Brooks-Le Masson-Lindenstrauss (IMRN 2016) proved quantum ergodicity for joint eigenfunctions of the spherical Laplacian and averaging operators over rotations generating a free group, and stated as the open problem of that setting the conjecture of Böcherer-Sarnak-Schulze-Pillot (Comm. Math. Phys. 2003): the joint eigenfunctions of the Laplacian and the Hecke averaging operators attached to a maximal order in a definite quaternion division algebra over Q with nonzero Hecke eigenvalues (the canonical arithmetic basis of the sphere — the O×\mathcal{O}^{\times}-invariant eigenfunctions, corresponding under Jacquet-Langlands to holomorphic newforms of growing weight) satisfy quantum unique ergodicity, i.e. the measures ∣ψℓ(x)∣2dσ(x)|\psi_\ell(x)|^2 d\sigma(x) converge weak-* to the uniform measure for every sequence of Hecke eigenfunctions, not merely along density-one subsequences. The conjecture reduces (Böcherer-Sarnak-Schulze-Pillot) to subconvex bounds for degree-8 triple-product L-functions in the weight aspect; the arithmetic QUE problem on hyperbolic surfaces is settled by dynamical and Fourier-based methods (Lindenstrauss; Soundararajan; Holowinsky-Soundararajan) that have no analogue on the sphere, whose geodesic flow is completely degenerate. The most recent progress (Sanchez Garza, 2026) proves quantitative QUE and shrinking-scale equidistribution conditionally on the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis; no unconditional result is known and the conjecture remains open.

Background

Let MM be a compact Riemannian manifold and Δ\Delta its Laplace-Beltrami operator. Quantum ergodicity (QE) is the statement that for an orthonormal basis of Δ\Delta-eigenfunctions, the probability measures ∣ψj∣2dVol|\psi_j|^2 d\mathrm{Vol} equidistribute along a subsequence of density one; quantum unique ergodicity (QUE) is the far stronger statement that they equidistribute along every sequence of eigenfunctions. A classical theorem of Snirel'man, Zelditch, and Colin de Verdière (see Zelditch 1987) states that QE holds for every orthonormal basis when the geodesic flow is ergodic; on negatively curved manifolds QUE is conjectured (Rudnick-Sarnak 1994) and open in general.

The sphere S2S^2 is the opposite extreme. The geodesic flow is completely degenerate (all geodesics are closed), and the Laplacian has large degeneracies: the eigenspace Hℓ\mathcal{H}_\ell of spherical harmonics of degree ℓ\ell (restrictions to S2S^2 of homogeneous harmonic polynomials of degree ℓ\ell on R3\mathbb{R}^3) has dimension 2ℓ+12\ell+1. Zelditch (1992) showed that the standard basis of spherical harmonics fails QE, while a random orthonormal basis is QE with probability one, and in fact QUE with probability one (VanderKam 1997). Which explicitly describable bases equidistribute is therefore a genuine question.

The arithmetic candidate is given by Hecke operators. Identify S2S^2 with the trace-zero, norm-one elements of the real Hamilton quaternions; each quaternion γ\gamma of positive reduced norm Nrd(γ)\mathrm{Nrd}(\gamma) (the quaternion analogue of the determinant) acts on S2S^2 by conjugation, hence by a rotation. Averaging operators built from such rotations were introduced by Lubotzky-Phillips-Sarnak (1986) to study the distribution of points on the sphere. Fix a maximal order O\mathcal{O} (a lattice closed under multiplication) in the rational Hamilton quaternion division algebra BB (the algebra that remains a division algebra after tensoring with Q2\mathbb{Q}_2 and with R\mathbb{R}; more generally one may take any definite, i.e. ramified-at-infinity, quaternion division algebra over Q\mathbb{Q} of class number one — meaning that it has a single class of left ideals — of discriminant in {2,3,5,7,13}\{2,3,5,7,13\}), for instance the Hurwitz order. For each positive integer nn the Hecke operator TnT_n averages a function over the finitely many rotations coming from elements γ∈O\gamma \in \mathcal{O} with Nrd(γ)=n\mathrm{Nrd}(\gamma) = n. The TnT_n are self-adjoint, commute with each other and with Δ\Delta, and all map into the O×\mathcal{O}^{\times}-invariant subspace, so each Hℓ\mathcal{H}_\ell splits into joint eigenspaces; the Hecke eigenfunctions are the O×\mathcal{O}^{\times}-invariant joint eigenfunctions, and by the theory of theta series (the classical construction packaging a harmonic polynomial on a quaternion order into a modular form) and the Jacquet-Langlands correspondence (a dictionary between automorphic forms on the quaternion algebra and on GL2\mathrm{GL}_2) their joint eigenspaces are one-dimensional and correspond to holomorphic newforms (Hecke-eigen cusp forms on Γ0(N)\Gamma_0(N) not induced from lower level) of weight 2ℓ+22\ell+2 and level equal to the discriminant.

Böcherer-Sarnak-Schulze-Pillot (2003) conjectured mass equidistribution (QUE) for this arithmetic basis, and separately conjectured that its moments become Gaussian (the random-wave prediction). The analytic heart is a formula of Watson-Ichino type (after Watson's unpublished thesis and Ichino's published trilinear-form identity) relating triple correlations ∫S2φ ψ ψ′ dσ\int_{S^2} \varphi\, \psi\, \psi' \, d\sigma of Hecke eigenfunctions to central values of degree-8 L-functions (the Rankin-Selberg-type L-function attached to a triple of automorphic representations, GL2×GL2×GL2\mathrm{GL}_2 \times \mathrm{GL}_2 \times \mathrm{GL}_2). Proving QUE reduces to bounding these central values beyond the convexity bound (the elementary estimate any L-function satisfies via its functional equation and Cauchy-Schwarz) in the archimedean weight aspect as ℓ→∞\ell \to \infty, uniformly in the test function; this required subconvexity is not known. Böcherer-Sarnak-Schulze-Pillot proved the third-moment case of the Gaussian conjecture unconditionally and showed that QUE follows from such subconvex estimates, hence from GRH.

On hyperbolic arithmetic surfaces the analogous arithmetic QUE problem is settled: Lindenstrauss (2006) classified the invariant measures of the microlocal lift (the phase-space lift of the eigenfunction measures to the unit cotangent bundle) with positive entropy, and Soundararajan (2010) excluded escape of mass; for holomorphic forms, mass equidistribution was proved by Holowinsky-Soundararajan (2010) via Fourier-expansion-based sieve and weak-subconvexity arguments. None of these tools is available for the sphere: there is no hyperbolic dynamics to classify and no Fourier expansion on the quaternionic side.

The source paper, Brooks-Le Masson-Lindenstrauss (2016), proves QE (density-one subsequences only) for joint eigenfunctions of Δ\Delta and an averaging operator over a finite set of rotations generating a free subgroup of SO(3)\mathrm{SO}(3) (continuous test functions), a quantitative O(1/log⁡ℓ)O(1/\log \ell) rate when the rotation entries are algebraic numbers (using the Bourgain-Gamburd spectral gap for finitely generated subgroups of SU(2)\mathrm{SU}(2)), and a new proof of quantum ergodicity for large regular graphs. These are free-group toy models that exclude the arithmetic Hecke operators; the paper's introduction states explicitly that the Böcherer-Sarnak-Schulze-Pillot QUE conjecture, the arithmetic problem, remains open. No unconditional result is known; the newest work on the conjecture (Sanchez Garza, 2026) is conditional on the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis.

Problem Statement

Prove or refute Conjecture 1 of Böcherer-Sarnak-Schulze-Pillot (2003), the open problem restated by Brooks-Le Masson-Lindenstrauss (2016) in connection with their quantum ergodicity theorem for averaging operators on the sphere.

Let BB be a definite quaternion division algebra over Q\mathbb{Q} of class number one (that is, with a single class of left ideals for its maximal orders), of discriminant N∈{2,3,5,7,13}N \in \{2,3,5,7,13\}; the target is the primary instance, the Hamilton quaternion algebra with the Hurwitz order O\mathcal{O} (discriminant N=2N = 2), and it suffices to settle the conjecture for this instance; the remaining discriminants are not required. Identify S2S^2 with the trace-zero, reduced-norm-one elements of B⊗RB \otimes \mathbb{R} (the reduced norm Nrd\mathrm{Nrd} is the quaternion analogue of the determinant), so that each γ∈O\gamma \in \mathcal{O} acts on S2S^2 by the rotation x↦γxγ−1x \mapsto \gamma x \gamma^{-1}. For each positive integer nn define the Hecke averaging operator

Tnf(x)  =  1∣O×∣∑γ∈O, Nrd(γ)=nf(γ⋅x),T_n f(x) \;=\; \frac{1}{|\mathcal{O}^{\times}|} \sum_{\gamma \in \mathcal{O},\ \mathrm{Nrd}(\gamma)=n} f(\gamma \cdot x),

where O×\mathcal{O}^{\times} is the finite unit group of O\mathcal{O} (of order 2424 for the Hurwitz order); for the Hamilton algebra T2nT_{2n} acts as T1T_1 or T2T_2 depending on the 2-adic valuation of nn, so the nontrivial Hecke indices are the odd nn (Böcherer-Sarnak-Schulze-Pillot define TnT_n for odd nn only; the normalization above is the one used by Sanchez Garza). The TnT_n are self-adjoint and commute with each other and with the spherical Laplacian Δ\Delta.

Let Hℓ\mathcal{H}_\ell be the space of spherical harmonics of degree ℓ\ell (restrictions to S2S^2 of homogeneous harmonic polynomials of degree ℓ\ell on R3\mathbb{R}^3), of dimension 2ℓ+12\ell+1, with Δ\Delta-eigenvalue ℓ(ℓ+1)\ell(\ell+1) in the standard convention. Every TnT_n maps Hℓ\mathcal{H}_\ell into the O×\mathcal{O}^{\times}-invariant subspace HℓO×\mathcal{H}_\ell^{\mathcal{O}^{\times}}, because right multiplication by a unit permutes {γ∈O:Nrd(γ)=n}\{\gamma \in \mathcal{O} : \mathrm{Nrd}(\gamma) = n\}; in particular T1T_1 is the projection onto HℓO×\mathcal{H}_\ell^{\mathcal{O}^{\times}}. The Hecke eigenfunctions are the joint eigenfunctions of Δ\Delta and all the TnT_n that lie in HℓO×\mathcal{H}_\ell^{\mathcal{O}^{\times}}, equivalently those with nonzero Hecke eigenvalues (a joint eigenspace with some eigenvalue λn≠0\lambda_n \neq 0 is mapped by TnT_n into the invariant subspace), equivalently those with T1ψ=ψT_1 \psi = \psi. This restriction is the sources' own: Böcherer-Sarnak-Schulze-Pillot impose it from the outset (their theta-series construction is nonzero only for eigenforms invariant under the unit group), and Sanchez Garza (2026) likewise defines the Hecke eigenfunctions on the invariant space L2(O×\S2)L^2(\mathcal{O}^{\times} \backslash S^2). It is also essential: the orthogonal complement of HℓO×\mathcal{H}_\ell^{\mathcal{O}^{\times}} in Hℓ\mathcal{H}_\ell is annihilated by every TnT_n (it is the joint eigenspace with all eigenvalues zero), so its elements are joint eigenfunctions only in the trivial all-zero sense; they carry no arithmetic, and they include the standard non-equidistributing harmonics (Zelditch 1992). By the Jacquet-Langlands correspondence (a dictionary between automorphic forms on the quaternion algebra and on GL2\mathrm{GL}_2) the nontrivial joint eigenspaces are one-dimensional and correspond to holomorphic newforms (Hecke-eigen cusp forms on Γ0(N)\Gamma_0(N) not induced from lower level) of weight 2ℓ+22\ell+2 and level NN.

Conjecture (QUE for the arithmetic basis of the sphere). For every sequence of L2L^2-normalized Hecke eigenfunctions ψℓ∈HℓO×\psi_\ell \in \mathcal{H}_\ell^{\mathcal{O}^{\times}} with ℓ→∞\ell \to \infty, the probability measures ∣ψℓ(x)∣2 dσ(x)|\psi_\ell(x)|^2\,d\sigma(x) converge weak-* to the normalized rotation-invariant measure; equivalently, for every continuous a:S2→Ca : S^2 \to \mathbb{C},

∫S2a(x) ∣ψℓ(x)∣2 dσ(x)  ⟶  14π∫S2a dσ(ℓ→∞).\int_{S^2} a(x)\,|\psi_\ell(x)|^2\,d\sigma(x) \;\longrightarrow\; \frac{1}{4\pi}\int_{S^2} a\,d\sigma \qquad (\ell \to \infty).

(In the normalization of Böcherer-Sarnak-Schulze-Pillot, who write dvdv for the rotation-invariant measure of total mass 2π2\pi on S2S^2 and integrate against continuous functions: μψν=∣ψν∣2 dv→dv/2π\mu_{\psi_\nu} = |\psi_\nu|^2\,dv \to dv/2\pi.)

The conjecture is known to follow from subconvex bounds for the degree-8 triple-product L-functions attached to triples of the corresponding newforms, and hence from GRH or the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis; quantitative rates and shrinking-scale versions under GLH are known (Sanchez Garza 2026).

References

  1. Shimon Brooks, Etienne Le Masson, Elon Lindenstrauss. Quantum Ergodicity and Averaging Operators on the Sphere. International Mathematics Research Notices 2016(19):6034-6064 (2016; published online 2015). DOI 10.1093/imrn/rnv337; arXiv:1505.03887; https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.03887
  2. Siegfried Böcherer, Peter Sarnak, Rainer Schulze-Pillot. Arithmetic and Equidistribution of Measures on the Sphere. Communications in Mathematical Physics 242(1-2):67-80 (2003). DOI 10.1007/s00220-003-0922-5; arXiv:math/0212100; https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0212100
  3. Maximiliano Sanchez Garza. Equidistribution in shrinking sets for arithmetic spherical harmonics. Preprint (2026). arXiv:2603.00790; https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00790
  4. Michael Magee. Arithmetic, Zeros, and Nodal Domains on the Sphere. Communications in Mathematical Physics 338(3):919-951 (2015). DOI 10.1007/s00220-015-2391-z; arXiv:1310.7977; https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.7977
  5. Shimon Brooks, Etienne Le Masson. LpL^p Norms of Eigenfunctions on Regular Graphs and on the Sphere. International Mathematics Research Notices 2020(11):3201-3228 (2020; published online 2018). DOI 10.1093/imrn/rny117; arXiv:1710.10922; https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10922
  6. Nalini Anantharaman, Etienne Le Masson. Quantum ergodicity on large regular graphs. Duke Mathematical Journal 164(4):723-765 (2015). DOI 10.1215/00127094-2881592; arXiv:1304.4343; https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.4343
  7. Nalini Anantharaman, Mostafa Sabri. Recent results of quantum ergodicity on graphs and further investigation. Annales de la Faculte des Sciences de Toulouse Mathematiques 28(3):559-592 (2019). DOI 10.5802/afst.1609; arXiv:1711.07666; https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.07666
  8. Jean Bourgain, Alex Gamburd. On the spectral gap for finitely-generated subgroups of SU(2). Inventiones mathematicae 171(1):83-121 (2008). DOI 10.1007/s00222-007-0072-z; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-007-0072-z
  9. Steven Zelditch. Quantum ergodicity on the sphere. Communications in Mathematical Physics 146(1):61-71 (1992). DOI 10.1007/BF02099207; https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099207
  10. A. Lubotzky, R. Phillips, P. Sarnak. Hecke operators and distributing points on the sphere I. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 39(S1):S149-S186 (1986). DOI 10.1002/cpa.3160390710; https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160390710
  11. Elon Lindenstrauss. Invariant measures and arithmetic quantum unique ergodicity. Annals of Mathematics (2) 163(1):165-219 (2006). DOI 10.4007/annals.2006.163.165; https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2006.163.165
  12. Kannan Soundararajan. Quantum unique ergodicity for SL2(Z)\H\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})\backslash\mathbb{H}. Annals of Mathematics (2) 172(2):1529-1538 (2010). DOI 10.4007/annals.2010.172.1529; https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2010.172.1529
  13. Roman Holowinsky, Kannan Soundararajan. Mass equidistribution for Hecke eigenforms. Annals of Mathematics (2) 172(2):1517-1528 (2010). DOI 10.4007/annals.2010.172.1517; https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2010.172.1517
  14. Paul D. Nelson. Quadratic Hecke sums and mass equidistribution. International Mathematics Research Notices 2022(17):13659-13701 (2022; published online 2021). DOI 10.1093/imrn/rnab093; arXiv:2001.08704; https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08704
  15. Peter Humphries, Jesse Thorner. New Variants of Arithmetic Quantum Ergodicity. Communications in Mathematical Physics 406(3), Article 59 (2025). DOI 10.1007/s00220-024-05203-3; arXiv:2403.14591; https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14591
  16. Roland Bauerschmidt, Jiaoyang Huang, Horng-Tzer Yau. Local Kesten-McKay Law for Random Regular Graphs. Communications in Mathematical Physics 369(2):523-636 (2019). DOI 10.1007/s00220-019-03345-3; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03345-3
  17. Zeév Rudnick, Peter Sarnak. The behaviour of eigenstates of arithmetic hyperbolic manifolds. Communications in Mathematical Physics 161(1):195-213 (1994). DOI 10.1007/BF02099418; https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099418
  18. Steven Zelditch. Uniform distribution of eigenfunctions on compact hyperbolic surfaces. Duke Mathematical Journal 55(4):919-941 (1987). DOI 10.1215/s0012-7094-87-05546-3; https://doi.org/10.1215/s0012-7094-87-05546-3
  19. Jeffrey VanderKam. L∞L^\infty norms and quantum ergodicity on the sphere. International Mathematics Research Notices 1997(7):329-347 (1997). DOI 10.1155/S1073792897000238; https://doi.org/10.1155/S1073792897000238
  20. Atsushi Ichino. Trilinear forms and the central values of triple product L-functions. Duke Mathematical Journal 145(2):281-307 (2008). DOI 10.1215/00127094-2008-052; https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-2008-052
  21. Peter Humphries. Quantitative Equidistribution on Hyperbolic Surfaces and Arithmetic Applications. Preprint (2025). arXiv:2512.15664; https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15664
  22. Peter Humphries, Liyang Yang. Rankin-Selberg Subconvexity via Spectral Reciprocity. Preprint (2026). arXiv:2606.11451; https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11451