The SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R}) action on a stratum of the moduli space of abelian or quadratic differentials on a Riemann surface, quotiented by the rotation group SO(2,R)SO(2,\mathbb{R}), is foliated by copies of the hyperbolic plane; gluing the hyperbolic Laplacians of these leaves defines a foliated Laplacian Δμ\Delta_\mu on L2L^2 of any invariant probability measure μ\mu. Avila and Gouëzel (Annals of Mathematics, 2013) proved that for every algebraic invariant measure the essential spectrum of Δμ\Delta_\mu is contained in [1/4,∞)[1/4,\infty), so that for each δ>0\delta>0 only finitely many eigenvalues lie in (0,1/4−δ)(0,1/4-\delta) — but they left the fine structure of the small-eigenvalue region open. This problem records the surviving open cluster. (Q1) Do Masur–Veech measures on strata of genus ≥2\ge 2 have any eigenvalue in (0,1/4)(0,1/4) at all? Yoccoz conjectured that they do not — the analogue for moduli space of Selberg's eigenvalue conjecture — and this is verified only in genus one. (Q2) Can the eigenvalues of an algebraic measure in (0,1/4)(0,1/4) accumulate at 1/41/4 from below, or is that set finite? (Q3) Does a fixed moduli space admit a spectral gap uniform over all algebraic measures it supports (known to fail when the genus is allowed to grow, by explicit Teichmüller curves with arbitrarily small eigenvalues)? (Q4) Does the Ruelle zeta function of the Teichmüller geodesic flow, restricted to the support of an algebraic measure, admit a meromorphic extension, and do the corresponding closed-geodesic asymptotics carry correction terms governed by the small eigenvalues?

Background

Flat surfaces and the Teichmüller flow. A translation surface is a Riemann surface equipped with a holomorphic 11-form ω\omega; away from the zeros of ω\omega the coordinate changes are translations, so the surface carries a flat metric with cone-type singularities at the zeros. More generally a quadratic differential defines a half-translation surface, where coordinate changes may also be half-turns. The moduli space of such surfaces decomposes into strata indexed by the orders of the zeros, and each connected stratum component H\mathcal{H} carries a canonical finite Lebesgue-class measure, ergodic for the natural SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R}) action and known as the Masur–Veech measure νMV\nu_{\mathrm{MV}}. Applying a matrix of SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R}) to the translation charts of a surface defines an action on the stratum; the diagonal subgroup gt=diag(et,e−t)g_t=\mathrm{diag}(e^t,e^{-t}) is the Teichmüller geodesic flow, which renormalizes the straight-line flow on flat surfaces (the flow trajectory records the changing scale at which a straight-line trajectory on the surface is observed), and SO(2,R)SO(2,\mathbb{R}) is the rotation subgroup. For the stratum of unit-area flat tori the space is SL(2,R)/SL(2,Z)SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SL(2,\mathbb{Z}), the unit tangent bundle of the modular surface, where the classical theory of automorphic forms (spectral analysis of the Laplacian on quotients of a Lie group by a lattice) applies; in genus ≥2\ge 2 the strata are not homogeneous spaces, and how far homogeneous behavior persists is a central question of the field.

The foliated Laplacian and the 1/41/4 barrier. Quotienting a stratum by SO(2,R)SO(2,\mathbb{R}) collapses each SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R})-orbit to a copy of the hyperbolic plane or a hyperbolic orbifold quotient. For an invariant probability measure μ\mu, the foliated Laplacian Δμ\Delta_\mu is the unbounded self-adjoint operator on the SO(2,R)SO(2,\mathbb{R})-invariant part of L2(μ)L^2(\mu) obtained by letting the hyperbolic Laplacian act leaf by leaf on these copies. For the modular surface this is the classical Laplacian, whose spectrum consists of a discrete set of eigenvalues below 1/41/4 and continuous spectrum [1/4,∞)[1/4,\infty); the threshold 1/41/4 is the bottom of the spectrum of the Laplacian on the hyperbolic plane itself. The meaning of the threshold is representation-theoretic: an eigenvalue λ∈(0,1/4)\lambda\in(0,1/4) of Δμ\Delta_\mu corresponds to a complementary-series representation Compu\mathrm{Comp}_u, with parameter u=1−4λu=\sqrt{1-4\lambda}, occurring in the decomposition of the regular representation of SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R}) on L2(μ)L^2(\mu), and the matrix coefficients of Compu\mathrm{Comp}_u decay only like e−(1−u)te^{-(1-u)t} (the remaining irreducible representations, the tempered or principal series, have coefficients decaying at the faster rate e−te^{-t}, up to subexponential factors). Small eigenvalues are therefore precisely the obstruction to fast mixing: a consequence of the main theorem of Avila and Gouëzel is that, for SO(2,R)SO(2,\mathbb{R})-finite observables, correlations under gtg_t decompose, for every 0<δ<10<\delta<1, as a finite sum of exponentials e−aite^{-a_i t} with ai=1−1−4λia_i=1-\sqrt{1-4\lambda_i} over the eigenvalues λi\lambda_i of Δμ\Delta_\mu in [0,(1−δ2)/4][0,(1-\delta^2)/4], up to an error o(e−(1−δ)t)o(e^{-(1-\delta)t}); thus λ\lambda close to 00 means nearly no decay, while λ\lambda approaching 1/41/4 gives the optimal rate e−te^{-t}. A spectral gap — absence of spectrum of Δμ\Delta_\mu on an interval (0,ε)(0,\varepsilon) — is equivalent to exponential mixing at a rate proportional to ε\varepsilon. Selberg proved that every finite-volume hyperbolic surface has only finitely many eigenvalues in (0,1/4)(0,1/4) and conjectured that congruence covers of the modular surface have none at all; it is classical that SL(2,R)/SL(2,Z)SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SL(2,\mathbb{Z}) itself has none. This is the arithmetic prototype for the present questions. The obstruction is real in general ergodic situations: Kelmer and Sarnak constructed examples, for lattices Γ\Gamma in G=SL(2,R)×SU(2)G=SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SU(2), where the foliated Laplacian on SO(2,R)\G/ΓSO(2,\mathbb{R})\backslash G/\Gamma has an accumulation point in (0,1/4)(0,1/4) — and whether a spectral gap always exists in that setting remains open.

Algebraic measures and the finiteness theorem. Strata also carry many invariant measures other than Masur–Veech measures, for instance the Liouville measures (normalized volume measures) on closed SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R})-orbits: a Teichmüller curve is such a closed orbit — equivalently, the orbit of a surface whose group of affine automorphisms (its Veech group) is a lattice in SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R}), whose image in the stratum is an algebraic curve; the simplest examples arise from square-tiled surfaces, that is, covers of a standard flat torus branched over a single point. The classification theorem of Eskin and Mirzakhani shows that every ergodic SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R})-invariant probability measure on a stratum is algebraic (in the terminology of Avila and Gouëzel: admissible): it is supported on an affine invariant submanifold — a subset which, in period coordinates (coordinates recording the integrals of the 11-form over relative homology classes), is locally defined by real-linear equations — and has Lebesgue-class conditional measures along orbit foliations. Building on earlier spectral-gap results for Masur–Veech measures by Avila–Gouëzel–Yoccoz and by Avila–Resende, and combining compact transfer operators (linear operators that encode one time-step of the dynamics on a space of functions, and whose compactness forces every non-zero spectral value to be an isolated eigenvalue of finite multiplicity) on anisotropic Banach spaces (spaces of distributions adapted to the hyperbolic directions of the flow) with a representation-theoretic measure-rigidity step, Avila and Gouëzel proved: for every algebraic invariant probability measure μ\mu in a moduli space of quadratic differentials and every δ>0\delta>0, the spectrum of Δμ\Delta_\mu in [0,1/4−δ][0,1/4-\delta] consists of finitely many eigenvalues of finite multiplicity; equivalently, the essential spectrum (the part of the spectrum stable under compact perturbations) is contained in [1/4,∞)[1/4,\infty). The theorem is sharp in its formulation but loses the fixed fraction δ\delta of the window (0,1/4)(0,1/4): by construction it says nothing on the full interval, nor at the endpoint.

What is known to exist, and what the paper left open. Some algebraic measures do have small eigenvalues: Ellenberg and McReynolds showed that for any finite-index subgroup Γ\Gamma of the congruence subgroup Γ(2)\Gamma(2) containing {±1}\{\pm 1\}, the curve SL(2,R)/ΓSL(2,\mathbb{R})/\Gamma is realized as a Teichmüller curve, so quotients of the hyperbolic plane with complementary series sit inside moduli space; Matheus and Weitze-Schmithüsen constructed explicit square-tiled examples. Hence no spectral gap is uniform over all algebraic measures in all moduli spaces. Avila and Gouëzel explicitly record the remaining questions: whether Masur–Veech measures have any eigenvalue in (0,1/4)(0,1/4) at all (they write that it is tempting to conjecture that there is none, but refrain, for lack of evidence in either direction; Yoccoz had made precisely this conjecture in private, and it appeared in print later); whether the eigenvalues in (0,1/4)(0,1/4) can accumulate at 1/41/4; whether there is a uniform spectral gap in each fixed moduli space; and they state the expectation that their techniques should give the meromorphic extension of the Ruelle zeta function ζRuelle(z)=∏τ(1−e−z∣τ∣)\zeta_{\mathrm{Ruelle}}(z)=\prod_\tau(1-e^{-z|\tau|}) of the Teichmüller flow — the product over prime closed orbits τ\tau of the flow with periods ∣τ∣|\tau| — and thereby precise asymptotic formulas for the number of closed geodesics in the support of any algebraic measure, including correction terms coming from small eigenvalues, in direct analogy with the Selberg trace formula and the prime geodesic theorem for hyperbolic surfaces.

Problem Statement

The problem is to determine the fine structure of the spectrum of the foliated Laplacian below the 1/41/4 barrier for SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R})-invariant probability measures on moduli spaces of flat surfaces, as left open by Avila and Gouëzel (2013). Let H\mathcal{H} be a connected component of a stratum of abelian differentials of genus ≥2\ge 2 (the setting of quadratic differentials is equivalent for this problem: a quadratic differential lifts, on a canonical double cover of the surface, to the square of an abelian differential, and this is the reduction by which Avila and Gouëzel derive their theorem for quadratic differentials from the abelian case), let νMV\nu_{\mathrm{MV}} be its Masur–Veech measure, and let μ\mu range over the algebraic SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R})-invariant probability measures supported on affine invariant submanifolds of a fixed moduli space Mg,n1\mathcal{M}^1_{g,n} of unit-area flat surfaces. The open questions are:

(Q1) Existence below the barrier (Yoccoz's conjecture). Does ΔνMV\Delta_{\nu_{\mathrm{MV}}}, acting on the SO(2,R)SO(2,\mathbb{R})-invariant part of L2(H,νMV)L^2(\mathcal{H},\nu_{\mathrm{MV}}), have any eigenvalue in (0,1/4)(0,1/4)? Equivalently, does the regular representation of SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R}) on L2(H,νMV)L^2(\mathcal{H},\nu_{\mathrm{MV}}) contain complementary series representations? The conjectured answer is no (the analogue of Selberg's eigenvalue conjecture for congruence surfaces).

(Q2) Accumulation at the barrier. Is σ(Δμ)∩(0,1/4)\sigma(\Delta_\mu)\cap(0,1/4) finite for every algebraic measure μ\mu, or does some μ\mu admit infinitely many eigenvalues in (0,1/4)(0,1/4) accumulating at 1/41/4 from below? The finiteness theorem of Avila and Gouëzel leaves precisely this endpoint question open.

(Q3) Uniformity in a fixed moduli space. Does there exist, for each fixed g,ng,n, a constant ε(g,n)>0\varepsilon(g,n)>0 such that every algebraic measure μ\mu supported in Mg,n1\mathcal{M}^1_{g,n} satisfies σ(Δμ)∩(0,ε(g,n))=∅\sigma(\Delta_\mu)\cap(0,\varepsilon(g,n))=\varnothing? It is known that no such constant exists uniformly over all genera and strata, since Matheus and Weitze-Schmithüsen constructed explicit Teichmüller curves whose smallest eigenvalues tend to 00 as the genus grows; the fixed-moduli-space version is open.

(Q4) The Ruelle zeta function of the Teichmüller flow. For an algebraic measure μ\mu, let ζRuelle(z)=∏τ(1−e−z∣τ∣)\zeta_{\mathrm{Ruelle}}(z)=\prod_\tau(1-e^{-z|\tau|}) be the Ruelle zeta function of the Teichmüller geodesic flow restricted to the support of μ\mu, the product over prime closed orbits τ\tau with periods ∣τ∣|\tau|. Does ζRuelle\zeta_{\mathrm{Ruelle}} admit a meromorphic extension to a half-plane containing the imaginary axis (or to all of C\mathbb{C}), and does the counting function of closed geodesics in the support of μ\mu admit an asymptotic expansion with error terms in which each small eigenvalue λ∈(0,1/4)\lambda\in(0,1/4) of Δμ\Delta_\mu contributes an explicit correction (in the hyperbolic-surface prototype, the prime geodesic theorem, a small eigenvalue λ\lambda contributes a correction of order e(1+1−4λ)Re^{(1+\sqrt{1-4\lambda})R} up to polynomial factors, where RR is the period in the normalization gt=diag(et,e−t)g_t=\mathrm{diag}(e^t,e^{-t}), in which the leading term of the modular-surface count has exponent 22)?

These four questions are facets of a single spectral object and its dynamical consequences, in the sense of the source: an eigenvalue λ∈(0,1/4)\lambda\in(0,1/4) simultaneously fixes the rate e−(1−1−4λ)te^{-(1-\sqrt{1-4\lambda})t} of decay of correlations of the Teichmüller flow, marks a complementary-series component of L2(μ)L^2(\mu), and would enter the error term of closed-geodesic counting. Q1–Q2 determine the discrete spectrum below 1/41/4, Q3 its uniformity over orbit closures, and Q4 its dynamical payoff. The problem is stated at the source's generality — all genera ≥2\ge 2, all stratum components, all algebraic measures — and no restriction of genus, stratum, or measure class is intended.

References

  1. Artur Avila and Sébastien Gouëzel, "Small eigenvalues of the Laplacian for algebraic measures in moduli space, and mixing properties of the Teichmüller flow", Annals of Mathematics 178, no. 2 (2013), 385–442. DOI: 10.4007/annals.2013.178.2.1. https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2013.178.2.1
  2. Artur Avila, Sébastien Gouëzel, and Jean-Christophe Yoccoz, "Exponential mixing for the Teichmüller flow", Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS 104 (2006), 143–211. DOI: 10.1007/s10240-006-0001-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10240-006-0001-5
  3. Artur Avila and Maria João Resende, "Exponential mixing for the Teichmüller flow in the space of quadratic differentials", Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 87, no. 3 (2012), 589–638. DOI: 10.4171/CMH/263. https://doi.org/10.4171/CMH/263
  4. Alex Eskin and Maryam Mirzakhani, "Invariant and stationary measures for the SL(2,R) action on Moduli space", Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS 127 (2018), 95–324. DOI: 10.1007/s10240-018-0099-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10240-018-0099-2
  5. Jordan S. Ellenberg and D. B. McReynolds, "Arithmetic Veech sublattices of SL(2,Z)", Duke Mathematical Journal 161, no. 3 (2012), 415–429. DOI: 10.1215/00127094-1507412. https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-1507412
  6. Carlos Matheus and Gabriela Weitze-Schmithüsen, "Explicit Teichmüller curves with complementary series", Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France 141, no. 4 (2013), 557–602. DOI: 10.24033/bsmf.2656. https://doi.org/10.24033/bsmf.2656
  7. Dubi Kelmer and Peter Sarnak, "Strong spectral gaps for compact quotients of products of PSL(2,R)", Journal of the European Mathematical Society 11, no. 2 (2009), 283–313. DOI: 10.4171/JEMS/151. https://doi.org/10.4171/JEMS/151
  8. Michael Magee, "On Selberg's eigenvalue conjecture for moduli spaces of abelian differentials", Compositio Mathematica 155, no. 12 (2019), 2354–2398. DOI: 10.1112/S0010437X1900767X. https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X1900767X
  9. Michael Magee and Rene Rühr, with an appendix by Rodolfo Gutiérrez-Romo, "Counting saddle connections in a homology class modulo q", Journal of Modern Dynamics 14 (2019), 237–262. DOI: 10.3934/jmd.2019020. https://doi.org/10.3934/jmd.2019020
  10. Jayadev S. Athreya, Jean Lagacé, Martin Möller, and Martin Raum, "Spectral decomposition and Siegel–Veech transforms for strata: the case of marked tori", Journal of Spectral Theory 15, no. 2 (2025), 895–959. DOI: 10.4171/JST/563. https://doi.org/10.4171/JST/563
  11. Alex Eskin, Maryam Mirzakhani, and Kasra Rafi, "Counting closed geodesics in strata", Inventiones mathematicae 215, no. 2 (2019), 535–607. DOI: 10.1007/s00222-018-0832-y. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-018-0832-y
  12. Frédéric Faure, Sébastien Gouëzel, and Erwan Lanneau, "Ruelle spectrum of linear pseudo-Anosov maps", Journal de l'École polytechnique — Mathématiques 6 (2019), 811–877. DOI: 10.5802/jep.107. https://doi.org/10.5802/jep.107
  13. François Ledrappier, "Three problems solved by Sébastien Gouëzel", Journal of Modern Dynamics 16 (2020), 373–387. DOI: 10.3934/jmd.2020015. https://doi.org/10.3934/jmd.2020015
  14. Carlos Matheus, "Quelques contributions à la théorie de l'action de SL(2,R) sur les espaces de modules de surfaces plates", mémoire d'habilitation à diriger des recherches (2016). arXiv:1612.02457. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.02457
  15. Osama Khalil, "Exponential mixing via additive combinatorics", Journal of the American Mathematical Society 39, no. 3 (2026), 781–856. DOI: 10.1090/jams/1076. https://doi.org/10.1090/jams/1076
  16. Atle Selberg, "On the estimation of Fourier coefficients of modular forms", Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. VIII (1965), 1–15, American Mathematical Society. DOI: 10.1090/pspum/008/0182610. https://doi.org/10.1090/pspum/008/0182610