The spectral action Tr(f(D/Λ)) — the trace of a smooth cutoff function of the Dirac operator of a spectral triple — yields, through its heat-kernel expansion, gravity coupled to the Standard Model with unification-scale relations among the gauge, Yukawa and Higgs couplings. The paper 'The Uncanny Precision of the Spectral Action' (Chamseddine and Connes, Commun. Math. Phys. 293 (2010) 867) proposed treating this action as an effective action at the unification scale and explicitly posed as an open question the computation of its renormalization-group flow in the context of spectral triples: Wilsonian coarse-graining over the high-frequency modes is expected to generate new, generally nonlocal terms of trace-of-bosonic-propagator type, and whether the spectral formulation survives the flow was unknown. Later work has settled partial cases — one-loop renormalizability of the asymptotically expanded Yang–Mills spectral action, with counterterms absorbed by a shift of the spectral function; renormalizability conditions on almost-commutative manifolds; matrix-form Feynman rules that preserve the spectral structure; and one-loop renormalizability in a generalized sense for matrix fluctuations — but the Wilsonian flow of the spectral action for the almost-commutative Standard-Model-plus-gravity spectral triple, the structure of the generated nonlocal terms, and the stability of the spectral class beyond these special cases remain uncomputed. The problem remains open.

Background

Noncommutative geometry generalizes Riemannian geometry through spectral data: a spectral triple (A, H, D) consists of an involutive algebra A represented on a Hilbert space H, together with a self-adjoint Dirac operator D with compact resolvent; for an ordinary compact Riemannian spin manifold M, A is the algebra of smooth functions, H the square-integrable spinors and D the usual Dirac operator, and the metric is encoded in the spectrum of D. One also allows almost-commutative geometries, products M × F of a manifold with a finite-dimensional noncommutative internal space F whose algebra and Dirac matrix encode the gauge and Higgs sectors of particle physics.

Chamseddine and Connes proposed in 1997 that the bosonic action of gravity coupled to matter be the spectral action Tr(f(D/Λ)), the trace of a smooth, even, rapidly decaying test function f evaluated on the Dirac operator, with Λ a high scale set roughly by the Planck scale. Its content is organized by the heat-kernel (small-t) expansion of the squared Dirac operator, whose coefficients a_k — the Seeley–DeWitt coefficients — are integrals of local curvature and gauge-field invariants. In dimension 4,

Tr(f(D/Λ))  ∼  2Λ4f4a0+2Λ2f2a2+f0a4+⋯\mathrm{Tr}\bigl(f(D/\Lambda)\bigr)\;\sim\;2\Lambda^{4}f_{4}a_{0}+2\Lambda^{2}f_{2}a_{2}+f_{0}a_{4}+\cdots

where the moments of f are f₄ = ∫₀^∞ f(u)u³du, f₂ = ∫₀^∞ f(u)u du and f₀ = f(0); for a genuine cutoff function, whose Taylor series at 0 vanishes, only these three terms survive, giving a cosmological term, the Einstein–Hilbert action and a curvature-quartic term. For the almost-commutative geometry selected by the axioms of the theory (finite space F of KO-dimension 6 — the dimension of F as seen by the charge-conjugation structure, which differs from its ordinary vector-space dimension), the inner fluctuations of D — the replacement of D by D + A + JAJ⁻¹ with A = Σ aⱼ[D,bⱼ], aⱼ,bⱼ ∈ A, where J is the charge-conjugation (real structure) operator on H — generate precisely the Standard Model gauge and Higgs fields minimally coupled to gravity, with Majorana mass terms (fermion masses coupling a particle to its charge conjugate, relevant for neutrinos) and the see-saw mechanism (heavy Majorana partners rendering the observed neutrino masses small), and the expansion fixes relations among couplings at the scale Λ: g₃² = g₂² = (5/3)g₁² for the gauge couplings and Y² = 4g² for the Yukawa couplings (the Higgs–fermion couplings that set the fermion masses).

'The Uncanny Precision of the Spectral Action' demonstrated how accurate the two-term truncation is on the model Euclidean spacetime S³ × S¹ (relative error of order 10⁻σ, where σ = Λμ and μ is the inner diameter of the geometry in cutoff units, with the Seeley–DeWitt coefficients a₄ and a₆ vanishing there), and then addressed the physical interpretation. Since the unification relations do not hold at low scales, the authors proposed a Wilsonian reading: treat Tr(f(D/Λ)) as an effective action valid at the unification scale Λ ≈ 10¹⁷ GeV, and obtain physics at observable scales by integrating out (coarse-graining over) the high-frequency modes between Λ and the observation resolution ρ, in the spirit of functional renormalization-group studies of gravity. The authors stated, as an open question, that this renormalization-group flow had not been computed in the context of spectral triples, that new terms involving traces of functions of the bosonic propagator were expected to be generated, and that taking the spectral action as a boundary condition of the renormalization group at unification 'generates a number of severe tests' — of the dimensionless couplings (gauge, Yukawa, Higgs quartic) and of the dimensionful ones (inverse Newton constant, Higgs mass term, Majorana masses, cosmological constant).

Two features make the problem distinctive. First, the spectral action is nonlocal as a function of D — only its asymptotic expansion is local — so coarse-graining is expected to generate genuinely nonlocal effective terms whose structure is unknown. Second, computing the flow 'in the context of spectral triples' means preserving the spectral-triple structure under quantization, which requires matrix-valued Feynman rules for the inner fluctuations rather than ordinary component fields; expanding into component fields first, as most phenomenological work does, sidesteps rather than solves the question.

Problem Statement

Compute the renormalization-group flow of the spectral action in the framework of spectral triples, at the generality of the source question. Starting from an almost-commutative spectral triple — a four-dimensional compact spin manifold times the finite space underlying the Standard Model, coupled to gravity — with the spectral action Tr(f(D/Λ)) imposed as a boundary condition at the unification scale Λ, determine: (i) the Wilsonian effective action obtained by integrating out the modes above a coarse-graining scale ρ, computed in a formulation that preserves the spectral-triple structure rather than expanding to component fields; (ii) the complete structure of the terms this generates — in particular, whether the anticipated nonlocal terms of trace-of-bosonic-propagator type arise, and whether they are expressible within the class of spectral actions; (iii) whether the spectral action is stable under this coarse-graining (renormalizability within the spectral framework, at one loop and beyond), or an explicit obstruction; and (iv) the resulting running of the couplings — the gauge, Yukawa and Higgs quartic couplings together with the dimensionful inverse Newton constant, Higgs mass, Majorana masses and cosmological term — from the unification boundary condition down to observable scales, so that the low-energy predictions of the spectral action can be tested. Here 'the class of spectral actions' means the spectral actions of the same almost-commutative spectral triple — the functionals Tr(f(D/Λ)) of its Dirac operator and of the inner fluctuations of D described above, at the fixed cutoff Λ; which variations within this class are admissible, in particular whether the test function f is held fixed or may vary, is itself part of what (ii) and (iii) must determine. (iv) is the scale-by-scale running of the couplings carried by the effective action of (i) and the term structure of (ii), and the stability verdict of (iii) turns on the same expressibility question as the corresponding clause of (ii). An obstruction established under (iii) resolves the flow question directly: if the coarse-grained action contains a term that no spectral action of the admissible class can absorb, the class of spectral actions is not preserved. Results restricted to the pure Yang–Mills sector, to one loop, or to matrix fluctuations around fixed backgrounds are already in the literature and do not by themselves answer the question.

References

  1. Ali H. Chamseddine and Alain Connes, The Spectral Action Principle, Communications in Mathematical Physics 186 (1997) 731–750, DOI: 10.1007/s002200050126, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200050126
  2. Ali H. Chamseddine and Alain Connes, The Uncanny Precision of the Spectral Action, Communications in Mathematical Physics 293 (2010) 867–897, DOI: 10.1007/s00220-009-0949-3, arXiv:0812.0165, https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.0165
  3. Ali H. Chamseddine and Alain Connes, Noncommutative Geometry as a Framework for Unification of all Fundamental Interactions including Gravity. Part I, Fortschritte der Physik 58 (2010) 553–600, DOI: 10.1002/prop.201000069, arXiv:1004.0464, https://arxiv.org/abs/1004.0464
  4. Daniel Kolodrubetz and Matilde Marcolli, Boundary conditions of the RGE flow in the noncommutative geometry approach to particle physics and cosmology, Physics Letters B 693 (2010) 166–174, DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.08.018, arXiv:1006.4000, https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4000
  5. Walter D. van Suijlekom, Renormalization of the spectral action for the Yang-Mills system, JHEP 03 (2011) 146, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2011)146, arXiv:1101.4804, https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.4804
  6. Walter D. van Suijlekom, Renormalization of the Asymptotically Expanded Yang–Mills Spectral Action, Communications in Mathematical Physics 312 (2012) 883–912, DOI: 10.1007/s00220-012-1464-5, arXiv:1104.5199, https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.5199
  7. Christopher Estrada and Matilde Marcolli, Asymptotic safety, hypergeometric functions, and the Higgs mass in spectral action models, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 10 (2013) 1350036, DOI: 10.1142/S0219887813500369, arXiv:1208.5023, https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5023
  8. Ali H. Chamseddine and Alain Connes, Resilience of the Spectral Standard Model, JHEP 09 (2012) 104, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2012)104, arXiv:1208.1030, https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1030
  9. Walter D. van Suijlekom, Renormalizability Conditions for Almost-Commutative Manifolds, Annales Henri Poincaré 15 (2014) 985–1011, DOI: 10.1007/s00023-013-0269-1, arXiv:1112.4690, https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.4690
  10. Ali H. Chamseddine, Alain Connes and Viatcheslav Mukhanov, Quanta of Geometry: Noncommutative Aspects, Physical Review Letters 114 (2015) 091302, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.091302, arXiv:1409.2471, https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.2471
  11. Ali H. Chamseddine, Alain Connes and Viatcheslav Mukhanov, Geometry and the Quantum: Basics, JHEP 12 (2014) 098, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2014)098, arXiv:1411.0977, https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.0977
  12. Maxim A. Kurkov, Fedele Lizzi, Mairi Sakellariadou and Apimook Watcharangkool, Spectral action with zeta function regularization, Physical Review D 91 (2015) 065013, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.065013, arXiv:1412.4669, https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.4669
  13. Ufuk Aydemir, Clifford-based spectral action and renormalization group analysis of the gauge couplings, European Physical Journal C 79 (2019) 325, DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6846-9, arXiv:1902.08090, https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.08090
  14. Michał Eckstein and Bruno Iochum, Spectral Action in Noncommutative Geometry, SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics 27, Springer (2018), DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94788-4, arXiv:1902.05306, https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.05306
  15. Ali H. Chamseddine, John Iliopoulos and Walter D. van Suijlekom, Spectral action in matrix form, European Physical Journal C 80 (2020) 1045, DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08618-z, arXiv:2009.03367, https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03367
  16. Teun D. H. van Nuland and Walter D. van Suijlekom, One-loop corrections to the spectral action, JHEP 05 (2022) 078, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2022)078, arXiv:2107.08485, https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.08485
  17. John W. Barrett, Lorentzian version of the noncommutative geometry of the standard model of particle physics, Journal of Mathematical Physics 48 (2007) 012303, DOI: 10.1063/1.2408400, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2408400
  18. Agostino Devastato, Shane Farnsworth, Fedele Lizzi and Pierre Martinetti, Lorentz signature and twisted spectral triples, JHEP 03 (2018) 089, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2018)089, arXiv:1710.04965, https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.04965
  19. Nguyen Viet Dang and Michał Wrochna, Complex powers of the wave operator and the spectral action on Lorentzian scattering spaces, Journal of the European Mathematical Society 27 (2023), no. 3, 971–1054, DOI: 10.4171/JEMS/1389, arXiv:2012.00712, https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00712
  20. Ali H. Chamseddine and Viatcheslav Mukhanov, Resolving Cosmological Singularities, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 03 (2017) 009, DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/009, arXiv:1612.05860, https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05860
  21. Ali H. Chamseddine and Walter D. van Suijlekom, A survey of spectral models of gravity coupled to matter, in Advances in Noncommutative Geometry (Springer, 2019), pp. 1–51, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29597-4_1, arXiv:1904.12392, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12392
  22. Ali H. Chamseddine, Hearing the Shape of the Universe: A Personal Journey in Noncommutative Geometry, arXiv:2511.05909 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05909
  23. Eva-Maria Hekkelman, Teun D. H. van Nuland and Jesse Reimann, Power counting in the spectral action matrix model, arXiv:2512.14581 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14581
  24. Lyudmil Antonov, Spectral Geometry and the One-Loop QED β-Function on S³ × S¹, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics (2026) 2650169, DOI: 10.1142/S0219887826501690, arXiv:2603.14081, https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14081