The 4-dimensional Jordan superalgebras D(t)D(t) form a one-parameter family in Kac's classification of simple finite-dimensional Jordan superalgebras. Martínez and Zelmanov classified the indecomposable finite-dimensional bimodules over D(t)D(t) for t≠−1,0,1t \neq -1, 0, 1, and Kashuba and Serganova later resolved the two degenerate simple values: for t=1t = 1 the category of unital bimodules is semisimple with simple objects Λa(V)\Lambda^a(V), and for t=−1t = -1 (≅M(1,1)(+)\cong M(1,1)^{(+)}) they gave a full block-by-block description, with some blocks of wild representation type. The remaining excluded value t=0t = 0 is different in nature: D(0)=F⋅1⊕K3D(0) = F{\cdot}1 \oplus K_3 is the unitization of the Kaplansky superalgebra K3K_3 and hence not simple, and its bimodule category is not semisimple (the regular module is a non-split extension of the trivial module by the ideal K3K_3). For t=0t = 0 only the irreducible modules are classified (Trushina, in characteristic 0 and in characteristic p≠2p \neq 2); no indecomposable-level or block-level description exists in the literature. This problem asks for a classification of the indecomposable finite-dimensional unital D(0)D(0)-bimodules over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, equivalently a block-level description of the category including the representation type of each block, together with the analogous determination for one-sided (special) D(0)D(0)-bimodules.

Background

A Jordan superalgebra is a Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-graded algebra J=J0ˉ⊕J1ˉJ = J_{\bar 0} \oplus J_{\bar 1} over a field of characteristic ≠2\neq 2 whose multiplication is supercommutative, a∘b=(−1)∣a∣∣b∣b∘aa \circ b = (-1)^{|a||b|} b \circ a for homogeneous a,ba, b, and satisfies the Jordan superidentity (the graded linearization of (a2∘b)∘a=a2∘(b∘a)(a^2 \circ b) \circ a = a^2 \circ (b \circ a)). The basic example is the symmetrization A(+)A^{(+)} of an associative superalgebra AA, with product a∘b=12(ab+(−1)∣a∣∣b∣ba)a \circ b = \frac{1}{2}(ab + (-1)^{|a||b|} ba). Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, the simple finite-dimensional Jordan superalgebras were classified by Kac and completed in later work; besides the Hermitian series Mm,n(+)M_{m,n}^{(+)}, Q(n)(+)Q(n)^{(+)}, Josp⁡(m,2n)\operatorname{Josp}(m,2n), JP(n)JP(n) and the Kantor series, the list contains the superalgebra J(V,f)J(V,f) of a nondegenerate supersymmetric bilinear form ff on a superspace VV (obtained by adjoining a unit 11 to VV: 1∘v=v1 \circ v = v and v∘w=f(v,w)⋅1v \circ w = f(v,w){\cdot}1 for v,w∈Vv, w \in V), a one-parameter family of 4-dimensional superalgebras D(t)D(t), the 3-dimensional non-unital Kaplansky superalgebra K3K_3, and the exceptional 10-dimensional K10K_{10}.

For a parameter tt, the superalgebra D(t)D(t) has even part ⟨e1,e2⟩\langle e_1, e_2\rangle and odd part ⟨x,y⟩\langle x, y\rangle, with ei2=eie_i^2 = e_i, e1∘e2=0e_1 \circ e_2 = 0, e1∘x=e2∘x=x/2e_1 \circ x = e_2 \circ x = x/2 (and similarly for yy), x∘y=−y∘x=e1+te2x \circ y = -y \circ x = e_1 + t e_2, and unit 1=e1+e21 = e_1 + e_2; it is simple exactly for t≠0t \neq 0. Two parameter values are isomorphism degenerations: D(−1)≅M(1,1)(F)(+)D(-1) \cong M(1,1)(F)^{(+)}, the symmetrized 2×22 \times 2 matrix superalgebra, and D(1)≅J(V,f)D(1) \cong J(V,f) with V=⟨e1−e2⟩0ˉ⊕⟨x,y⟩1ˉV = \langle e_1 - e_2\rangle_{\bar 0} \oplus \langle x, y\rangle_{\bar 1}. At t=0t = 0 the superalgebra is not simple: D(0)=F⋅1⊕K3D(0) = F{\cdot}1 \oplus K_3 is the unitization (unital hull) of the Kaplansky superalgebra K3=⟨e1,x,y⟩K_3 = \langle e_1, x, y\rangle (where x∘y=e1x \circ y = e_1), a 3-dimensional simple non-unital superalgebra that occurs as an ideal of D(0)D(0); D(0)D(0) is also not a superform algebra, since x∘yx \circ y has a nonzero component along e1−e2e_1 - e_2.

A Jordan bimodule over JJ is a superspace MM with left and right actions of JJ such that the split null extension J⊕MJ \oplus M (the multiplication of JJ extended by M∘M=0M \circ M = 0 and the given actions) is a Jordan superalgebra. When JJ is unital, every Jordan bimodule decomposes into a direct sum of a unital bimodule (the identity acts as the identity operator) and a one-sided (or special) bimodule, characterized by {J,M,J}=0\{J, M, J\} = 0 where {a,m,b}=(am)b+a(mb)−(−1)∣a∣∣m∣m(a∘b)\{a, m, b\} = (a m) b + a (m b) - (-1)^{|a||m|} m (a \circ b) is the Jordan triple product; on a one-sided bimodule the identity acts as 12id⁡\frac{1}{2}\operatorname{id} (the degenerate alternative, the identity acting as 00, forces the whole action of JJ to be trivial). For an even idempotent e∈Je \in J, every bimodule carries a Peirce decomposition M=M0(e)⊕M1/2(e)⊕M1(e)M = M_0(e) \oplus M_{1/2}(e) \oplus M_1(e) according to the eigenvalues 0,12,10, \frac{1}{2}, 1 of the action of ee. Two Lie-theoretic tools underlie the known classifications: the Tits–Kantor–Koecher (TKK) construction, which assigns to JJ a short Z\mathbb{Z}-graded Lie superalgebra Lie⁡(J)\operatorname{Lie}(J) (grading concentrated in degrees −1,0,1-1, 0, 1) and relates unital Jordan bimodules to short-graded modules over Lie⁡(J)\operatorname{Lie}(J) and its universal central extension, and the universal associative enveloping algebra, which realizes one-sided bimodules as modules over an associative algebra. By these methods, Martínez and Zelmanov classified the indecomposable finite-dimensional bimodules over D(t)D(t) for all t≠−1,0,1t \neq -1, 0, 1, and the categories of unital and one-sided bimodules have since been described at the block level for the degenerate simple values t=±1t = \pm 1 (see Kashuba–Serganova [10]); the value t=0t = 0 is the one not covered by any of these works.

Problem Statement

Let FF be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, and let D(0)D(0) be the Jordan superalgebra at the parameter value t=0t = 0 of the family D(t)D(t): even part ⟨e1,e2⟩\langle e_1, e_2 \rangle, odd part ⟨x,y⟩\langle x, y \rangle, ei∘ei=eie_i \circ e_i = e_i, e1∘e2=0e_1 \circ e_2 = 0, ei∘x=ei∘y=x/2e_i \circ x = e_i \circ y = x/2 (respectively y/2y/2), x∘y=−y∘x=e1x \circ y = -y \circ x = e_1, unit 1=e1+e21 = e_1 + e_2; equivalently D(0)=F⋅1⊕K3D(0) = F{\cdot}1 \oplus K_3 is the unitization of the Kaplansky superalgebra K3=⟨e1,x,y⟩K_3 = \langle e_1, x, y \rangle. Let D(0)-mod1D(0)\text{-mod}_1 denote the category of finite-dimensional unital Jordan bimodules over D(0)D(0) (superspaces MM on which 11 acts as the identity and such that the split null extension D(0)⊕MD(0) \oplus M, with M∘M=0M \circ M = 0, is a Jordan superalgebra), and D(0)-mod1/2D(0)\text{-mod}_{1/2} the category of finite-dimensional one-sided (special) bimodules (those on which the identity acts as 12id⁡\frac{1}{2}\operatorname{id} and the Jordan triple product {a,m,b}=(am)b+a(mb)−(−1)∣a∣∣m∣m(a∘b)\{a, m, b\} = (a m) b + a (m b) - (-1)^{|a||m|} m (a \circ b) vanishes identically for homogeneous a,b∈D(0)a, b \in D(0) and m∈Mm \in M). Determine the structure of these categories, as follows.

  1. Determine the block structure of D(0)-mod1D(0)\text{-mod}_1: for each block (connected component under nontrivial extensions), decide whether it is equivalent to the category of finite-dimensional modules over an explicitly given associative algebra, and determine the representation type of each block (finite: only finitely many indecomposable objects up to isomorphism; tame: indecomposables of each dimension occur in finitely many one-parameter families; wild: the classification problem contains the classification of finite-dimensional modules over a free associative algebra on two generators, so no explicit list of all indecomposables can exist).

  2. Classify the indecomposable finite-dimensional unital D(0)D(0)-bimodules explicitly and completely; if some block has wild representation type, prove this and give the block-level description of item 1 as the definitive answer. A classification of D(0)-mod1D(0)\text{-mod}_1 recovers the irreducible unital D(0)D(0)-modules classified by Trushina and the regular module Reg⁡(D(0))\operatorname{Reg}(D(0)) (the bimodule defined on D(0)D(0) itself by its own multiplication) as a non-split extension of the trivial module (the one-dimensional module on which 11 acts as the identity and K3K_3 as 00) by the ideal K3K_3.

  3. Determine whether nonzero finite-dimensional one-sided D(0)D(0)-bimodules exist; if so, classify their indecomposables explicitly and completely or describe the blocks of D(0)-mod1/2D(0)\text{-mod}_{1/2} in the same sense as item 1.

The characteristic-0 case is the target; modular variants are not required.

References

  1. V. G. Kac, Classification of simple Z-graded Lie superalgebras and simple Jordan superalgebras, Communications in Algebra 5 (1977), no. 13, 1375–1400. DOI: 10.1080/00927877708822224, URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00927877708822224
  2. I. Kaplansky, Superalgebras, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 86 (1980), no. 1, 93–98. DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1980.86.93, URL: https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1980.86.93
  3. C. Martínez and E. Zelmanov, Unital bimodules over the simple Jordan superalgebra D(t)D(t), Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 358 (2006), no. 8, 3637–3649. DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9947-05-03821-3, URL: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-05-03821-3
  4. M. Trushina, Irreducible representations of a certain Jordan superalgebra, Journal of Algebra and Its Applications 4 (2005), no. 1, 1–14. DOI: 10.1142/S0219498805001010, URL: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498805001010
  5. M. Trushina, Modular representations of the Jordan superalgebras D(t)D(t) and K3K_3, Journal of Algebra 320 (2008), no. 4, 1327–1343. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.04.020, URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.04.020
  6. C. Martínez and E. Zelmanov, Representation theory of Jordan superalgebras I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 362 (2010), no. 2, 815–846. DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9947-09-04883-1, URL: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-09-04883-1
  7. Yu. Popov, Representations of simple noncommutative Jordan superalgebras I, Journal of Algebra 544 (2020), 329–390. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2019.09.018, URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.02160
  8. I. Kashuba and V. Serganova, On the Tits–Kantor–Koecher construction of unital Jordan bimodules, Journal of Algebra 481 (2017), 420–463. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2017.03.002, URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.07407
  9. C. Martínez and I. Shestakov, Jordan bimodules over the superalgebra M1∣1M_{1|1}, Glasgow Mathematical Journal 62 (2020), S6–S13. DOI: 10.1017/S0017089519000247, URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017089519000247
  10. I. Kashuba and V. Serganova, Representations of simple Jordan superalgebras, Advances in Mathematics 370 (2020), 107218. DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2020.107218, URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.12079
  11. F. A. Gómez González and J. A. Ramírez Bermúdez, Second cohomology group of the finite-dimensional simple Jordan superalgebra DtD_t, t≠0t \neq 0, Journal of Algebra and Its Applications 21 (2022), no. 5, 2250091. DOI: 10.1142/S0219498822500918, URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.10408
  12. J. A. Ramírez-Bermúdez and F. A. Gómez-González, Cohomologies of Some Four-Dimensional Simple Jordan Superalgebras, Algebra and Logic 63 (2025), no. 6, 458–474. DOI: 10.1007/s10469-025-09806-0, URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10469-025-09806-0