Winter haze in eastern China is dominated by organic particulate matter, yet the fraction of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) produced by aqueous-phase chemistry — reactions in aerosol liquid water and fog/cloud droplets — versus gas-phase photochemical oxidation and primary emissions remains unquantified and mechanistically contested. A core obstacle is a measurement ambiguity noted in the source literature: online aerosol mass spectrometers sample through an aerodynamic lens that transmits only roughly 40 nm to 1 µm particles, so SOA incorporated into fog/droplet-mode particles can be undersampled, making a genuinely small aqueous SOA contribution indistinguishable from a large one hidden above the inlet's upper size cut. The problem is to deliver a quantitative budget of aqueous SOA in winter haze with measurement closure across the full fine-particle size range, including droplet-processed material. The aqueous versus gas-phase split is method-dependent, with estimates ranging from below 10% to about half of SOA/OA mass, precursor and oxidant identity remain unresolved, and no closure study resolving the sampling ambiguity exists.

Background

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5, particles with aerodynamic diameter below 2.5 µm) during winter haze episodes in China is dominated by organics, a mixture of primary organic aerosol (POA, emitted directly by coal and biomass combustion and traffic) and secondary organic aerosol (SOA, formed in the atmosphere from oxidized gas- or condensed-phase precursors). Real-time instruments such as the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) and its research-grade predecessor the aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) vaporize and ionize non-refractory submicron particles to measure their chemical composition; their inlet uses an aerodynamic lens, an assembly of apertures that focuses a narrow particle beam, and transmits particles efficiently only between roughly 40 nm and 1 µm. Source apportionment of the measured organic mass spectra by positive matrix factorization (PMF, commonly implemented with the multilinear engine ME-2) separates primary factors (e.g., hydrocarbon-like, coal-combustion, and biomass-burning OA) from oxygenated OA (OOA), a surrogate for SOA. In winter haze, aqueous-phase chemistry — reactions dissolved in aerosol liquid water, which swells at high relative humidity (RH), and in fog droplets — is well established as the driver of explosive sulfate growth, and an analogous aqueous route to SOA ("aqSOA") is expected from oxidation and accretion of water-soluble organics such as glyoxal, methylglyoxal, and biomass-burning phenols. The observational record is, however, contradictory. In Beijing winter, Sun et al. (2016) retrieved an aqueous-processed OOA factor that tracked RH, and Ge et al. (2012) observed strong SOA enhancement in California winter fog; but in an extremely polluted North China Plain city (Handan), Li et al. (2017) found that while aqueous reactions at high RH strongly promoted sulfate, the SOA mass fraction showed no dependence on RH at all. Li et al. (2017) themselves noted two unseparated explanations: high POA fractions masking the secondary signal, or a size-dependent measurement artifact — OOA formed in fog droplets is incorporated into particles too large for the ACSM aerodynamic lens to transmit, as reported by Ge et al. (2012), and consistent with a London fog event where the AMS detected no OOA increase while single-particle mass spectrometry revealed aqueous SOA formation (Dall'Osto et al. 2009). A Yangtze River Delta haze study (Haque et al. 2020) found secondary organic carbon strongly coupled to humidity and temperature and to secondary inorganic aerosol, with SOA formation occurring by both aqueous-phase and photochemical oxidation reactions, and noted that the formation mechanism of secondary aerosol, particularly SOA, is "very complex and still poorly understood". The question thus stands both observationally (how much aqueous SOA is there, including in the droplet mode that standard online instruments undersample?) and mechanistically (which precursors and oxidants produce it under low-winter-photolysis conditions?).

Problem Statement

Determine, quantitatively, the contribution of aqueous-phase chemistry to secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation during winter haze in China — relative to gas-phase photochemical production and primary organic aerosol — and resolve the associated measurement ambiguity in which online aerosol mass spectrometers undersample SOA incorporated into fog/droplet-mode particles. A complete answer must provide: (1) a mass budget of secondary organic aerosol over the full fine-particle size range (including droplet-processed material above the roughly 1 µm transmission limit of aerodynamic-lens inlets), with quantified uncertainty, closing the gap between submicron online composition and total PM2.5/fog-water organic mass during winter haze episodes through an explicit closure method; and (2) a reconciliation of the conflicting observational signatures in the literature — e.g., the absence of any relative-humidity (RH) dependence of the SOA fraction in Handan (Li et al. 2017) versus RH-driven aqueous SOA enhancements in Beijing, Xi'an, and the Yangtze River Delta — demonstrating whether such null results reflect primary-OA masking, genuine regional differences in the aqueous contribution, or droplet-mode undersampling by the instruments. The precursor-and-oxidant question raised in the Background — which species produce aqueous SOA under low-winter-photolysis conditions — is context that motivates (1) and (2) rather than a separately required part of this completion standard.

References

  1. Li, Haiyan; Zhang, Qi; Zhang, Qiang; Chen, Chunrong; Wang, Litao; Wei, Zhe; Zhou, Shan; Parworth, Caroline; Zheng, Bo; Canonaco, Francesco; Prévôt, André S. H.; Chen, Ping; Zhang, Hongliang; Wallington, Timothy J.; He, Kebin (2017). Wintertime aerosol chemistry and haze evolution in an extremely polluted city of the North China Plain: significant contribution from coal and biomass combustion. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 17, 4751–4768. doi:10.5194/acp-17-4751-2017. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4751-2017
  2. Haque, Md. Mozammel; Fang, Cao; Schnelle-Kreis, Jürgen; Abbaszade, Gülcin; Liu, Xiaoyan; Bao, Mengying; Zhang, Wenqi; Zhang, Yan-Lin (2020). Regional haze formation enhanced the atmospheric pollution levels in the Yangtze River Delta region, China: Implications for anthropogenic sources and secondary aerosol formation. Science of the Total Environment 728, 138013. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138013
  3. Ge, Xinlei; Zhang, Qi; Sun, Yele; Ruehl, Christopher R.; Setyan, Ari (2012). Effect of aqueous-phase processing on aerosol chemistry and size distributions in Fresno, California, during wintertime. Environmental Chemistry 9, 221–235. doi:10.1071/EN11168. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN11168
  4. Dall'Osto, M.; Harrison, R. M.; Coe, H.; Williams, P. (2009). Real-time secondary aerosol formation during a fog event in London. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9, 2459–2469. doi:10.5194/acp-9-2459-2009. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2459-2009
  5. Sun, Yele; Du, Wei; Fu, Pingqing; Wang, Qingqing; Li, Jie; Ge, Xinlei; Zhang, Qi; Zhu, Chunmao; Ren, Lujie; Xu, Weiqi; Zhao, Jian; Han, Tingting; Worsnop, Douglas R.; Wang, Zifa (2016). Primary and secondary aerosols in Beijing in winter: sources, variations and processes. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16, 8309–8329. doi:10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016
  6. Xing, Li; Wu, Jiarui; Elser, Miriam; Tong, Shengrui; Liu, Suixin; Li, Xia; Liu, Lang; Cao, Junji; Zhou, Jiamao; El-Haddad, Imad; Huang, Rujin; Ge, Maofa; Tie, Xuexi; Prévôt, André S. H.; Li, Guohui (2019). Wintertime secondary organic aerosol formation in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH): contributions of HONO sources and heterogeneous reactions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 19, 2343–2359. doi:10.5194/acp-19-2343-2019. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2343-2019
  7. Huang, Ru-Jin; He, Yao; Duan, Jing; Li, Yongjie; Chen, Qi; Zheng, Yan; Chen, Yang; Hu, Weiwei; Lin, Chunshui; Ni, Haiyan; Dai, Wenting; Cao, Junji; Wu, Yunfei; Zhang, Renjian; Xu, Wei; Ovadnevaite, Jurgita; Ceburnis, Darius; Hoffmann, Thorsten; O'Dowd, Colin D. (2020). Contrasting sources and processes of particulate species in haze days with low and high relative humidity in wintertime Beijing. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 20, 9101–9114. doi:10.5194/acp-20-9101-2020. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9101-2020
  8. Wang, Junfeng; Ye, Jianhuai; Zhang, Qi; Zhao, Jian; Wu, Yangzhou; Li, Jingyi; Liu, Dantong; Li, Weijun; Zhang, Yange; Wu, Cheng; Xie, Conghui; Qin, Yiming; Lei, Yali; Huang, Xiangpeng; Guo, Jianping; Liu, Pengfei; Fu, Pingqing; Li, Yongjie; Lee, Hyun Chul; Choi, Hyoungwoo; Zhang, Jie; Liao, Hong; Chen, Mindong; Sun, Yele; Ge, Xinlei; Martin, Scot T.; Jacob, Daniel J. (2021). Aqueous production of secondary organic aerosol from fossil-fuel emissions in winter Beijing haze. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2022179118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2022179118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022179118
  9. Xiao, Yao; Hu, Min; Zong, Taomou; Wu, Zhijun; Tan, Tianyi; Zhang, Zirui; Fang, Xin; Chen, Shiyi; Guo, Song (2021). Insights into aqueous-phase and photochemical formation of secondary organic aerosol in the winter of Beijing. Atmospheric Environment 259, 118535. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118535
  10. Chen, Chunrong; Zhang, Haixu; Yan, Weijia; Wu, Nana; Zhang, Qiang; He, Kebin (2021). Aerosol water content enhancement leads to changes in the major formation mechanisms of nitrate and secondary organic aerosols in winter over the North China Plain. Environmental Pollution 287, 117625. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117625
  11. Xu, Buqing; Zhang, Gan; Gustafsson, Örjan; Kawamura, Kimitaka; Li, Jun; Andersson, August; Bikkina, Srinivas; Kunwar, Bhagawati; Pokhrel, Ambarish; Zhong, Guangcai; Zhao, Shizhen; Li, Jing; Huang, Chen; Cheng, Zhineng; Zhu, Sanyuan; Peng, Pingan; Sheng, Guoying (2022). Large contribution of fossil-derived components to aqueous secondary organic aerosols in China. Nature Communications 13, 5115. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32863-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32863-3
  12. Duan, Jing; Huang, Ru-Jin; Gu, Yifang; Lin, Chunshui; Zhong, Haobin; Xu, Wei; Liu, Quan; You, Yan; Ovadnevaite, Jurgita; Ceburnis, Darius; Hoffmann, Thorsten; O'Dowd, Colin (2022). Measurement report: Large contribution of biomass burning and aqueous-phase processes to the wintertime secondary organic aerosol formation in Xi'an, Northwest China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 22, 10139–10153. doi:10.5194/acp-22-10139-2022. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10139-2022
  13. Wang, Fanglin; Lv, Shaojun; Liu, Xiaodi; Lei, Yali; Wu, Can; Chen, Yubao; Zhang, Fan; Wang, Gehui (2023). Investigation into the differences and relationships between gasSOA and aqSOA in winter haze pollution on Chongming Island, Shanghai, based on VOCs observation. Environmental Pollution 316, 120684. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120684
  14. Li, Shuaiyi; Chen, Cheng; Yang, Guang-li; Fang, Jie; Sun, Yele; Tang, Lili; Wang, Hongli; Xiang, Wentao; Zhang, Hongliang; Croteau, Philip L.; Jayne, John T.; Liao, Hong; Ge, Xinlei; Favez, Olivier; Zhang, Yunjiang (2022). Sources and processes of organic aerosol in non-refractory PM1 and PM2.5 during foggy and haze episodes in an urban environment of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Environmental Research 212, 113557. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.113557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113557
  15. Mei, Sheng-Shi; Xia, Kaihui; Liu, Cheng-Cheng; Chen, Xiaokang; Yuan, Renmin; Liu, Hao; Zhao, Chun; Liu, Shang (2025). Aqueous-Phase Processing Affects the Formation and Size Distribution of Aerosol Organic Functional Groups During Heavy Pollution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 130, e2024JD042029. doi:10.1029/2024JD042029. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042029
  16. Wu, Liqing; Wu, Bing; Ling, Zhenhao; Shao, Min; Wang, Xuemei (2025). Development of SOA modules in the WRF-Chem model and evaluation of the key formation pathways of SOA and associated health risk over mainland China. Environment International 202, 109662. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2025.109662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109662
  17. Wang, Qiu; Liu, Tengyu; Xu, Weiqi; Wang, Jinbo; Ge, Dafeng; Zhu, Caijun; Ren, Chuanhua; Wang, Jiaping; Zha, Qiaozhi; Qi, Ximeng; Nie, Wei; Chi, Xuguang; Lou, Sijia; Huang, Xin; Ding, Aijun (2026). Characteristics and processing of aqueous secondary organic aerosols during autumn in suburban Eastern China: role of aerosol liquid water, aerosol acidity, and photochemistry. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 26, 3185–3194. doi:10.5194/acp-26-3185-2026. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3185-2026
  18. Jin, Yali; Luo, Hao; Tang, Siqi; Xue, Shuhui; Nie, Chengyu; Peng, Xiaocong; Zheng, Yan; Xu, Weiqi; Zhang, Guohua; Pan, Xiaole; Sun, Yele; Chen, Qi; Liu, Lanzhong; Zhao, Defeng (2026). Molecular composition and processing of aqueous secondary organic aerosol in clouds at a mountain site in southeastern China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 26, 2813–2830. doi:10.5194/acp-26-2813-2026. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-2813-2026
  19. Li, Rongjie; Wang, Gehui; Xiao, Binyu; Li, Zheng; Wu, Can; Liang, Chenlong; Li, Rui; Chen, Kaitao; Wu, Meixuan; Li, Rui; Zhang, Fan (2026). Aqueous-Phase Formation of Nitrogen-Containing Secondary Organic Aerosols in China Winter Haze Continuously Enhanced in the Past Decade. Environmental Science & Technology 60 (23), 16725–16734. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6c00958. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c00958