Hot-carrier solar cells aim to exceed the Shockley–Queisser single-bandgap efficiency limit by extracting photoexcited carriers before they thermalize. Esmaielpour et al. (Nature Energy, 2020) demonstrated a promising 'valley photovoltaic' route in InGaAs/AlInAs heterojunctions, where rapid intervalley scattering funnels hot carriers into the satellite L-valley so that the device voltage is set by the upper-valley energy (~1.25 V) rather than the 0.75 eV absorber bandgap. However, the demonstrated device cannot exceed the single-bandgap limit because its AlInAs extraction layer has a Gamma-valley conduction-band minimum, creating a parasitic valley-degeneracy and effective-mass mismatch that blocks efficient collection of the L-valley carriers and reduces the fill factor. The open problem is to identify, grow, and integrate an absorber/extraction-layer combination whose extraction-layer conduction-band minimum is valley-matched (L-valley or of equal/heavier effective mass) with the absorber's upper valleys, to engineer the interface doping and thickness profiles for loss-free extraction, and to demonstrate a complete device attaining the projected performance under 1-sun operation — the prerequisite for a valley-based hot-carrier solar cell with efficiency beyond the Shockley–Queisser limit. This materials-and-device core remains open: though valley transfer across GaAs/AlGaAs interfaces has recently been reported, no complete valley-matched device has been demonstrated.

Background

A single-junction solar cell is bounded by the Shockley–Queisser (SQ) limit, the maximum efficiency of an ideal cell whose absorbed photon energy above the bandgap is lost to rapid carrier thermalization ('hot' carriers cooling to the lattice temperature). The hot-carrier solar cell (HCSC) concept proposes to beat this limit by extracting carriers while they are still hot, ideally through energy-selective contacts that accept only a narrow energy band. A key obstacle is that carriers in conventional III–V semiconductors cool within picoseconds, chiefly by emitting polar optical phonons. The conduction band of III–V materials such as InGaAs has its minimum at the Gamma point but also higher-lying satellite minima at the L and X points of the Brillouin zone ('valleys'); because the L-valley has a much larger density of states, intervalley phonon scattering from Gamma to L is extremely fast — faster than polar optical phonon cooling — so carriers can be transiently stored in the L-valley (a 'phonon bottleneck' further slows their cooling). Esmaielpour et al. (Nature Energy 5, 336–343, 2020) exploited this in an In0.53Ga0.47As/Al0.48In0.52As heterojunction: photoexcitation and strong localized interface electric fields (>100 kV cm^-1 over ~20 nm) accelerate carriers into the L-valley, and the device voltage is defined by the upper valley (~1.25 V in the ideal case), set by the L-valley energy (~1.25 eV above the valence band) rather than the 0.75 eV Gamma-valley bandgap of the InGaAs absorber; separately, a 'turn-on' operating voltage of ~1.375 V was extracted by a linear fit to the forward-bias J–V above 1.5 V, an extrapolation whose potential error the authors note limits claims that this system exceeds the 1.25 V valley-defined photovoltage. Crucially, however, the AlInAs extraction layer also has its conduction-band minimum at Gamma. Across the n+-AlInAs/n-InGaAs interface this creates a mismatch of valley degeneracy (the number and energetic alignment of equivalent minima) and effective mass between the absorber's L-valley carriers and the extractor's Gamma-valley minimum, acting as a parasitic barrier: carriers must tunnel to be collected, the current-density–voltage (J–V) curve develops an inflection near the maximum power point that degrades the fill factor (the ratio of the maximum output power to the product of short-circuit current and open-circuit voltage), and the device cannot reach efficiencies beyond the single-bandgap (SQ) limit. The authors argue this limitation is a materials-engineering issue, not a fundamental one: it could be removed by an extraction layer whose conduction-band minimum is itself L-valley, or otherwise resonant with the absorber's L-valley or of equal or heavier effective mass. Shifting the measured dark J–V curve to the value of the light Jsc (a saturated 1-sun photocurrent of ~22 mA cm^-2) with an 'ideal' L-valley-defined Voc of 1.25 V, they construct an 'adjusted/optimal' J–V comparison for a valley-matched device — the projected quantitative reference for materials development. Companion reviews (Ferry et al., J. Appl. Phys. 128, 220903, 2020; Zhang et al., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 225, 111073, 2021) confirm that no operational hot-carrier solar cell with the expected efficiency existed at the time, and that absorber-side thermalization physics (phonon bottleneck in III–V quantum wells) was far more developed than extractor-side materials science.

Problem Statement

Realize the valley-matched extraction that Esmaielpour et al. (2020) identified as the removable, non-fundamental obstacle blocking a practical valley-photovoltaic hot-carrier solar cell. Specifically: (1) identify and grow lattice-matched or integrable absorber/extraction-layer material combinations in which the extraction layer's conduction-band minimum is an L-valley (or is otherwise resonant with the absorber's L-valley, or is of equal or heavier effective mass), so that hot carriers stored in the absorber's satellite valleys can be collected directly across the interface without the parasitic degeneracy mismatch that the Gamma-valley AlInAs extractor imposes; (2) quantitatively design the interface doping and thickness profiles so that the localized interface fields that accelerate carriers into the absorber's upper valleys — together with any residual barrier remaining at the interface — do not introduce destructive recombination; (3) determine the device-scale tradeoffs among absorber thickness, minority-carrier diffusion length (the distance photoexcited minority carriers travel before recombining), and the spatial extent of the high interface fields so carriers generated throughout the absorber are collected; and (4) produce a quantitative device design whose simulated 1-sun AM1.5G current–voltage (J–V) characteristic (AM1.5G is the standard terrestrial solar reference spectrum, and 1 sun is its reference irradiance of 100 mW cm^-2) attains the projected valley-defined optimum — for the reference In0.53Ga0.47As/Al0.48In0.52As-based system this target is a saturated photocurrent Jsc ≈ 22 mA cm^-2, the ideal L-valley-defined Voc = 1.25 V, and a fill factor FF ≈ 66% (the paper's projected ('adjusted/optimal') 1-sun J–V curve, Fig. 5b), while a solver who instead designs a different admissible absorber/extraction-layer pair must meet that pair's own analogous projected valley-defined optimum rather than these reference numbers — as the prerequisite step toward a valley-based hot-carrier solar cell whose power conversion efficiency exceeds the Shockley–Queisser single-bandgap limit; fabricating and measuring the designed device is the stated longer-term goal, not the required resolution. These four deliverables form one coherent engineering objective: each supplies a necessary ingredient (materials pair, interface design, device geometry, simulated performance) of the same valley-matched hot-carrier cell, and the problem is complete when such a design is produced and its simulated 1-sun J–V attains the projected valley-defined target.

References

  1. Hamidreza Esmaielpour, Kyle R. Dorman, David K. Ferry, Tetsuya D. Mishima, Michael B. Santos, Vincent R. Whiteside, Ian R. Sellers, 'Exploiting intervalley scattering to harness hot carriers in III–V solar cells', Nature Energy 5(4), 336–343 (2020), DOI 10.1038/s41560-020-0602-0, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0602-0
  2. D. K. Ferry, S. M. Goodnick, V. R. Whiteside, I. R. Sellers, 'Challenges, myths, and opportunities in hot carrier solar cells', Journal of Applied Physics 128(22), 220903 (2020), DOI 10.1063/5.0028981, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0028981
  3. Yi Zhang, Xuguang Jia, Shuang Liu, Bo Zhang, Keman Lin, Jiayu Zhang, Gavin Conibeer, 'A review on thermalization mechanisms and prospect absorber materials for the hot carrier solar cells', Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 225, 111073 (2021), DOI 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111073, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111073
  4. Yi Zhang, Gavin Conibeer, Shuang Liu, Jiayu Zhang, Jean-François Guillemoles, 'Review of the mechanisms for the phonon bottleneck effect in III–V semiconductors and their application for efficient hot carrier solar cells', Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 30(6), 581–596 (2022), DOI 10.1002/pip.3557, https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3557
  5. Kyle R. Dorman, Vincent R. Whiteside, David K. Ferry, Israa G. Yusuf, Tanner J. Legvold, Tetsuya D. Mishima, Michael B. Santos, Stephen J. Polly, Seth M. Hubbard, Ian R. Sellers, 'The Role of Valley Degeneracy in Carrier Extraction in Valley Photovoltaic Solar Cells', 2021 IEEE 48th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), pp. 0583–0585 (2021), DOI 10.1109/pvsc43889.2021.9518917, https://doi.org/10.1109/pvsc43889.2021.9518917
  6. Kyle R. Dorman, Vincent R. Whiteside, David K. Ferry, Israa G. Yusuf, Tanner J. Legvold, Tetsuya D. Mishima, Michael B. Santos, Stephen J. Polly, Seth M. Hubbard, Ian R. Sellers, 'Toward Hot Carrier Extraction in Intervalley Photovoltaic Devices', ACS Applied Energy Materials 5(9), 11159–11166 (2022), DOI 10.1021/acsaem.2c01758, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c01758
  7. Kyle R. Dorman, Vincent R. Whiteside, David K. Ferry, Tetsuya D. Mishima, Israa Yusuf, Hamidreza Esmaielpour, Michael B. Santos, Ian R. Sellers, 'Electric Field and Its Effect on Hot Carriers in InGaAs Valley Photovoltaic Devices', IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 12(5), 1175–1183 (2022), DOI 10.1109/jphotov.2022.3189781, https://doi.org/10.1109/jphotov.2022.3189781
  8. David K. Ferry, Vincent R. Whiteside, Ian R. Sellers, 'Pathways to hot carrier solar cells', Journal of Photonics for Energy 12(2), 022204 (2022), DOI 10.1117/1.jpe.12.022204, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jpe.12.022204
  9. Yongjie Zou, Hamidreza Esmaielpour, Daniel Suchet, Jean-François Guillemoles, Stephen M. Goodnick, 'The role of nonequilibrium LO phonons, Pauli exclusion, and intervalley pathways on the relaxation of hot carriers in InGaAs/InGaAsP multi-quantum-wells', Scientific Reports 13, 5601 (2023), DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-32125-2, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32125-2
  10. Tom Markvart, 'Hot carrier solar cells by adiabatic cooling', Applied Physics Letters 125(20), 203503 (2024), DOI 10.1063/5.0234167, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234167
  11. Hasan Ahmed, Chiran Wijesundara, Vincent R. Whiteside, David K. Ferry, Tim Thomay, Stephen J. Polly, Seth M. Hubbard, Ian R. Sellers, 'Valley Transfer and Hot Carrier Extraction in GaAs/Al0.16Ga0.84As Heterojunction Solar Cells', 2025 IEEE 53rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), pp. 0349–0351 (2025), DOI 10.1109/pvsc59419.2025.11132414, https://doi.org/10.1109/pvsc59419.2025.11132414
  12. Ian R. Sellers, 'Hot carrier solar cells and valley photovoltaics', Proc. SPIE, New Concepts in Solar and Thermal Radiation Conversion VI (2025), DOI 10.1117/12.3063917, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3063917
  13. Chiran Wijesundara, Hasan Ahmad, Vincent R. Whiteside, David K. Ferry, Ian R. Sellers, Tim Thomay, 'Hot-carrier relaxation dynamics and valley-selective scattering in GaAs/AlGaAs photovoltaic structures', Proc. SPIE, Physics, Simulation, and Photonic Engineering of Photovoltaic Devices XV (2026), DOI 10.1117/12.3081959, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3081959