The 18.6-year lunar nodal cycle modulates the amplitude of diurnal tides, and hence the intensity of tidally driven vertical (diapycnal) mixing at known mixing hotspots such as the Kuril Straits, the Sea of Okhotsk, and the Aleutian passes. Yasuda, Osafune and Tatebe (2006) proposed that this modulation paces the dominant bi-decadal variations of North Pacific intermediate waters, sea surface temperature (SST), and atmospheric indices such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and the Aleutian Low, but explicitly framed the proposal as a conditional hypothesis whose validation requires coupled ocean–atmosphere modeling with spatially varying tidal mixing, quantification of the hotspots and their nodal response, attribution against direct atmospheric variability, demonstration of air–sea feedback amplification, and clarification of an ENSO link. Coupled-model experiments with nodally modulated tidal mixing have been performed and reproduce 18.6-year SST and Pacific Decadal Oscillation-like responses of plausible amplitude, and statistical links to ENSO timing and multi-century proxy records have been reported; however, the observationally constrained quantitative validation of the full chain — the amplitude of the nodal modulation of mixing at the hotspots, its net basin-scale transport contribution, and rigorous separation from atmospheric internal variability — remains unresolved and is actively hedged in the most recent studies.

Background

The Moon's orbital plane precesses with respect to Earth's equator, completing a cycle every 18.6 years; this "lunar nodal cycle" modulates the amplitude of the diurnal tidal constituents (K1 and O1, the once-per-day tidal harmonics) by up to about 20% at mid-latitudes. Where strong diurnal tidal currents interact with rough topography — notably in the Kuril Straits between the Sea of Okhotsk and the North Pacific, in the Okhotsk Sea itself, and near the Aleutian passes — the tides generate internal waves whose breaking sustains intense diapycnal mixing, i.e. turbulent mixing across density surfaces that converts dense water upward and maintains the ocean's stratification and overturning. Because the forcing of this mixing carries the nodal modulation, the mixing strength itself should oscillate with a precisely known 18.6-year period and phase.

Bi-decadal (roughly 18–20-year) variations are a dominant feature of North Pacific climate on interdecadal timescales: they appear in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO, the leading empirical mode of North Pacific sea surface temperature variability), in the winter North Pacific Index (NPI, a sea-level-pressure measure of the Aleutian Low, the semi-permanent low-pressure system south of Alaska), in the East Asian winter monsoon, and in hydrographic properties of the subarctic intermediate waters (for example, apparent oxygen utilization, the offset between measured dissolved oxygen and saturation, in the Oyashio region east of Japan). The mechanism of these variations has not been fully understood.

Yasuda, Osafune and Tatebe (2006, Geophysical Research Letters) reported that the 18.6-year nodal time series correlates strongly with bandpass-filtered bi-decadal components of these indices and of intermediate-water properties, and — using a three-layer primitive-equation ocean model in which Okhotsk Sea layer thicknesses were restored to observed strong-tide versus weak-tide states — estimated that stronger tidal mixing during strong-diurnal-tide phases increases poleward oceanic heat transport by about 0.05 petawatts (roughly 10% of the North Pacific poleward heat transport), which could warm SST in the Kuroshio–Oyashio Extension east of Japan and, through coupling with the Aleutian Low, be amplified into the observed bi-decadal atmospheric excursions. The paper presented this as a testable, explicitly conditional hypothesis and its discussion acknowledged six major unresolved issues: (1) validation by fully coupled atmosphere–ocean model experiments including spatially varying tidal-mixing coefficients at the Kuril/Aleutian/Okhotsk hotspots; (2) quantitative mapping of the hotspots — their spatial distribution, magnitude, and temporal response to the nodal cycle — and their net contribution to basin-scale diapycnal transports; (3) rigorous separation of the roles of tidally driven oceanic changes versus direct atmospheric variability in the observed bi-decadal signals; (4) the dynamics of the SST–Aleutian Low co-variation and whether positive air–sea feedbacks can amplify the modest oceanic heat-transport anomalies into the full observed atmospheric index excursions; (5) the relationship between the nodal-cycle-related oceanic anomalies and ENSO (El Niño–Southern Oscillation) occurrence and timing; and (6) implications for ecosystems and carbon-cycle exchanges. These six components jointly serve one objective: to determine whether the proposed mechanistic chain from astronomical tidal forcing to observed bi-decadal North Pacific climate variability actually operates.

Subsequent work built directly on this program. Coupled ocean–atmosphere experiments with 18.6-year-modulated tidal mixing reproduced ENSO-like and PDO-like 18.6-year responses (Hasumi et al. 2008; Tanaka et al. 2012); ocean general circulation and data-synthesis studies traced how localized mixing anomalies spread and reach the central Pacific (Osafune and Yasuda 2012, 2013; Osafune et al. 2014, 2020); statistical studies linked ENSO timing and a 298-year PDO reconstruction to the nodal cycle (Yasuda 2018; Hamamoto and Yasuda 2021); and a recent multi-centennial coupled study parameterized the nodal modulation of tidal and internal-tidal diffusion and found surface-temperature responses near 0.1 K in the northwest Pacific, while finding the ENSO response not statistically significant (Joshi et al. 2023). A skeptical review (Ray 2007) had earlier cautioned that definitive detection of the tidal signal in climate observations is hindered by the shortness of instrumental records. What remains contested is therefore not the plausibility of the chain in models but its observationally constrained, quantitative validity in the real ocean and atmosphere.

Problem Statement

Determine, quantitatively and against observations, whether the 18.6-year lunar nodal modulation of diurnal tidal forcing drives the observed bi-decadal variations of the North Pacific ocean and climate, by validating or falsifying the mechanistic chain proposed by Yasuda, Osafune and Tatebe (2006). Concretely, the question decomposes into the six linked components the source itself identifies as necessary further work: (1) coupled ocean–atmosphere model experiments that include spatially varying, nodally modulated tidal-mixing coefficients at the Kuril, Aleutian, and Okhotsk hotspots, testing whether the resulting oceanic heat-transport anomalies force the observed SST and atmospheric responses; (2) quantitative mapping of the tidal-mixing hotspots — their spatial distribution, magnitude, and temporal response to the nodal cycle — and evaluation of their net contribution to basin-scale diapycnal transports; (3) rigorous separation of the relative roles of tidally driven oceanic changes versus direct atmospheric variability in producing the observed bi-decadal index signals, including sensitivity to wind-stress and storm-track responses; (4) clarification of the SST–Aleutian Low co-variation and whether positive air–sea feedbacks amplify the modest (order 0.05 petawatt) oceanic heat-transport anomalies into the full observed atmospheric index excursions; (5) the relationship between the nodal-cycle-related oceanic anomalies and the occurrence, timing, and magnitude of ENSO events; and (6) the implications of the putative bi-decadal water-mass and SST changes for North Pacific ecosystems and carbon-cycle exchanges. The proposed chain is validated only if, with observationally constrained amplitudes and phases, the tidally forced chain accounts for a statistically significant fraction of the observed bi-decadal variability in the real ocean–atmosphere system once direct atmospheric internal variability is removed; a quantitative demonstration that it cannot account for the observed signals would falsify it. Evidence that the observed bi-decadal signals are attributable to direct atmospheric internal variability (component 3) would falsify the chain on its own, whereas validating the chain requires the joint evidence of components (1)–(5). Component (6) is a downstream implication of the putative bi-decadal water-mass and SST changes and does not bear on whether the chain operates.

References

  1. Yasuda, I., Osafune, S., and Tatebe, H. (2006). Possible explanation linking 18.6-year period nodal tidal cycle with bi-decadal variations of ocean and climate in the North Pacific. Geophysical Research Letters, 33. DOI: 10.1029/2005GL025237. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025237
  2. Osafune, S., and Yasuda, I. (2006). Bidecadal variability in the intermediate waters of the northwestern subarctic Pacific and the Okhotsk Sea in relation to 18.6-year period nodal tidal cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 111. DOI: 10.1029/2005JC003277. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003277
  3. Ray, R. D. (2007). Decadal Climate Variability: Is There a Tidal Connection? Journal of Climate, 20(14), 3542–3560. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI4193.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4193.1
  4. Hasumi, H., Yasuda, I., Tatebe, H., and Kimoto, M. (2008). Pacific bidecadal climate variability regulated by tidal mixing around the Kuril Islands. Geophysical Research Letters, 35. DOI: 10.1029/2008GL034406. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034406
  5. Osafune, S., and Yasuda, I. (2010). Bidecadal variability in the Bering Sea and the relation with 18.6 year period nodal tidal cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 115. DOI: 10.1029/2008JC005110. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC005110
  6. Osafune, S., and Yasuda, I. (2012). Numerical study on the impact of the 18.6-year period nodal tidal cycle on water masses in the subarctic North Pacific. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117. DOI: 10.1029/2011JC007734. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007734
  7. Tanaka, Y., Yasuda, I., Hasumi, H., Tatebe, H., and Osafune, S. (2012). Effects of the 18.6-yr Modulation of Tidal Mixing on the North Pacific Bidecadal Climate Variability in a Coupled Climate Model. Journal of Climate, 25(21), 7625–7642. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00051.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00051.1
  8. Osafune, S., and Yasuda, I. (2013). Remote impacts of the 18.6 year period modulation of localized tidal mixing in the North Pacific. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 118(6), 3128–3137. DOI: 10.1002/jgrc.20230. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20230
  9. Osafune, S., Masuda, S., and Sugiura, N. (2014). Role of the oceanic bridge in linking the 18.6 year modulation of tidal mixing and long-term SST change in the North Pacific. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(20), 7284–7290. DOI: 10.1002/2014GL061737. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061737
  10. Nakamura, T., Takeuchi, Y., Uchimoto, K., Mitsudera, H., and Wakatsuchi, M. (2014). Effects of temporal variation in tide-induced vertical mixing in the Kuril Straits on the thermohaline circulation originating in the Okhotsk Sea. Progress in Oceanography, 126, 135–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2014.05.007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.05.007
  11. Yasuda, I. (2018). Impact of the astronomical lunar 18.6-yr tidal cycle on El-Niño and Southern Oscillation. Scientific Reports, 8, 15206. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33526-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33526-4
  12. Osafune, S., Kouketsu, S., Masuda, S., and Sugiura, N. (2020). Dynamical Ocean Response Controlling the Eastward Movement of a Heat Content Anomaly Caused by the 18.6-Year Modulation of Localized Tidally Induced Mixing. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 125(2), e2019JC015513. DOI: 10.1029/2019JC015513. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015513
  13. Hamamoto, M., and Yasuda, I. (2021). Synchronized interdecadal variations behind regime shifts in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. Journal of Oceanography, 77(3), 383–392. DOI: 10.1007/s10872-021-00592-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-021-00592-8
  14. Joshi, M., Hall, R. A., Stevens, D. P., and Hawkins, E. (2023). The modelled climatic response to the 18.6-year lunar nodal cycle and its role in decadal temperature trends. Earth System Dynamics, 14(2), 443–455. DOI: 10.5194/esd-14-443-2023. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-443-2023
  15. Bult, S. V., Le Bars, D., Haigh, I. D., and Gerkema, T. (2024). The Effect of the 18.6-Year Lunar Nodal Cycle on Steric Sea Level Changes. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(8), e2023GL106563. DOI: 10.1029/2023GL106563. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106563
  16. Valle-Levinson, A., and Pattiaratchi, C. (2024). Filling in Munk's 'orbital gap' in climate and sea-level variability. Environmental Research Letters, 19(11), 114030. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad7ee5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad7ee5