derived later — is conditional on the unproven convergence of critical FKq_q random-cluster models to CLEκ′_{\kappa'}. The problem is to prove this convergence, known only for the uniform spanning tree (q→0+q \to 0^+), site percolation on the triangular lattice (q=1q=1), and the Ising case (q=2q=2): concretely, conformal invariance of critical bond percolation on the square lattice, convergence of FK3_3 to CLE24/5_{24/5}, and the general q∈(0,4)q \in (0,4) statement, together with the joint convergence of the cluster coloring that would make the arm exponents unconditional.

Background

Conformal loop ensembles (CLEs) are the scaling-limit objects for loop-type interfaces in two-dimensional critical statistical-mechanics models. A CLEκ_\kappa is a countable collection of random loops in a simply connected planar domain, characterized by conformal invariance and a Markov-type resampling property; each loop locally looks like a Schramm-Loewner evolution (SLEκ_\kappa), the conformally invariant random curve introduced by Schramm. For κ∈(8/3,4]\kappa \in (8/3,4] the CLE loops are simple and disjoint; for κ′∈(4,8)\kappa' \in (4,8) they are non-simple, i.e. they touch themselves, each other, and the domain boundary. Following the convention of the source paper, non-simple ensembles are denoted CLEκ′_{\kappa'} with κ′∈(4,8)\kappa' \in (4,8).

The discrete counterparts are the Fortuin-Kasteleyn (FK) random-cluster model with cluster weight qq at criticality on a planar lattice (a correlated percolation model generalizing Bernoulli percolation, q=1q=1) and the qq-state Potts model, which are coupled by the Edwards-Sokal construction: coloring each FKq_q cluster with an independent uniform color out of qq recovers the Potts model. If instead one colors clusters independently red/blue with probabilities rr and 1−r1-r, one obtains the fuzzy Potts model, also called the divide-and-color model (for q=1q=1 it is Bernoulli percolation clusters colored independently, the setting of Statement 1.1 below). The long-standing conjecture, going back to the origins of CLE, is that the FKq_q interface loops (free boundary conditions) converge to CLEκ′_{\kappa'} while the boundaries of Potts spin clusters converge to CLEκ_\kappa with κ=16/κ′\kappa = 16/\kappa', where qq and κ′\kappa' are related by q=4cos⁡2(4π/κ′)q = 4\cos^2(4\pi/\kappa'); as qq increases from 00 to 44, κ′\kappa' decreases from 88 to 44. The precise formulation — critical FKq_q with free boundary conditions on the square lattice Z2\mathbb{Z}^2 converging to the nested CLEκ′_{\kappa'} — goes back to Sheffield's construction of CLEs via exploration trees and is stated as Conjecture 2.8 (the "FK conformal invariance conjecture") by Kohler-Schindler and Lehmkuehler.

Miller, Sheffield, and Werner's "CLE percolations" (2017) described the continuum divide-and-color interfaces — the law of the red/blue interface when loops of a CLEκ′_{\kappa'} are colored independently — up to one missing parameter ρ\rho. Miller, Sheffield, and Werner (2021), "Non-simple conformal loop ensembles on Liouville quantum gravity and the law of CLE percolation interfaces", completed the identification: it explores a CLEκ′_{\kappa'} drawn on an independent Liouville quantum gravity (LQG) surface — the random planar geometry built from the Gaussian free field with parameter γ\gamma, here γ2=16/κ′\gamma^2 = 16/\kappa', where the boundary surfaces cut out by the exploration are quantum disks and their "forested" variants — and shows the exploration is a Poissonian growth-fragmentation process (a Markovian tree encoding how explored regions split and shrink, as also arises in peeling of random planar maps). Consequences: (i) Theorem 1.2, the coloring parameter matches the cluster weight via q(κ′)=4cos⁡2(4π/κ′)q(\kappa') = 4\cos^2(4\pi/\kappa'), giving a continuum analog of the Edwards-Sokal coupling between CLEκ′_{\kappa'} and CLE16/κ′_{16/\kappa'}; (ii) Theorem 1.3, the explicit p↦ρp \mapsto \rho map identifying the interface as an SLEκ(ρ;κ−6−ρ)_\kappa(\rho;\kappa-6-\rho) with κ=16/κ′\kappa = 16/\kappa'; (iii) arctan-type half-plane arm exponents for fuzzy Potts models, in particular Statement 1.1: if critical Bernoulli percolation is conformally invariant in the scaling limit, then in the divide-and-color model on Z×N\mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{N} (critical bond percolation clusters colored independently red with probability pp, blue with probability 1−p1-p), the probability P[ER(p)]\mathbb{P}[E_R(p)] of the event ER(p)E_R(p) that a path of red sites joins the origin to the semi-circle of radius RR around the origin satisfies P[ER(p)]=R−a(p)+o(1)\mathbb{P}[E_R(p)] = R^{-a(p)+o(1)} with

a(p)=16(2−3πarctan⁡p32−p)(1−3πarctan⁡p32−p).a(p) = \frac{1}{6}\left(2-\frac{3}{\pi}\arctan\frac{p\sqrt{3}}{2-p}\right)\left(1-\frac{3}{\pi}\arctan\frac{p\sqrt{3}}{2-p}\right).

Every discrete consequence of this program rests on one unproven hypothesis: the discrete-to-continuum convergence of critical FKq_q models to CLEκ′_{\kappa'}. This has been proved only in the integrable cases: the uniform spanning tree (q→0+q \to 0^+), site percolation on the triangular lattice (q=1q=1; Smirnov's conformal invariance and the Camia-Newman full scaling limit), and the Ising case q=2q=2 (Smirnov's holomorphic fermions, the Kemppainen-Smirnov full scaling limit as a branching SLE, and Benoist-Hongler's identification of Ising interfaces with CLE3_3). It is open for Bernoulli bond percolation on the square lattice, for FK3_3 (expected to converge to CLE24/5_{24/5}, with the coupled 3-state Potts clusters converging to CLE10/3_{10/3}), and for all non-integer q∈(0,4)q \in (0,4). The strongest progress toward the square-lattice cases is the large-scale rotational invariance of the critical random-cluster model with q∈[1,4]q \in [1,4] on the square lattice proved by Duminil-Copin, Kozlowski, Krachun, Manolescu, and Oulamara, which does not imply conformal invariance. Later works in the line — the fuzzy Potts arm exponents of Kohler-Schindler and Lehmkuehler and the bulk one-arm exponent of Liu, Sun, Yu, and Zhuang — still take exactly this convergence as an assumption.

Problem Statement

Prove the discrete-to-continuum convergence conjecture underlying the CLE-percolation program of Miller-Sheffield-Werner in the non-simple regime, and thereby make its divide-and-color exponent formulas unconditional.

(Core conjecture) Let q∈(0,4)q \in (0,4) and κ′∈(4,8)\kappa' \in (4,8) satisfy q=4cos⁡2(4π/κ′)q = 4\cos^2(4\pi/\kappa') (equivalently κ′=4π/arccos⁡(−q/2)\kappa' = 4\pi/\arccos(-\sqrt{q}/2)). In the precise formulation of the conjecture used in this line of work (Conjecture 2.8 of Kohler-Schindler and Lehmkuehler, the "FK conformal invariance conjecture", tracing back to Sheffield's exploration-trees paper): for a Jordan domain DD and discrete domains DnD_n of mesh δn→0\delta_n \to 0 on the square lattice Z2\mathbb{Z}^2 with Dn→DD_n \to D, the interface loop ensemble of the critical FKq_q model on DnD_n with free boundary conditions converges in law, as n→∞n \to \infty, to the nested CLEκ′_{\kappa'} in DD. Prove this convergence. The boundary case q=4q = 4 (κ′=4\kappa' = 4) lies outside the non-simple regime κ′∈(4,8)\kappa' \in (4,8) of the source paper and is not part of the problem as stated here (Kohler-Schindler and Lehmkuehler state their conjecture for q∈(0,4]q \in (0,4]). The conjecture is open already for: (i) q=1q=1, critical Bernoulli bond percolation on the square lattice, where the conjecture is exactly the conformal invariance of the critical scaling limit that Statement 1.1 of the source paper hypothesizes — a Cardy-type crossing formula, convergence of exploration paths to SLE6_6, and convergence of the loop ensemble to CLE6_6; (ii) q=3q=3, where FK3_3 should converge to CLE24/5_{24/5} with the coupled 3-state Potts clusters converging to CLE10/3_{10/3}; and (iii) all non-integer q∈(0,4)q \in (0,4).

(Joint coloring convergence) Prove, jointly with the loop-ensemble convergence, that coloring the FKq_q clusters independently red/blue with probabilities rr and 1−r1-r (the fuzzy Potts, or divide-and-color, model) converges to the continuum divide-and-color construction of CLE percolations — the coupled pair (CLEκ′_{\kappa'}, CLE16/κ′_{16/\kappa'}) with the Miller-Sheffield-Werner p↦ρp \mapsto \rho map — so that the fuzzy Potts arm exponents hold unconditionally for the discrete models. This includes Statement 1.1 of the source paper for q=1q=1: for critical bond percolation on Z×N\mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{N} with clusters colored independently red with probability pp and blue with probability 1−p1-p (the divide-and-color model), if ER(p)E_R(p) denotes the event that there exists a path of red sites joining the origin to the semi-circle of radius RR around the origin, then

P[ER(p)]=R−a(p)+o(1)as R→∞,a(p)=16(2−3πarctan⁡p32−p)(1−3πarctan⁡p32−p),\mathbb{P}[E_R(p)] = R^{-a(p)+o(1)} \quad \text{as } R \to \infty, \quad a(p) = \frac{1}{6}\left(2-\frac{3}{\pi}\arctan\frac{p\sqrt{3}}{2-p}\right)\left(1-\frac{3}{\pi}\arctan\frac{p\sqrt{3}}{2-p}\right),

together with the FKq_q generalizations established for q∈[1,4)q \in [1,4) (fuzzy Potts half-plane and bulk arm exponents, including the bichromatic one-arm exponent 4/1354/135 for the critical 3-state Potts model).

The complete problem is the general q∈(0,4)q \in (0,4) statement on the square lattice Z2\mathbb{Z}^2.

References

  1. Jason Miller, Scott Sheffield, Wendelin Werner (2021). Non-simple conformal loop ensembles on Liouville quantum gravity and the law of CLE percolation interfaces. Probability Theory and Related Fields 181, 669-710. DOI 10.1007/s00440-021-01070-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-021-01070-4 (preprint arXiv:2006.14605, https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.14605)
  2. Jason Miller, Scott Sheffield, Wendelin Werner (2017). CLE percolations. Forum of Mathematics, Pi 5, e4. DOI 10.1017/fmp.2017.5, https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2017.5
  3. Jason Miller, Scott Sheffield, Wendelin Werner (2022). Simple conformal loop ensembles on Liouville quantum gravity. Annals of Probability 50(3). DOI 10.1214/21-aop1550, https://doi.org/10.1214/21-aop1550 (preprint arXiv:2002.05698, https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.05698)
  4. Laurin Köhler-Schindler, Matthis Lehmkuehler (2024). The fuzzy Potts model in the plane: scaling limits and arm exponents. Probability Theory and Related Fields 191, 287-359. DOI 10.1007/s00440-024-01319-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-024-01319-8 (preprint arXiv:2209.12529, https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12529)
  5. Scott Sheffield (2006). Exploration trees and conformal loop ensembles. Preprint arXiv:math/0609167, https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0609167
  6. Haoyu Liu, Xin Sun, Pu Yu, Zijie Zhuang (2026). The bulk one-arm exponent for the CLE_kappa' percolations. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 133(1), e70176. DOI 10.1112/plms.70176, https://doi.org/10.1112/plms.70176 (preprint arXiv:2410.12724, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12724)
  7. Haoyu Liu, Baojun Wu, Zijie Zhuang (2025). Mixing rate exponent of planar Fortuin-Kasteleyn percolation. arXiv:2502.09950, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09950
  8. Hugo Duminil-Copin, Karol Kajetan Kozlowski, Dmitry Krachun, Ioan Manolescu, Mendes Oulamara (2020). Rotational invariance in critical planar lattice models. arXiv:2012.11672, https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.11672
  9. Vincent Tassion (2023). Exposé Bourbaki 1210: Rotation invariance of critical planar percolation [after Hugo Duminil-Copin, Karol Kajetan Kozlowski, Dmitry Krachun, Ioan Manolescu and Mendes Oulamara]. Astérisque 446, 481-499. DOI 10.24033/ast.1219, https://doi.org/10.24033/ast.1219
  10. Federico Camia, Charles M. Newman (2006). Two-dimensional critical percolation: the full scaling limit. Communications in Mathematical Physics 268(1), 1-38. DOI 10.1007/s00220-006-0086-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-006-0086-1
  11. Stanislav Smirnov (2010). Conformal invariance in random cluster models. I. Holomorphic fermions in the Ising model. Annals of Mathematics 172(2), 1435-1467. DOI 10.4007/annals.2010.172.1435, https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2010.172.1435 (preprint arXiv:0708.0039, https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0039)
  12. Antti Kemppainen, Stanislav Smirnov (2016, revised 2019). Conformal invariance in random cluster models. II. Full scaling limit as a branching SLE. Preprint arXiv:1609.08527, https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08527
  13. Stéphane Benoist, Clément Hongler (2019). The scaling limit of critical Ising interfaces is CLE_3. Annals of Probability 47(4), 2049-2086. DOI 10.1214/18-aop1301, https://doi.org/10.1214/18-aop1301
  14. Hugo Duminil-Copin, Marcin Lis, Wei Qian (2025). Conformal invariance of double random currents I: Identification of the limit. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 130(1), e70022. DOI 10.1112/plms.70022, https://doi.org/10.1112/plms.70022
  15. Valeria Ambrosio, Jason Miller, Yizheng Yuan (2025). Tightness of approximations to metrics on non-simple conformal loop ensemble gaskets. arXiv:2507.15589, https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15589
  16. Jason Miller, Yizheng Yuan (2025). Existence and uniqueness of the conformally covariant geodesic metric on non-simple conformal loop ensemble gaskets. arXiv:2508.10470, https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10470