Hairer and Pardoux (Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 239, 2021) proved a law of large numbers and a first-order central limit theorem for a semilinear parabolic PDE on [0,1]d[0,1]^d, d≤3d\le 3, driven by a critically scaled (amplitude ε−1\varepsilon^{-1} under parabolic rescaling), highly oscillating, stationary and possibly non-Gaussian random potential, with homogeneous Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions: after subtracting the deterministic homogenised limit u(0)u^{(0)} and, in d∈{2,3}d\in\{2,3\}, a first-order corrector u(1)u^{(1)} whose Neumann boundary condition is modified by a boundary layer, the rescaled fluctuations converge to a Gaussian process solving a linear SPDE driven by space-time white noise. The paper itself conjectures the full higher-order expansion ε−d/2(uε−∑k=0⌊d/2⌋εku(k))→v\varepsilon^{-d/2}(u_\varepsilon-\sum_{k=0}^{\lfloor d/2\rfloor}\varepsilon^k u^{(k)})\to v with recursively defined deterministic correctors, and records the obstructions: its techniques yield no moment bounds on uεu_\varepsilon (the source notes that even in d≤3d\le 3 the expansion of Euε\mathbb{E}u_\varepsilon would require additional work on this account); the boundary power-counting breaks at d=4d=4, where correction terms charging codimension-2 faces are expected; the noise assumptions (tree-based cumulant summability plus an LpL^p moment condition) are probably non-optimal; and the counterterm constants are identified only in principle via the BPHZ tree algebra.

Background

Homogenisation theory describes the large-scale behaviour of PDEs whose coefficients or potentials oscillate rapidly on a small spatial scale: when the oscillations mix sufficiently, the solution converges to that of an effective deterministic equation — a law of large numbers (LLN) — and the refined question is a central limit theorem (CLT) describing the rescaled fluctuations around that effective solution. Hairer and Pardoux (2021) studied the critical regime of this problem for semilinear parabolic equations: on [0,T]×[0,1]d[0,T]\times[0,1]^d with d≤3d\le 3 and either homogeneous Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions, consider

∂tuε=Δuε+H(uε)+G(uε) ηε,uε(0,x)=u0(x),\partial_t u_\varepsilon=\Delta u_\varepsilon+H(u_\varepsilon)+G(u_\varepsilon)\,\eta_\varepsilon,\qquad u_\varepsilon(0,x)=u_0(x),

where H,G:R→RH,G:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} are smooth nonlinearities and the random potential is a stationary, centred, possibly non-Gaussian field η\eta under parabolic rescaling with critical amplitude,

ηε(t,x)=ε−1 η(ε−2t, ε−1x).\eta_\varepsilon(t,x)=\varepsilon^{-1}\,\eta(\varepsilon^{-2}t,\,\varepsilon^{-1}x).

The field η\eta is assumed to have jointly controlled cumulants (the connected parts of moments, used to encode mixing: the cumulant of order pp decays as a power of the parabolic distance between its arguments at both small and large scales, with a tree-based summability condition) and, in d∈{2,3}d\in\{2,3\}, an LpL^p moment condition with p=(d+2)/cp=(d+2)/c on the decay exponent cc — Assumption 2.1 of the paper, satisfied for example by a mollified Poisson field. For the linear case (GG linear, H=0H=0) the LLN and CLT were obtained by Bal (2010) (Gaussian, time-independent potential) and Yu Gu and Guillaume Bal (2015) (non-Gaussian case); Bal and Jing (2016) treated semilinear equations with random potentials in a non-critical amplitude regime. The critical amplitude ε−1\varepsilon^{-1} is the same at which the related Wong–Zakai problem for stochastic PDEs was analysed by Hairer and Pardoux (2015).

The source paper proves: (i) an LLN — uε→u(0)u_\varepsilon\to u^{(0)} in probability, uniformly on [0,T]×[0,1]d[0,T]\times[0,1]^d, where u(0)u^{(0)} solves a deterministic parabolic PDE with renormalised drift Hη(u)=H(u)+cη G′(u)G(u)H_\eta(u)=H(u)+c_\eta\,G'(u)G(u), with cηc_\eta an explicit constant obtained by integrating the heat kernel against the second cumulant of η\eta (Eq. (1.4) of the source); and (ii) a CLT — in d∈{2,3}d\in\{2,3\}, after subtracting u(0)u^{(0)} and a first-order deterministic corrector u(1)u^{(1)} (solving a linear parabolic equation whose inhomogeneity is built from ∇u(0)\nabla u^{(0)} and constants obtained by integrating the heat kernel against the second and third cumulants of η\eta), one has convergence in law, in a Hölder space of low regularity,

lim⁡ε→0ε−d/2(uε−u(0)−εu(1))=v,\lim_{\varepsilon\to 0}\varepsilon^{-d/2}\big(u_\varepsilon-u^{(0)}-\varepsilon u^{(1)}\big)=v,

where vv solves a linear SPDE driven by additive space-time white noise (the generalised Gaussian field with covariance δ(t−t′)δ(x−x′)\delta(t-t')\delta(x-x')). In d=1d=1 the limit is a centred Gaussian (Ornstein–Uhlenbeck-type) process; in d=2d=2 it is non-centred unless u(1)u^{(1)} is subtracted. A striking feature is that under Neumann boundary conditions the corrector u(1)u^{(1)} obeys a non-homogeneous Neumann condition even though uεu_\varepsilon, u(0)u^{(0)} and vv all satisfy homogeneous ones — a boundary-layer effect analogous to the boundary renormalisation arising for singular stochastic PDEs (SPDEs whose noise is too irregular for classical solution theories) on domains with boundaries, as developed by Gerencsér and Hairer (2019). The proofs rely on Hairer's theory of regularity structures (a framework that lifts a singular equation to a graded algebraic structure of models and modelled distributions on which analytic operations and renormalisation can be performed) together with BPHZ-type counterterms (the systematic renormalisation scheme of Bruned, Chandra, Chevyrev and Hairer (2021) assigning to each decoration tree a renormalisation constant) adapted to the non-Gaussian cumulant structure.

The paper stops at first order. Remark 1.6 records the expectation that in any dimension a full expansion should hold with recursively defined correctors, and identifies the obstruction: the techniques give no moment bounds on the solution, so even in d≤3d\le 3 the passage to the expansion of the expectation Euε\mathbb{E}u_\varepsilon requires additional work. In the model-convergence analysis the authors moreover show that a boundary power-counting sum diverges exactly at d=4d=4, and predict that correction terms charging faces of codimension 2 (the (d−2)(d-2)-dimensional edges of the cube) must be added there.

Problem Statement

Prove, or disprove, the higher-order fluctuation expansion conjectured in Remark 1.6 (Eq. (1.11)) of Hairer–Pardoux (2021). For the semilinear random PDE

∂tuε=Δuε+H(uε)+G(uε) ηε,ηε(t,x)=ε−1η(ε−2t,ε−1x),\partial_t u_\varepsilon=\Delta u_\varepsilon+H(u_\varepsilon)+G(u_\varepsilon)\,\eta_\varepsilon,\qquad \eta_\varepsilon(t,x)=\varepsilon^{-1}\eta(\varepsilon^{-2}t,\varepsilon^{-1}x),

on [0,T]×[0,1]d[0,T]\times[0,1]^d with homogeneous Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions, with GG of class C5C^5 and HH of class C4C^4, with an initial condition u0u_0 satisfying the regularity assumptions of the source's Theorem 1.2, and with η\eta a stationary centred random field satisfying Assumption 2.1 of the source, resolve with complete proofs: prove or disprove the conjectured expansion of Remark 1.6 (Proposition 1), in full or on an identified range of dimensions that includes at least one dimension d≥4d\ge 4, and prove or refute the expectation expansion (Proposition 2) — Proposition 2 implies Proposition 1, so a proof of Proposition 2 also establishes Proposition 1 and a disproof of Proposition 1 also refutes Proposition 2:

  1. Full expansion in general dimension: in every d≥1d\ge 1 — in particular in d≥4d\ge 4, where the source's boundary power-counting breaks down — the convergence in law
lim⁡ε→0ε−d/2(uε−∑k=0⌊d/2⌋εku(k))=v\lim_{\varepsilon\to 0}\varepsilon^{-d/2}\Big(u_\varepsilon-\sum_{k=0}^{\lfloor d/2\rfloor}\varepsilon^k u^{(k)}\Big)=v

with convergence in Cα([0,T]×[0,1]d)C^\alpha([0,T]\times[0,1]^d) for every α<1−d/2\alpha<1-d/2 and every d≥1d\ge 1 (for d≤3d\le 3, as in the source's Theorem 1.2), where the deterministic correctors u(k)u^{(k)} are defined recursively by linear parabolic equations ∂tu(k)=Δu(k)+Hη′(u(0))u(k)+Ψk\partial_t u^{(k)}=\Delta u^{(k)}+H_\eta'(u^{(0)})u^{(k)}+\Psi_k with explicitly identified inhomogeneities Ψk\Psi_k (functions of the lower correctors and their derivatives) and with the correct boundary conditions, including whatever modification of the Neumann condition the boundary layers induce at each order.

  1. Expectation expansion: ε−d/2(uε−Euε)→v\varepsilon^{-d/2}(u_\varepsilon-\mathbb{E}u_\varepsilon)\to v in law and Euε=∑k=0⌊d/2⌋εku(k)+o(εd/2)\mathbb{E}u_\varepsilon=\sum_{k=0}^{\lfloor d/2\rfloor}\varepsilon^k u^{(k)}+o(\varepsilon^{d/2}) as ε→0\varepsilon\to 0.

Consistency requirement: for d≤3d\le 3 the correctors and the limit must reproduce Theorems 1.1–1.2 of the source (the k=0,1k=0,1 correctors and the limiting SPDE for vv). Remark 1.7 of the source indicates that the form of the higher corrector equations and their constants can in principle be derived from the BPHZ counterterm algebra of Bruned–Chandra–Chevyrev–Hairer, with numerical constants differing from those of that algebra because the source computes a 'centering' rather than a 'recentering' of the original equation.

Two auxiliary directions recorded in the source may be addressed within the same objective: weakening the noise Assumption 2.1 (the tree-based cumulant homogeneity and the LpL^p condition, which the authors deem probably non-optimal) while preserving the above results; and giving a systematic algebraic/combinatorial computation of all counterterm coefficients for arbitrary trees, including their boundary analogues.

References

  1. Martin Hairer and Étienne Pardoux (2021), 'Fluctuations around a homogenised semilinear random PDE', Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 239(1):151–217. DOI: 10.1007/s00205-020-01574-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-020-01574-8 (preprint arXiv:1911.02865, https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02865)
  2. Yvain Bruned, Ajay Chandra, Ilya Chevyrev, and Martin Hairer (2021), 'Renormalising SPDEs in regularity structures', Journal of the European Mathematical Society 23(3):869–947. DOI: 10.4171/jems/1025, https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1025 (preprint arXiv:1711.10239, https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10239)
  3. Máté Gerencsér and Martin Hairer (2019), 'Singular SPDEs in domains with boundaries', Probability Theory and Related Fields 173:697–758. DOI: 10.1007/s00440-018-0841-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-018-0841-1 (preprint arXiv:1702.06522, https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.06522)
  4. Máté Gerencsér and Martin Hairer (2022), 'Boundary renormalisation of SPDEs', Communications in Partial Differential Equations 47(10):2070–2123. DOI: 10.1080/03605302.2022.2109173, https://doi.org/10.1080/03605302.2022.2109173
  5. Martin Hairer and Harprit Singh (2025), 'Periodic space-time homogenisation of the ϕ24\phi^4_2 equation', Journal of Functional Analysis 288(5):110762. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2024.110762, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2024.110762 (preprint arXiv:2311.15788, https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.15788)
  6. Martin Hairer and Harprit Singh (2025), 'Homogenisation of singular SPDEs', preprint arXiv:2510.19339, https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19339
  7. Ajay Chandra, Augustin Moinat, and Hendrik Weber (2023), 'A Priori Bounds for the Φ4\Phi^4 Equation in the Full Sub-critical Regime', Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 247(3), article 48. DOI: 10.1007/s00205-023-01876-7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-023-01876-7
  8. Guillaume Bal (2010), 'Homogenization with Large Spatial Random Potential', Multiscale Modeling and Simulation 8(4):1484–1510. DOI: 10.1137/090754066, https://doi.org/10.1137/090754066
  9. Yu Gu and Guillaume Bal (2015), 'Fluctuations of parabolic equations with large random potentials', Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations 3(1):1–51. DOI: 10.1007/s40072-014-0040-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40072-014-0040-8 (preprint arXiv:1312.0238, https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.0238)
  10. Guillaume Bal and Wenjia Jing (2016), 'Fluctuations in the Homogenization of Semilinear Equations with Random Potentials', Communications in Partial Differential Equations 41(12):1839–1859. DOI: 10.1080/03605302.2016.1238482, https://doi.org/10.1080/03605302.2016.1238482 (preprint arXiv:1509.05321, https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.05321)
  11. Martin Hairer and Étienne Pardoux (2015), 'A Wong-Zakai theorem for stochastic PDEs', Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan 67(4):1551–1604. DOI: 10.2969/jmsj/06741551, https://doi.org/10.2969/jmsj/06741551 (preprint arXiv:1409.3138, https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3138)
  12. Michael Röckner and Longjie Xie (2021), 'Averaging Principle and Normal Deviations for Multiscale Stochastic Systems', Communications in Mathematical Physics 383(3):1889–1937. DOI: 10.1007/s00220-021-04069-z, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04069-z
  13. Lucio Galeati (2020), 'On the convergence of stochastic transport equations to a deterministic parabolic one', Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations 8(4):833–868. DOI: 10.1007/s40072-019-00162-6, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40072-019-00162-6
  14. Lucas Broux, Francesco Caravenna, and Lorenzo Zambotti (2024), 'Hairer's multilevel Schauder estimates without regularity structures', Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 377:6981–7035. DOI: 10.1090/tran/9245, https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/9245
  15. Ismaël Bailleul and Masato Hoshino (2021), 'Paracontrolled calculus and regularity structures II', Journal de l'École polytechnique — Mathématiques 8:1275–1328. DOI: 10.5802/jep.172, https://doi.org/10.5802/jep.172
  16. Luca Gerolla, Martin Hairer, and Xue-Mei Li (2025), 'Fluctuations of stochastic PDEs with long-range correlations', The Annals of Applied Probability 35(2). DOI: 10.1214/24-aap2140, https://doi.org/10.1214/24-aap2140 (preprint arXiv:2303.09811, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09811)