The community climate framework (Blonder et al. 2015) quantifies environmental filtering and disequilibrium by comparing the climate implied by the niches of the species in a local community (the community-inferred climate) with observed climate, past, present, and future. Its central unresolved weakness is that the resulting mismatch statistics have no unique mechanistic interpretation: dispersal limitation, species interactions, priority effects, and extinction debt versus colonization credit can all generate the same disequilibrium signal, while the reliance on occurrence-inferred realized niches — which can be systematically displaced from fundamental physiological niches — adds a measurement bias of unknown direction and size. Later literature has applied the framework widely, decomposed lags into demographic components where exceptional paleoecological data exist, and built consequence-focused theory, but no general method exists that (i) attributes observed community–climate disequilibrium to specific assembly processes, or (ii) replaces or corrects the realized-niche estimates with fundamental-niche data at community scale. The open problem is to give the framework's statistics mechanistic content along both of these linked axes.

Background

A long-standing goal of community ecology and biogeography is to explain why the species found together at a site are those particular species. Three broad processes structure ecological communities: environmental filtering (abiotic conditions excluding species whose tolerances do not match the local climate), dispersal limitation (species being absent because they cannot reach the site, not because conditions are unsuitable), and species interactions such as competition (negative effects between species that share resources) and facilitation (positive effects, e.g. a plant canopy buffering harsh conditions for others). Priority effects — early-arriving species constraining which later arrivals can establish — add historical contingency. When communities are tracked through time, composition often lags behind climate change because poorly adapted species persist (trailing-edge lag) while better-adapted species fail to arrive or establish (leading-edge lag); such lags are described as disequilibrium between community composition and climate.

A key methodological distinction is between the realized niche — the climate range a species actually occupies, inferred from occurrence records, and shaped by dispersal, interactions, and land use — and the fundamental niche — the range it could occupy based on physiological tolerances alone, measurable only by experiment. Occurrence data are abundant; experimental tolerance data are rare and cover few taxa and few climate axes.

Blonder et al. (2015, Ecology 96(4):972–985) proposed a community climate framework that operationalizes these ideas. For each local community, species' occurrence data are mapped into a low-dimensional climate space, and the community-inferred climate is the climate volume or centroid occupied by the set of niches of the locally present species. Comparing this with observed climate, and with climate at other times such as the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, about 21,000 years ago), yields statistics for climate-volume deviation (interpreted as environmental filtering) and climate mismatch (interpreted as disequilibrium). In a scaled version, the local community is compared against random draws from a regional species pool (the set of species that could potentially disperse to the site) under a null model, which controls for which species are available. Applying this to 471 New World forest plots and over 14,000 tree species, they found most communities strongly filtered, more in equilibrium with current climate than random pool samples, and current disequilibrium predictable from LGM climate and increasing under near-future change.

The authors themselves identified the framework's decisive limitations. First, the scaled statistics depend on how the regional species pool and null model are defined, and the published null model ignores abundance and demography. Second — and central here — the mismatch statistic cannot uniquely identify process: dispersal limitation and species interactions can produce the same sign of mismatch, priority effects and propagule pressure add further ambiguity, and the paper states explicitly that the mismatch statistic is not always able to distinguish these processes, analogous to how competition and environmental filtering are confounded in phylogenetic and trait-based community ecology. Third, the framework assumes realized niches are good proxies for fundamental niches, even though systematic displacement between the two is documented; the authors note the framework could in principle accept experimentally measured response surfaces instead, but such data were then available for very few taxa. Related community-level metrics, such as the Community Temperature Index used in thermophilization research (the warming over time of a community's species composition, expressed as an average of species' thermal affiliations), face the same attribution problem and can be partitioned at most into demographic components (colonization versus local extinction).

Problem Statement

Give the community climate framework's filtering and disequilibrium statistics mechanistic content. Specifically, two linked components serve this single objective: (1) Causal attribution — develop and validate approaches that, from community composition data together with climate data, species niche estimates, and where available time series or paleoecological records, determine how much of an observed community–climate disequilibrium is attributable to specific candidate assembly processes — among others, dispersal limitation, species interactions including competition and facilitation, priority effects, extinction debt versus colonization credit, and adaptive niche evolution — instead of the current situation in which these processes produce indistinguishable mismatch signatures; and (2) Estimation fidelity — quantify and correct the bias that arises because community-level statistics are built from occurrence-inferred realized niches that may be systematically displaced from fundamental physiological niches, so that filtering and disequilibrium estimates are not artifacts of niche measurement. The problem retains the source's full generality across taxa, regions, and climate axes; no restriction to particular systems or mechanisms is intended.

References

  1. Blonder, B., Nogués-Bravo, D., Borregaard, M. K., Donoghue II, J. C., Jørgensen, P. M., Kraft, N. J. B., Lessard, J.-P., Morueta-Holme, N., Sandel, B., Svenning, J. C., Violle, C., Rahbek, C., Enquist, B. J. (2015). Linking environmental filtering and disequilibrium to biogeography with a community climate framework. Ecology 96(4):972–985. doi:10.1890/14-0589.1, https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0589.1
  2. Butterfield, B. J., Anderson, R. S., Holmgren, C. A., Betancourt, J. L. (2019). Extinction debt and delayed colonization have had comparable but unique effects on plant community–climate lags since the Last Glacial Maximum. Global Ecology and Biogeography 28(8):1067–1077. doi:10.1111/geb.12915, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12915
  3. Knight, C. A., Blois, J. L., Blonder, B., Macias-Fauria, M., Ordonez, A., Svenning, J. C. (2020). Community Assembly and Climate Mismatch in Late Quaternary Eastern North American Pollen Assemblages. The American Naturalist 195(2):166–180. doi:10.1086/706340, https://doi.org/10.1086/706340
  4. Feeley, K. J., Bravo-Avila, C., Fadrique, B., Perez, T. M., Zuleta, D. (2020). Climate-driven changes in the composition of New World plant communities. Nature Climate Change 10(10):965–970. doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0873-2, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0873-2
  5. Münkemüller, T., Gallien, L., Pollock, L. J., Barros, C., Carboni, M., Chalmandrier, L., Mazel, F., Mokany, K., Roquet, C., Smyčka, J., Talluto, M. V., Thuiller, W. (2020). Dos and don'ts when inferring assembly rules from diversity patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography 29(7):1212–1229. doi:10.1111/geb.13098, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13098
  6. Pérez-Navarro, M. Á., Serra-Díaz, J. M., Svenning, J. C., Esteve-Selma, M. Á., Hernández-Bastida, J., Lloret, F. (2021). Extreme drought reduces climatic disequilibrium in dryland plant communities. Oikos 130(5):680–690. doi:10.1111/oik.07882, https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.07882
  7. Felton, A. J., Shriver, R. K., Stemkovski, M., Bradford, J. B., Suding, K. N., Adler, P. B. (2022). Climate disequilibrium dominates uncertainty in long-term projections of primary productivity. Ecology Letters 25(12):2688–2698. doi:10.1111/ele.14132, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14132
  8. Pérez-Navarro, M. A., Lloret, F., Ogaya, R., Estiarte, M., Peñuelas, J. (2023). Decrease in climatic disequilibrium associated with climate change and species abundance shifts in Mediterranean plant communities. Journal of Ecology 112(2):291–304. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.14233, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14233
  9. Pérez-Navarro, M. A., Lloret, F., Molina-Venegas, R., Alcántara, J. M., Verdú, M. (2024). Plant canopies promote climatic disequilibrium in Mediterranean recruit communities. Ecology Letters 27(2):e14391. doi:10.1111/ele.14391, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14391
  10. Díaz-Borrego, R., Pérez-Navarro, M. Á., Jaime, L., Elvira, N. J., Lloret, F. (2024). Climatic disequilibrium of recruit communities across a drought-induced die-off gradient in Mediterranean shrubland. Oikos 2024(7):e10465. doi:10.1111/oik.10465, https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10465
  11. Stemkovski, M., Cortez, M. H., Bernhardt, J. R., Bladen, K. K., Bradford, J. B., Clark-Wolf, K., Evans, M. E. K., Johnson, L. C., Lynch, A. J., Pastore, M. A., Pinsky, M. L., Rollinson, C. R., Selmoni, O., Walker, A. P., Williams, J. W., Adler, P. B. (2026). Linking Community-Climate Disequilibrium to Ecosystem Function. Ecology Letters 29(1):e70314. doi:10.1111/ele.70314, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70314
  12. Feeley, K. J., Iseli, E., Bektaş, B., Manzanedo, R. D., McMichael, C. H., Alexander, J. M., Hille Ris Lambers, J. (2026). Thermophilization: Concepts, Methods, and Implications of Changes in Community Composition due to Global Warming. Global Change Biology 32(8):e71063. doi:10.1111/gcb.71063, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.71063