Winter observations over North China and the Huang-Huai area (NCHH) show a multi-decadal divergence: haze days (HD) increased strongly after 1980 while fog days (FD), roughly half as numerous, rose before the 1980s and fell thereafter; fog is spatially smooth and more frequent in the south, whereas haze clusters around large cities. The source study (Yin, Wang and Guo 2015) and the large attribution literature it motivated still leave unresolved the quantitative decomposition of this evolution among anthropogenic emissions, urbanization-induced meteorological change, emission-control policy, and large-scale climate variability, as well as the physical mechanism behind the spatial behavior of the most severe fog. This problem asks for a reconciled quantitative attribution of the 1961-2012 winter FD and HD record over NCHH across these driver classes, with uncertainties, together with a mechanistic explanation of the fog-specific spatial patterns and demonstrated robustness to the inhomogeneities of the visibility record.

Background

In Chinese surface-observation practice, a day with horizontal visibility below 10 km is recorded as a fog day (FD) when relative humidity (RH) is at least 90% and as a haze day (HD) when RH is below 90%. This separates visibility loss caused by suspended water droplets from that caused by dry aerosol, although intermediate 'wet haze' states, in which hygroscopic fine particles grow by absorbing water vapor, are common in the modern, aerosol-rich atmosphere. Yin, Wang and Guo (2015) reconstructed a daily winter climatology of fog and haze by visibility level for 78 stations over North China and the Huang-Huai area (NCHH; roughly 31-44 degrees N, 109-119 degrees E) for 1961-2012, using four observations per day, excluding precipitation and dust, and, because the surface-observation reporting code changed around 1980, mapping the pre-1980 categorical visibility grades onto the four post-1980 visibility levels (Lv1: 4-10 km, Lv2: 2-4 km, Lv3: 1-2 km, Lv4: below 1 km).

Their reconstruction, corroborated by the earlier climatologies of Fu et al. (2014) for the North China Plain and Ding and Liu (2014) for all of China, established several facts that any explanation of the region's visibility climate must reproduce: winter HD increased markedly, with severe haze (Lv3-Lv4) growing after 1980; FD is about half of HD in number and rose before the 1980s but declined afterwards, so the two records diverge over the full period; the haze-prone season spread from winter to the whole year; fog has a comparatively smooth spatial pattern with more fog south of Hebei and less to the north, while haze is spatially discrete around major urban and industrial centers; an East Asian Winter Monsoon index is negatively correlated with HD (Pearson r = -0.52, significant at 99%); and the meteorological controls on haze changed regime - before the 1980s HD was significantly anticorrelated with surface wind speed (ventilation-limited), whereas afterwards the wind anticorrelation weakened and HD became significantly positively correlated with precipitation and RH, with RH inside haze events rising from roughly 40% in the 1960s to about 55% by 2000, indicating moisture-limited 'wet haze' dominated by hygroscopic fine particles.

The candidate drivers span scales. The East Asian winter monsoon (EAWM) - the winter circulation that drives cold, dry, ventilating northerlies across eastern China and whose standard intensity index is often built from the sea-level-pressure gradient between the Siberian High and the western Pacific - weakened from the mid-1980s. Proposed large-scale modulators include El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO, the tropical Pacific interannual mode, whose linkage to the EAWM itself weakened after the mid-1970s), the Arctic Oscillation (AO, the northern hemispheric surface-pressure seesaw), and autumn Arctic sea-ice decline, each argued to favor stagnant, haze-conducive circulation. Local drivers include urbanization - urban heat and dry islands, increased surface roughness, and shallower planetary boundary layers (the lowest turbulent atmospheric layer, whose depth controls vertical dilution of pollutants) - and emissions of primary particles and of the precursors of secondary aerosol formed in the atmosphere. Policy interventions (fuel switching, episodic controls such as the 2008 Beijing Olympic measures, and, beyond the 1961-2012 record window, the clean-air actions from 2013 onward) changed emissions stepwise rather than smoothly.

A substantial post-2015 literature attacked pieces of this problem. Chen and Wang (2015) documented the circulation-haze relationship on the 1960-2012 visibility record; Yuan, Yin and Wang (2015) tied the interdecadal haze increase to EAWM weakening; Wang and Chen (2016) attributed the post-2000 haze intensification in central North China jointly to growing energy consumption, autumn Arctic sea-ice decline, and reduced wind and precipitation; Zou et al. (2017) and Zou et al. (2020) supplied modeling evidence that cryospheric change (Arctic sea ice and Eurasian snow - the frozen components of the climate system) influences Chinese haze through teleconnections, i.e. climate linkages that connect distant regions; Cai et al. (2017) projected more frequent haze-conducive weather under climate change; Yin and Wang (2016, 2017) built seasonal-prediction and event-attribution frameworks. Other results cut against the climate narrative: Shen et al. (2018) showed the Arctic sea-ice and sea-surface-temperature correlations with Beijing haze are dipole-like, shift sign on interdecadal timescales, and support no reliable future trend; Xu et al. (2020) found no significant decline of the northerly wind within the North China mixing layer over 1979-2016 and net meteorological change that was on balance favorable for pollutant reduction; Pei et al. (2020) found Beijing hazy-day frequency mainly controlled by climate variability (r = 0.77) but haze intensity driven by emissions; Gao et al. (2020) found that emission cuts reduced Beijing winter PM2.5 (particulate matter below 2.5 micrometers) despite unfavorable meteorology; Yang et al. (2018) attributed part of the post-2000 PM2.5 trend to changes in foreign emissions and weakened winds; Xu et al. (2021) found anthropogenic forcing made Jing-Jin-Ji haze-related meteorology more conducive over 1961-2016. On the fog side, process studies of single events (Jia et al. 2019; Yan et al. 2020) show that aerosols can promote fog liquid water content while urbanization suppresses low-level fog, and Shen et al. (2024) showed that northern and southern winter fog events over eastern China arise from different Rossby-wave-train pathways (large-scale planetary atmospheric wave patterns) and moisture sources.

Despite this literature, no study provides a reconciled quantitative attribution of the full NCHH winter fog-and-haze-day record across the four driver classes named by the source paper, the published partial attributions disagree in sign and magnitude, the urbanization contribution to the regional record is unquantified, and the specific fog-level spatial behaviors - overall fog frequency decreasing northward while the extremely severe fog level (Lv4, visibility below 1 km) shows very little north-south difference in days, being even slightly more frequent in the north - remain unexplained. That is the unresolved target.

Problem Statement

Using the longest available homogeneous observations of winter fog days (FD) and haze days (HD, resolved by visibility level) over North China and the Huang-Huai area - the 1961-2012 reconstruction of Yin, Wang and Guo (2015), which fixes the primary attribution window, optionally supplemented by any independently validated extension of it - the problem is to: (a) quantitatively attribute the observed decadal evolution, including the post-1980 divergence between increasing HD and decreasing FD, the shift from wind-limited to moisture-limited haze regimes, and the spatial reorganization of haze centers, by separating and quantifying, with stated uncertainties, the contributions of (i) anthropogenic emissions (primary particles and secondary aerosol formation), (ii) urbanization-induced local meteorological change (boundary-layer depth, surface wind, urban heat and dry islands), (iii) emission-control policy interventions, and (iv) large-scale climate variability and teleconnections (East Asian winter monsoon, ENSO, Arctic Oscillation, Arctic sea ice); (b) provide a physical mechanism for the fog-specific spatial behaviors, in particular why overall fog frequency decreases northward over NCHH while the extremely severe fog level (Lv4, visibility below 1 km) shows very little north-south difference in days and is even slightly more frequent in the north; and (c) demonstrate the robustness of the attribution to the inhomogeneities of the visibility record (the 1980 reporting-code change, the pre-2012 manual observations, and the RH-threshold classification of fog versus haze). A complete answer must cover fog days and haze days jointly rather than haze or PM2.5 alone, and must state the relative importance of the four factor classes with uncertainties rather than only establishing pairwise correlations.

References

  1. Yin ZhiCong, Wang HuiJun, Guo WenLi (2015). Climatic change features of fog and haze in winter over North China and Huang-Huai Area. Science China Earth Sciences 58:1370-1376. doi:10.1007/s11430-015-5089-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-5089-3 (source paper)
  2. Yuan DongMin, Yin ZhiCong, Wang HuiJun (2015). Interdecadal increase of haze in winter over North China and the Huang-huai Area and the weakening of the East Asia Winter Monsoon. Chinese Science Bulletin 60:1395-1400. doi:10.1360/N972014-01348. https://doi.org/10.1360/N972014-01348
  3. Chen Huopo, Wang Huijun (2015). Haze Days in North China and the associated atmospheric circulations based on daily visibility data from 1960 to 2012. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 120:5895-5909. doi:10.1002/2015JD023225. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023225
  4. Fu G. Q., Xu W. Y., Yang R. F., Li J. B., Zhao C. S. (2014). The distribution and trends of fog and haze in the North China Plain over the past 30 years. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14:11949-11958. doi:10.5194/acp-14-11949-2014. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11949-2014
  5. Ding YiHui, Liu YanJu (2014). Analysis of long-term variations of fog and haze in China in recent 50 years and their relations with atmospheric humidity. Science China Earth Sciences 57:36-46. doi:10.1007/s11430-013-4792-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-013-4792-1
  6. Wang Hui-Jun, Chen Huo-Po (2016). Understanding the recent trend of haze pollution in eastern China: roles of climate change. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16:4205-4211. doi:10.5194/acp-16-4205-2016. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4205-2016
  7. Yin Zhicong, Wang Huijun (2016). Seasonal prediction of winter haze days in the north central North China Plain. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16:14843-14852. doi:10.5194/acp-16-14843-2016. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14843-2016
  8. Yin Zhicong, Wang Huijun, Chen Huopo (2017). Understanding severe winter haze events in the North China Plain in 2014: roles of climate anomalies. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 17:1641-1651. doi:10.5194/acp-17-1641-2017. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1641-2017
  9. Zou Yufei, Wang Yuhang, Zhang Yuzhong, Koo Ja-Ho (2017). Arctic sea ice, Eurasia snow, and extreme winter haze in China. Science Advances 3:e1602751. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602751. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602751
  10. Zou Yufei, Wang Yuhang, Xie Zuowei, Wang Hailong, Rasch Philip J. (2020). Atmospheric teleconnection processes linking winter air stagnation and haze extremes in China with regional Arctic sea ice decline. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 20:4999-5017. doi:10.5194/acp-20-4999-2020. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4999-2020
  11. Cai Wenju, Li Ke, Liao Hong, Wang Huijun, Wu Lixin (2017). Weather conditions conducive to Beijing severe haze more frequent under climate change. Nature Climate Change 7:257-262. doi:10.1038/nclimate3249. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3249
  12. Shen Lu, Jacob Daniel J., Mickley Loretta J., Wang Yuxuan, Zhang Qiang (2018). Insignificant effect of climate change on winter haze pollution in Beijing. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18:17489-17496. doi:10.5194/acp-18-17489-2018. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17489-2018
  13. Pei Lin, Yan Zhongwei, Chen Deliang, Miao Shiguang (2020). Climate variability or anthropogenic emissions: which caused Beijing Haze? Environmental Research Letters 15:034004. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab6f11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6f11
  14. Gao Meng, Liu Zirui, Zheng Bo, Ji Dongsheng, Sherman Peter, Song Shaojie, Xin Jinyuan, Liu Cheng, Wang Yuesi, Zhang Qiang, Xing Jia, Jiang Jingkun, Wang Zifa, Carmichael Gregory R., McElroy Michael B. (2020). China's emission control strategies have suppressed unfavorable influences of climate on wintertime PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing since 2002. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 20:1497-1505. doi:10.5194/acp-20-1497-2020. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1497-2020
  15. Xu Ziping, Chen Song Xi, Wu Xiaoqing (2020). Meteorological Change and Impacts on Air Pollution: Results From North China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 125:e2020JD032423. doi:10.1029/2020JD032423. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032423
  16. Yang Yang, Wang Hailong, Smith Steven J., Zhang Rudong, Lou Sijia, Qian Yun, Ma Po-Lun, Rasch Philip J. (2018). Recent intensification of winter haze in China linked to foreign emissions and meteorology. Scientific Reports 8:2107. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20437-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20437-7
  17. Xu Ying, Liu Yanju, Han Zhenyu, Zhou Botao, Ding Yihui, Wu Jie, Tian Tongfei, Li Rouke, Wang Jing (2021). Influence of Human Activities on Wintertime Haze-Related Meteorological Conditions over the Jing-Jin-Ji Region. Engineering 7:1185-1192. doi:10.1016/j.eng.2020.03.015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.03.015
  18. Jia Xingcan, Quan Jiannong, Zheng Ziyan, Liu Xiange, Liu Quan, He Hui, Liu Yangang (2019). Impacts of Anthropogenic Aerosols on Fog in North China Plain. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 124:252-265. doi:10.1029/2018JD029437. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029437
  19. Yan Shuqi, Zhu Bin, Huang Yong, Zhu Jun, Kang Hanqing, Lu Chunsong, Zhu Tong (2020). To what extents do urbanization and air pollution affect fog? Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 20:5559-5572. doi:10.5194/acp-20-5559-2020. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5559-2020
  20. Shen Xiaojing, Zhou Yuanlong, Chen Jian, Liu Shuang, Ma Ming, Lin Pengfei (2024). Different Mechanisms for the Northern and Southern Winter Fog Events over Eastern China. Atmosphere 15:528. doi:10.3390/atmos15050528. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15050528
  21. Yin ZhiCong, Wang HuiJun, Guo WenLi (2015). 华北黄淮地区冬季雾和霾的时空气候变化特征 (Spatiotemporal climatic change features of fog and haze in winter over the North China and Huang-Huai area; journal-designated open-access Chinese version of Reference 1). Scientia Sinica: Terrae 45(5):649-655. doi:10.1360/zd-2015-45-5-649. https://doi.org/10.1360/zd-2015-45-5-649