Kodaira (1949) studied the half-line Schrödinger operator H=−d2/dx2+ν(ν+1)/x2+V(x)H=-d^2/dx^2+\nu(\nu+1)/x^2+V(x) with an inverse-square term at the origin and a Coulomb tail V(x)=α/x+O(x−1−ϵ)V(x)=\alpha/x+O(x^{-1-\epsilon}) at infinity, and proved — conditionally on two analyticity hypotheses on the scattering solution u(x,k)u(x,k) (Assumption I: continuation across the negative real kk-axis into the lower half-plane; Assumption II: regularity in the cut plane C∖[0,∞)\mathbb{C}\setminus[0,\infty)) — that Heisenberg's S-function S(k)=A(−k)/A(k)S(k)=A(-k)/A(k) is meromorphic in ℑk>0\Im k>0 with its only poles the simple poles at the bound states, so the negative eigenvalues are exactly the poles of SS. Whether the assumptions hold throughout the class, and the necessary and sufficient condition on VV for them to hold, remain unestablished. The later literature maps only the sufficient side, and only for purely short-range potentials: compact support gives an entire Jost function; exponential decay O(e−ax)O(e^{-ax}) gives continuation to a strip of width a/2a/2; super-exponential decay gives the whole lower half-plane; power decay with sector analyticity gives only a sector. No necessity result, no explicit counterexample, and no treatment of the Coulomb-tail case is known. The problem asks for the characterization, or a counterexample, within Kodaira's class.

Background

On the half-line x>0x>0 consider the radial Schrödinger equation

Hu=−d2udx2+ν(ν+1)x2u+V(x)u=k2u,ν≥−12,Hu=-\frac{d^{2}u}{dx^{2}}+\frac{\nu(\nu+1)}{x^{2}}u+V(x)u=k^{2}u,\qquad \nu\ge-\tfrac12,

which describes a quantum particle in one dimension with a centrifugal (inverse-square) barrier ν(ν+1)/x2\nu(\nu+1)/x^{2} indexed by the angular momentum ν\nu, together with a perturbation VV that is O(x−2+ϵ)O(x^{-2+\epsilon}) at the origin and has a Coulomb tail V(x)=α/x+O(x−1−ϵ)V(x)=\alpha/x+O(x^{-1-\epsilon}) at infinity, α\alpha being the Coulomb charge. Writing the energy as E=k2E=k^{2}, the spectrum of the self-adjoint operator HH consists of negative eigenvalues (bound states, i.e. square-integrable solutions at E=λm<0E=\lambda_m<0) plus a continuous part on E>0E>0.

Scattering theory studies solutions behaving like free waves at infinity; because of the tail, 'free' means Coulomb-modified. The scattering (or Jost) solution u(x,k)u(x,k) is the unique solution of Hu=k2uHu=k^{2}u with asymptotic behaviour u(x,k)∼exp⁡(ikx−iα2klog⁡x)u(x,k)\sim\exp(ikx-\tfrac{i\alpha}{2k}\log x) as x→∞x\to\infty for ℑk≥0\Im k\ge0, k≠0k\ne0; the logarithmic phase is the distortion produced by the 1/x1/x tail. Kodaira proved (his Theorem 5.1) that uu and its xx-derivative u′u' are analytic in kk throughout the upper half-plane ℑk>0\Im k>0. From uu one builds the Jost function A(k)A(k): the Wronskian A(k)=[u,s1]A(k)=[u,s_{1}] (with [f,g]=fg′−f′g[f,g]=fg'-f'g, constant in xx) of uu with the solution s1s_{1} that behaves like xν+1x^{\nu+1} at the origin. AA is analytic in ℑk>0\Im k>0, and its zeros on the positive imaginary axis, k=iϰk=i\varkappa, are exactly the bound states E=−ϰ2E=-\varkappa^{2}.

The motivation was Heisenberg's theory of S-matrices: the 1940s proposal that all bound-state data of a quantum system should be readable off the analytic structure of its scattering matrix (S-function), the object relating incoming to outgoing waves. Kodaira's Theorem 6.1 realizes this for the half-line Coulomb-tail problem: under two hypotheses on uu, the S-function S(k)=A(−k)/A(k)S(k)=A(-k)/A(k) is meromorphic in ℑk>0\Im k>0, and its only poles there are simple poles on the imaginary axis located exactly at the bound-state momenta km=i∣km∣k_{m}=i|k_{m}|, with residues giving the norming constants, i.e. the normalization constants of the bound-state eigenfunctions (cm2=∮kmS(k) dkc_{m}^{2}=\oint_{k_{m}}S(k)\,dk). The hypotheses are: (Assumption I) u(x,k)u(x,k) and u′(x,k)u'(x,k), a priori analytic only for ℑk>0\Im k>0, admit analytic continuation across the negative real kk-axis into the lower half-plane ℑk<0\Im k<0; and (Assumption II) uu and u′u' are regular (analytic) in the whole kk-plane cut along the positive real axis [0,∞)[0,\infty). Kodaira proved the theorem conditionally and stated that the validity of the assumptions throughout the class, and the necessary and sufficient condition on VV for them, were open. If Assumption I fails, SS cannot be defined off the real axis at all; if Assumption I holds but Assumption II fails, the numerator A(−k)A(-k) may contribute additional singularities in ℑk>0\Im k>0 (symmetric images of lower-half-plane singularities of AA), and the negative eigenvalues could no longer be recovered from the singular points of S(k)S(k) alone.

In modern language, continuing AA (equivalently the resolvent of HH) from the physical sheet ℑk>0\Im k>0 across the real kk-axis into the lower half-plane ℑk<0\Im k<0 — called the unphysical sheet — exposes resonances: poles of the continued resolvent off the real axis, which describe decaying states and dominate the long-time behaviour of waves. The modern theory of scattering resonances (systematized by Dyatlov and Zworski for compactly supported potentials) is complete in dimension one when VV has compact support: the Jost function is entire, and Korotyaev's inverse resonance theorem on the half line shows compactly supported potentials are in bijection with their Jost functions. For merely decaying potentials the picture is fragmentary. Dolph, McLeod and Thoe (1966) proved that exponential decay V(x)=O(e−ax)V(x)=O(e^{-ax}) of the short-range part yields continuation into a strip ℑz>−a/2\Im z>-a/2, so the attainable depth of continuation is governed by the exponential decay rate; McLeod (1967) extended this resolvent-kernel continuation to the unphysical sheet. Froese (1997) and Hitrik (1999) showed that super-exponential decay yields continuation into the whole lower half-plane. Brown, Eastham and McCormack (2000) obtained strip continuation and resonance-free regions for special exponentially decaying classes. Brown and Eastham (2002) proved that power decay V(x)=O(x−γ)V(x)=O(x^{-\gamma}) combined with analyticity of VV in a sector yields continuation only into a sector 2π−θ0<arg⁡z<2π2\pi-\theta_{0}<\arg z<2\pi of the unphysical sheet (where θ0\theta_{0} is the angle of that sector of analyticity in their result), stating explicitly that all existing results require exponential decay. Christiansen and Cunningham (2024) tied the density of resonances to the convex hull of the singular support of the potential. All of these results concern short-range tails; none covers the Coulomb-tail class, and none gives a necessary and sufficient condition — that is precisely Kodaira's still-open question.

Problem Statement

Fix ν≥−12\nu\ge-\tfrac12 and a real-valued potential VV on (0,∞)(0,\infty) with V(x)=O(x−2+ϵ)V(x)=O(x^{-2+\epsilon}) at the origin and V(x)=α/x+O(x−1−ϵ)V(x)=\alpha/x+O(x^{-1-\epsilon}) at infinity for some ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} (Kodaira's class), and let H=−d2dx2+ν(ν+1)x2+V(x)H=-\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}+\frac{\nu(\nu+1)}{x^{2}}+V(x) be the Schrödinger operator on (0,∞)(0,\infty). Let u(x,k)u(x,k) be the scattering solution of Hu=k2uHu=k^{2}u with u(x,k)∼exp⁡(ikx−iα2klog⁡x)u(x,k)\sim\exp(ikx-\tfrac{i\alpha}{2k}\log x) as x→∞x\to\infty (ℑk≥0\Im k\ge0, k≠0k\ne0), let s1(⋅,k2)s_{1}(\cdot,k^{2}) be the solution of the same equation with s1∼xν+1s_{1}\sim x^{\nu+1} at the origin, let A(k)=[u,s1]A(k)=[u,s_{1}] be the Jost function (Wronskian [f,g]=fg′−f′g[f,g]=fg'-f'g, which is constant in xx), and let S(k)=A(−k)/A(k)S(k)=A(-k)/A(k) be the Heisenberg S-function. Kodaira's Assumption I asserts that u(x,⋅)u(x,\cdot) and u′(x,⋅)u'(x,\cdot), a priori analytic only for ℑk>0\Im k>0, admit analytic continuation across the negative real kk-axis into the lower half-plane ℑk<0\Im k<0; Assumption II asserts that uu and u′u' are regular (analytic) in the whole cut plane C∖[0,∞)\mathbb{C}\setminus[0,\infty). Under I and II, the negative eigenvalues of HH are exactly the poles of SS in ℑk>0\Im k>0.

Determine the following, within Kodaira's class. The three parts are distinct and each is required: (1) concerns Assumption I alone, (2) is the stronger condition for Assumptions I and II jointly, and (3) is the corollary of (1) and (2).

(1) Validity of Assumption I. Either prove that for every real VV in the class the Jost function A(k)A(k) (equivalently u(x,k)u(x,k), u′(x,k)u'(x,k) for fixed xx) admits analytic continuation across the negative real kk-axis into ℑk<0\Im k<0, and identify the maximal domain of continuation; or exhibit a specific VV in the class for which continuation across some point of the negative real axis provably fails (for example, an arc of the negative real axis that is a natural boundary for AA, meaning no analytic continuation across it exists).

(2) Characterization. Give a necessary and sufficient condition on VV for Assumptions I and II to hold — that is, for A(k)A(k) to be analytic in the whole cut plane C∖[0,∞)\mathbb{C}\setminus[0,\infty) — so that S(k)=A(−k)/A(k)S(k)=A(-k)/A(k) is meromorphic in ℑk>0\Im k>0 with no singularities other than the simple bound-state poles at k=iϰmk=i\varkappa_{m} (the bound states being the negative eigenvalues Em=−ϰm2E_{m}=-\varkappa_{m}^{2} of HH).

(3) Consequences for the eigenvalue-pole correspondence. Deduce from (1)-(2) for which potentials of the class the negative eigenvalues can be recovered from the singular points of S(k)S(k) alone.

References

  1. Kunihiko Kodaira, The Eigenvalue Problem for Ordinary Differential Equations of the Second Order and Heisenberg's Theory of S-Matrices, American Journal of Mathematics 71 (1949), 921-945. DOI: 10.2307/2372377. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2372377
  2. C. L. Dolph, J. B. McLeod, and D. Thoe, The analytic continuation of the resolvent kernel and scattering operator associated with the Schroedinger operator, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 16 (1966), 311-332. DOI: 10.1016/0022-247x(66)90174-0. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247x(66)90174-0
  3. J. B. McLeod, The analytic continuation to the unphysical sheet of the resolvent kernel associated with the Schroedinger operator, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics 18 (1967), 219-231. DOI: 10.1093/qmath/18.1.219. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/qmath/18.1.219
  4. Richard Froese, Asymptotic Distribution of Resonances in One Dimension, Journal of Differential Equations 137 (1997), 251-272. DOI: 10.1006/jdeq.1996.3248. URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jdeq.1996.3248
  5. Michael Hitrik, Bounds on Scattering Poles in One Dimension, Communications in Mathematical Physics 208 (1999), 381-411. DOI: 10.1007/s002200050763. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200050763
  6. B. M. Brown, M. S. P. Eastham, and D. K. R. McCormack, Resonances and analytic continuation for exponentially decaying Sturm–Liouville potentials, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 116 (2000), 181-193. DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0427(99)00324-6. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-0427(99)00324-6
  7. B. M. Brown and M. S. P. Eastham, Analytic continuation and resonance-free regions for Sturm–Liouville potentials with power decay, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 148 (2002), 49-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0427(02)00572-1. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-0427(02)00572-1. Preprint: arXiv:math/0006064, https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0006064
  8. Evgeni Korotyaev, Inverse resonance scattering on the half line, Asymptotic Analysis 37 (2004), 215-226. DOI: 10.3233/asy-2004-605. URL: https://doi.org/10.3233/asy-2004-605
  9. Semyon Dyatlov and Maciej Zworski, Mathematical Theory of Scattering Resonances, Graduate Studies in Mathematics 200, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2019. DOI: 10.1090/gsm/200. URL: https://doi.org/10.1090/gsm/200 (author's draft: https://math.mit.edu/~dyatlov/res/)
  10. T. J. Christiansen and T. Cunningham, Singularities and Asymptotic Distribution of Resonances for Schrödinger Operators in One Dimension, Asymptotic Analysis 143 (2024), 619-640. DOI: 10.3233/asy-241928. URL: https://doi.org/10.3233/asy-241928. Preprint: arXiv:2311.00804, https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00804
  11. Denis A. W. White, Meromorphic Continuation of Scattering Matrices: Long Range, Stark Case, Communications in Partial Differential Equations 33 (2008), 131-156. DOI: 10.1080/03605300701588755. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03605300701588755